How prioritized is self-prioritization during stimulus processing?

References

• Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3–51). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Pratto, F. (1986). Individual construct accessibility and perceptual selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 293–311. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2002). Affective priming of semantic categorisation responses. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 643–666. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1367–1377. doi: 10.1080/17470210600955645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golubickis, M., Falbén, J. K., Cunningham, W. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2018). Exploring the self-ownership effect: Separating stimulus and response biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 295–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henik, A., Friedrich, F. J., & Kellog, W. A. (1983). The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing. Memory & Cognition, 11, 366–373. doi: 10.3758/BF03202451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2016). Attentional control and the self: The self-attention network (SAN). Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 5–17. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, H., & Brady, N. (2010). Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 840–847. doi: 10.1080/17470211003611264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M. (2007). Top-down modulation of unconscious ‘automatic’ processes: A gating framework. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 289–306. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0031-2
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., Adams, S. C., & Zovko, M. (2012). Attentional sensitization of unconscious visual processing: Top-down influences on masked priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 50–61. doi: 10.5709/acp-0102-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., & Musch, J. (2002). Goal-dependent and goal-independent effects of irrelevant evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 802–814. doi: 10.1177/0146167202289009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper, N. A., & Rogers, T. B. (1979). Encoding of personal information: Self-other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 499–514. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., Visokomogilski, A., Golubickis, M., Cunningham, W. A., & Sahraie, A. (2017). Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 438–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxfield, L. (1997). Attention and semantic priming: A review of prime task effects. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 204–218. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1997.0311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and Conceptual analysis.. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13(5), 416–424. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Development Core Team. (2015). Nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. Vienna, Austria: The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).
   Google Scholar
• Reuther, J., & Chakravarthi, R. (2017). Does self-prioritization affect perceptual processes? Visual Cognition, 25, 381–398. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1323813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual “cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 504–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebold, A., Weaver, M. D., Donk, M., & van Zoest, W. (2015). Social salience does not transfer to oculomotor visual search. Visual Cognition, 23, 989–1019. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1121946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, T., Siebold, A., & Zoest, M. V. (2016). Testing the idea of privileged awareness of self-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1105–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2017). The ubiquitous self: What the properties of self-bias tell us about the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1396, 222–235. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., Liu, M., Mevorach, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). The salient self: The left intra-parietal sulcus responds to social as well as perceptual salience after self-association. Cerebral Cortex, 4, 1060–1068.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, J., Sun, Y., Peng, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (2014). The automatic and the expected self: Separating self- and familiarity biases effects by manipulating stimulus probability. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1176–1184. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0631-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371–394. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, G. L., & Vickery, T. J. (in press). Target self-relevance speeds visual search responses but does not improve search efficiency. Visual Cognition, 26, 563–582. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2018.1520377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar