Democracy promotion in EU enlargement negotiations: more interaction, less hierarchy

Bibliography

• Acharya, A. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 239–275. doi: 10.1017/S0020818304582024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autesserre, S. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Berridge, G. R. Diplomacy: Theory & Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Beichelt, T. “The Research Field of Democracy Promotion.” Living Reviews in Democracy, July, 2012 . http://democracy.livingreviews.org.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse. The Transformative Power of Europe: The European Union and the Diffusion of Ideas . KFG Working Paper (1). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Burnell, P. “Democracy Assistance. The State of the Discourse.” In Democracy Assistance. International Co-operation for Democratization, edited by P. Burnell, 3–33. London: Frank Cass, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, R. “Partner or Patron? International Civil Administration and Local Capacity-building.” International Peacekeeping 11, no. 2 (2004): 229–247. doi: 10.1080/1353331042000237256
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, R. International Governance of War-torn Territories. Rule and Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. Aiding Democracy Abroad. The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. Critical Mission. Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chesterman, S. “Ownership in Theory and Practice. Transfer of Authority in UN Statebuilding Operations.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1, no. 1 (2007): 3–26. doi: 10.1080/17502970601075873
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. W., and N. Sambanis. “International Peacebuilding: A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 4 (2000): 779–801. doi: 10.2307/2586208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbasani, A. “Europeanization Travels to the Western Balkans: Enlargement Strategy, Domestic Obstacles and Diverging Reforms.” In European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans, edited by A Elbasani, 3–21. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Croatia 2011 Progress Report . SEC(2011) 1200 Final. Brussels: European Commission, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Feeny, S., and M. McGillivray. “Aid Allocation to Fragile States: Absorptive Capacity Constraints.” Journal of International Development 21, no. 5 (2009): 618–632. doi: 10.1002/jid.1502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortna, V. P. “Peacekeeping and Democratization.” In From War to Democracy. Dilemmas of Peacebuilding, edited by A. K. Jarstad and T. D. Sisk, 39–79. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fortna, V. P., and L. M. Howard. “Pitfalls and Prospects in the Peacekeeping Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 283–301. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.041205.103022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., and S. Richter. “National Identity Matters. The Limited Impact of EU Political Conditionality in the Western Balkans.” Journal of European Public Policy 17, no. 2 (2010): 263–281. doi: 10.1080/13501760903561450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. L., and A. Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. “What is a Case Study and What is it Good For?” American Political Science Review 98, no. 2 (2004): 341–54.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, S. Erzwungene Demokratie. Politische Neuordnung Nach Militärischer Intervention Unter Externer Aufsicht. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, S., and J. Leininger. “Not All Good Things Go Together. Conflicting Objectives in Democracy Promotion.” Democratization 19, no. 3 (2012): 391–414. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.674355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groß, L., and S. Grimm. “The External-domestic Interplay in Democracy Promotion: A Case Study on Public Administration Reform in Croatia.” Democratization 21, no. 5 (2014): 912–936. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.771257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groß, L., and S. Grimm. “Conflicts of Preferences and Domestic Constraints: Understanding Reform Failure in Liberal Statebuilding and Democracy Promotion.” Contemporary Politics 22, no. 2 (2016): 125–143. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2016.1153285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S. “Capacity and its Fallacies: International State Building as State Transformation.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38, no. 1 (2009): 55–81. doi: 10.1177/0305829809335942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappler, S., and O. P. Richmond. “Peacebuilding and Culture in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Resistance or Emancipation?” Security Dialogue 42, no. 3 (2011): 261–278. doi: 10.1177/0967010611405377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, S. “A Typology of Political Conditionality Beyond Aid: Conceptual Horizons Based on Lessons from the European Union.” World Development 75 (2015): 97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leininger, J. “‘Bringing the Outside In’: Illustrations from Haiti and Mali for the Re-conceptualization of Democracy Promotion.” Contemporary Politics 16, no. 1 (2010): 63–80. doi: 10.1080/13569771003593888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. A. Way. “Linkage Versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change.” Comparative Politics 38, no. 4 (2006): 379–400. doi: 10.2307/20434008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. A. Way. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Milačić, F. “A Painful Break or Agony Without end? The Stateness Problem and its Influence on Democratization in Croatia and Serbia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 17, no. 3 (2017): 69–387. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2017.1355030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, R. “International Peacebuilding and the ‘Mission Civilisatrice’.” Review of International Studies 28, no. 4 (2002): 637–656. doi: 10.1017/S026021050200637X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, R. At War's End. Building Peace After Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Poppe, A. E., and J. Wolff. “The Normative Challenge of Interaction: Justice Conflicts in Democracy Promotion.” Global Constitutionalism 2, no. 3 (2013): 373–406. doi: 10.1017/S204538171200024X
   Google Scholar
• Ramsbotham, O. “Reflections on UN Post-settlement Peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 7, no. 1 (2000): 169–189. doi: 10.1080/13533310008413824
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Croatia. 2004 Pre-Accession Economic Recovery Programme. Zagreb, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Croatia. 2005 Pre-Accession Economic Recovery Programme. Zagreb, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Croatia. 2006 Pre-Accession Economic Recovery Programme. Zagreb, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. P. “Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace.” Millennium – Journal of International Studies 38, no. 3 (2010): 665–692. doi: 10.1177/0305829810365017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. P., and A. Mitchell. “Peacebuilding and Critical Forms of Agency: From Resistance to Subsistence.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 36, no. 4 (2011): 326–344. doi: 10.1177/0304375411432099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. “Verwaltungswissenschaft als Teil der Politikwissenschaft. Planung als Politischer Prozess [Administrative Science as Political Science. Planning as Political Process].” In Aufsätze zur Theorie der Planenden Demokratie [Essays on a Theory of a Planning Democracy], edited by F. W. Scharpf, 9–23. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and H. Scholtz. “Legacies and Leverage: EU Political Conditionality and Democracy Promotion in Historical Perspective.” Europe-Asia Studies 62, no. 3 (2010): 443–460. doi: 10.1080/09668131003647820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. “Governance by Conditionality. EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11, no. 4 (2004): 661–679. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000248089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, H. P. “Domestic and Transnational Perspectives on Democratization.” International Studies Review 6, no. 3 (2004): 403–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.00423.x
   Google Scholar
• SIGMA. European Principles for Public Administration . SIGMA Papers No. 27. Paris: OECD Publishing, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert, J., and S. Grimm. “Too Good to be True? UN Peacebuilding and the Democratization of War-torn States.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 32, no. 5 (2015): 513–535. doi: 10.1177/0738894214559671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streich, P., and J. S. Levy. “Time Horizons, Discounting, and Intertemporal Choice.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51, no. 2 (2007): 199–226. doi: 10.1177/0022002706298133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholens, S., and L. Gross. “Diffusion, Contestation and Localisation in Post-war States: 20 Years of Western Balkans Reconstruction.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18, no. 3 (2015): 269–264. doi: 10.1057/jird.2015.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. New York/Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation/Princeton University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. “A New Approach for Determining Exchange-rate Level Preferences.” International Organization 62, no. 3 (2008): 405–438. doi: 10.1017/S0020818308080144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. A Theory of Contestation. Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zeeuw, J. D. “Projects Do Not Create Institutions. The Record of Democracy Assistance in Post-conflict Societies.” Democratization 12, no. 4 (2005): 481–504. doi: 10.1080/13510340500226036
   Google Scholar
• Zeeuw, J. D. and K. Kumar, eds. Promoting Democracy in Postconflict Societies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, L. Global Norms with a Local Face: Rule-of-law Promotion and Norm Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zürcher, C., C. Manning, K. Evenson, R. Hayman, S. Riese, and N. Röhner. Costly Democracy. Peacebuilding and Democratization After War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar