Efficient tuning of attention to narrow and broad ranges of task-relevant feature values

References

• Albright, T. D., Desimone, R., & Gross, C. G. (1984). Columnar organization of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 51(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1984.51.1.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2005). Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science, 16(8), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01587.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. K., Hillyard, S. A., & Müller, M. M. (2008). Attention facilitates multiple stimulus features in parallel in human visual cortex. Current Biology, 18(13), 1006–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. K., Hillyard, S. A., & Müller, M. M. (2013). Global facilitation of attended features Is obligatory and restricts divided attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(46), 18200–18207. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1913-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., & Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 834–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, K., & Sekuler, R. (1981). Cues reduce direction uncertainty and enhance motion detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204469
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I. (2010). The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2010). The role of relational information in contingent capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1460–1476. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2013). Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations. Psychological Science, 24(5), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I., Harris, A. M., Venini, D., & Retell, J. D. (2014). Visual search for color and shape: When is the gaze guided by feature relationships, when by feature values? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 264–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I., Martin, A., & Hamblin-Frohman, Z. (2019). Target templates in singleton search vs. Feature-based search modes. Visual Cognition, 27(5–8), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1676352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohon, K. S., Hermann, K. L., Hansen, T., & Conway, B. R. (2016). Representation of perceptual color space in macaque posterior inferior temporal cortex (The V4 complex). ENeuro, 3(4), ENEURO.0039-16.2016. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0039-16.2016
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brainard, D. H., Longère, P., Delahunt, P. B., Freeman, W. T., Kraft, J. M., & Xiao, B. (2006). Bayesian model of human color constancy. Journal of Vision, 6(11), 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.11.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2012). Task demands determine the specificity of the search template. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0224-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, G. J., & Heeger, D. J. (2009). Decoding and reconstructing color from responses in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(44), 13992–14003. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3577-09.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13), 1484–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychologica, 73(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90022-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. F., & Störmer, V. S. (2022). Feature similarity is non-linearly related to attentional selection: Evidence from visual search and sustained attention tasks. Journal of Vision, 22(8), 4. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.8.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, B. R., & Tsao, D. Y. (2009). Color-tuned neurons are spatially clustered according to color preference within alert macaque posterior inferior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(42), 18034–18039. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810943106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutzu, F., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2003). The selective tuning model of attention: Psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item. Vision Research, 43(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00491-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). Jspsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dori, H., & Henik, A. (2006). Indications for two attentional gradients in endogenous visual-spatial attention. Visual Cognition, 13(2), 166–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500277504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner, & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(4), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional contro. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franconeri, S. L., Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2013). Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(3), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. L., Merriam, E. P., Movshon, J. A., & Heeger, D. J. (2008). Maps of visual space in human occipital cortex are retinotopic, not spatiotopic. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(15), 3988–3999. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5476-07.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., Diquattro, N. E., & Helm, J. (2017). Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(12), 1993–2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000430.supp
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., & Witkowski, P. (2019). Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2016). All set, indeed! N2PC components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(8), 1215–1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamblin-Frohman, Z., & Becker, S. I. (2021). The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations? Cognition, 212(April), 104732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herrmann, K., Montaser-Kouhsari, L., Carrasco, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2010). When size matters: Attention affects performance by contrast or response gain. Nature Neuroscience, 13(12), 1554–1561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, J.-M. M., Boehler, C. N., Luck, S. J., Tsotsos, J. K., Heinze, H.-J. J., & Schoenfeld, M. A. (2006). Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(4), 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507746103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2014). Target templates: The precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(1), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., & Pashler, H. (2007). A Boolean Map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114(3), 599–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itthipuripat, S., Garcia, J. O., Rungratsameetaweemana, N., Sprague, T. C., & Serences, J. T. (2014). Changing the spatial scope of attention alters patterns of neural gain in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3943-13.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10–12), 1489–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner, S., Pinsk, M. A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999). Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron, 22(4), 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80734-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafer-Sousa, R., Hermann, K. L., & Conway, B. R. (2015). Striking individual differences in color perception uncovered by “the dress” photograph. Current Biology, 25(13), R545–R546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (2001). On the status of location in visual attention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 305–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440125789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, J., Solomon, S. G., & Kohn, A. (2016). fMRI adaptation revisited. Cortex, 80, 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, S., Liu, T., & Carrasco, M. (2009). How spatial and feature-based attention affect the gain and tuning of population responses. Vision Research, 49(10), 1194–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Becker, M. W., & Jigo, M. (2013). Limited featured-based attention to multiple features. Vision Research, 85, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., & Jigo, M. (2017). Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79(8), 2327–2337. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1390-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Larsson, J., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex. Neuron, 55(2), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Stevens, S. T., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Comparing the time course and efficacy of spatial and feature-based attention. Vision Research, 47(1), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maringelli, F., & Umiltà, C. (1998). The control of the attentional focus. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10(3), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752276
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Trujillo, J. C., & Treue, S. (2004). Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Current Biology, 14(9), 744–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunsell, J. H. R., & Treue, S. (2006). Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(6), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2006.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. C., Malkoc, G., Mulligan, J. B., & Webster, M. A. (2010). Adaptation and visual salience. Journal of Vision, 10(13), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.13.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMains, S. A., & Somers, D. C. (2004). Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex. Neuron, 42(4), 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00263-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merzenich, M. M., & Brugge, J. F. (1973). Representation of the cochlear partition on the superior temporal plane of the macaque monkey. Brain Research, 50(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(73)90731-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moerel, M., De Martino, F., & Formisano, E. (2012). Processing of natural sounds in human auditory cortex: Tonotopy, spectral tuning, and relation to voice sensitivity. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(41), 14205–14216. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1388-12.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountcastle, V. B. (1997). The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain, 120(4), 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/120.4.701
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mounts, J. R. W. (2000). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(7), 1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, N. G., Mollenhauer, M., Rösler, A., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2005). The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution. Vision Research, 45(9), 1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2007). Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron, 53(4), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations. Vision Research, 45(14), 1867–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, N., & Kingdom, F. A. A. (2009). Palamedes: Matlab routines for analyzing psychophysical data. http://www.palamedestoolbox.org
   Google Scholar
• Rajananda, S., Lau, H., & Odegaard, B. (2018). A random-dot kinematogram for web-based vision research. Journal of Open Research Software, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.194
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 611–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009). The normalization model of attention. Neuron, 61(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sàenz, M., Buraĉas, G. T., & Boynton, G. M. (2003). Global feature-based attention for motion and color. Vision Research, 43(6), 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00595-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönhammer, J. G., Grubert, A., Kerzel, D., & Becker, S. I. (2016). Attentional guidance by relative features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Psychophysiology, 53(7), 1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, G. L., Sheehy, J. B., & Wilson, J. (1986). Gradients of spatial attention. Acta Psychologica, 61(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(86)90029-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Störmer, V. S., & Alvarez, G. A. (2014). Feature-based attention elicits surround suppression in feature space. Current Biology, 24(17), 1985–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19(1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.19.1.109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka, K. (2003). Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: Clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. Cerebral Cortex, 13(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.1.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Miller, J., & Liu, T. (2015). Suppression effects in feature-based attention. Journal of Vision, 15(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.5.15.doi
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, A. L., & Carrasco, M. (2011). Feature-based attention involuntarily and simultaneously improves visual performance across locations. Journal of Vision, 11(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.6.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. R., Brady, T. F., & Störmer, V. S. (2022). Guidance of attention by working memory Is a matter of representational guidance of attention by working memory Is a matter of representational fidelity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(3), 202–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkowski, P. P., & Geng, J. J. (2022). Attentional priority Is determined by predicted feature distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(11), 1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, A. A., Sewell, D. K., & Becker, S. I. (2020). Dual target search: Attention tuned to relative features, both within and across feature dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(11), 1368–1386. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., & Geng, J. J. (2019). The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(3), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., Hanks, T. D., & Geng, J. J. (2022). Attentional guidance and match decisions rely on different template information during visual search. Psychological Science, 33(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211032225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., Johal, S. K., & Geng, J. J. (2022). Visual search guidance uses coarser template information than target-match decisions. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 84(5), 1432–1445. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02478-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar