Simple actions influence pop-out search

References

• Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035–1047. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, R. A., & Weidler, B. J. (2014). Trade-offs in visual processing for stimuli near the hands. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76, 383–390. doi:10.3758/s13414-013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10367–10371. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104047108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 437–443. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brascamp, J. W., Blake, R., & Kritjansson, A. (2011). Deciding where to attend: Priming of pop-out drives target selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1700–1707. doi:10.1037/a0025636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo, M. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465–472. doi:10.3758/BF03211642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, W. S., & Vecera, S. P. (2014). Differential effect of one versus two hands on visual processing. Cognition, 133, 232–237. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttaccio, D. R., & Hahn, S. (2011). The influence of action on visual search: Behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process. Attention, Perception, & Psycophysics, 73, 1453–1466. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0121-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, V. H. (2001). Action does not resist visual illusions. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 457–459. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01772-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale, M. A., & Milner, D. A. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20–25. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goolsby, B. A., & Suzuki, S. (2001). Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and “retrieval”. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 929–944. doi:10.3758/BF03194513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gozli, D. G., West, G. L., & Pratt, J. (2012). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Cognition, 124, 244–250. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(33), 11096–11103. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791–804. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, K. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 5–18. doi:10.3758/APP.72.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á., Saevarsson, S., & Driver, J. (2013). The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: From passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 514–521. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0375-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657–672. doi:10.3758/BF03209251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? Visual Cognition, 14, 490–513. doi:10.1080/13506280500194154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theewes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1234–1265. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2007). Psychopy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (2006). Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research, 46, 1010–1018. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symes, E., Ottoboni, G., Tucker, M., Ellis, R., & Tessari, A. (2010). When motor attention improves selective attention: The dissociating role of saliency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1387–1397. doi:10.1080/17470210903380806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symes, E., Tucker, M., Ellis, R., Vainio, L., & Ottoboni, G. (2008). Grasp preparation improves change detection for congruent objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 854–871. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184–193. doi:10.3758/BF03212219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. E. (2015). Grasp posture alters visual processing biases near the hands. Psychological Science, 26, 625–632. doi:10.1177/0956797615571418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2014). Decomposing the action effect: How simple actions affect subsequent perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76(4), 1242–1252. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0652-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J. K. (2011). Action’s effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 201–206. doi:10.1177/0963721411408770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlschläger, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40(8), 925–930. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00239-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, 1–119.
   Google Scholar
• Wykowska, A., Anderl, C., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2013). Motivation modulates visual attention: Evidence from pupillometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 59. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykowska, A., Hommel, B., & Schubö, A. (2011). Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 1034–1041. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0122-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2009). How you move is what you see: Action planning biases selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755–1769. doi:10.1037/a0016798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar