Are individual differences in masked repetition and semantic priming reliable?

References

• Adelman, J. S., Johnson, R. L., McCormick, S. E., McKague, M., Kinoshita, S., Bowers, J., … Davis, C. J. (2014). A behavioral database for masked form priming. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1052–1067. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0442-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Milson, R. (1989). Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review, 96, 703–719. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading: The role of lexical quality. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals, and development (pp. 151–172). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 299–318. doi: 10.1037/a0018366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 279–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Aschenbrenner, A., & Yap, M. J. (2013). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1563–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493–512. doi: 10.3758/BF03213769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (1997). Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 268–293. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616–647. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 645–652. doi: 10.3758/BF03196527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2014). Memory recruitment: A backward idea about masked priming. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Volume 61 (pp. 179–213). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 83–99. doi: 10.3758/BF03210726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, L. K., Hess, U., & Wolford, G. (1993). Transformations for within-subject designs: A Monte Carlo investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 566–579. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushell, C. M. (1996). Dissociated identity and semantic priming in Broca’s aphasia: How controlled processing produces inhibitory semantic priming. Brain and Language, 55, 264–288. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. F., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention & Performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dagenbach, D., Carr, T. H., & Wilhelmesen, A. (1989). Task-induced strategies and near-threshold priming: Conscious influences on unconscious perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 412–443. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90020-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi: 10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., & Kim, J. (2006). Changing circumstance: How flexible is lexical access? In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 207–226). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Wit, B., & Kinoshita, S. (2015). The masked semantic priming effect is task dependent: Reconsidering the automatic spreading activation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1062–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filzmoser, P., & Gschwandtner, M. (2015). mvoutlier: Multivariate outlier detection based on robust methods. R Package Version 2.0.6. [Software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mvoutlier/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cos of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203–233. doi: 10.1023/A:1023202116609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 3–37). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Perea, M., & Ratcliff, R. (2013). A diffusion model account of masked versus unmasked priming: Are they qualitatively different? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1731–1740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G. (2006). Relatedness proportion effects on masked associative priming: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 43, 21–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00383.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K. A. (2007). Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 645–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Predicting semantic priming at the item level. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1036–1066. doi: 10.1080/17470210701438111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K. A., Heap, S. J., Neely, J. H., & Thomas, M. A. (2014). Attentional control and asymmetric associative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 844–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 627–633. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S. (2006). Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 668–673. doi: 10.3758/BF03193979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., Forster, K. I., & Mozer, M. C. (2008). Unconscious cognition isn’t that smart: Modulation of masked repetition priming effect in the word naming task. Cognition, 107, 623–649. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Masked priming: State of the art. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., Mozer, M. C., & Forster, K. I. (2011). Dynamic adaptation to history of trial difficulty explains the effect of congruency proportion on masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 622–636. doi: 10.1037/a0024230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2012). Task-dependent masked priming effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (2007). Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: Strength of Strooplike interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1366–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Masson, M. E. J., & Richter, E. M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18, 655–681. doi: 10.1080/13506280902986058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopriva, R. J., & Shaw, D. G. (1991). Power estimates: The effect of dependent variable reliability on the power of one-factor ANOVAs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 585–595. doi: 10.1177/0013164491513006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R Package Version 2.0-30. [Software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, G. D., & Burke, D. M. (1993). Why do semantic priming effects increase in old age? A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 8, 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.8.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, S., & Andrews, S. (2015). To transform or not to transform: Using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1171. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, C., & Rabbitt, P. (1998). Test\re-test reliability of the CANTAB and ISPOCD neuropsychological batteries: Theoretical and practical issues. Neuropsychologia, 36, 915–923. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00036-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 898–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., & Harley, T. A. (1993). Effects of extraversion and self-report arousal on semantic priming: A connectionist approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 735–756. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P. (1992). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psychological Review, 99, 650–662. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minzenberg, M. J., Ober, B. A., & Vinogradov, S. (2002). Semantic priming in schizophrenia: A review and synthesis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 699–720. doi: 10.1017/S1355617702801357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, P. J., Florentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2008). Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography. Brain and Language, 106, 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. J. A., Bedford, N. J., & Rossell, S. L. (2006). Evidence of semantic disorganisation using semantic priming in individuals with high schizotypy. Schizophrenia Research, 84, 272–280. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.01.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic Priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Memory & Language, 15, 1003–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402–407. doi: 10.3758/BF03195588
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? Acta Psychologica, 110, 103–124. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00074-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107, 786–823. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385–408. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Schnyer, D. M., Allen, J. J. B., Kaszniak, A. W., & Forster, K. I. (1999). An event-related potential examination of masked and unmasked repetition priming in Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for theories of implicit memory. Neuropsychology, 13, 323–337. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.13.3.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K. M., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2001). Masked semantic priming of emotional information in subclinical depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 505–524. doi: 10.1023/A:1005541701832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. The Journal of Psychology, 9, 371–377. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1940.9917704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, M., Braun, U., Hermle, L., & Maier, S. (1993). Associative semantic network dysfunction in thought-disordered schizophrenic patients: Direct evidence from indirect semantic priming. Biological Psychiatry, 34, 864–877. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(93)90054-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (1996). Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1166–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolz, J. A., Besner, D., & Carr, T. H. (2005). Implications of measures of reliability for theories of priming: Activity in semantic memory is inherently noisy and uncoordinated. Visual Cognition, 12, 284–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolz, J. A., & Neely, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 596–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339–363. doi: 10.3758/BF03210972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. A., Neely, J. H., & O’Connor, P. (2012). When word identification gets tough, retrospective semantic processing comes to the rescue. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 623–643. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 452–477. doi: 10.1037/a0015329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47, 631–650. doi: 10.1080/14640749408401131
   Google Scholar
• Waechter, S., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2010). Visual word recognition: On the reliability of repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18, 537–558. doi: 10.1080/13506280902868603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltz, D. J., & Shute, V. J. (1993). Individual difference in repetition priming and its relationship to declarative knowledge acquisition. Intelligence, 17, 333–359. doi: 10.1016/0160-2896(93)90004-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Sibley, D. E., & Ratcliff, R. (2012). Individual differences in visual word recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 53–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., & Tan, L. C. (in press). Individual differences in semantic priming performance: Insights from the Semantic Priming Project. In M. N. Jones (Ed.), Big data in cognitive science: From methods to insights. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Tse, C.-S., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 303–325. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar