A search advantage for dynamic same-race and other-race faces

References

• Bernstein, M., & Yovel, G. (2015). Two neural pathways of face processing: A critical evaluation of current models. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 55, 536–546. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19–25. doi: 10.1177/0146167289151002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braje, W. L., Kersten, D., Tarr, M. J., & Troje, N. F. (1998). Illumination effects in face recognition. Psychobiology, 26, 271–380.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, N., & Lander, K. (2016). Exploring the motion advantage: Evaluating the contribution of familiarity and differences in facial motion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1138974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, N., Lander, K., Fang, H., & Costen, N. (2011). The effect of motion at encoding and retrieval for same- and other-race face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 931–942. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02060.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1998). The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Memory & Cognition, 26, 780–790. doi: 10.3758/BF03211397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. J., Iaria, G., & Barton, J. J. S. (2009). Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30(5), 1637–1651. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94(4), 427–438. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 179–192. doi: 10.1038/nrn1057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. A., Richler, J. J., Mack, M. L., Palmeri, T. J., Hayward, W. G., & Gauthier, I. (2011). The complete design lets you see the whole picture: Differences in holistic processing contribute to face-inversion and other-race effects. Journal of Vision, 11, 625–625. doi:10.1167/11.11.625.
   Google Scholar
• Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223–233. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G., Crookes, K., & Rhodes, G. (2013). The other-race effect: Holistic coding differences and beyond. Visual Cognition, 21, 1224–1247. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.824530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Z., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching the faces of robbers captured on video. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 445–464. doi: 10.1002/acp.718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., & Johnston, A. (2001). Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Current Biology, 11, 880–885. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00243-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., Schyns, P. G., & Akamatsu, S. (1997). Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition, 62, 201–222. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00785-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117, 1168–1187. doi: 10.1037/a0020463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2005). “We all look the same to me”: Positive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 875–881. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01631.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knappmeyer, B., Thornton, I. M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2003). The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Research, 43, 1921–1936. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00236-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, B., & Johnston, A. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4, 265–273. doi: 10.1080/713756764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, K., & Bruce, V. (2003). The role of motion in learning new faces. Visual Cognition, 10, 897–912. doi: 10.1080/13506280344000149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, K., Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1999). The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory & Cognition, 27, 974–985. doi: 10.3758/BF03201228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, K., & Davies, R. (2007). Exploring the role of characteristic motion when learning new faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 519–526. doi: 10.1080/17470210601117559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, K., Hill, H., Kamachi, M., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (2007). It’s not what you say but the way you say it: Matching faces and voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 905–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, J., de Lussanet, M., Kuhlmann, S., Zimmermann, A., Lappe, M., Zwitserlood, P., & Dobel, C. (2009). Impairments of biological motion perception in congenital prosopagnosia. PLos ONE, 4(10), e7414. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1364–1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559–574. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone, E. (2004). Isolating the special component of face recognition: Peripheral identification and a Mooney face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 181–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review. Paper presented at the meetings of the American psychology-Law society, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Butz, D. A. (2005). Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 545–567. doi: 10.1002/acp.1097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, D. J., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 454–469. doi: 10.3758/BF03196180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. (1997). Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 72–107. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, A. J., Roark, D. A., & Abdi, H. (2002). Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 261–266. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01908-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, G. E., Kemp, R. I., Towell, N., & Phillips, K. C. (1997). Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. Visual Cognition, 4, 409–438. doi: 10.1080/713756769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilz, S. K., Bülthoff, H. H., & Vuong, Q. C. (2009). Learning influences the encoding of static and dynamic faces and their recognition across different spatial frequencies. Visual Cognition, 17, 716–735. doi: 10.1080/13506280802340588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilz, K. S., Thornton, I. M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2006). A search advantage for faces learned in motion. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 436–447. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0283-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilz, K. S., Vuong, Q. C., Bülthoff, H. H., & Thornton, I. M. (2011). Walk this way: Approaching bodies can influence the processing of faces. Cognition, 118(1), 17–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitcher, D., Dilks, D. D., Saxe, R. R., Triantafyllou, C., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions. NeuroImage, 56, 2356–2363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitcher, D., Duchaine, B., & Walsh, V. (2014). Combined TMS and fMRI reveal dissociable cortical pathways for dynamic and static face perception. Current Biology, 24, 2066–2070. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Hayward, W. G., & Winkler, C. (2006). Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 499–505. doi: 10.3758/BF03193876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Tan, S., Brake, S., & Taylor, K. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 313–331. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02323.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roark, D. A., Barrett, S. E., Spence, M. J., Abdi, H., & O’Toole, A. J. (2003). Psychological and neural perspectives on the role of motion in face recognition. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2, 15–46. doi: 10.1177/1534582303002001002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossion, B., & Michel C. (2011). An experience-based holistic account of the other-race face effect. In G. Rhodes., A. Calder., M. Johnson., J. V. Haxby (Eds.), Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 215–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, J., Brockhaus, M., Bülthoff, H. H., & Pilz, K. (2013). What the human brain likes about facial motion. Cerebral Cortex, 23(5), 1167–1178. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, J., & Pilz, K. S. (2009). Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces. Experimental Brain Research, 194(3), 465–475. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1721-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyns, P. G., & Gosselin, F. (2003). Diagnostic use of scale information for componential and holistic recognition. In M. A. Peterson, & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes advances in visual cognition (pp. 120–148). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition, 69, 243–265. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00069-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., & Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93, B1–B9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, I. M., & Kourtzi, Z. (2002). A matching advantage for dynamic human faces. Perception, 31, 113–132. doi: 10.1068/p3300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, I. M., Mullins, E., & Banahan, K. (2011). Motion can amplify the face-inversion effect. Psihologija, 44, 5–22. doi: 10.2298/PSI1101005T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poises: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761–1771. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00230-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). Recognizing familiar faces: The role of distinctiveness and familiarity. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 40, 300–305. doi: 10.1037/h0080101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Endo, A. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44, 671–703. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagenaar, W. A., & van der Schrier, J. H. (1996). Face recognition as a function of distance and illumination: A practical tool for use in the courtroom. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2, 321–332. doi: 10.1080/10683169608409787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, A., Anzures, G., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., Omrin, D. S., & Lee, K. (2011). Caucasian infants scan own- and other-race faces differently. PLoS ONE, 6, e18621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, N. G., Quinn, P. C., Ge, L., & Lee, K. (2012). Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing. Vision Research, 57, 26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, N. G., Quinn, P. C., Ge, L., & Lee, K. (2013). Elastic facial movement influences part-based but not holistic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1457–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, N. G., Quinn, P. C., Liu, S., Ge, L., Pascalis, O., & Lee, K. (2015). Eye tracking reveals a crucial role for facial motion in recognition of faces by infants. Developmental Psychology, 51, 744–757. doi: 10.1037/dev0000019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145. doi: 10.1037/h0027474
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747–759. doi: 10.1068/p160747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., Hayward, W., & Bülthoff, I. (2014). Face format at encoding affects the other-race effect in face memory. Journal of Vision, 14(6), 1–13. doi: 10.1167/14.6.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar