Semantic and visual relatedness of distractors impairs episodic retrieval of pictures in a divided attention paradigm

References

• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 22(5), 349–368. doi: 10.1037/h0082775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J. K., & Bruning, R. H. (1982). Interference effects on the recall of pictures, printed words, and spoken words. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7(1), 61–69. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(82)90008-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15(8), 559–564. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarais, G., & Dixon, M. J. (2005). Understanding the structural determinants of object confusion in memory: An assessment of psychophysical approaches to estimating visual similarity. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 67(6), 980–996. doi: 10.3758/BF03193625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarais, G., Dixon, M. J., & Roy, E. A. (2007). A role for action knowledge in visual object identification. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1712–1723. doi: 10.3758/BF03193504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 155–176. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2002). Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words. Memory & Cognition, 30, 731–744. doi: 10.3758/BF03196429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2003). Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 18, 219–230. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M., & Guild, E. (2009). Process-specific interference effects during recognition of spatial patterns and words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 24–32. doi: 10.1037/a0012870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A., Polson, M. C., Dafoe, D. G., & Gaskill, S. (1982). Dividing attention within and between hemispheres: Testing a multiple resources approach to limited-capacity information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 625–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaissert, N., & Wallraven, C. (2012). Categorizing natural objects: A comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities. Experimental Brain Research, 216(1), 123–134. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2916-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., & Geraci, L. (2006). The picture superiority effect in conceptual implicit memory: A conceptual distinctiveness hypothesis. The American Journal of Psychology, 119(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsbourne, M., & Hicks, R. E. (1978). Functional cerebral space: A model for overflow, transfer and interference effects in human performance: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Eds.), Attention and performance VII. (pp. 345–362). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Klingberg, T. (1998). Concurrent performance of two working memory tasks: Potential mechanisms of interference. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 593–601. doi: 10.1093/cercor/8.7.593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingberg, T., & Roland, P. E. (1997). Interference between two concurrent tasks is associated with activation of overlapping fields in the cortex. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00010-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Köhler, S., Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & McIntosh, A. R. (2000). Episodic encoding and recognition of pictures and words: Role of the human medial temporal lobes. Acta Psychologica, 105(2), 159–179. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00059-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, M. E., & Fernandes, M. A. (2016). The role of semantically related distractors during encoding and retrieval of words in long-term memory. Memory, 24(6), 801–811. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1053491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 89–115. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & McEvoy, C. L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3(5), 485–497.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1969). Concrete image and verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(2p1), 279–285. doi: 10.1037/h0027273
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 176–206. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90032-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecher, D., Zanolie, K., & Zeelenberg, R. (2007). Verifying visual properties in sentence verification facilitates picture recognition memory. Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 173–179. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.3.173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Siegel, A. W., & Dhawan, M. (1975). Short-term retention of pictures and words: Evidence for dual coding systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1(2), 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Siegel, A. W., & Dhawan, M. (1976a). Short-term retention of pictures and words as a function of type of distraction and length of delay interval. Memory & Cognition, 4(1), 11–15. doi: 10.3758/BF03213249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Siegel, A. W., & Dhawan, M. (1976b). Differential distraction effects in short-term and long-term retention of pictures and words.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), 541–547.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pezdek, K., Maki, R., Valencia-Laver, D., Whetstone, T., Stoeckert, J., & Dougherty, T. (1988). Picture memory: Recognizing added and deleted details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 468–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg, N., & Buchanan, L. (2005). Verbal mediation and memory for novel figural designs: A dual interference study. Brain and Cognition, 57(2), 198–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.045
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. N. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19(2), 73–74. doi: 10.3758/BF03337426
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya, C. J., Zhao, M., Desmond, J. E., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Evidence for cortical encoding specificity in episodic memory: Memory-induced re-activation of picture processing areas. Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 2136–2143. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00053-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, R., Price, C., Wise, R., Josephs, O., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1996). Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures. Nature, 383(6597), 254–256. doi: 10.1038/383254a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wammes, J. D., & Fernandes, M. A. (2016). Interfering with memory for faces: The cost of doing two things at once. Memory, 24(2), 184–203. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.998240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., Huffstetler, S., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2011). Function follows form: Activation of shape and function features during object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 348–363. doi: 10.1037/a0022840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar