The protective and developmental varieties of liberal democracy: a difference in kind or degree?

Bibliography

• Amirah-Fernández, Haizam, and Irene Menéndez. ‘Reform in Comparative Perspective: US and EU Strategies of Democracy Promotion in the MENA Region after 9/11’. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17, no. 3 (2009): 325–38.
   Google Scholar
• Asp, Kent. ‘Fairness, Informativeness and Scrutiny: The Role of News Media in Democracy’. Nordicom Review, Jubilee Issue (2007): 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Asp, Kent. ‘Rättvisa Nyhetsmedier: Partiskheten under 2006 års mediavalrorelse’. Arbetsrapport 42 (2006). Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Azpuru, Dinorah, Steven E. Finkel, Anibal Perez-Linan, and Mitchell A. Seligson. ‘Trends in Democracy Assistance: What Has the United States Been Doing?’ Journal of Democracy 19, no. 2 (2008): 150–9.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, David. ‘Towards a Universal Framework for Democracy Assessment’. Democratization 11, no. 2 (2004): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Board, Joseph B. The Government and Politics of Sweden. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, Kenneth A., and Pamela Paxton. ‘Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy’. Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 1 (2000): 58–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchet, Nicolas. ‘Barack Obama's Democracy Promotion at Midterm’. The International Journal of Human Rights 15, no. 4 (2011): 572–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan, and Jennifer van Heerde. ‘The United States of America: Perpetual Campaigning in the Absence of Competition’. In The Politics of Electoral Systems, ed. Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell, 185–208. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Burnell, Peter. ‘International Democracy Promotion: A Role for Public Goods Theory?’ Contemporary Politics 14, no.1 (2008): 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Burnell, Peter, and André Gerrits. ‘Promoting Party Politics in Emerging Democracies’. Democratization 17, no. 6 (2010): 1065–1084.
   Google Scholar
• Burnell, Peter, and Oliver Schlumberger. ‘Promoting Democracy – Promoting Autocracy? International Politics and National Political Regimes’. Contemporary Politics 16, no. 2 (2010): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, Thomas. ‘Democracy Assistance: Political vs. Developmental?’ Journal of Democracy 20, no. 1 (2009): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, David, and Steven Levitsky. ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’. World Politics 49, no. 3 (1997): 430–451.
   Google Scholar
• Corporation for Public Broadcasting. ‘Public Broadcasting Revenue Fiscal Year 2008’. September 2009. www.cpb.org/stations/reports/revenue/2008PublicBroadcastingRevenue.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral System. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Gordon. ‘EU Human Rights and Democracy Promotion in Central Asia: From Lofty Principles to Lowly Self-Interests’. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9, no. 2 (2008): 172–91.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice. ‘Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Reference Guide’. January 2010. http://www.justice.gov/oip/04_3.html (accessed 15 October 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry. ‘Thinking about Hybrid Regimes’. Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2002): 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry, and Leonardo Morlino. ‘Introduction’. In Assessing the Quality of Democracy, ed. Larry Diamond and Leonardo Morlino, ix–xliii. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, Harry. ‘Case Studies and Theory in Political Science’. In Handbook of Political Science Vol. 7 Political Science: Scope and Theory, ed. Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 94–137. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Einhorn, Eric S., and John Logue. Modern Welfare States: Scandinavian Politics and Policy in the Global Age. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. ‘The Making of a Social Democratic Welfare State’. In Creating Social Democracy, ed. Klaus Misgeld, Karl Molin and Klas Åmark, 35–65. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, Steven E. ‘Can Democracy Be Taught?’ Journal of Democracy 14, no. 4 (2003): 137–51.
   Google Scholar
• Foweraker, Joe, and Roman Krznaric. ‘Measuring Liberal Democratic Performance: An Empirical and Conceptual Critique’. Political Studies 48, no. 4 (2000): 759–87.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. ‘Freedom in the World 2010’. http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=363&year=2010 (accessed 23 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Freidenvall, Lenita. ‘Women's Political Representation and Gender Quotas – The Swedish Case’. University of Stockholm Political Science Department Research Program on Gender Quotas Working Paper Series, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Francis. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21 st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. ‘Conclusion’. In The Politics of Electoral Systems, ed. Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell, 535–49. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. ‘Americans Renew Call for Third Party’. September 17, 2010. http://www.gallup.com/poll/143051/Americans-Renew-Call-Third-Party.aspx (accessed 15 November 2010).
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L. ‘Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison’. In Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy, ed. Paul Gordon Lauren, 43–68. New York: The Free Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John, and Strom C. Thacker. A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gershman, Carl, and Michael Allen. ‘The Assault on Democracy Assistance’. Journal of Democracy 17, no. 2 (2006): 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, Samuel Merrill, Thomas Brunell, and William Koetzle. ‘The Potential Electoral Disadvantages of a Catch-All Party: Ideological Variance among Republicans and Democrats in the 50 US States’. Party Politics 5, no. 2 (1999): 199–210.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Karl Erik. ‘The Market Consequences of Swedish Press Subsidies’. Gothenburg: Analysis Commissioned by the Swedish Ministry of Culture, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Håstad, Elis. The Parliament of Sweden. London: Hansard Society, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Held, David. Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Patrick. ‘Degrees of Democracy: Some Comparative Lessons from India’. World Politics 52 (2000): 484–519.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Steven. 10 Steps to Repair American Democracy. Sausalito, CA: Polipoint Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hilson, Mary. The Nordic Model: Scandinavia Since 1945. London: Reaktion, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, Christopher. ‘The Limits of Liberal-Democracy Promotion’. Alternatives 34, no. 4 (2009): 383–405.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, Barry. Understanding Liberal Democracy. Oxford: P. Allan, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, John D., and G. Bingham Powell, Jr. ‘Congruence between Citizens and Policy-makers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy’. World Politics 46, no. 3 (1994): 291–326.
   Google Scholar
• International IDEA (Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance). ‘Political Finance Database’. http://www.idea.int/parties/finance/db/ (accessed 15 October 2010).
   Google Scholar
• International IDEA (Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance). ‘Voter Turnout Database’. http://www.idea.int/vt/viewdata.cfm (accessed 15 October 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Devin, and Neha Navlakha. ‘Social Democracy in Sweden’. Economic and Political Weekly 45, no. 47 (2010): 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Julianna, and Katherine Lim. ‘2008 Presidential Candidates’ Tax Proposals'. September 2008. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/election_issues_matrix.cfm (accessed October 15, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kurki, Milja. ‘Democracy and Conceptual Contestability: Reconsidering Conceptions of Democracy in Democracy Promotion’. International Studies Review 12 (2010): 362–86.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Torbjörn, and Henry Bäck. Governing and Governance in Sweden. Stockholm: Studentliteratur, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Leissner, Maria. ‘Sweden's Policy on Democracy in the Light of the Swedish Presidency of the EU 2009.’ In Democracy Promotion in a Transatlantic Perspective, ed. Maria Leissner, Annika Björkdahl, Roel von Meijenfelft, Tom Melia, Pavol Demes and Michael Allen, 7–10. Stockholm: SIEPS, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, David H., and José E. Molina, eds., The Quality of Democracy in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. ‘Why Democracy Needs a Level Playing Field’. Journal of Democracy 21, no.1 (2010): 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. ‘Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma’. American Political Science Review 91, no. 1 (1997): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J. ‘Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?’ In The Failure of Presidential Democracy Vol. I, ed. Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, 3–87. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, David W. ‘Promoting Democracy: The Challenge of Creating a Civil Society’. Comparative Sociology 6, no. 3 (2007): 324–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Gabrielle, and Gordon Crawford. ‘Democratization in Africa 1990–2010: An Assessment’. Democratization, 18, no. 2 (2011): 275–310.
   Google Scholar
• Manza, Jeff, Clem Brooks, and Christopher Uggen. ‘Public Attitudes Toward Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States’. Political Opinion Quarterly 68, no. 2 (2004): 275–86.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, Robert. ‘Comparing the Financing of Media in Sweden, Mexico, the USA, and China’. Paper presented at the 2nd International Congress of Media Law, Mexico City, November 2005. http://www.bibliojuridica.org/libros/5/2404/21.pdf (accessed 15 November 2010).
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey and Company. ‘Review of Public Service Broadcasting Around the World’. 2004. http://www.mckinsey.com/practices/mediaentertainment/home/content/pdfs/PSB_Review.pdf (accessed 23 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas, with Lewis Hinchman. The Theory of Social Democracy. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Munck, Gerardo L. Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Federal Election Reform. To Assure Pride and Confidence in the Electoral Process. New York: The Century Foundation, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• National Public Radio. ‘Public Radio Finances’. 2010. http://www.npr.org/about/aboutnpr/publicradiofinances.html (accessed 15 October 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Dana D. Bad for Democracy: How the Presidency Undermines the Power of the People. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, Guillermo. ‘Delegative Democracy’. In Democracy: A Reader, ed. Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner, 32–46, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Inspector General. A Review of the FBI's Investigations of Certain Domestic Advocacy Groups. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Plattner, Marc F. ‘Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal Democracy’. Journal of Democracy 21, no. 1 (2010): 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Pot, Ferrie. Employment Relations and National Culture: Continuity and Change in the Age of Globalization. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Powel, Brieg Tomos. ‘The Stability Syndrome: US and EU Democracy Promotion in Tunisia’. The Journal of North African Studies 14, no. 1 (2009): 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. ‘Voters Rate the Parties’ Ideologies'. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 16 July 2010. http://people-press.org/report/636/ (accessed 15 November 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Rendall, Steve, and Daniel Butterworth. ‘How Public is Public Radio? A Study of NPR's Guest List’. Extra! May/June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rendall, Steve, and Julie Hollar. ‘Are You on the NewsHour's Guestlist? PBS Flagship News Show Fails Public Mission’. Extra! September/October 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Rendall, Steve, and Michael Morel. ‘Does NewsHour “Help Us See America Whole”?’ Extra! November 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Riksdagen (Swedish Parliament). 2010. 1) Freedom of the Press: http://www.riksdagen.se/templates/R_PageExtended____6332.aspx and 2) Financial Support of the Parties: http://www.riksdagen.se/templates/R_Page____11040.aspx (accessed 23 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo. The Social Democratic State: The Swedish Model and the Bureaucratic Problem of Social Reforms. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Rytina, Nancy. ‘Estimates of the Legal Permanent Resident Population in 2006’. Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security Office of Immigration Statistics Policy Directorate, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. ‘The Menu of Manipulation’. Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2002): 36–50.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, Philippe C., and Terry Lynn Karl. ‘What Democracy Is … and Is Not’. Journal of Democracy 2 (1991): 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Schriner, Kay, Lisa A. Ochs, and Todd G. Shields. ‘The Last Suffrage Movement: Voting Rights for Persons with Cognitive and Emotional Disabilities’. Publius 27, no. 3 (1997): 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Statistika Centralbyrån. Statistik Årsbok för Sverige 2010. Stockholm: SCB, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, Sven. The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, Alfred. ‘Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model’. Journal of Democracy 10, no. 4 (1999): 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Tilton, Tim. The Political Theory of Swedish Social Democracy: Through the Welfare State to Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. ‘2010 Statistical Abstract of the United States’. 2010. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2010/2010edition.html (accessed 23 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=fb853a4107083210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=fb853a4107083210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD (accessed 23 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Valmyndigheten (Swedish Election Authority). ‘Det svenska valsystemet’. http://www.val.se/det_svenska_valsystemet/ (accessed 22 October 2010).
   Google Scholar
• van Cranenburgh, Oda. 2011. ‘Democracy Promotion in Africa: the Institutional Context’. Democratization 18, no. 2 (2011): 443–61.
   Google Scholar
• Weibull, Lennart, Anna Maria Jönsson, and Ingela Wadbring. ‘Media Landscape: Sweden’. European Journalism Centre. 2006. http://www.ejc.net/media_landscape/article/sweden/ (accessed 8 October 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wiarda, Howard J. ‘Smarter Democracy Promotion’. American Foreign Policy Interests 31, no. 5 (2009): 325–9.
   Google Scholar
• World Values Survey. 2009. ‘World Values Survey Data for 2005–2008’. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, Richard. 2008. ‘Trends in Democracy Assistance: What Has Europe Been Doing?’ Journal of Democracy 19, no. 2: 160–8.
   Google Scholar