Word predictability depends on parafoveal preview validity in Chinese reading

References

• Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on information theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
   Google Scholar
• Angele, B., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2016). Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1241–1249. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 1–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, W., Lowder, M. W., Ferreira, F., Swaab, T. Y., & Henderson, J. M. (2017). Effects of word predictability and preview lexicality on eye movements during reading: A comparison between young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 32, 232–242. doi: 10.1037/pag0000160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hoosain, R. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in psychology, 90. Language processing in Chinese (pp. 111–130). Oxford: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Hutzler, F., Schuster, S., Marx, C., & Hawelka, S. (2019). An investigation of parafoveal masks with the incremental boundary paradigm. PLOS ONE, 14, e0203013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1995). The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1101–1110. doi: 10.3758/BF03208367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., White, S. J., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1560–1579. doi: 10.1037/a0012319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Wang, S., Mo, L., & Kliegl, R. (2018). Contextual constraint and preview time modulate the semantic preview effect: Evidence from Chinese sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 241–249. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Zang, C., Liversedge, S. P., & Pollatsek, A. (2015). The role of words in Chinese reading. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 232–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Guo, S., Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D. (2017). Word predictability affects saccade length in Chinese reading: An evaluation of the dynamic-adjustment model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 1891–1899. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1357-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G. (2018). Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1675–1682. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1581-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & O’Regan, J. K. (1981). Expectations increase the benefit derived from parafoveal visual information in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 634–644. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.3.634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, J. I., & Pitt, M. A. (2018). Model comparison in psychology. In J. Wixted (Editor-in-Chief) & E.-J. Wagenmakers (Volume Editor) (Eds.), The stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (4th ed., pp. 85–118). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327–357. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A. J., Kirkby, J. A., & Slattery, T. J. (2017). Predictability effects during reading in the absence of parafoveal preview. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29, 902–911. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1340303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A. J., & Slattery, T. J. (2019). Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(12), 1614–1633. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). Parafoveal identification during a fixation in reading. Acta Psychologica, 39, 271–281. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(75)90011-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Li, X., Barbara, J. J., & Yan, G. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1089–1093. doi.org/10.3758/BF03206448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley, B., Venables, B., Bates, D. M., Hornik, K., Gebhardt, A., & Firth, D. (2015). Package ‘MASS’. Retrieved from CRAN:https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/MASS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Lee, M., Reiderman, M., & Rayner, K. (2015). The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 118–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2015). The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: Critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9, 311–327. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Goddard, K. (2019). The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 110–127. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. R. (1978). Applying new design principles to the construction of an illiterate E chart. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 55, 348–351. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197805000-00008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2012). Eye movement control in reading: Logographic Chinese versus alphabetic scripts. PsyCh Journal, 1, 128–142. doi: 10.1002/pchj.10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasilev, M. R., & Angele, B. (2017). Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 666–689. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1147-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2018). Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 64–74. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1247894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 466–471. doi: 10.3758/BF03193789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561–566. doi: 10.3758/pbr.16.3.561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Rayner, K., Li, N., & Wang, S. (2012). Is preview benefit from word n+2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25, 1079–1091. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9282-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1409–1425. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1083594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Li, L., Chang, M., Xu, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, J., & Paterson, K. B. (2019). Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading. Psychology and Aging, 34(6), 780–790. doi: 10.1037/pag0000382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2013). A validation of parafoveal semantic information extraction in reading Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, S51–S63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2013.01556.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar