The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding: comparative evidence

Bibliography

• Abramowitz, Alan I., and Steven Webster. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41 (2016): 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Albertus, Michael, and Guy Grossman. “Democratic Fragilities in the Americas.” Working Paper, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, Barry. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, Roy F., and Mark R. Leary. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117, no. 3 (1995): 497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, Michael, and Sylvain Brouard. “Executive Accountability Beyond Outcomes: Experimental Evidence on Public Evaluations of Powerful Prime Ministers.” American Journal of Political Science 66 (2020): 106–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, Nancy. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1 (2016): 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, Michael, and Henri Tajfel. “Social Categorization and Similarity in Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 3, no. 1 (1973): 27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, Matthijs. “De-Democratization in Hungary: Diffusely Defective Democracy.” Democratization 25, no. 8 (2018): 1481–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Marilynn B., and Kathleen P. Pierce. “Social Identity Complexity and Outgroup Tolerance.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31, no. 3 (2005): 428–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, David E., Joshua L. Kalla, and Sean J. Westwood. “Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not.” Working Paper, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, James E. Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, Giovanni. Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chiopris, Caterina, Monika Nalepa, and Georg Vanberg. “A Wolf in Sheep`s Clothing: Citizen Uncertainty and Democratic Backsliding.” Working Paper (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Tom S., and Drew A. Linzer. “Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects?” Political Science Research and Methods 3, no. 2 (2015): 399–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, et al. "V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v10” Varieties of Democracy Project, 2020. doi:10.23696/vdemds21
   Google Scholar
• Croissant, Aurel, and Jeffrey Haynes. “Democratic Regression in Asia: Introduction.” Democratization 28, no. 1 (2021): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. “The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 7 (2008): 899–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov, Matthew Levendusky, and John Barry Ryan. “Affective Polarization, Local Contexts and Public Opinion in America.” Nature Human Behaviour 5 (2020): 28–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James, Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov, Matthew Levendusky, and John Barry Ryan. “How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans’ Political Beliefs: A Study of Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Working Paper (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence. “The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters.” The Journal of Politics 69, no. 1 (2007): 182–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, Samuel L., John F. Dovidio, Phyllis A. Anastasio, Betty A. Bachman, and Mary C. Rust. “The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias.” European Journal of Social Psychology 4 (1993): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer, and Elvin Ong. “Committed or Conditional Democrats? Opposition Dynamics in Electoral Autocracies.” American Journal of Political Science 63, no. 4 (2019): 948–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and J. Hill. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gibler, Douglas M., and Kirk A. Randazzo. “Testing the Effects of Independent Judiciaries on the Likelihood of Democratic Backsliding.” American Journal of Political Science 55, no. 3 (2011): 696–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward L. Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, Noam, James Adams, and Will Horne. American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, Noam, James Adams, and Will Horne. “Toward a Comparative Research Agenda on Affective Polarization in Mass Publics.” APSA Comparative Politics Newsletter 29, no. 1 (2019): 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gift, Karen, and Thomas Gift. “Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Political Behavior 37 (2015): 653–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, Tom, and Tamir Moustafa. Rule by Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Matthew H., and Milan W. Svolik. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States.” The American Political Science Review 114, no. 2 (2020): 392–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, Guy, Dorothy Kronick, Matthew Levendusky, and Marc Meredith. The Majoritarian Threat to Liberal Democracy. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9, no. 1 (2022): 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. Dictators and Democrats: Masses, Elites, and Regime Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Handlin, Samuel. State Crisis in Fragile Democracies: Polarization and Political Regimes in South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Gregory A., and Neil Malhotra. “Political Homophily in Social Relationships: Evidence from Online Dating Behavior.” The Journal of Politics 79, no. 1 (2016): 269–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, Alexa Bankert, and Caitlin Davies. “Expressive Versus Instrumental Partisanship in Multiparty European Systems.” Political Psychology 39 (2018): 173–99. doi:10.1111/pops.12482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Masha Krupenkin. “The Strengthening of Partisan Affect.” Political Psychology 39 (2018): 201–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. “Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 3 (2015): 690–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthew Levendusky, Neil Malhotra, and Sean J. Westwood. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 129–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. “Affect, Not Ideology.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76, no. 3 (2012): 405–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapstein, Ethan B., and Nathan Converse. The Fate of Young Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, Philip. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 4 (2007): 804–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, Donald R., and Nathan P. Kalmoe. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kronick, Dorothy, B. Plunkett, and P. Rodríguez. “Heresthetic Threats to Democracy: Evidence from Venezuela.” Working Paper (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Lachat, Romain. “The Impact of Party Polarization on Ideological Voting.” Electoral Studies 27 (2008): 687–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laebens, Melis G., and Aykut Öztürk. “Partisanship and Autocratization: Polarization, Power Asymmetry, and Partisan Social Identities in Turkey.” Comparative Political Studies 54, no, 2 (2020): 245–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layman, Geoffrey C., Thomas M. Carsey, and Juliana Menasce Horowitz. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9, no. 1 (2006): 83–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, Matthew S., and Neil Malhotra. “(Mis)Perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (2016): 378–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour M. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City: Doubleday, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam. “Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective.” Political Behavior 37 (2015): 331–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lust, Ellen, and David Waldner. “Unwelcome Change: Understanding, Evaluating, and Extending Theories of Democratic Backsliding.” USAID (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Lührmann, Anna, and Staffan I. Lindberg. “A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New About It?” Democratization 26, no. 7 (2019): 1095–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Lilliana. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 1 (2015): 128–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Jane. Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of Radical Right. New York: Doubleday, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, Christopher, Yotam Margalit, Neil Malhotra, and Matthew Levendusky. “The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era.” American Journal of Political Science 62, no. 1 (2018): 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, Jennifer, and Murat Somer. “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 234–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, Jennifer, Tahmina Rahman, and Murat Somer. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 16–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerrose, Anna M. “The Unintended Consequences of Democracy Promotion: International Organizations and Democratic Backsliding.” Comparative Political Studies 53, no. (10-11), (2020): 1547–1581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, Penelope J. “The Salience of Social Categories.” edited by J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell, 117–41. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, Keith. The Broken Ladder: How Inequality Affects the Way We Think, Live, and Die. New York: Penguin Books, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, Nicolás Schmidt, and Daniela Vairo. “Presidential Hegemony and Democratic Backsliding in Latin America, 1925–2016.” Democratization 26, no. 4 (2019): 606–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, R. Michael Alvarez, Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limongi, and Fernando Papaterra Limongi Neto. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Reiljan, Andres. “‘Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines’ (Also) in Europe: Affective Polarisation in European Party Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 59, no. 2 (2019): 376–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, David. “Political Socialization.” In Handbook of Political Science, edited by F. Greenstein, and N. Polsby, 93–154. Massachusetts: Addison-Walley, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Skaaning, Svend-Erik. “Waves of Autocratization and Democratization: A Critical Note on Conceptualization and Measurement.” Democratization 27, no. 8 (2020): 1533–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Richard. Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics, edited by Agustina Giraudy, Eduardo Moncada, and Richard Snyder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat. “Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat, Jennifer McCoy IV, and Russell Evan Luke. “Pernicious Polarization, Autocratization and Opposition Strategies.” Democratization 28, no, 5 (2021): 929–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickler, Ryan. “Deliberate with the Enemy? Polarization, Social Identity, and Attitudes Toward Disagreement.” Political Research Quarterly 71, no. 1 (2018): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 57, no. 3 (2013): 685–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “Polarization Versus Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 30, no. 3 (2019): 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “Voting Against Autocracy.” Working Paper (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “When Polarization Trumps Civic Virtue: Partisan Conflict and the Subversion of Democracy by Incumbents.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 15, no. 1 (2020): 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, Henri. “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.” Scientific American 223, no. 5 (1970): 96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, Henri, and John Turner. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” edited by William G. Austin, and Stephen Worchel, 33–37. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Tworzecki, Hubert. “Poland: A Case of Top-down Polarization.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 97–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus. “Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems.” Electoral Studies 69 (2020): 102199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Dalston G., and Margit Tavits. “How Partisan Affect Shapes Citizens’ Perception of the Political World.” Electoral Studies 60 (2019): 102045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, Steven W., and Alan I. Abramowitz. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research 45, no. 4 (2017): 621–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, Sean J., Shanto Iyengar, Stefaan Walgrave, Rafael Leonisio, Luis Miller, and Oliver Strijbis. “The Tie That Divides: Cross-National Evidence of the Primacy of Partyism.” European Journal of Political Research 57, no. 2 (2017): 333–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar