Theoretical distinction between functional states in working memory and their corresponding neural states

References

• Almeida, R., Barbosa, J., & Compte, A. (2015). Neural circuit basis of visuo-spatial working memory precision: A computational and behavioral study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 114(3), 1806–1818. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00362.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, D. J., & Brunel, N. (1997). Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 7(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/7.3.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., Anllo-Vento, L., & Hillyard, S. A. (2000). The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 840–847. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axmacher, N., Henseler, M. M., Jensen, O., Weinreich, I., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J. (2010). Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(7), 3228–3233. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911531107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahramisharif, A., Jensen, O., Jacobs, J., Lisman, J., & Tong, F. (2018). Serial representation of items during working memory maintenance at letter-selective cortical sites. PLoS Biology, 16(8), e2003805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchacourt, F., & Buschman, T. J. (2019). A flexible model of working memory. Neuron, 103(1), 147–160.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camperi, M., & Wang, X. J. (1998). A model of visuospatial working memory in prefrontal cortex: Recurrent network and cellular bistability. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 5(4), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008837311948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2013). Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(7), 1330–1335. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0529-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2019). Quantifying the attentional impact of working memory matching targets and distractors. Visual Cognition, 27(5-8), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1634172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christophel, T. B., Iamshchinina, P., Yan, C., Allefeld, C., & Haynes, J.-D. (2018). Cortical specialization for attended versus unattended working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0094-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophel, T. B., Klink, P. C., Spitzer, B., Roelfsema, P. R., & Haynes, J.-D. (2017). The distributed nature of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M. (2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1407–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinidis, C., Funahashi, S., Lee, D., Murray, J. D., Qi, X.-L., Wang, M., & Arnsten, A. F. T. (2018). Persistent spiking activity underlies working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(32), 7020–7028. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2486-17.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, D. A., Goodwin, S. J., Blackman, R. K., Sakellaridi, S., Sponheim, S. R., MacDonald, A. W., & Chafee, M. V. (2013). Prefrontal neurons transmit signals to parietal neurons that reflect executive control of cognition. Nature Neuroscience, 16(10), 1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daie, K., Svoboda, K., & Druckmann, S. (2019). Targeted photostimulation uncovers circuit motifs supporting short-term memory. bioRxiv, 12, 623785. https://doi.org/10.1101/623785
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, E. W., Pearson, J. M., & Egner, T. (2017). Decoding working memory content from attentional biases. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 24(4), 1252–1260. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1204-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11(6), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckmann, S., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2012). Neuronal circuits underlying persistent representations despite time varying activity. Current Biology, 22(22), 2095–2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsayed, G. F., Lara, A. H., Kaufman, M. T., Churchland, M. M., & Cunningham, J. P. (2016). Reorganization between preparatory and movement population responses in motor cortex. Nature Communications, 7(1), 13239–13215. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fusi, S., Miller, E. K., & Rigotti, M. (2016). Why neurons mix: High dimensionality for higher cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 37, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuster, J. M. (1973). Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: Neuronal correlates of transient memory. Journal of Neurophysiology, 36(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1973.36.1.61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayet, S., Guggenmos, M., Christophel, T. B., Haynes, J.-D., Paffen, C. L. E., Van der Stigchel, S., & Sterzer, P. (2017). Visual working memory enhances the neural response to matching visual input. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(28), 6638–6647. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3418-16.2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., DiQuattro, N. E., & Helm, J. (2017). Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(12), 1993–2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-García, C., Formica, S., Liefooghe, B., & Brass, M. (2020). Attentional prioritization reconfigures novel instructions into action-oriented task sets. Cognition, 194, 104059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, C. M., Kennedy, K., & Soto, D. (2015). Dynamic states in working memory modulate guidance of visual attention: Evidence from an n-back paradigm. Visual Cognition, 23(5), 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2015.1052033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, A., & Beck, V. M. (2016). Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 911–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, A., & Maxcey-Richard, A. M. (2013). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79(8), 2554–2558. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussar, C. R., & Pasternak, T. (2012). Memory-guided sensory comparisons in the prefrontal cortex: Contribution of putative pyramidal cells and interneurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(8), 2747–2761. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5135-11.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O., & Lisman, J. E. (1996). Novel lists of 7 +/− 2 known items can be reliably stored in an oscillatory short-term memory network: Interaction with long-term memory. Learning & Memory, 3(2-3), 257–263. http://doi.org/10.1101/lm.3.2-3.257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. L., Adams, J. N., Solbakk, A.-K., Endestad, T., Larsson, P. G., Ivanovic, J., Meling, T. R., Lin, J. J., Knight, R. T., & Rushworth, M. (2018). Dynamic frontotemporal systems process space and time in working memory. PLoS Biology, 16(3), e2004274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiński, J., & Rutishauser, U. (2019). Between persistently active and activity-silent frameworks: Novel vistas on the cellular basis of working memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 61, 267. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14213
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Z., & Spitzer, B. (2020). Concurrent visual working memory bias in perception and decision making. bioRxiv, 26, 2020.07.16.191445. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.16.191445
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, M. T., Churchland, M. M., Ryu, S. I., & Shenoy, K. V. (2014). Cortical activity in the null space: Permitting preparation without movement. Nature Neuroscience, 17(3), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyonaga, A., & Egner, T. (2013). Working memory as internal attention: Toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara, A. H., & Wallis, J. D. (2014). Executive control processes underlying multi-item working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17(6), 876–883. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRocque, J. J., Eichenbaum, A. S., Starrett, M. J., Rose, N. S., Emrich, S. M., & Postle, B. R. (2015). The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention. Memory & Cognition, 43(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0486-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRocque, J. J., Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Drysdale, A. T., Oberauer, K., & Postle, B. R. (2013). Decoding attended information in short-term memory: An EEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Drysdale, A. T., Oberauer, K., & Postle, B. R. (2012). Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linke, A. C., Vicente-Grabovetsky, A., & Cusack, R. (2011). Stimulus-specific suppression preserves information in auditory short-term memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(31), 12961–12966. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102118108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisman, J. E., & Idiart, M. (1995). Storage of 7 +/− 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles. Science, 267(5203), 1512–1515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7878473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412(6843), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/35084005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenc, E. S., Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Nee, D. E., de Lange, F. P., & D’Esposito, M. (2020). Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie currently-relevant, future-relevant, and discarded working memory representations. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 11195–11117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67634-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, M., Herman, P., & Miller, E. K. (2018). Working memory: Delay activity, yes! Persistent activity? Maybe not. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(32), 7013–7019. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2485-17.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W. J., Husain, M., & Bays, P. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, R., & Lewis-Peacock, J. A. (2018). Behavioral decoding of working memory items inside and outside the focus of attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424(1), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manohar, S. G., Zokaei, N., Fallon, S. J., Vogels, T. P., & Husain, M. (2019). Neural mechanisms of attending to items in working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 101, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mante, V., Sussillo, D., Shenoy, K. V., & Newsome, W. T. (2013). Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex. Nature, 503(7474), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse, N. Y., Rosen, M. C., & Freedman, D. J. (2020). Reevaluating the role of persistent neural activity in short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse, N. Y., Yang, G. R., Song, H. F., Wang, X.-J., & Freedman, D. J. (2019). Circuit mechanisms for the maintenance and manipulation of information in working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 22(7), 1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0414-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiran, N., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2012). When planning results in loss of control: Intention-based reflexivity and working-memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiran, N., Pereg, M., Kessler, Y., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2015). Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus–response rules: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0321-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., Lundqvist, M., & Bastos, A. M. (2018). Working memory 2.0. Neuron, 100(2), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongillo, G., Barak, O., & Tsodyks, M. (2008). Synaptic theory of working memory. Science, 319(5869), 1543–1546. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhle-Karbe, P. S., Duncan, J., De Baene, W., Mitchell, D., & Brass, M. (2016). Neural coding for instruction-based task sets in human frontoparietal and visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 27, 1891–1905. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhle-Karbe, P. S., Myers, N. E., & Stokes, M. G. (2020). A hierarchy of functional states in working memory. bioRxiv, 51(2), 2020.04.16.044511. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.044511
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N. E., Chekroud, S. R., Stokes, M. G., & Nobre, A. C. (2018). Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(3), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. E., Rohenkohl, G., Wyart, V., Woolrich, M. W., Nobre, A. C., & Stokes, M. G. (2015). Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates. eLife, 4, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. E., Stokes, M. G., & Nobre, A. C. (2017). Prioritizing information during working memory: Beyond sustained internal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(6), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar, M. R., Helmers, J. C., & Frank, M. J. (2018). Chunking as a rational strategy for lossy data compression in visual working memory. Psychological Review, 125(4), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee, D. E., & Jonides, J. (2014). Frontal-medial temporal interactions mediate transitions among representational states in short-term memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(23), 7964–7975. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0130-14.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Lin, H.-Y. (2017). An interference model of visual working memory. Psychological Review, 124(1), 21–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1243–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panichello, M. F., & Buschman, T. J. (2020). Selective control of working memory in prefrontal, parietal, and visual cortex. bioRxiv, 21, 2020.04.07.030718. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.07.030718
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, A., Herikstad, R., Bong, J. H., Medina, F. S., Libedinsky, C., & Yen, S.-C. (2017). Mixed selectivity morphs population codes in prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-017-0003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington, E. D., Narain, D., Hosseini, E. A., & Jazayeri, M. (2018). Flexible sensorimotor computations through rapid reconfiguration of cortical dynamics. Neuron, 98(5), 1005–1019.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2013). Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1075–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rerko, L., Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention. Memory & Cognition, 42(5), 712–728. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0392-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigotti, M., Barak, O., Warden, M. R., Wang, X.-J., Daw, N. D., Miller, E. K., & Fusi, S. (2013). The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks. Nature, 497(7451), 585–590. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. S., LaRocque, J. J., Riggall, A. C., Gosseries, O., Starrett, M. J., Meyering, E. E., & Postle, B. R. (2016). Reactivation of latent working memories with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Science, 354(6316), 1136–1139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah7011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneegans, S., & Bays, P. M. (2017). Restoration of fMRI decodability does not imply latent working memory states. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(12), 1977–1994. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaak, E., Watanabe, K., Funahashi, S., & Stokes, M. G. (2017). Stable and dynamic coding for working memory in primate prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(27), 6503–6516. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3364-16.2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellman, T., Rigotti, M., Ahmari, S. E., Fusi, S., Gogos, J. A., & Gordon, J. A. (2015). Hippocampal-prefrontal input supports spatial encoding in working memory. Nature, 522(7556), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, M. G. (2011). Top-down visual activity underlying VSTM and preparatory attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1425–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, M. G. (2015). ‘Activity-silent’ working memory in prefrontal cortex: A dynamic coding framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(7), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, M. G., Kusunoki, M., Sigala, N., Nili, H., Gaffan, D., & Duncan, J. (2013). Dynamic coding for cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 78(2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, J. P., Porter, M. A., Hennequin, G., & Vogels, T. P. (2018). Motor primitives in space and time via targeted gain modulation in cortical networks. Nature Neuroscience, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0276-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugase-Miyamoto, Y., Liu, Z., Wiener, M. C., Optican, L. M., Richmond, B. J., & Friston, K. J. (2008). Short-term memory trace in rapidly adapting synapses of inferior temporal cortex. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(5), e1000073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C., Herikstad, R., Parthasarathy, A., Libedinsky, C., & Yen, S.-C. (2019). Independent activity subspaces for working memory and motor preparation in the lateral prefrontal cortex. bioRxiv, 22, 756072. https://doi.org/10.1101/756072
   Google Scholar
• Trübutschek, D., Marti, S., Ueberschär, H., & Dehaene, S. (2019). Probing the limits of activity-silent non-conscious working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(28), 14358–14367. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820730116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Stigchel, S., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2019). The flexible nature of the interaction between attention and working memory. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Loon, A. M., Olmos-Solis, K., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Olivers, C. N. (2018). Current and future goals are represented in opposite patterns in object-selective cortex. eLife, 7, 1427. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon, A. M., Olmos-Solis, K., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2017). Subtle eye movement metrics reveal task-relevant representations prior to visual search. Journal of Vision, 17(6), 13. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.6.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Moorselaar, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2014). In competition for the attentional template: Can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1450–1464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Moorselaar, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2016). Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1483–1490. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1008-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.-J. (2001). Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity. Trends in Neurosciences, 24(8), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01868-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, K., Nykamp, D. Q., Constantinidis, C., & Compte, A. (2014). Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17(3), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, M. J., Ding, J., Myers, N. E., & Stokes, M. G. (2015). Revealing hidden states in visual working memory using electroencephalography. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9(5), 123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolff, M. J., Jochim, J., Akyürek, E. G., & Stokes, M. G. (2017). Dynamic hidden states underlying working-memory-guided behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 20(6), 864–871. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. B. M., & Hayden, B. Y. (2020). The transition from evaluation to selection involves neural subspace reorganization in core reward regions. Neuron, 105(4), 712–724.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Q., Teng, C., & Postle, B. R. (2020). Different states of priority recruit different neural representations in visual working memory. PLoS Biology, 18(6), e3000769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaksas, D., & Pasternak, T. (2006). Directional signals in the prefrontal cortex and in area MT during a working memory for visual motion task. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(45), 11726–11742. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3420-06.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Katsuki, F., Qi, X.-L., & Constantinidis, C. (2012). Neurons with inverted tuning during the delay periods of working memory tasks in the dorsal prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01151.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, R. S., & Regehr, W. G. (2002). Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annual Review of Physiology, 64(1), 355–405. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar