Bibliography
- Alsan, M., and S. Eichmeyer. Experimental Evidence on the Effectiveness of Non-Experts for Improving Vaccine Demand. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2021. doi:10.3386/w28593.
- Amat, F., A. Arenas, A. Falcó-Gimeno, and J. Muñoz. “Pandemics Meet Democracy. Experimental Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in Spain.” 2020. doi:10.31235/osf.io/dkusw.
- Ambrus, M., K. Arts, E. Hey, and H. Raulus. The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
- Arceneaux, K., B. N. Bakker, S. Hobolt, and C. E. De Vries. “Is COVID-19 a Threat to Liberal Democracy?” 2020. doi:10.31234/osf.io/8e4pa.
- Austin, E. W., and Q. Dong. “Source v. Content Effects on Judgments of News Believability.” Journalism Quarterly 71, no. 4 (1994): 973–983.
- Babones, S. The New Authoritarianism: Trump, Populism, and the Tyranny of Experts. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
- Baekkeskov, E., and O. Rubin. “Information Dilemmas and Blame-Avoidance Strategies: From Secrecy to Lightning Rods in Chinese Health Crises.” Governance 30, no. 3 (2017): 425–443.
- Barbieri, P., and B. Bonini. “Populism and Political (Mis-) Belief Effect on Individual Adherence to Lockdown during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy.” SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3640324
- Battiston, P., R. Kashyap, and V. Rotondi. “Reliance on Scientists and Experts during an Epidemic: Evidence from the Covid-19 Outbreak in Italy.” SSM-Population Health 13 (2021): 100721.
- Belyaeva, N. “Revisiting Demand, Politicization and Externalization in Authoritarian Political Regimes: Policy Advisory System in Russian Practices.” Policy Studies 40, no. 3–4 (2019): 392–409.
- Blair, G., A. Coppock, and M. Moor. “When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias: A Social Reference Theory and Evidence from 30 Years of List Experiments.” American Political Science Review 114, no. 4 (2020): 1297–1315.
- Casarões, G., and D. Magalhães. “The Hydroxychloroquine Alliance: How Far-Right Leaders and Alt-Science Preachers Came Together to Promote a Miracle Drug.” Revista de Administração Pública 55, no. 1 (2021): 197–214.
- Case, W. “Hybrid Politics and New Competitiveness: Hong Kong’s 2007 Chief Executive Election.” East Asia 25, no. 4 (2008): 365–388.
- Chan, R. K. “Tackling COVID-19 Risk in Hong Kong: Examining Distrust, Compliance and Risk Management.” Current Sociology 69, no. 4 (2021): 547–565.
- Chang, E. C. and Y.-h. Chu. “Corruption and Trust: Exceptionalism in Asian Democracies?” The Journal of Politics 68, no. 2 (2006): 259–271.
- Chen, D. “‘Supervision by Public Opinion’ or by Government Officials? Media Criticism and Central-Local Government Relations in China.” Modern China 43, no. 6 (2017): 620–645.
- Chen, J. Popular Political Support in Urban China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.
- Chen, J. “Popular Support for Village Self-Government in China: Intensity and Sources.” Asian Survey 45, no. 6 (2005): 865–885.
- Converse, J. M., and S. Presser. Survey Questions: Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaire. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986.
- Dahlquist, M., and H. D. Kugelberg. “Public Justification and Expert Disagreement over Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Medical Ethics 49, no. 1 (2023): 9–13.
- Daniele, G., A. F. Martinangeli, F. Passarelli, W. Sas, and L. Windsteiger. “When Distrust Goes Viral: Causal Effects of COVID-19 on European Political Attitudes.” SSRN, 2020.
- Della Porta, D. “Critical Trust: Social Movements and Democracy in Times of Crisis.” Cambio 2, no. 4 (2012): 33–43.
- Easterly, W. The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. New York: Basic Books, 2014.
- Edgell, A. B., J. Lachapelle, A. Lührmann, and S. F. Maerz. “Pandemic Backsliding: Violations of Democratic Standards during Covid-19.” Social Science & Medicine 285 (2021): 114244.
- Elsbach, K. D., and G. Elofson. “How the Packaging of Decision Explanations Affects Perceptions of Trustworthiness.” Academy of Management Journal 43, no. 1 (2000): 80–89.
- Fang, K. “Praise from the International Community: How China Uses Foreign Experts to Legitimize Authoritarian Rule.” The China Journal 87, no. 1 (2022): 72–91.
- Farjam, M., F. Bianchi, F. Squazzoni, and G. Bravo. “Dangerous Liaisons: An Online Experiment on the Role of Scientific Experts and Politicians in Ensuring Public Support for Anti-COVID Measures.” Royal Society Open Science 8, no. 3 (2021): 201310.
- Flood, C. M., V. MacDonnell, B. Thomas, and K. Wilson. “Reconciling Civil Liberties and Public Health in the Response to Covid-19.” FACETS 5, no. 1 (2020): 887–898.
- Fong, B. “In-between Liberal Authoritarianism and Electoral Authoritarianism: Hong Kong’s Democratization under Chinese Sovereignty, 1997–2016.” Democratization 4 (2016): 1–27.
- Froio, C. “The Rassemblement National and COVID-19: How Nativism, Authoritarianism and Expert Populism Did Not Pay off during the Pandemic.” Government and Opposition (2022): 1–21. https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03859547
- Frye, T., S. Gehlbach, K. L. Marquardt, and O. J. Reuter. “Is Putin’s Popularity Real?” Post-Soviet Affairs 33, no. 1 (2017): 1–15.
- Gallo, E. “Three Varieties of Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Rule by the Experts, the People, the Leader.” Competition & Change 26, no. 5 (2022): 554–574.
- Gewirtz, J. Unlikely Partners: Chinese Reformers, Western Economists, and the Making of Global China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
- Gill, D. A. “Secondary Trauma or Secondary Disaster? Insights from Hurricane Katrina.” Sociological Spectrum 27, no. 6 (2007): 613–632.
- Goldfinch, S., R. Taplin, and R. Gauld. “Trust in Government Increased during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Australia and New Zealand.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 80, no. 1 (2021): 3–11.
- Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. “LegCo General Election Postponed for a Year.” Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Accessed January 2, 2021. https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202007/31/P2020073100898.htm/.
- Green, J., J. Edgerton, D. Naftel, K. Shoub, and S. J. Cranmer. “Elusive Consensus: Polarization in Elite Communication on the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Science Advances 6, no. 28 (2020): eabc2717.
- Grundmann, R. “The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies.” Minerva 55, no. 1 (2017): 25–48.
- Harvey, D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
- Hertog, S. Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats: Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.
- Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute. [「修訂逃犯條例」民意調查]. Hong Kong, 2019.
- Hovland, C., and W. Weiss. “Source Credibility and Effective Communication.” Public Opinion Quarterly 16, no. 1 (1952): 635–650.
- Huat, C. B. “Singapore as Model: Planning Innovations, Knowledge Experts.” In Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, edited by Ananya Roy, and Aihwa Ong, 27–54. Chichester: Blackwell, 2011.
- Isaacs, D., P. N. Britton, and A. Preisz. “Ethical Reflections on the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Epidemiology of Panic.” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 56, no. 5 (2020): 690.
- Jakobson, L. “Russian Experts: Missing Actors of the Budget Process.” Post-Communist Economies 29, no. 4 (2017): 491–504.
- Jessop, B. “Repoliticising Depoliticisation: Theoretical Preliminaries on Some Responses to the American Fiscal and Eurozone Debt Crises.” Policy & Politics 42, no. 2 (2014): 207–223.
- Jones, C. W. “Adviser to the King: Experts, Rationalization, and Legitimacy.” World Politics 71, no. 1 (2019): 1–43.
- Kaeding, M. P. “‘The Rise of Localism’ in Hong Kong.” Journal of Democracy 28, no. 1 (2017): 157–171.
- Kerr, J., C. Panagopoulos, and S. van der Linden. “Political Polarization on COVID-19 Pandemic Response in the United States.” Personality and Individual Differences 179 (2021): 110892.
- King, A. Y.-c. “Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the Grass Roots Level.” Asian Survey 15, no. 5 (1975): 422–439.
- Lam-Knott, S., C. Connolly, and K. C. Ho. “Introduction: Theorising the Post-Political in Asian Cities.” In Post-Politics and Civil Society in Asian Cities, edited by Sonia Lam-Knott, Creighton Connolly, Kong Chong Ho, 1–17. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.
- Lau, S.-K., and H.-C. Kuan. “Hong Kong after the Sino-British Agreement: The Limits to Change.” Pacific Affairs 59, no. 2 (1986): 214–236.
- Lavezzolo, S., L. Ramiro, and P. Fernandez-Vazquez. “Technocratic Attitudes in Covid-19 Times: Change and Preference over Types of Experts.” European Journal of Political Research, 61 (2021):1123–1142.
- Lee, F. L. “市民回應民意調查時 會否自我審查?” Ming Pao, 2022.
- Lee, F. L. “Pandemic Control and Public Evaluation of Government Performance in Hong Kong.” Chinese Journal of Communication 15, no. 2 (2022): 284–302.
- Lee, F. L., P. S. Lee, C. Y. So, L. Leung, and M. C. Chan. “Conditional Impact of Facebook as an Information Source on Political Opinions: The Case of Political Reform in Hong Kong.” Asian Journal of Political Science 25, no. 3 (2017): 365–382.
- Lei, X., and J. Lu. “Revisiting Political Wariness in China’s Public Opinion Surveys: Experimental Evidence on Responses to Politically Sensitive Questions.” Journal of Contemporary China 26, no. 104 (2017): 213–232.
- Li, X., and D. Chen. “Public Opinion, International Reputation, and Audience Costs in an Authoritarian Regime.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 38, no. 5 (2021): 543–560.
- Maizland, L. “How Countries Are Holding Elections during the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Council on Foreign Relations 17 (2020).
- Majnemer, J., and G. Meibauer. “Names from Nowhere? Fictitious Country Names in Survey Vignettes Affect Experimental Results.” International Studies Quarterly 67, no. 1 (2023): sqac081.
- Manion, M. “Survey Research in the Study of Contemporary China: Learning from Local Samples.” The China Quarterly 139 (1994): 741–765.
- Martin, A., G. Mikołajczak, E. Baekkeskov, and K. Hartley. “Political Stability, Trust and Support for Public Policies: A Survey Experiment Examining Source Effects for Covid-19 Interventions in Australia and Hong Kong.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 34, no. 3 (2022): edac024.
- Mattingly, D., T. Incerti, C. Ju, C. Moreshead, S. Tanaka, and H. Yamagishi. “Chinese Propaganda Persuades a Global Audience That the “China Model” Is Superior: Evidence from a 19-Country Experiment.” 2022. doi:10.31219/osf.io/5cafd.
- McDonald, Jared. “Avoiding the Hypothetical: Why ‘Mirror Experiments’ Are an Essential Part of Survey Research.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 32, no. 2 (2020): 266–283.
- Morgan, M. G. “Use (and Abuse) of Expert Elicitation in Support of Decision Making for Public Policy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. 20 (2014): 7176–7184.
- Murphy, H., A. Greer, and H. C. Wu. “Trusting Government to Mitigate a New Hazard: The Case of Oklahoma Earthquakes.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 9, no. 3 (2018): 357–380.
- Nachiappan, K., E. Mendizabal, and A. Datta. “Think Tanks in East and Southeast Asia.” 2010.
- Nathan, A. J. “The Puzzle of Authoritarian Legitimacy.” Journal of Democracy 31, no. 1 (2020): 158–168.
- Neo, R., and C. Xiang. “State Rhetoric, Nationalism and Public Opinion in China.” International Affairs 98, no. 4 (2022): 1327–1346.
- Nie, J.-B., and C. Elliott. “Humiliating Whistle-Blowers: Li Wenliang, the Response to Covid-19, and the Call for a Decent Society.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17, no. 4 (2020): 543–547.
- O’Shea, B. A., and M. Ueda. “Who Is More Likely to Ignore Experts’ Advice Related to Covid-19?” Preventive Medicine Reports 23 (2021): 101470.
- Pielke Jr., R. A. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
- Radaelli, C. M. “The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise?” Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 5 (1999): 757–774.
- Ray, D. “‘Red and Expert’ and China’s Cultural Revolution.” Pacific Affairs 43, no. 1 (1970): 22–33.
- Reinhardt, G. Y. “First-Hand Experience and Second-Hand Information: Changing Trust across Three Levels of Government.” The Review of Policy Research 32, no. 3 (2015): 345–364.
- Reis, H. T., H. T. Reis, and C. M. Judd. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
- Sandhu, K. S., and P. Wheatley. The Management of Success: The Moulding of Modern Singapore. London: Routledge, 2019.
- Shen, Y., M. U. Ieong, and Z. Zhu. “The Function of Expert Involvement in China’s Local Policy Making.” Politics & Policy 50, no. 1 (2022): 59–76.
- Shen, X., and R. Truex. “In Search of Self-Censorship.” British Journal of Political Science 51, no. 4 (2021): 1672–1684.
- Shi, T. The Cultural Logic of Politics in Mainland China and Taiwan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
- Siegrist, M., and G. Cvetkovich. “Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge.” Risk Analysis 20, no. 5 (2000): 713–720.
- Springer, S. “Neoliberalism and Geography: Expansions, Variegations, Formations.” Geography Compass 4, no. 8 (2010): 1025–1038.
- Staerklé, C., M. Cavallaro, A. Cortijos-Bernabeu, and S. Bonny. “Common Sense as a Political Weapon: Populism, Science Skepticism, and Global Crisis-Solving Motivations.” Political Psychology 43, no. 5 (2022): 913–929.
- Tang, W. Public Opinion and Political Change in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.
- Tannenberg, M. “The Autocratic Bias: Self-Censorship of Regime Support.” Democratization 29, no. 4 (2022): 591–610.
- Vieten, U. M. “The ‘New Normal’ and ‘Pandemic Populism’: The COVID-19 Crisis and Anti-Hygienic Mobilisation of the Far-Right.” Social Sciences 9, no. 9 (2020): 165.
- Vraga, E., T. Myers, J. Kotcher, L. Beall, and E. Maibach. “Scientific Risk Communication about Controversial Issues Influences Public Perceptions of Scientists’ Political Orientations and Credibility.” Royal Society Open Science 5, no. 2 (2018): 170505.
- Ward, J. K., C. Alleaume, P. Peretti-Watel, V. Seror, S. Cortaredona, O. Launay, J. Raude, P. Verger, F. Beck, and S. Legleye. “The French Public’s Attitudes to a Future COVID-19 Vaccine: The Politicization of a Public Health Issue.” Social Science & Medicine 265 (2020): 113414.
- Weiss, M. L. The Roots of Resilience: Party Machines and Grassroots Politics in Southeast Asia. New York: Cornell University Press, 2020.
- Wilson, E. J., and D. L. Sherrell. “Source Effects in Communication and Persuasion Research: A Meta-Analysis of Effect Size.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21 (1993): 101–112.
- Wong, M. Y. Comparative Hong Kong Politics. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
- Wong, M. Y. “Party Models in a Hybrid Regime: Hong Kong 2007–2012.” China Review 15, no. 1 (2015): 67–94.
- Wong, S. H.-W. “Resource Disparity and Multi-Level Elections in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from Hong Kong.” Electoral Studies 33 (2014): 200–219.
- Wong, M. Y. “Welfare or Politics? A Survey Experiment of Political Discontent and Support for Redistribution in Hong Kong.” Politics 40, no. 1 (2020): 70–89.
- Wong, B., and X. Huang. “Political Legitimacy in Singapore.” Politics & Policy 38, no. 3 (2010): 523–543.
- Wrasai, P., and O. H. Swank. “Policy Makers, Advisers, and Reputation.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 62, no. 4 (2007): 579–590.
- Xue, L., X. Zhu, and W. Han. “Embracing Scientific Decision Making: The Rise of Think-Tank Policies in China.” Pacific Affairs 91, no. 1 (2018): 49–71.
- Yuen, S., E. W. Cheng, N. H. Or, K. A. Grépin, K.-W. Fu, K.-C. Yung, and R. P. Yue. “A Tale of Two City-States: A Comparison of the State-Led vs Civil Society-Led Responses to COVID-19 in Singapore and Hong Kong.” Global Public Health 16, no. 8-9 (2021): 1283–1303.