References
- Arrow , K. , Solow , R. , Portney , P. , Leamer , E. , Radner , R. and Schuman , H. 1993 . Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation . Federal Register , 58 : 4601 – 14 .
- Boyce , R. , Brown , T. C. , McClelland , G. H. , Peterson , G. L. and Schulze , W. D. 1992 . An experimental examination of intrinsic values as a source of the WTA-WTP disparity . The American Economic Review , 82 : 1366 – 73 .
- Cummings , R. D. and Taylor , L. O. 1999 . Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method . American Economic Review , 89 : 649 – 65 .
- Hanemann , W. M. 1991 . Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? . The American Economic Review , 81 : 635 – 47 .
- Horowitz , J. K. and McConnell , K. E. 2002 . A review of WTA/WTP studies . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 44 : 426 – 47 .
- Kaheman , D. and Tversky , A. 1979 . Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk . Econometrica , 47 : 263 – 91 .
- Loureiro , M. L. , Loomis , J. B. and Nahuelhual , L. 2004 . A comparison of a parametric and a non-parametric method to value a non-rejectable public good . Journal of Forest Economics , 10 : 61 – 74 .
- Zhao , J. and Kling , C. L. 2001 . A new explanation for the WTP/WTA disparity . Economics Letters , 73 : 293 – 300 .