The capacity of multiple-target search

References

• Adamo, S. H., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Self-induced attentional blink: A cause of errors in multiple-target search. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2569–2574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613497970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, M., Pun, C., & Ferber, S. (2010). Multiple attentional control settings influence late attentional selection but do not provide an early attentional filter. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588921003646149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, M., Pun, C., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2008). Your divided attention, please! The maintenance of multiple attentional control sets over distinct regions in space. Cognition, 107(1), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, M., Wozny, S., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2010). Parallel, independent attentional control settings for colors and shapes. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1730–1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. K., Fuchs, S., & Müller, M. M. (2011). Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. K., Hillyard, S. A., & Müller, M. M. (2008). Attention facilitates multiple stimulus features in parallel in human visual cortex. Current Biology, 18(13), 1006–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. K., Hillyard, S. A., & Muller, M. M. (2013). Global facilitation of attended features is obligatory and restricts divided attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(46), 18200–18207. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1913-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. K., Müller, M. M., & Hillyard, S. A. (2009). Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention. Journal of Vision, 9(6), 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.6.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. K., Muller, M. M., & Hillyard, S. A. (2015). Attentional selection of feature conjunctions is accomplished by parallel and independent selection of single features. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(27), 9912–9919. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5268-14.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2007). Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(7), 952–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600822795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G., & Carbone, E. (2005). Top-down contingent capture by color: Evidence from RT distribution analyses in a manual choice reaction task. Acta Psychologica, 120(3), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., Armstrong, K. M., & Moore, T. (2006). Visual and oculomotor selection: Links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahle, B., Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2018). The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(7), 992–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahle, B., Thayer, D. D., Mordkoff, J. T., & Hollingworth, A. (2019). The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluch, F., & Itti, L. (2011). Mechanisms of top-down attention. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(4), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, D. J. K., & Zobay, O. (2014). Attentional control via parallel target-templates in dual-target search. PLoS ONE, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, D. J. K., & Zobay, O. (2019). Concurrent evaluation of independently cued features during perceptual decisions and saccadic targeting in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01854-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321(5890), 851–854. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2017). Competition in saccade target selection reveals attentional guidance by simultaneously active working memory representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 43(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V. M., Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2012). Simultaneous control of attention by multiple working memory representations. Psychological Science, 23(8), 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612439068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, D. M., & Kastner, S. (2009). Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain. Vision Research, 49(10), 1154–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V. M., & Vickery, T. J. (2019). Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1340–1346. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01608-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I. (2008a). The mechanism of priming: Episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out? Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I. (2008b). The stage of priming: Are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional? Vision Research, 48(5), 664–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. W., Ravizza, S. M., & Peltier, C. (2015). An inability to set independent attentional control settings by hemifield. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8), 2640–2652. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0964-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichot, N. P., Heard, M. T., DeGennaro, E. M., & Desimone, R. (2015). A source for feature-based attention in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 88(4), 832–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biderman, D., Biderman, N., Zivony, A., & Lamy, D. (2017). Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(12), 1974–1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettcher, S. E. P., Drew, T., & Wolfe, J. M. (2018). Lost in the supermarket: Quantifying the cost of partitioning memory sets in hybrid search. Memory and Cognition, 46(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0744-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brascamp, J. W., Blake, R., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2011). Deciding where to attend: Priming of pop-out drives target selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1700–1707. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisson, B., Leblanc, É, & Jolicœur, P. (2009). Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: Evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period. Biological Psychology, 80(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112(2), 291–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, N. A., Dubois, J., & VanRullen, R. (2009). The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(24), 7869–7876. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0113-09.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. S., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). A taxonomy of errors in multiple-target visual search. Visual Cognition, 21(7), 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.843627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. S., Vul, E., Clark, K., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). A Bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1047–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional templates in visual working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(25), 9315–9322. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1097-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cave, K. R., Menneer, T., Nomani, M. S., Stroud, M. J., & Donnelly, N. (2018). Dual target search is neither purely simultaneous nor purely successive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1307425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363(6427), 345–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/363345a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Du, F. (2017). Two visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05865-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S. A., & Cho, Y. S. (2018). Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(7), 1718–1730. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1549-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, G. J., Livingstone, A. C., & McDonald, J. J. (2015). Searching for inefficiency in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114; discussion 114–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.18.1.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36(12), 1827–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, I. E. J., van Driel, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2017). Posterior α EEG dynamics dissociate current from future goals in working memory-guided visual search. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(6), 1591–1603. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2945-16.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombrowe, I., Donk, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2011). The costs of switching attentional sets. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(8), 2481–2488. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0198-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, P. E., & Dodds, C. M. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition, 11(6), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280344000446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, T., Boettcher, S. E. P., & Wolfe, J. M. (2016). Searching while loaded: Visual working memory does not interfere with hybrid search efficiency but hybrid search uses working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0874-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, T., Boettcher, S. E. P., & Wolfe, J. M. (2017). One visual search, many memory searches: An eye-tracking investigation of hybrid search. Journal of Vision, 17(11), 5–5. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.11.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, T., & Wolfe, J. M. (2014). Hybrid search in the temporal domain: Evidence for rapid, serial logarithmic search through memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(2), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0606-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87(3), 272–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Zmura, M. (1991). Color in visual search. Vision Research, 31(6), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(91)90203-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Visual search: A retrospective. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 14–14. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.5.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, M. P., Thomas, J. P., Palmer, J., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2000). A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(3), 425–451. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-884X(96)95711-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eimer, M. (2014). The neural basis of attentional control in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(10), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(8), 1423–1433. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2010). The top-down control of visual selection and how it is linked to the N2pc component. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 100–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrenfort, J. J., Grubert, A., Olivers, C. N. L., & Eimer, M. (2017). Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01911-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrenfort, J. J., van Driel, J., van Gaal, S., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2018). From ERPs to MVPA using the Amsterdam decoding and modeling toolbox (ADAM). Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018). Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, L., Sun, M., Xu, M., Li, Z., Diao, L., & Zhang, X. (2019). Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters. Acta Psychologica, 192, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., & Anderson, B. A. (2010). Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.3.421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(5), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frătescu, M., Van Moorselaar, D., & Mathôt, S. (2019). Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(8), 2700–2709. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01791-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giammarco, M., Paoletti, A., Guild, E. B., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2016). Attentional capture by items that match episodic long-term memory representations. Visual Cognition, 24(1), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1195470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, A. S., Esterman, M., Wilson, D., Serences, J. T., & Yantis, S. (2010). Control of spatial and feature-based attention in frontoparietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 30(43), 14330–14339. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4248-09.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., Carlisle, N. B., & Eimer, M. (2016). The control of single-color and multiple-color visual search by attentional templates in working memory and in long-term memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(12), 1947–1963. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2013). Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1433–1442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2015a). Rapid parallel attentional target selection in single-color and multiple-color visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2015b). The speed of serial attention shifts in visual search: Evidence from the N2pc component. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2016). All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(8), 1215–1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., Krummenacher, J., & Eimer, M. (2011). Redundancy gains in pop-out visual search are determined by top-down task set: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Vision, 11(14), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.14.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(4), 800–817. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, A., & Beck, V. M. (2016). Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 911–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, A., Matsukura, M., & Luck, S. J. (2013). Visual working memory modulates rapid eye movements to simple onset targets. Psychological Science, 24(5), 790–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612459767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2012). Target templates: How the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(90–112), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023894
   Google Scholar
• Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2015). Target templates: The precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2009). Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time. Psychological Research, 73(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0157-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., & Pashler, H. (2007). A Boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114(3), 599–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irons, J. L., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2012). All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 758–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irons, J. L., & Remington, R. W. (2013). Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color–location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(5), 862–875. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0439-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., & Kawahara, J. I. (2016). Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task. Acta Psychologica, 163, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10), 1489–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, M., Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2016). The speed of voluntary and priority-driven shifts of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jóhannesson, ÓI, Thornton, I. M., Smith, I. J., Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2016). Visual foraging with fingers and eye gaze. I-Perception, 7(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516637279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juola, J. F., Botella, J., & Palacios, A. (2004). Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(8), 1303–1317. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, I. T., & Carvellas, T. (1965). Scanning for multiple targets. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21(1), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1965.21.1.239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2001). The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex. Neuropsychologia, 39(12), 1263–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00116-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerzel, D., & Witzel, C. (2019). The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(5), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, M., Jolicœur, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Eimer, M. (2008). Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: New evidence from the N2pc component. Psychophysiology, 45(6), 1013–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00700.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyonaga, A., Egner, T., & Soto, D. (2012). Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0253-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á, Björnsson, A. S., & Kristjánsson, T. (2020). Foraging with Anne Treisman: Features versus conjunctions, patch leaving and memory for foraged locations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01941-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á, & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á, Jóhannesson, ÓI, & Thornton, I. M. (2014). Common attentional constraints in visual foraging. PloS One, 9(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, T., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018). Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory. Acta Psychologica, 183, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, T., Thornton, I. M., Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2020). Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks. Cognition, 194. Article 104032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, T., Thornton, I. M., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018). Time limits during visual foraging reveal flexible working memory templates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(6), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruijne, W., & Meeter, M. (2015). The long and the short of priming in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(5), 1558–1573. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0860-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krummenacher, J., Müller, H. J., & Heller, D. (2001). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(5), 901–917. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for attentional guidance by the contents of working memory. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06805.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagroix, H. E. P., Yanko, M. R., & Spalek, T. M. (2018). Transition from feature-search to singleton-detection strategies in visual search: The role of number of target-defining options. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(3), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc, É, Prime, D. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2008). Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, B., Pageot, A., Plancher, G., & Portrat, S. (2018). What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1282-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liesefeld, H. R., Liesefeld, A. M., Töllner, T., & Müller, H. J. (2017). Attentional capture in visual search: Capture and post-capture dynamics revealed by EEG. NeuroImage, 156, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liesefeld, H. R., & Müller, H. J. (2020). A theoretical attempt to revive the serial/parallel-search dichotomy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(1), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01819-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Becker, M. W., & Jigo, M. (2013). Limited featured-based attention to multiple features. Vision Research, 85, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., & Jigo, M. (2017). Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(8), 2327–2337. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1390-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Slotnick, S. D., Serences, J. T., & Yantis, S. (2003). Cortical mechanisms of feature-based attentional control. Cerebral Cortex, 13(12), 1334–1343. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhg080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02218.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/36846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W. J., Husain, M., & Bays, P. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, J., & Hout, M. C. (2019). Examining the effects of passive and active strategies on behavior during hybrid visual memory search: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0191-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannan, S. K., Kennard, C., Potter, D., Pan, Y., & Soto, D. (2010). Early oculomotor capture by new onsets driven by the contents of working memory. Vision Research, 50(16), 1590–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manohar, S. G., Zokaei, N., Fallon, S. J., Vogels, T. P., & Husain, M. (2019). Neural mechanisms of attending to items in working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 101, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinovic, J., Wuerger, S. M., Hillyard, S. A., Müller, M. M., & Andersen, S. K. (2018). Neural mechanisms of divided feature-selective attention to colour. NeuroImage, 181, 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunsell, J. H. R., & Treue, S. (2006). Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(6), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2006.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCants, C. W., Berggren, N., & Eimer, M. (2018). The guidance of visual search by shape features and shape configurations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(7), 1072–1085. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeter, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2006). Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search. Visual Cognition, 13(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500277488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiran, N. (2010). Task switching and cognitive self control. In Self control in society, mind and brain (pp. 202–220). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391381.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Menneer, T., Barrett, D. J. K., Phillips, L., Donnelly, N., & Cave, K. R. (2007). Costs in searching for two targets: Dividing search across target types could improve airport security screening. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(7), 915–932. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2009). The cost of search for multiple targets: Effects of practice and target similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menneer, T., Stroud, M. J., Cave, K. R., Li, X., Godwin, H. J., Liversedge, S. P., & Donnelly, N. (2012). Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestry, N., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., Godwin, H. J., & Donnelly, N. (2017). Dual-target cost in visual search for multiple unfamiliar faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(8), 1504–1519. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90010-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, C. M., & Osman, A. M. (1993). Looking for two targets at the same time: One search or two? Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206781
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, K. S., & Weissman, D. H. (2010). Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: Evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1495–1509. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. S., & Weissman, D. H. (2011). Set-specific capture can be reduced by preemptively occupying a limited-capacity focus of attention. Visual Cognition, 19(4), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2011.558862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229(4715), 782–784. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.4023713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(2), 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motter, B. C. (1994). Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 14(4), 2178–2189. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-02178.1994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(I), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211845
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller, M. M., Malinowski, P., Gruber, T., & Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Sustained division of the attentional spotlight. Nature, 424(6946), 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima, M., Schmitt, L. I., & Halassa, M. M. (2019). Prefrontal cortex regulates sensory filtering through a Basal Ganglia-to-Thalamus pathway. Neuron, 103(3), 445–458.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcia, A. M., Appelbaum, L. G., Ales, J. M., Cottereau, B. R., & Rossion, B. (2015). The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review. Journal of Vision, 15(6), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.6.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L. (2009). What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1275–1291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., & Eimer, M. (2011). On the difference between working memory and attentional set. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1553–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29(3), 650–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2006). On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500308101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1243–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ort, E., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2017). Lack of free choice Reveals the cost of having to look for more than one object. Psychological Science, 28(8), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617705667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ort, E., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2018). Lack of free choice reveals the cost of multiple-target search within and across feature dimensions. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 80(8), 1904–1917. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1579-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ort, E., Fahrenfort, J. J., Reeder, R., Pollmann, S., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2019). Frontal cortex differentiates between free and imposed target selection in multiple-target search. NeuroImage, 202, 116133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ort, E., Fahrenfort, J. J., ten Cate, T., Eimer, M., & Olivers, C. N. (2019). Humans can efficiently look for but not select multiple visual objects. ELife, 8. Article e49130. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J., Verghese, P., & Pavel, M. (2000). The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40(10), 1227–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00244-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott, S. E., Levinthal, B. R., & Franconeri, S. L. (2010). Complex attentional control settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(12), 2297–2304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.520085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, P. T., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(5), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raye, C. L., Johnson, M. K., Mitchell, K. J., Greene, E. J., & Johnson, M. R. (2007). Refreshing: A minimal executive function. Cortex, 43(1), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70451-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Re, D., Inbar, M., Richter, C. G., & Landau, A. N. (2019). Feature-based attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Current Biology, 29(4), 693–699.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, Z. J. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2012). Searching for two things at once: Establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1114–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0297-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz, M., Buracas, G. T., & Boynton, G. M. (2002). Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5(7), 631–632. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serences, J. T. (2016). Neural mechanisms of information storage in visual short-term memory. Vision Research, 128, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1980). Comparing parallel and serial models: Theory and implementation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(2), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.6.2.330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Greene, C. M., Chaudhary, A., & Rotshtein, P. (2012). Competition in working memory reduces frontal guidance of visual selection. Cerebral Cortex, 22(5), 1159–1169. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rothstein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Stressing the mind: The effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(5), 924–934. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.5.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (2006). Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research, 46(6), 1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, M. J., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2012). Using the dual-target cost to explore the nature of search target representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, M. J., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., Donnelly, N., & Rayner, K. (2011). Search for multiple targets of different colours: Misguided eye movements reveal a reduction of colour selectivity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 971–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, M. J., Menneer, T., Kaplan, E., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2019). We can guide search by a set of colors, but are reluctant to do it. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(2), 377–406. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1617-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(6), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thigpen, N., Petro, N. M., Oschwald, J., Oberauer, K., & Keil, A. (2019). Selection of visual objects in perception and working memory one at a time. Psychological Science, 30(9), 1259–1272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619854067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töllner, T., Conci, M., Müller, H. J., & Mazza, V. (2016). Attending to multiple objects relies on both feature- and dimension-based control mechanisms: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 2079–2089. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1152-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töllner, T., Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2008). Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töllner, T., Zehetleitner, M., Krummenacher, J., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Perceptual basis of redundnacy gains in visual pop out search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like tweedledum and tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. CUP Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39(4), 321–359. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1995.1033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(2), 201–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724988843000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treue, S., & Trujillo Martínez, J. C. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399(6736), 575–579. https://doi.org/10.1038/21176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urai, A. E., de Gee, J. W., Tsetsos, K., & Donner, T. H. (2019). Choice history biases subsequent evidence accumulation. ELife, 8. Article e46331. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Driel, J., Ort, E., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2019). Beta and theta oscillations differentially support free versus forced control over multiple-target search. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(9), 1733–1743. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2547-18.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon, A. M., Olmos Solis, K., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2017). Subtle eye movement metrics reveal task-relevant representations prior to visual search. Journal of Vision, 17(6), 13–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.6.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Moorselaar, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). In competition for the attentional template: Can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1450–1464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanRullen, R. (2016). Perceptual cycles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. R., Brady, T. F., & Störmer, V. S. (2019). Natural variation in the fidelity of working memory representations cause only one item to guide attention [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c4t92
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2012). Saved by a log: How do humans perform hybrid visual and memory search? Psychological Science, 23(7), 698–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Aizenman, A. M., Boettcher, S. E. P., & Cain, M. S. (2016). Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target. Vision Research, 119, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Van Wert, M. J. (2010). Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search. Current Biology, 20(2), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Yu, K. P., Stewart, M. I., Shorter, a. D., Friedman-Hill, S. R., & Cave, K. R. (1990). Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., & Fu, S. (2017). The different roles of category- and feature-specific attentional control settings on attentional enhancement and inhibition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7), 1968–1978. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1363-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S.-C., & Remington, R. W. (2003). Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 1050–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyble, B., Folk, C., & Potter, M. C. (2013). Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Psychological Research, 63(3–4), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004269900003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Liu, S., Doro, M., & Galfano, G. (2018). Attentional guidance from multiple working memory representations: Evidence from eye movements. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32144-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Zhang, J. X., Huang, S., Kong, L., & Wang, S. (2011). Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory. Vision Research, 51(23), 2356–2361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., Lorist, M. M., & Mathôt, S. (2019). Behavioral and Computational Evidence for Simultaneous Guidance of Attention by Multiple Working Memory Items [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.1101/629378
   Google Scholar