Environmental disobedience and the dialogic dimensions of dissent

Bibliography

• Allen, Michael. “Civil Disobedience and Terrorism: Testing the Limits of Deliberative Democracy.” Theoria 56, no. 118 (2009): 15–39. doi: 10.3167/th.2009.5611803
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. “Civil Disobedience.” In Crises of the Republic, edited by H. Arendt, 49–63. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, John L. How to Do Things with Words, The William James Lectures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Emily. “Calling Foul: Deficiencies in Approaches to Environmental Whistleblowers and Suggested Reforms.” Journal of Energy, Climate and Environment 6, no. 1 (2014): 65–96.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, Sayla. Democracy and Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, James. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy, Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, Sophie. “Negotiating a ‘Democratic Ethos’: Moving beyond the Agonistic – Communicative Divide.” Planning Theory (2011): 1–26. doi:10.1177/1473095210383081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Michael F. “On Resisting Resistance.” American Anthropologist 98, no. 4 (1996): 729–735. doi: 10.1525/aa.1996.98.4.02a00030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, Kimberly. Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience, Oxford Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Caraus, Tamara. Cosmopolitanism of Dissent. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ceva, Emanuela. “Political Justification through Democratic Participation: The Case for Conscientious Objection.” Social Theory and Practice 41, no. 1 (2015): 1–35. doi: 10.5840/soctheorpract20154112
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Briankle, and Garnet Butchart. “Introduction.” In Philosophy of Communication, edited by B. Chang and G. B. Chang, 1–10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cheong, Pauline, and Cris Lundry. “Prosumption, Transmediation, and Resistance: Terrorism and Man-Hunting in Southeast Asia.” American Behavioral Scientist 56, no. 4 (2012): 488–510. doi: 10.1177/0002764211429365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, Laura Tolnov, Hans-Peter Hansen, and Esben Tind. Democracy and Sustainability: A Lesson Learned from Modern Nature Conservation, A New Agenda for Sustainability. Surrey: Ashgate, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, Stewart. Frameworks of Power. Sydney: SAGE, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea, and Anne Marie Goetz. “Democratizing Democracy: Feminist Perspectives.” Democratization 12, no. 5 (2005): 783–800. doi: 10.1080/13510340500322181
   Google Scholar
• Craig, Robert T. “Communication Theory as a Field.” Communication Theory 9, no. 2 (1999): 119–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, Charles. “‘Abortion And Consensus: The Futility of Speech’, The Power of Disobedience.” Washington and Lee Law Review 48 (1991): 218–234.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, Andrew. Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, Sye, and Will Kymlicka. Zoopolis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory 38, no. 3 (2010): 319–339. doi: 10.1177/0090591709359596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, Robyn. The University of Melbourne, Ecocentric Discourses: Problems and Future Prospects for Nature Advocacy. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M., and T. N. P. Bondaroff. “From Advocacy to Confrontation: Direct Enforcement by Environmental NGOs.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 2 (2014): 348–361. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Essen, Erica. “Whose Discourse is it Anyway? Understanding Resistance through the Rise of ‘Barstool Biology’ in Nature Conservation.” Environmental Communication (2015). doi:10.1080/17524032.2015.1042986.
   Google Scholar
• von Essen, Erica, and Michael Allen. “Reconsidering Illegal Hunting as a Crime of Dissent: Implication for Justice and Deliberative Uptake.” Criminal Law & Philosophy (2015): 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11572-014-9364-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Essen, Erica. Hans Peter Hansen, Helen Nordström Källström, M. Nils Peterson, and Tarla R. Peterson. “The Radicalisation of Rural Resistance: How Hunting Counterpublics in the Nordic Countries Contribute to Illegal Hunting.” Journal of Rural Studies 39 (2015): 199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text, no. 25/26 (1990): 56–80. doi:10.2307/466240.
   Google Scholar
• Futrell, Robert, and Barbara Brents. “Protest as Terrorism? The Potential for Violent Anti-Nuclear Activism.” American Behavioral Scientist 46, no. 6 (2003): 745–765. doi: 10.1177/0002764202239172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh, Shiv, and Zoller, Heather. “Dialogue, Activism, and Democratic Social Change.” Communication Theory 1, no. 22 (2012): 66–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantchev, Nickolay. The Cost of Activist Monitoring: Evidence from a Sequential Decision Model. Philadelphia: Wharton Business School, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, Robert. A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights in a Nonideal World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Jeremy. “Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Human Health: A Response to the Causal Impotence Objection.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 24, no. 3 (2007): 223–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00375.x
   Google Scholar
• Gebh, Sara. “Democratic Disobedience: A Different Justification for Civil Disobedience and the Case of Anti-Abortion Activism in the U.S.” American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gledhill, John. “Introduction: A Case for Rethinking Resistance.” In New Approaches to Resistance in Brazil and Mexico, edited by P. A. Schell and J. Gledhill, 1–36. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Graumann, Carl. “Commonality, Mutuality, Reciprocity: A Conceptual Introduction.” In Mutualities in Dialogue, edited by I. Marková, C. Graumann and K. Foppa, 1–24. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30 (1985): 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. T. “Legal Toleration of Civil Disobedience.” Ethics 81, no. 2 (1971): 128–142. doi: 10.1086/291803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. Multitude. New York: Penguin Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, Michael, and Larkham, Peter. Informal Urban Agriculture: The Secret Lives of Guerrilla Gardeners. New York: Springer, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, Tim. “Constitutional Environmental Rights: a Case for Political Analysis.” Political Studies 48, no. 3 (2000): 558–572. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28, no. 3 (2009): 277–292. doi: 10.1177/0739456X08325175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettinger, Ned. “Environmental Disobedience.” In A Companion to Environmental Philosophy, edited by D. Jamieson, 498–509. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishers, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Hoefler, Sivan, and Cas Mudde. “‘Ecoterrorism’: Terrorist Threat or Political Ploy?” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 7, no. 37 (2014): 586–603. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2014.913121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Diane. “Turning Power Inside Out: Reflections on Resistance from the (Anthropological) Field.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 12, no. 6 (1999): 671–687. doi: 10.1080/095183999235827
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, Jocelyn, and Rachel Einwohner. “Conceptualizing Resistance.” Sociological Forum 19, no. 4 (2004): 533–554. doi: 10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, George. “Protection, Politics and Protest: Understanding Resistance to Conservation.” Conservation and Society 5, no. 2, (2007): 184–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Martha, and John Kelly. “Rethinking Resistance: Dialogics of ‘Disaffection’ in Colonial Fiji.” American Ethnologist 21, no. 1 (1994): 123–151. doi: 10.1525/ae.1994.21.1.02a00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, B. J. Tria. “Everyday Politics in Peasant Societies (and Ours).” The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1 (2009): 227–243. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopstein, Jeffrey. “Does Everyday Resistance Matter? Lessons from the Two German Dictatorship.” In After the GDR: New Perspectives on the Old GRD and the Young Lander, edited by L. McFalls and L. Probst, 97–108. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V., 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Latorre, Sara, Katharine Farrell, and Joan Martínez-Alier. “The Commodification of Nature and Socio-environmental Resistance in Ecuador: An Inventory of Accumulation by Dispossession Cases, 1980–2013.” Ecological Economics 116 (2015): 58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, James. Crimes of Dissent: Civil Disobedience, Criminal Justice and the Politics of Conscience. New York: New York University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, Maggie, Holmes, Rachel, Jones, Liz, and MacRae, Christina. “Silence as Resistance to Analysis: Or, on Not Opening One’s Mouth Properly.” Qualitative Inquiry 6, no. 16 (2010): 492–500. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeseele, Pieter. “Beyond the Post-Political Zeitgeist.” In The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, edited by A. Hansen and R. Cox, 382–401. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Marková, Ivana. “Thinking Through the Mind.” In Dialogicality and Social Representations - The Dynamics of Mind, edited by I. Marková, 89–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Markovitz, Daniel. “Democratic Disobedience.” In The Yale Law Journal (2005). http://www.yalelawjournal.org/essay/democratic-disobedience.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Brian. “Slow Injustice.” Social Alternatives 26, no. 4 (2007): 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Brian, and Wendy Varney. Nonviolence Speaks: Communicating against Repression. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, Clark, and Moskalenko, Sophia. “Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways toward Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 20, no. 3 (2008): 415–433. doi: 10.1080/09546550802073367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCausland, Clare, Siobhan O’Sullivan, and Brenton Scott. “Trespass, Animals and Democratic Engagement.” Res Publica 19, no. 3 (2013): 205–221. doi: 10.1007/s11158-013-9214-x
