Parafoveal preview benefits during silent and oral reading: Testing the parafoveal information extraction hypothesis

REFERENCES

• Ashby, J., Yang, J., Evans, K. H. C., & Rayner, K. (2012). Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 634–640. 10.3758/s13414-012-0277-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes R package version 1.0-4 (Computer software). Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, H. E., McConkie, G. W., Zola, D. E., & Wolverton, G. S. (1984). Time course of visual information utilization during fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(1), 75–89. 10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CELEX Database. (1995). Release D2.5 (Computer software). Nijmegen: Centre for Lexical Information.
   Google Scholar
• Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1239–1249. 10.1080/17470210701467953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813. 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417–429. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huestegge, L., Radach, R., Corbic, D., & Huestegge, S. M. (2009). Oculomotor and linguistic determinants of reading development: A longitudinal study. Vision Research, 49, 2948–2959. 10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 1430–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). The time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979–995. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29–54). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Eiter, B. (2006). Temporal overlap in the processing of successive words in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1490–1495. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., Solomon, M., Radach, R., & Seymour, B. (2011). Temporal dynamics of the eye voice span and eye movement control during oral reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 543–558. 10.1080/20445911.2011.546782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Wang, (1992). The encoding of text, manual movement planning, and eye-hand coordination during copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 437–448. 10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. (2003). Advancing the methodological middle ground. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 335–344). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. (2008). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects are not an artifact of mislocated saccades. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 578–586. 10.3758/BF03203972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 221–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1987). Visual attention during eye fixations while reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 385–401). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for the future. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3–26. 10.1080/09541440340000295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2013). Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 429–452. 10.1080/17470218.2012.750676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81. 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. 10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213–234). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4–22. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34–55. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 177–206. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2000). Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 119–149). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2003). Using the saccadic inhibition paradigm to investigate saccadic control in reading. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 347–360). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2004). Saccadic inhibition in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 194–211. 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2 in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 1026–1042. 10.1037/a0027735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. ( in press). Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of Word n + 1 during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 5–35. 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, H., Rayner, K., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). Unsegmented text delays word identification: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 21, 38–60. 10.1080/13506285.2013.767296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2012). The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations. Memory and Cognition, 40, 1122–1131. 10.3758/s13421-012-0216-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, T. J., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movements and display change detection during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924–1938. 10.1037/a0024322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-A., & Inhoff, A. W. (2013). Extraction of linguistic information from successive words during reading: Evidence for spatially distributed lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 662–677. 10.1037/a0030242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2004). Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 226–261. 10.1080/09541440340000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar