A more precise way to assess the success of the president’s legislative agenda: the success of presidential priority bills in Chile, 1990–2018

Bibliography

• Alemán, Eduardo. “Policy Positions in the Chilean Senate: An Analysis of Coauthorship and Roll Call Data.” Brazilian Political Science Review (Online) 3 (2008): 74–93. http://socialsciences.scielo.org/pdf/s_bpsr/v3nse/a08v3nse.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aleman, Eduardo, and Ernesto Calvo. “Analyzing Legislative Success in Latin America: The Case of Democratic Argentina.” In New Voices in the Study of Democracy in Latin America, edited by Guillermo O’Donnell, Joseph H. Tulchin, and Augusto Varas, 7–37. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Alemán, Eduardo, and Ernesto Calvo. “Unified Government, Bill Approval, and the Legislative Weight of the President.” Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 4 (2010): 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009355534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemán, Eduardo, Juan Pablo Micozzi, Pablo M. Pinto, and Sebastián Saiegh. “Disentangling the Role of Ideology and Partisanship in Legislative Voting: Evidence from Argentina.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 43, no. 2 (2018): 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleman, Eduardo, Juan Pablo Micozzi, and Margarita M. Ramírez. “The Hidden Electoral Connection: Analysing Parliamentary Questions in the Chilean Congress.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 24, no. 2 (2018): 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1477275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemán, Eduardo, and Patricio Navia. “Institutions and the Legislative Success of ‘Strong’ Presidents: An Analysis of Government Bills in Chile.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 15, no. 4 (2009): 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330903302471.
   Google Scholar
• Alemán, Eduardo, and Patricio Navia. “Presidential Power, Legislative Rules and Law Making in Chile.” In Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America, edited by Eduardo Alemán, and George Tsebelis, 92–121. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Aleman, Eduardo, and Sebastián M. Saiegh. “Legislative Preferences, Political Parties, and Coalition Unity in Chile.” Comparative Politics 39, no. 3 (2007): 253–272. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20434040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemán, Eduardo, and George Tsebelis. “The Origins of Presidential Conditional Agenda-Setting Power in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40, no. 2 (2005): 3–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3662799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim Neto, Octavio. “Presidential Cabinets, Electoral Cycles, and Coalition Discipline in Brazil.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, edited by Scott Morgenstern, and Benito Nacif, 48–78. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Gary W. Cox. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41, no. 1 (1997): 149–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim Neto, Octavio, Gary W. Cox, and Mathew D Mccubbins. “Agenda Power in Brazil’s Camara dos Deputados, 1998–98.” World Politics 55 (2003): 550–578. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aninat, Cristóbal, John Londregan, Patricio Navia, and Joaquín Vial. “Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes in Chile.” In Policy Making in Latin America. How Politics Shapes Policies, edited by Ernesto Stein, and Mariano Tommasi, 155–198. Cambridge: DRCLAS/Harvard, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Andrew W. “Gone Public: The Impact of Going Public on Presidential Legislative Success.” American Politics Research 32, no. 3 (2004): 338–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03260580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, Andrew W., and Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha. “Presidential Success on the Substance of Legislation.” Political Research Quarterly 60, no. 1 (2007): 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912906298605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, Jason S., Jamie L. Carson, and Ryan D. Williamson. “Policymaking by the Executive: Examining the Fate of Presidential Agenda Items.” Congress & the Presidency 47, no. 1 (2020): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07343469.2019.1631905.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, Ernesto. “The Responsive Legislature: Public Opinion and Law Making in a Highly Disciplined Legislature.” British Journal of Political Science 37, no. 2 (2007): 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos-Parra, Hernán, and Patricio Navia. “Disciplina legislativa en la Cámara de Diputados de Chile, 2010-2014.” Política y gobierno 24, no. 1 (2017): 81–123.
   Google Scholar
• Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Scott de Marchi. “Presidential Approval and Legislative Success.” The Journal of Politics 64 (2002): 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, Royce, and Mónica Pachón. “The Unrealized Potential of Presidential Coalitions in Colombia.” In Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America, edited by Eduardo Aleman, and George Tsebelis, 127–147. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Chasquetti, Daniel. “Democracia, multipartidismo y coaliciones en América Latina: evaluando la difícil combinación.” In Tipos de presidencialismo y modos de gobierno en América Latina, edited by Jorge Lanzaro, 319–359. Montevideo: CLACSO, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Chasquetti, Daniel. “El secreto del éxito: presidentes y cárteles legislativos en Uruguay (1995-2010).” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 20, no. 1 (2011): 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cheibub, Jose A., Adam Przeworski, and Sebastián Saiegh. “Government Coalitions and Legislative Success Under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science 34, no. 4 (2004): 656–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000195.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W., and Scott Morgenstern. “Latin America’s Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents.” Comparative Politics 33, no. 2 (2001): 171–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/422377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett, David A. “The Contemporary Presidency: ‘An Excess of Refinement’: Lame Duck Presidents in Constitutional and Historical Context.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38, no. 4 (2008): 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02673.x.
   Google Scholar
• Diermeier, Daniel, and Razvan Vlaicu. “Executive Control and Legislative Success.” The Review of Economic Studies 78, no. 3 (2011): 846–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdq030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockendorff, Andrés. “Who is Ready to Climb The Hill? The Effect of Legislative Activity on Promotion to Higher Offices in Chile.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 25, no. 2 (2019): 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1603196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockendorff, Andrés. “Why are Some Parliamentarians’ Bills More Likely to Progress? Sponsorship as a Signal.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 23, no. 1 (2021): 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120949978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards III, George C., Andrew Barrett, and Jeffrey Peake. “The Legislative Impact of Divided Government.” American Journal of Political Science 41, no. 2 (1997): 545–563. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobedo Aránguiz, Isai, and Patricio Navia. “What Motivates a Legislator to Sponsor a Bill That Will Never Become Law? The Case of Members of the Chilean Chamber of Deputies, 1990–2014.” Democratization 27, no. 8 (2020): 1436–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1797684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, Angelina C, and Fernando Limongi. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32, no. 2 (2000): 151–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/422395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, Daniel Paul, and Michael P. Fix. “The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Polarization and Presidential Success in Congress.” Congress & the Presidency 43, no. 3 (2016): 377–394.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, Claudio. “Shifting the Status Quo: Constitutional Reforms in Chile.” Latin American Politics and Society 57, no. 1 (2015): 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00258.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, Robert, ed. El Gobierno de Ricardo Lagos: La Nueva vía Chilena Hacia el Socialismo. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gamboa, Ricardo, and Sergio Toro. “The Electoral Connection in Presidential Systems: Non-Legislative Actions Inside the Chilean Congress.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 24, no. 3 (2018): 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1516602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garreton Merino, Manuel Antonio. “Redemocratization in Chile.” Journal of Democracy 6, no. 1 (1995): 146–158.
   Google Scholar
• Hiroi, Taeko, and Lucio Renno. “Agenda Setting and Gridlock in a Multiparty Coalitional Presidential System: The Case of Brazil.” In Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America, edited by Eduardo Aleman, and George Tsebelis, 61–91. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Le Foulon Moran, Carmen. “Cooperation and Polarization in a Presidential Congress: Policy Networks in the Chilean Lower House 2006–2017.” Politics 40, no. 2 (2020): 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719862478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockerbie, Brad, Stephan Borrelli, and Scott Hedger. “An Integrative Approach to Modeling Presidential Success in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 51, no. 1 (1998): 155–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, David, and Patricio Navia. “Determinantes de la cohesión en la votación del legislativo en las coaliciones oficialistas y de oposición en la Cámara de Diputados de Chile, 2006-2014.” Revista de Estudios Políticos 185 (2019): 225–258.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, Scott. Patterns of Legislative Politics. Roll-Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Palanza, Valeria. Checking Presidential Power: Executive Decrees and the Legislative Process in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Palanza, Valeria, Carlos Scartascini, and Mariano Tommasi. “Congressional Institutionalization: A Cross-National Comparison.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41, no. 1 (2016): 7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raile, Eric D., Carlos Pereira, and Timothy J. Power. “The Executive Toolbox: Building Legislative Support in a Multiparty Presidential Regime.” Political Research Quarterly 64, no. 2 (2011): 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, Thomas, and Howard Rosenthal. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo.” Public Choice 33, no. 4 (1978): 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiegh, Sebastián M. Ruling by Statute: How Uncertainty and Vote Buying Shape Lawmaking. New York, NY: Cambridge Univ Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Manoel Leonardo, Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, and Mercedes García Montero. “El control presidencial de la agenda legislativa en América Latina.” Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 34, no. 3 (2014): 511–536.
   Google Scholar
• Sehnbruch, Kirsten, and Peter Siavelis, eds. Democratic Chile: The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990-2010. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Siavelis, Peter. The President and Congress in Post-Authoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Terry, and Scott de Marchi. “Congressional Bargaining in Presidential Time: Give and Take, Anticipation, and the Constitutional Rationalization of Dead Ducks.” The Journal of Politics 73, no. 3 (2011): 748–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloza Castillo, Mackarena, and Sergio Toro Maureira. “Amigos cerca, enemigos más cerca: el gobierno de Sebastián Piñera y las dinámicas legislativas en Chile.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 26, no. 1 (2017): 131–149.
   Google Scholar
• Toro Maureira, Sergio. “Conducta legislativa ante las iniciativas del Ejecutivo: unidad de los bloques políticos en Chile.” Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 27, no. 1 (2007): 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Toro-Maureira, Sergio, and Nicolás Hurtado. “The Executive on the Battlefield: Government Amendments and Cartel Theory in the Chilean Congress.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 22, no. 2 (2016): 196–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro Maureira, Sergio, Carolina Acevedo de la Harpe, and Kimberling Matamala Rosales. “Quebrando Paradigmas en Contextos Presidencialistas: Un Examen Sobre la Capacidad Legislativa en Chile.” Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Legislativos 1, no. 1 (2010): 102–110.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, J. Samuel, Timothy R. Scully, and Nicolás Somma. “The Enduring Presence of Religion in Chilean Ideological Positionings and Voter Options.” Comparative Politics 40, no. 1 (2007): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visconti, Giancarlo. “COMPORTAMIENTO DIACRÓNICO DEL CONGRESO EN CHILE: ¿crecimiento O ESTANCAMIENTO DE SU INFLUENCIA?” Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 31, no. 1 (2011): 91–115.
   Google Scholar