   Google Scholar
• McClanahan, Billl. “Green and Grey: Water Justice, Criminalization, and Resistance.” Critical Criminology 22, no. 3 (2014): 403–418. doi:10.1007/s10612-014-9241-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertes, Tom. A Movement of Movements: Is Another World Really Possible? London: Verso, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelman, James H. “Globalisation and Environmental Resistance Politics.” Third World Quarterly 19, no. 5 (1998): 847–872. doi: 10.1080/01436599814064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research 66, no. 3 (1999): 745–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, Smita. The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers (106), 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ólafsson, Jón. “Defiance: A Comment on the Logic of Protest.” TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11, no. 4 (2012): 432–442.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, Sherry B. “Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 37, no. 1 (1995): 173–193. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500019587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piven, Frances, and Richard Cloward. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed and How They Fail. New York: Pantheon Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rothfusz, Jaquelin. “Civil Disoedience and the Dutch-Carribean Top 50.” Krisis, no. 3 (2012): 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Lynn. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25, no. 3 (1997): 347–376. doi: 10.1177/0090591797025003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Seel, Ben. “Strategies of Resistance at the Pollok Free State Road Protest Camp.” Environmental Politics 6, no. 4 (1997): 108–139. doi: 10.1080/09644019708414360
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, William H. “Ideologies and Social Revolutions: Reflections on the French Case.” The Journal of Modern History 57, no. 1 (1985): 57–85. doi: 10.1086/242777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simi, Pete, and Robert Futrell. “Negotiating White Power Activist Stigma.” Social Problems 56, no. 1 (2009): 89–110. doi: 10.1525/sp.2009.56.1.89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, John. “Disobedience and its objects.” Boston University Law Review 90, no. 4 (2010): 1805–1831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, Peter. “Disobedience as Plea for Reconsideration.” In Civil Disobedience in Focus, edited by H. A. Bedau, 84–92. London: Routledge, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, William. “A Consitutional Niche for Civil Disobedience? Reflections on Arendt.” In Hannah Arendt and the Law, edited by M. Goldoni and C. McCorkindale, 133–150. Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, William. Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy. New York: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, William, and James Brassett. “Law, Interrupted: On Legislative Disruption and Deliberative Democracy.” Democratization 20, no. 3 (2013): 522–538. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.786548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sydney G. “Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention.” Social Science History 17 (1993): 281–307. doi: 10.1017/S0145553200016850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodossopoulos, Dimitrios. “On De-Pathologizing Resistance.” History and Anthropology 25, no. 4 (2014): 415–430. doi: 10.1080/02757206.2014.933101
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Lasse. “Within the Limits of Deliberative Reason Alone: Habermas, Civil Disobedience and Constitutional Democracy.” European Journal of Political Theory 6, no. 2 (2007): 200–218. doi: 10.1177/1474885107074350
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, Steve. “Eco-terrorism or Justified Resistance? Radical Environmentalism and the ‘War on Terror’.” Politics & Society 33, no. 3 (2005): 425–447. doi: 10.1177/0032329205278462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinthagen, Stellan, and Johansson, Anna. “Everyday Resistance: Exploration of a Concept & Its Theories.” Resistance Studies Magazine no. 1 (2013): 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars. 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Mark. “What Should and Should Not Be Said: Deliberating Sensitive Issues.” Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no. 2 (2006): 163–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00325.x
   Google Scholar
• Wee, Lee. “‘Extreme Communicative Acts’ and the Boosting of Illocutionary Force.” Journal of Pragmatics 36, no. 12 (2004): 2161–2178. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welchman, Jennifer. “Is ecosabotage civil disobedience?” Philosophy & Geography 4, no. 1 (2001): 97–107. doi: 10.1080/10903770124815
   Google Scholar
• White, Steven, and Evan Farr. “‘No-Saying’ in Habermas.” Political Theory 40, no. 1 (2012): 32–57. doi: 10.1177/0090591711426854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29, no. 5 (2001): 670–690. doi: 10.1177/0090591701029005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar