CPAD 2.0: a repository of curated experimental data on aggregating proteins and peptides

References

• Sunde M, Serpell LC, Bartlam M, et al. Common core structure of amyloid fibrils by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. J Mol Biol. 1997;273(3):729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles TP, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM. The amyloid state and its association with protein misfolding diseases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(6):384–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. Therapeutic protein aggregation: mechanisms, design, and control. Trends Biotechnol. 2014;32(7):372–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila CL, Chaves S, Socias SB, et al. Lessons learned from protein aggregation: toward technological and biomedical applications. Biophys Rev. 2017;9(5):501–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maurer-Stroh S, Debulpaep M, Kuemmerer N, et al. Exploring the sequence determinants of amyloid structure using position-specific scoring matrices. Nat Methods. 2010;7(3):237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Escamilla AM, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J, et al. Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22(10):1302–1306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangakani AM, Kumar S, Nagarajan R, et al. GAP: towards almost 100 percent prediction for β-strand-mediated aggregating peptides with distinct morphologies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):1983–1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh I, Seno F, Tosatto SC, et al. PASTA 2.0: an improved server for protein aggregation prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(W1):W301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conchillo-Solé O, de Groot NS, Avilés FX, et al. AGGRESCAN: a server for the prediction and evaluation of ‘hot spots’ of aggregation in polypeptides. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8(1):65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbuzynskiy SO, Lobanov MY, Galzitskaya OV. FoldAmyloid: a method of prediction of amyloidogenic regions from protein sequence. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(3):326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsiolaki PL, Nastou KC, Hamodrakas SJ, et al. Mining databases for protein aggregation: a review. Amyloid. 2017;24(3):143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerten J, Van Durme J, Gallardo R, et al. WALTZ-DB: a benchmark database of amyloidogenic hexapeptides. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(10):1698–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozniak PP, Kotulska M. AmyLoad: website dedicated to amyloidogenic protein fragments. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(20):3395–3397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varadi M, De Baets G, Vranken WF, et al. AmyPro: a database of proteins with validated amyloidogenic regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangakani AM, Kumar S, Velmurugan D, et al. Distinct position-specific sequence features of hexa-peptides that form amyloid-fibrils: application to discriminate between amyloid fibril and amorphous β-aggregate forming peptide sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14(Suppl 8):S6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastou KC, Nasi GI, Tsiolaki PL, et al. AmyCo: the amyloidoses collection. Amyloid. 2019;26(3):112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangakani AM, Nagarajan R, Kumar S, et al. CPAD, curated protein aggregation database: a repository of manually curated experimental data on protein and peptide aggregation. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0152949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiti F, Stefani M, Taddei N, et al. Rationalization of the effects of mutations on peptide and protein aggregation rates. Nature. 2003;424(6950):805–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBay KF, Pawar AP, Chiti F, et al. Prediction of the absolute aggregation rates of amyloidogenic polypeptide chains. J Mol Biol. 2004;341(5):1317–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartaglia GG, Cavalli A, Pellarin R, et al. Prediction of aggregation rate and aggregation‐prone segments in polypeptide sequences. Protein Sci. 2005;14(10):2723–2734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat P, Kumar S, Gromiha MM. An in-silico method for identifying aggregation rate enhancer and mitigator mutations in proteins. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;118:1157–1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat P, Prabakaran R, Kumar S, et al. AggreRATE-Pred: a mathematical model for the prediction of change in aggregation rate upon point mutation. Bioinformatics. 2019: doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaya MR, Sambashivan S, Nelson R, et al. Atomic structures of amyloid cross-β spines reveal varied steric zippers. Nature. 2007;447(7143):453–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlicki S, Le Béchec A, Delamarche C. AMYPdb: a database dedicated to amyloid precursor proteins. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(1):273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The protein data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 ;47(D1):D506–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayikci M, Venkatakrishnan AJ, Scott-Brown J, et al. Visualization and analysis of non-covalent contacts using the Protein Contacts Atlas. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018;25(2):185–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louros N, Konstantoulea K, De Vleeschouwer M, et al. WALTZ-DB 2.0: an updated database containing structural information of experimentally determined amyloid-forming peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48(D1):D389–D393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiti F, Taddei N, Baroni F, et al. Kinetic partitioning of protein folding and aggregation. Nat Struct Biol. 2002;9(2):137–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose AS, Bradley AR, Valasatava Y, et al. NGL viewer: web-based molecular graphics for large complexes. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(21):3755–3758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz M, Lopes CT, Huck G, et al. Cytoscape.js: a graph theory library for visualisation and analysis. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(2):309–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabakaran R, Goel D, Kumar S, et al. Aggregation prone regions in human proteome: insights from large-scale data analyses. Proteins. 2017;85(6):1099–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar