Conceptualizing and measuring subnational democracy across Indian states

Bibliography

• Ahuja, Amit, and Pradeep Chhibber. “Why the Poor Vote in India: “If I Don’t Vote, I am Dead to the State.” Studies in Comparative International Development 47, no. 4 (2012): 389–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, Mukulika. Why India Votes? New Delhi: Routledge India, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, Caroline, and Neil J. Mitchell. “Comparing Nations and States: Human Rights and Democracy in India.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 8 (2006): 996–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrend, Jacqueline. “The Unevenness of Democracy at the Subnational Level: Provincial Closed Games in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review (2011): 150–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenschot, Ward. “On the Usefulness of Goondas in Indian Politics: ‘Moneypower’ and ‘Musclepower’ in a Gujarati Locality.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 34, no. 2 (2011): 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, Nancy. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1 (2016): 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, Gary. “Considering Local Democratic Transition in Latin America.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 3, no. 1 (2011): 65–98.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, Jean. Comparative Government Introduction. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, Kanchan. Patronage, Democracy, and Ethnic Politics in India. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chhibber, Pradeep, and Irfan Nooruddin. “Do Party Systems Count? The Number of Parties and Government Performance in the Indian States.” Comparative Political Studies 37, no. 2 (2004): 152–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius, Wayne A. “Blind Spots in Democratization: Sub-National Politics as a Constraint on Mexico's Transition.” Democratization 7, no. 3 (2000): 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert Alan. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, Renske. “Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratization.” World Politics 52, no. 3 (2000): 384–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durazo Herrmann, Julián. “Neo-patrimonialism and Subnational Authoritarianism in Mexico. The Case of Oaxaca.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 2, no. 2 (2010): 85–112.
   Google Scholar
• Franzosi, Roberto, and Franzosi Roberto. From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data, and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly, Šumit. “Explaining the Kashmir Insurgency: Political Mobilization and Institutional Decay.” International Security 21, no. 2 (1996): 76–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 2 (2014): 313–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervasoni, Carlos. “A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes: Fiscal Federalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces.” World Politics 62, no. 2 (2010): 302–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward L. Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, David, and Robert Moog. ““Introduction to ‘Election Law in India’.” Election Law Journal 11, no. 2 (2012): 136–148.
   Google Scholar
• Giraudy, Agustina. Democrats and Autocrats: Pathways of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity Within Democratic Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Giraudy, Agustina, Eduardo Moncada, and Richard Snyder. Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Giraudy, Agustina. “Varieties of Subnational Undemocratic Regimes: Evidence From Argentina and Mexico.” Studies in Comparative International Development 48, no. 1 (2013): 51–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, Garima. “Voting from the Margins: Patterns of ‘None of the above’ Voting in India.” Economic and Political Weekly 53, no. 33 (2018): 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, Gary. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. “The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 4 (2011): 623–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbers, Imke, and Matthew C. Ingram. “On the Engineerability of Political Parties: Evidence From Mexico.” In Regulating Political Parties: European Democracies in Comparative Perspective, edited by Ingrid van Biezen and Hans-Martien ten Napel, 253–277. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Harbers, Imke, and Matthew C. Ingram. “Democratic Institutions Beyond the Nation State: Measuring Institutional Dissimilarity in Federal Countries.” Government and Opposition 49, no. 1 (2014): 24–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, Patrick. “Degrees of Democracy: Some Comparative Lessons from India.” World Politics 52, no. 4 (2000): 484–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, Vernon, and Shirin Rai. “Parliament.” In The Oxford Companion to Politics in India, edited by Niraja Gopal Jayal and Pratap Bhanu Mehta, 28–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kochanek, Stanley A., and Robert L. Hardgrave. India: Government and Politics in a Developing Nation. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12, no. 1 (1979): 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, Tomila V., and Lullit Getachew. “A Geographic Incremental Theory of Democratization: Territory, Aid, and Democracy in Postcommunist Regions.” World Politics 58, no. 4 (2006): 536–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, Tomila V., and Alexander Libman. “Soviet Legacies of Economic Development, Oligarchic Rule and Electoral Quality in Eastern Europe’s Partial Democracies: The Case of Ukraine.” Comparative Politics (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Lankina, Tomila, and Lullit Getachew. “Mission or Empire, Word or Sword? The Human Capital Legacy in Postcolonial Democratic Development.” American Journal of Political Science 56, no. 2 (2012): 465–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael. “Models of Government Formation.” Annual Review of Political Science 1, no. 1 (1998): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Chappell. “Mexico's Unfinished Transition: Democratization and Authoritarian Enclaves in Mexico.” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 16, no. 2 (2000): 267–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ley, Sandra. “To Vote or Not to Vote: How Criminal Violence Shapes Electoral Participation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 62, no. 9 (2018): 1963–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, Alexander. “Subnational Political Regimes and Formal Economic Regulation: Evidence From Russian Regions.” Regional & Federal Studies 27, no. 2 (2017): 127–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, Staffan I., Michael Coppedge, John Gerring, and Jan Teorell. “V-Dem: A New Way to Measure Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 25, no. 3 (2014): 159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53, no. 1 (1959): 69–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, Zaad, and Rahul Ganguli. “The Performance of Indian States in Electoral Integrity.” Electoral Integrity Project, January 2, 2017. https://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/international-blogs/2017/1/2/the-performance-of-indian-states-in-electoral-integrity.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy Scully. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, Daniel Brinks, and Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945-1999.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36, no. 1 (2001): 37–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMann, Kelly M. “Measuring Subnational Democracy: Toward Improved Regime Typologies and Theories of Regime Change.” Democratization 25, no. 1 (2018): 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMann, Kelly M. Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, Barbara D., and Thomas R. Metcalf. A Concise History of Modern India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, Subrata, and Malte Pehl. “Federalism.” In The Oxford Companion to Politics in India, edited by Niraja Gopal Jayal and Pratap Bhanu Mehta, 43–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Niedzwiecki, Sara, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz, Liesbet Hooghe, and Gary Marks. “The RAI Travels to Latin America: Measuring Regional Authority Under Regime Change.” Regional & Federal Studies (2018): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, Guillermo A. Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Cameron, and Petr Panov. “The Range and Limitation of Sub-National Regime Variations Under Electoral Authoritarianism: The Case of Russia.” Regional & Federal Studies (2018): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber, and Lloyd I. Rudolph. “New Dimensions in Indian Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1 (2002): 52–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. “The Criminal Subversion of Mexican Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 25, no. 1 (2014): 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Chanchal Kumar, and Wilfried Swenden. “Modi-fying Indian Federalism? Center–State Relations under Modi’s Tenure as Prime Minister.” Indian Politics & Policy Journal 1, no. 1 (2018): 51–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, Aseema. “Scaling Up: Beyond the Subnational Comparative Method for India.” Studies in Indian Politics 3, no. 1 (2015): 128–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Richard. “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36, no. 1 (2001): 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spokesperson. “On the Election Boycott Tactic of the Maoists.” Economic and Political Weekly 44, no. 38 (2009): 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sridharan, Eswaran, and Milan Vaishnav. “Election Commission of India.” Rethinking Public Institutions in India (2017): 417–463.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, Paul. “Violence and Democracy.” Comparative Politics 47, no. 1 (2014): 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillin, Louise. “National and Subnational Comparative Politics: Why, What and How.” Studies in Indian Politics 1, no. 2 (2013): 235–240.
   Google Scholar
• Times of India. “Electoral Violence Endemic in Bihar.” March 19, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Tudor, Maya, and Adam Ziegfeld. “Subnational Democratization in India: The Role of Colonial Competition and Central Intervention.” In Illiberal Practices: Territorial Variance Within Large Federal Democracies, edited by Jacqueline Behrend and Laurence Whitehead, 49–88. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhanen, Tatu. “A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy, 1810–1998.” Journal of Peace Research 37, no. 2 (2000): 251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, Arvind. “Policing Elections in India.” India Review 4, no. 3–4 (2005): 354–376.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegfeld, Adam. “Are Higher-Magnitude Electoral Districts Always Better for Small Parties?” Electoral Studies 32, no. 1 (2013): 63–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegfeld, Adam. “Electoral Systems in Context: India.” The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190258658.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190258658-e-41.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegfeld, Adam, and Maya Tudor. “How Opposition Parties Sustain Single-Party Dominance: Lessons From India.” Party Politics 23, no. 3 (2017): 262–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar