References
- Abrams, R. L., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00226
- Albrecht, T., & Mattler, U. (2012). Individual differences in subjective experience and objective performance in metacontrast masking. Journal of Vision, 12(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.5.5
- Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567(7748), 305–307. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9
- Arndt, J., Lee, K., & Flora, D. B. (2008). Recognition without identification for words, pseudowords and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(3), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.004
- Besner, D., Risko, E. F., & Sklair, N. (2005). Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to early processes in reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087465
- Besner, D., Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., White, D., Reynolds, M., O’Malley, S., & Robidoux, S. (2016). Varieties of attention: Their roles in visual word identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416639351
- Bottini, R., Bucur, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2016). The nature of semantic priming by subliminal spatial words: Embodied or disembodied? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1160–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000197
- Breitmeyer, B. G. (2015). Psychophysical “blinding” methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.012
- Carr, T. H., McCauley, C., Sperber, R. D., & Parmelee, C. M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(6), 757–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.757
- Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1194
- Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception and Psychophysics, 36(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202793
- Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 40(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080103
- Damian, M. F. (2001). Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: Automaticity rather than semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.154
- Dannenbring, G. L., & Briand, K. (1982). Semantic priming and the word repetition effect in a lexical decision task. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 36(3), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080650
- Debner, J. A., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(2), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.2.304
- Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. Viking.
- Dehaene, S., Sergent, C., & Changeux, J. (2003). A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8520–8525. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1332574100
- Dulany, D. E. (2012). How should we understand implicit and explicit processes in scientific thinking? In R. W. Proctor, E. J. Capaldi, R. W. Proctor, & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 199–227). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199753628.003.0009
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Fernández-López, M., Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2018). Can response congruency effects be obtained in masked priming lexical decision? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000666
- Finkbeiner, M., & Palermo, R. (2009). The role of spatial attention in nonconscious processing: A comparison of face and nonface stimuli. Psychological Science, 20(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02256.x
- Fisk, G., & Haase, S. J. (2005). Unconscious perception or not? An evaluation of detection and discrimination as indicators of awareness. The American Journal of Psychology, 118(2), 183–212.
- Fisk, G. D., & Haase, S. J. (2011). The relationship between the objective identification threshold and priming effects does not provide a definitive boundary between conscious and unconscious perceptual processes. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.016
- Fisk, G. D., & Haase, S. J. (n.d.). Nonassociative word/nonword response congruency effects for studying unconscious perception. https://osf.io/62yf3/
- Friendly, M., Franklin, P. E., Hoffman, D., & Rubin, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14(4), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203275
- Fuentes, L. J., Carmona, E., Agis, I. F., & Catena, A. (1994). The role of the anterior attention system in semantic processing of both foveal and parafoveal words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.17
- Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New Look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47(6), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.766
- Haase, S. J., & Fisk, G. (2001). Confidence in word detection predicts word identification: Implications for an unconscious perception paradigm. The American Journal of Psychology, 114(3), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423690
- Haase, S. J., & Fisk, G. D. (2011). A comparison of signal detection theory to the objective threshold/strategic model of unconscious perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(1), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.2466/22.24.27.PMS.113.4.242-256
- Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00021269
- Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(4), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.9.4.497
- Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). Academic Press.
- Kiefer, M., & Brendel, D. (2006). Attentional modulation of unconscious “automatic” processes: Evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.184
- Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.012
- Kouider, S., de Gardelle, V., Sackur, J., & Dupoux, E. (2010). How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.006
- Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111(4), 880–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.880
- Lachter, J., Ruthruff, E., Lien, M., & McCann, R. S. (2008). Is attention needed for word identification? Evidence from the Stroop paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 950–955. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.950
- Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(863), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
- Lin, Z., & Murray, S. O. (2015). More power to the unconscious: Conscious, but not unconscious, exogenous attention requires location variation. Psychological Science, 26(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614560770
- Lupker, S. J. (1986). Conscious identification: Where do you draw the line? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(1), 37–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00021415
- Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
- Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 197–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90009-9
- Martens, U., Ansorge, U., & Kiefer, M. (2011). Controlling the unconscious: Attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuomotor processes differentially. Psychological Science, 22(2), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610397056
- Marzouki, Y., Grainger, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Exogenous spatial cueing modulates subliminal masked priming. Acta Psychologica, 126(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.002
- McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.168
- Merikle, P. M., & Joordens, S. (1997). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 6(2-3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1997.0310
- Mulckhuyse, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Unconscious attentional orienting to exogenous cues: A review of the literature. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.002
- Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00474
- Nakamura, K., Makuuchi, M., Oga, T., Mizuochi-Endo, T., Iwabuchi, T., Nakajima, Y., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Neural capacity limits during unconscious semantic processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 47(8), 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13890
- Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and Motor processes (pp. 255–293). Springer Verlag.
- Ocampo, B. (2017). The influence of masked stimuli on response selection: Evidence from a semantic categorization task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 79(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1234-0
- Ortells, J. J., Frings, C., & Plaza-Ayllon, V. (2012). Influence of spatial attention on conscious and unconscious word priming. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.10.012
- Peters, M. A. K., & Lau, H. (2015). Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli. ELife, 4, e09651. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09651
- Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. (2012). http://www.pstnet.com
- Ramsøy, T. Z., & Overgaard, M. (2004). Introspection and subliminal perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000041900.30172.e8
- Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(6), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207490
- Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1990). On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes. Mind and Language, 5(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1990.tb00150.x
- Robidoux, S., & Besner, D. (2015). Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0830-7
- Sadil, P., Potter, K. W., Huber, D. E., & Cowell, R. A. (2019). Connecting the dots without top-down knowledge: Evidence for rapidly-learned low-level associations that are independent of object identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(Suppl.), 1058–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000607
- Sandberg, K., Del Pin, S. H., Bibby, B. M., & Overgaard, M. (2014). Evidence of weak conscious experiences in the exclusion task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01080
- Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
- Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
- Silverstein, B. H., Snodgrass, M., Shevrin, H., & Kushwaha, R. (2015). P3b, consciousness, and complex unconscious processing. Cortex, 73, 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.004
- Snodgrass, M. (2002). Disambiguating conscious and unconscious influences: Do exclusion paradigms demonstrate unconscious perception? The American Journal of Psychology, 115(4), 545–579. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423527
- Snodgrass, M., Bernat, E., & Shevrin, H. (2004). Unconscious perception: A model-based approach to method and evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(5), 846–867. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194978
- Stanners, R. F., Forbach, G. B., & Headley, D. B. (1971). Decision and search processes in word-nonword classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031359
- Theeuwes, J. (2019). Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.024
- Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015329
- Van den Bussche, E., Vermeiren, A., Desender, K., Gevers, W., Hughes, G., Verguts, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2013). Disentangling conscious and unconscious processing: A subjective trial-based assessment approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00769
- Waechter, S., Besner, D., & Stolz, J. A. (2011). Basic processes in reading: Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to orthographic and semantic processing. Visual Cognition, 19(2), 171–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2010.517228
- Wang, B., van Driel, J., Ort, E., & Theeuwes, J. (2019). Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(10), 1535–1548. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01433
- Yantis, S., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.135