Do electoral systems affect how citizens hold their government accountable? Evidence from Africa

References

• Ackerman, John. “Co-governance for Accountability: Beyond ‘Exit’ and ‘Voice’.” World Development 32, no. 3 (2004): 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrobarometer Data [34 countries], [Round 2-6] [2002–2015] ([dataset]; accessed August 24, 2016). http://www.afrobarometer.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja, Sunil. “Electoral Status and Representation in the United States Senate: Does Temporary Proximity to Election Matter?” American Politics Quarterly 22, no. 1 (1994): 104–118.
   Google Scholar
• Aksoy, Deniz, and David B. Carter. “Electoral Institutions and the Emergence of Terrorist Groups.” British Journal of Political Science 44, no. 1 (2014): 181–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Josephine, and Robert Jackman. “Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choice Under Extreme Uncertainty.” Electoral Studies 24, no. 1 (2005): 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, Scotland Ethan Bueno de Mesquita. “Delivering the Goods: Legislative Particularism in Different Electoral and Institutional Settings.” The Journal of Politics 68, no. 1 (2006): 168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkan, Joel D., Robert Mattes, Shaheen Mozaffar, and Kimberly Smiddy. The African Legislatures Project: First Findings. University of Cape Town, 2012. http://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/19858.
   Google Scholar
• Bedasso, Biniam E., and Nonso Obikili. “A Dream Deferred: The Microfoundations of Direct Political Action in Pre- and Post-Democratisation South Africa.” The Journal of Development Studies 52, no. 1 (2016): 130–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, Robert. “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model.” Public Choice 14 (1973): 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Robert H. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, Richard, and Antonio Palumbo, eds. Political Accountability. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and Agnieszka Dobrzynska. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 33, no. 2 (1998): 239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, Matthijs. “Crafting Competitive Party Systems: Electoral Laws and the Opposition in Africa.” Democratization 7, no. 4 (2000): 163–190.
   Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies.” American Political Science Review 93, no. 3 (1999): 609–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booysen, Susan. The African National Congress and the Regeneration of Political Power. Johannesburg: Wits University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun. “Reasoning Voters, Voter Behaviour and Institutions: The Decision Dependence of Voting Behaviour.” British Elections and Parties Yearbook 6, no. 1 (1996): 106–127.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89, no. 2 (1995): 271–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, Michael, Robert B. Mattes, and E. Gyimah-Boadi. Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, Anita, Todd Landman, and Dorothea Farquhar. “Social Media and Protest Mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian Revolution.” Democratization 22, no. 4 (2015): 764–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, Bruce, John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, John M, and Matthew S. Shugart. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14, no. 4 (1995): 417–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, Paul. Conflict, Political Accountability and Aid. New York: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper Frederick. Decolonization and African Society: The Labour Question in French and British Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Hendrik Knutsen, Staffan I Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, et al. “V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v10” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project ([dataset]; accessed August 15, 2020). https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds20.
   Google Scholar
• Curtice, John, and Phil Shively. “Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many.” Presented at the International Political Science Association World Congress, Quebec, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cutts, D., E. Fieldhouse, and P. John. “Is Voting Habit Forming? The Longitudinal Impact of a GOTV Campaign in the UK.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19 (2009): 251–263.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: CQ Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dinas, Elias. “The Formation of Voting Habits.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 22, no. 4 (2012): 431–456.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, Peter. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 67 (1973): 11–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, David M. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation, edited by Adam Przeworski, Susan C Stokes, and Bernard Manin, 55–97. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, John. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50 (1986): 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Fjelde, Hanne, and Kristine Höglund. “Electoral Institutions and Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa.” British Journal of Political Science 46, no. 2 (April 2016): 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flacks, Richard. “Knowledge for What? Thoughts on the State of Social Movement Studies.” In Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotion, edited by Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper, 135–154. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark. “The Institutional Context: Turnout.” In Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, edited by Mark Franklin, C van der Eijk, and E Oppenhuis, 306–331. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Oscar, Mirjam Dageförde, Florian Rabuza, and Uwe Remer-Bollow. “Does Contact Between the Represented and the Representatives Improve Political Trust? The Case of France and Germany.” Paper Presented at the International Political Science Association Workshop on Changing Modes of Parliamentary Representation, Prague, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and Ron Shachar. “Voting May Be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 3 (2003): 540–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, Harold F. Why Europe Votes. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Mark, and Miki Caul. “Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997.” Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 9 (2000): 1091–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Adam S., and Erin Hern. “Taking to the Streets: Protest as an Expression of Political Preference in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 52, no. 8 (July 1, 2019): 1169–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018806540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrix, Cullen, Stephen Haggard, and Beatriz Magaloni. “Grievance and Opportunity: Food Prices, Political Regime, and Protest.” Paper Presented at the International studies Association Convention, New York, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Donald L. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Ltd, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Itzkovitch-Malka, Reut, and Reuven Y Hazan. “Unpacking Party Unity: The Combined Effects of Electoral Systems and Candidate Selection Methods on Legislative Attitudes and Behavioural Norms.” Political Studies 65, no. 2 (2017): 452–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelmin, Kristina. Democratic Accountability in Service Delivery: A Synthesis of Case Studies. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. Craig. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9 (1983): 527–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A. “Producing Social Accountability? The Impact of Service Delivery Reforms.” IDS Bulletin 38, no. 6 (2007): 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Willem Duyvendak, and Marco G Guigni. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, Anirudh. “Gaining Access to Public Services and the Democratic State in India: Institutions in the Middle.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46, no. 1 (2011): 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-010-9080-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenwetter, Michael. Protest!. New York: Twenty-First Century Books, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lavery, Jerry. “Protest and Political Participation in South Africa: Time Trends and Characteristics of Protesters.” Afrobarometer Briefing Paper 102 (2012): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of 27 Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996.” American Political Science Review 91, no. 1 (1997): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Massicotte, Louis, and André Blais. “Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey.” Electoral Studies 18, no. 3 (1999): 341–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, Robert and Shaheen Mozaffar. “Proportional Representation in Africa: The ‘Dumbing Down’ Effect.” Working paper presented at the working Group in African political Economy, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, R., and S. Richmond. “Are South Africa’s Youth Really a Ticking ‘Time Bomb’?” Afrobarometer Working Paper, 152, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• McVeigh, R., and C. Smith. “Who Protests in America: An Analysis of Three Political Alternatives – Inaction, Institutionalized Politics, or Protest.” Sociological Forum 14, no. 4 (1999): 685–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. “Does Proportional Representation Boost Turnout? A Political Knowledge-Based Explanation.” Paper Presented at the Comparative study of electoral systems (CSES) Conference at the University of Toronto, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mozaffar, Shaheen. “Democratization, Institutional Choice, and the Political Management of Ethnic Conflict: Africa in Comparative Perspective.” American political science Association annual meeting, Washington D.C, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. “Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed Systems.” International Political Science Review 18, no. 3 (1997): 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Oberschall, Anthony. “Theories of Social Conflict.” Annual Review of Sociology 4 (1978): 291–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, Torsten, and Guido E. Tabellini. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Pilet, Jean-Benoit, André Freire, and Olivier Costa. “Ballot Structure, District Magnitude and Constituency-Orientation of MPs in Proportional Representation and Majority Electoral Systems.” Representation 48, no. 4 (2012): 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.720880.
   Google Scholar
• Pottie, David. “The Electoral System and Opposition Parties in South Africa.” Democratization 8, no. 1 (2001): 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000187.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy Whitten. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37, no. 2 (1993): 391–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, D. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Raffler, Pia. “News, Accountability and Electoral Rules: The Impact of Media Markets on Local Accountability under Majoritarian and PR Rules.” 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, Ben, and Andrew Reynolds. “Electoral Systems and Conflict in Divided Societies.” In International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War, edited by Paul C. Stern, and Daniel Druckman, 420–482. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, D., & Casale, D. “The Political Participation of Africa’s Youth: Turnout, Partisanship, and Protest.” Working Paper World Institute for Development Economics Research, no. 56 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rodden, Jonathan. “Back to the Future: Endogenous Institutions and Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by Mark I. Lichbach, and Alan S. Zuckerman, 333–357. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstone, Steven J, and John Mark Hansen. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Pub Co, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Will. “Classifying Electoral Systems by Input Rules: Building on Blais and Rae Through Australian Experience.” Australian Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3 (2015): 462–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. “Political Development and Political Engineering.” In Public Policy, edited by J. D. Montgomery, and A.O. Hirschman, 261–298. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Scarritt, James R., Susan McMillan, and Shaheen Mozaffar. “The Interaction between Democracy and Ethnopolitical Protest and Rebellion in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 34, no. 7 (2001): 800–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, Edward L. “The Electoral System and Constituency-Oriented Activity in the European Parliament.” International Studies Quarterly 30, no. 3 (September 1, 1986): 315–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Catherine R, David W Brady, Richard A Brody, and John Ferejohn. “Linking Constituency Opinion and Senate Voting Scores: A Hybrid Explanation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15, no. 4 (1990): 599–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Jae Hyeok. “The Choice of Electoral Systems in New Democracies: A Case Study of South Korea in 1988.” Democratization 18, no. 6 (2011): 1246–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulovitz, Catalina, and Enrique Peruzotti. “Societal Accountability in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 11, no. 4 (2000): 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare. “Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37, no. 3 (2000): 261–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein. “How Electoral Systems Matter for Democratization.” Democratization 5, no. 3 (1998): 68–91.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Norman Nie, and Jae-on Kim. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Yi-ting. “Satisfaction with Democracy and Democratic Accountability Strategies.” 2013.
   Google Scholar