Activities of Looters in the Republic of Bashkortostan (According to Analysis of Internet Communities in 2018–2020)

References

• Akhatov, A. T., and E. V. Kamaleyev. 2014. ”Izuchenie poselencheskih pamyatnikov XVI–XIX vv. na territorii Respubliki Bashkortostan: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya arheologii Novogo vremeni v regione.” Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 1 no. 4 (60): 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Analiticheskaya informatsiya. 2017. “Analiticheskaya informatsiya o rabote v sfere sokhraneniya, ispolzovaniya, populyarizatsii i gosudarstvennoy okhrany ob”yektov kul’turnogo naslediya v 2017 godu i zadachakh na 2018 god.” Accessed January 16 2021. https://okn.bashkortostan.ru/documents/active/50981/
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshiyev, I. I. 2015. “O. Sohranenie arheologicheskogo naslediya v Respublike Bashkortostan.” Federalizm 1: 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bashkultnasledie. 2020. “Chernyj kopatel” – eto vrag!” Accessed January 15 2021. https://vk.com/bashkultnasledie?w=wall-131796757_1328
   Google Scholar
• Belyaev, L. A. 2002. “Nezakonnye raskopki i arheologicheskoe nasledie Rossii (doklad).” Russian Archeology 4: 70–71.
   Google Scholar
• Berdnikov, I. M., and I. V. Ulanov. 2014. “Metody protivodejstviya rasprostraneniyu idey kladoiskatelstva i lyubitelskoy arheologii v rossiyskom obshhestve.” In Evraziya v kaynozoye. Stratigrafiya, paleoekologiya, kultury, edited by I. M. Berdnikov and E. A. Lipnina, 26–43. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, N. 2015. ”The Internet Market in Antiquities”. In Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods: The Global Challenge of Protecting the World’s Heritage, edited by F. Desmarais, 11–20. Paris: International Council of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, N. 2017a. “How to Control the Internet Market in Antiquities? The Need for Regulation and Monitoring.” Antiquities Coalition. Policy Brief Policy Brief, no. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, N. 2017b. “Virtually Gone! The Internet Market in Antiquities.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Experts on the Return of Cultural Property, Seoul: Overseas Korean Cultural Heritage Foundation, 190–204.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, N. 2019. “Through a Glass, Darkly: Long-Term Antiquities Auction Data in Context.” International Journal of Cultural Property 26 (3): 265–283. doi:10.1017/S094073911900016X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, N. 2020. “What is the Thing Called the PAS? Metal-Detecting Entanglements in England and Wales.” Revista d’Arqueologia De Ponent 30: 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, P. B. 2013. “The Illicit Antiquities Trade as a Transnational Criminal Network: Characterizing and Anticipating Trafficking of Cultural Heritage.” International Journal of Cultural Property 20 (2): 113–153. doi:10.1017/S0940739113000015.
   Google Scholar
• Cherny. 2020. “Socialnye Seti V Rossii: Cifry I Trendy, Osen 2020.” Accessed January 26 2021. https://br-analytics.ru/blog/social-media-russia-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Fedotova, L. N. 2001. Analiz soderzhaniya-sociologicheskij metod izucheniya sredstv massovoj kommunikacii. Moscow: Institut Sociologii RAN.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, R. L. 1958. “Roles in Sociological Field Observations.” Social Forces 36 (3): 217–223. doi:10.2307/2573808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. A. 2015. “Is Looting-To-Order ‘Just a Myth’? Open-Source Analysis of Theft-To-Order of Cultural Property.” Cogent Social Sciences 1 (1): 1087110. doi:10.1080/23311886.2015.1087110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. A. 2016. “‘Black Archaeology’ in Eastern Europe: Metal Detecting, Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Objects, and ‘Legal Nihilism’ in Belarus, Poland, Russia, and Ukraine.” Public Archaeology 15 (4): 214–237. doi:10.1080/14655187.2017.1410050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. A. 2017a. “Illegal Finders of Antiquities in Ukraine: Do Digital Data Indicate Grassroots Growth, Coincidence, False Advertising, Astroturfing, Trolling or Sockpuppetry?” Ukrainian Archaeology 2016: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. A. 2017b. “Quantitative Analysis of Open-Source Data on Metal Detecting for Cultural Property: Estimation of the Scale and Intensity of Metal Detecting and the Quantity of Metal-Detected Cultural Goods.” Cogent Social Sciences 3 (1): 1298397. doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1298397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. A. 2018. “Metal-Detecting for Cultural Objects Until ‘There is Nothing Left’: The Potential and Limits of Digital Data, Netnographic Data and Market Data for Open-Source Analysis.” Arts 7 (3): 40. doi:10.3390/arts7030040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl, R., and K. Möller. 2016. “Empirische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses der Anzahl von MetallsucherInnen im deutsch-britischen Vergleich. Oder: Wie wenig Einfluss die Gesetzeslage hat [Empirical Investigation of the Ratio of the Number of Metal Detectorists in German-British Comparison. Or: How Little Influence the Law Has].” Archäologische Informationen 39: 1–12. doi:10.11588/ai.2016.1.33553.
   Google Scholar
• Karl, R., and K. Möller. 2018. “An Empirical Examination of Metal Detecting.” Archäologische Denkmalpflege 126. https://archdenk.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/an-empirical-examination-of-metal_3.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kastels, M. 2004. “Galaktika Internet: Razmyshleniya ob internete, biznese i obshchestve.” Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya.
   Google Scholar
• Khalikov, I. A. 2018. “Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za narushenie trebovanij sohraneniya ili ispolzovaniya obektov kulturnogo naslediya (pamyatnikov istorii i kultury) narodov Rossijskoy Federacii.” PhD diss., Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinetz, R. V. 2002. “The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1): 62. doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinetz, R. V. 2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinetz, R. V., 2015a. ”Netnography for Management and Business Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods, edited by C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, and G. Grandy, 384–397. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinetz, R. V. 2015b. Netnography: Redefined. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S., N. Brodie, D. Yates, and C. Tsirogiannis. 2019. Trafficking Culture: New Directions in Researching the Global Market in Illicit Antiquities. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Makarov, N. A. 2002. “Nezakonnye raskopki i arheologicheskoe nasledie Rossii (doklad).” Russian Archeology 4: 70–71.
   Google Scholar
• Makarov, N. A. 2004. “Grabitelskie raskopki kak faktor unichtozheniya arheologicheskogo naslediya Rossii.” In Sohranenie arheologicheskogo naslediya Rossii: Materialy kruglogo stola Soveta Federacii ot 19 marta 2004 g, edited by O. V. Zelencova, 13–24. Izdaniye Soveta Federatsii.
   Google Scholar
• Meylakhs, P. A., and Y. G. Rykov. 2015. “Onlaynovoe soobschestvo SPID-dissidentov v socialnoy seti “Vkontakte” struktura i ritoricheskie strategii.” In XV aprelskaya mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva no 3. Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, edited by E. G. Yasin, 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, K. A. 2018. “Ancient Artifacts Vs. Digital Artifacts: New Tools for Unmasking the Sale of Illicit Antiquities on the Dark Web.” Arts 7 (2): 12. doi:10.3390/arts7020012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polukhina, E. 2014. “Onlayn-Nabljudenie Kak Metod Sbora Dannyh.” Interaktsiya Intervyu Interpretatsiya 7: 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Reyngold, G. 2006. “Umnaya tolpa. Novaya sotsialnaya revolyutsiya.”. Moscow: Fair-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rozhdestvenskaya, E., and V. Semenova. 2014. “Kiberetnografiya virtualnogo soobshchestva: analiz turistskogo foruma.” Interaktsiya Intervyu Interpretatsiya 7: 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ruslanov, E. V., and R. R. Ruslanova. 2014. “Subkultura “chernyh kopateley“Respubliki Bashkortostan: problemy i resheniya.” In Aktualnaya arkheologiya 2. Arkheologiya v sovremennom mire: v kontakte i v konflikte, edited by O. I. Boguslavskiy, A. A. Bessudnov and O. V. Grigoreva, 62–65. Periferiya.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzbekov, A. I. 2019. “Socialnye seti kak resurs v issledovanii dejatelnosti «kladoiskateley» (primer Respubliki Bashkortostan).” Sociodynamics 12: 126–133. doi:10.25136/2409-7144.2019.12.31139.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzbekov, A. I. 2020a. “Activities of ‘Treasure-Hunters‘ in the Republic of Bashkortostan (According to the Analysis of Internet Communities in 2020).” Izvestiya Ufimskogo nauchnogo centra RAN (4): 64–71. doi:10.31040/2222-8349-2020-0-4-64-71.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzbekov, A. I. 2020b. “’Kladoiskatelstvo’ Kak Faktor Razrushenija Arheologicheskih Pamjatnikov Novogo Vremeni (Primer Respubliki Bashkortostan).” Russian Archeology (1): 107–116. doi:10.31857/S086960630008256-0.
   Google Scholar
• VKontakte. 2022, August 11. “VKontakte Summed Up the Results of the Second Quarter of 2022: A Record 75.7 Million Russian Users per Month and 2.35 Billion Views on VK Video per Day.” Accessed 1 September 2022. https://vk.com/press/q2-2022-results.
   Google Scholar