152
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Novel scene understanding, from gist to elaboration

, , &
Pages 188-215 | Received 19 Aug 2022, Accepted 25 May 2023, Published online: 21 Jun 2023

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ansorge, U., Pelowski, M., Quigley, C., Peschl, M. F., & Leder, H. (2022). Art and perception: Using empirical aesthetics in research on consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895985
  • Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00327
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2007). Continuing themes in the study of human knowledge: Associations, imagery, propositions, and situations. In M. A. Gluck, J. R. Anderson, & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Memory and mind: A festschrift for Gordon H. Bower (pp. 209–227). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Brady, T. F., Shafer-Skelton, A., & Alvarez, G. A. (2017). Global ensemble texture representations are critical to rapid scene perception.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(6), 1160–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000399
  • Breitmeyer, B. G. (2008). Visual masking: Past accomplishments, present status, future developments. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3(1-2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0010-7
  • Cohen, M. A., Dennett, D. C., & Kanwisher, N. (2016). What is the bandwidth of perceptual experience?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.006
  • Davenport, J., & Potter, M. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15(8), 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
  • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
  • Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007
  • Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? Journal of Vision, 7(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.1.10
  • Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for ‘top-down’ effects. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, e229, 1–77.
  • Greene, M. R., Botros, A. P., Beck, D. M., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015). What you see is what you expect: Rapid scene understanding benefits from prior experience. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77(4), 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0859-8
  • Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009). The briefest of glances: The time course of natural scene understanding. Psychological Science, 20(4), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02316.x
  • Hafri, A., & Firestone, C. (2021). The perception of relations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(6), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.01.006
  • Harrison, G. W., Rajsic, J., & Wilson, D. E. (2016). Object-substitution masking degrades the quality of conscious object representations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(1), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0875-7
  • Helmholtz, H. L. (1867/1910). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. L. Voss. Reprinted, with extensive commentary, in A. Gullstrand, J. von Kries, & W. Nagel (Eds.), Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (3rd ed.). L. Voss. (Original work published 1867)
  • Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 243–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
  • Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.4.398
  • Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.113
  • Hollingworth, A., Richard, A. M., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: Transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(1), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.163
  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
  • Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46(11), 1762–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.002
  • Larson, A. M., Freeman, T. E., Ringer, R. V., & Loschky, L. C. (2014). The spatiotemporal dynamics of scene gist recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(2), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034986
  • Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006
  • Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 558–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90006-A
  • Maxfield, J. T., Stalder, W. D., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2014). Effects of target typicality on categorical search. Journal of Vision, 14(12), 1, 1–11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/14/12/1, https://doi.org/10.1167/14.12.1
  • McClelland, J. L. (2013). Integrating probabilistic models of perception and interactive neural networks: A historical and tutorial review. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00503
  • Melcher, D. (2006). Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 6(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.1.2
  • Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027366
  • Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92(3), 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289
  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. Freeman.
  • O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 46(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084327
  • Oxford Languages. (2022, November 19). Definitions provided by Google.
  • Palmer, S. E. (1975a). Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 279–307). Freeman.
  • Palmer, S. E. (1975b). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3(5), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197524
  • Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509
  • Potter, M. C. (2010). Conceptual short term memory. Scholarpedia, 5(2), 3334. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.3334
  • Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Verwoerd, M. (1989). A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(3), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.378
  • Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
  • Rensink, R. A. (2000a). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394667
  • Rensink, R. A. (2000b). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing. Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394847
  • Robinson, M. M., & Irwin, D. E. (2019). Are there two visual short-term memory stores? A state-trace analysis. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 90, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2019.02.001
  • Sanocki, T. (2003). Representation and perception of scenic layout. Cognitive Psychology, 47(1), 43–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00002-1
  • Sanocki, T., Defant, J., Mackay, G., & Zipprer, D. (2018). Do scene-category primes facilitate scene perception?. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 142. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.142
  • Sanocki, T., Islam, M., Doyon, J., & Lee, C. (2015). Rapid scene perception with tragic consequences: Observers miss perceiving vulnerable road users, especially in crowded traffic scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(4), 1252–1262. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0850-4
  • Sanocki, T., Sellers, E., Mittelstadt, J., & Sulman, N. (2010). How high is visual short term memory capacity for object layout? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(4), 1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.1097
  • Sanocki, T., & Sulman, N. (2009). Priming of simple and complex scene layout: Rapid function from the intermediate level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013032
  • Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01080-2
  • Sinclair, S., & Rockwell, G. (2016). Voyant tools. http://voyant-tools.org/
  • Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? PLoS One, 3(2), e1699. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001699
  • Smith, M. E., & Loschky, L. C. (2019). The influence of sequential predictions on scene-gist recognition. Journal of Vision, 19(12), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.12.14
  • Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018). OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125(6), 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000119
  • Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74(11), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093759
  • Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766
  • Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
  • Tsotsos, J. (1990). Analyzing vision at the complexity level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(3), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00079577
  • Tsotsos, J. (2022). When we study the ability to attend, what exactly are we trying to understand? Journal of Imaging, 8(8), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8080212
  • VanRullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003). Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects. Journal of Vision, 3(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.1.8
  • Võ, M. L.-H. (2021). The meaning and structure of scenes. Vision Research, 181, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.11.003
  • Zelinsky, G., Chen, Y., Ahn, S., & Adeli, H. (2020). Changing perspectives on goal-directed attention control: The past, present, and future of modeling fixations during visual search. In K. D. Federmeier & E. R. Schotter (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 231–286). Elsevier.
  • Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0864-x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.