It takes two to toyi-toyi: one party dominance and opposition party failure in South Africa’s 2019 national election

Bibliography

• Africa, Cherrel. “Do Election Campaigns Matter in South Africa? An Examination of Fluctuations in Support for the ANC, DA, IFP and NNP 1994–2019.” Politikon 46, no. 4 (2019): 371–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Paul, Russell Dalton, Steven Greene, and Robert Huckfeldt. “The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choice.” American Political Science Review 96, no. 1 (2002): 57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker, Martin, Carin Runciman, and Benjamin Roberts. “Beyond the Binary: Examining Dynamic Youth Voter Behaviour in South Africa.” Politikon 49, no. 4 (2022): 297–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berelson, Bernard, Paul Lazarsfeld, and William McPhee. Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, Andre. “Turnout in Elections.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour, edited by Russell Dalton, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 622–635. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau, and Neil Nevitte. “Measuring Party Identification: Britain, Canada, and the United States.” Political Behavior 23, no. 1 (2001): 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, David, and Donald Stokes. Political Change in Britain: Basis of Electoral Choice. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, Kanchan. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed. Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chipkin, Ivor, and Mark Swilling. Shadow State: The Politics of State Capture. Johannesburg: Wits University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell. The Apartisan American: Dealignment and Changing Electoral Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell, Ian McAllister, and Martin Wattenberg. “The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment.” In Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Russell Dalton, and Martin Wattenberg, 37–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell, and Martin Wattenberg. In Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell, and Steven Weldon. “Public Images of Political Parties: A Necessary Evil?” West European Politics 28, no. 5 (2005): 931–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth. “Electoral Volatility, Political Sophistication, Trust and Efficacy: A Study on Changes in Voter Preferences During the Belgian Regional Elections of 2009.” Acta Politica 47, no. 1 (2012): 18–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth, André Blais, and Yves Dejaeghere. “Staying With the Party, Switching or Exiting? A Comparative Analysis of Determinants of Party Switching and Abstaining.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25, no. 3 (2015): 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jager, Nicola, and Pierre Du Toit, eds. Friend Or Foe? Dominant Party Systems in Southern Africa. Cape Town: United Nations University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• De Kadt, Daniel, and Evan Lieberman. “Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa.” British Journal of Political Science 50, no. 1 (2020): 185–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, David, Ian McAllister, and David Broughton. “The Changing British Voter Revisited: Patterns of Election Campaign Volatility Since 1964.” British Elections and Parties Yearbook 4, no. 1 (1994): 110–127.
   Google Scholar
• Feddersen, Timothy. “Rational Choice Theory and the Paradox of Not Voting.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, no. 1 (2004): 99–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, Karen. “Explaining South Africa’s Racial Census.” The Journal of Politics 68, no. 4 (2006): 803–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, Karen. Framing the Race in South Africa: The Political Origins of Racial-Census Election. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris. Retrospective Voting in American Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Giliomee, Hermann. “South Africa's Emerging Dominant-Party Regime.” Journal of Democracy 9, no. 4 (1998): 128–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giliomee, Hermann, James Myburgh, and Lawrence Schlemmer. “Dominant Party Rule, Opposition Parties and Minorities in South Africa.” Democratization 8, no. 1 (2001): 161–182.
   Google Scholar
• Giliomee, Hermann, and Charles Simkins. In The Awkward Embrace: One-Party Domination and Democracy. Cape Town: Tafelberg, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Steven. “Racial Animosity and Political Party Partisanship in South Africa: The Case of the African National Congress and the Black African Majority.” Democratization 25, no. 2 (2018): 351–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Donald, Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Kenneth. “Dominant Party Strategy and Democratization.” American Journal of Political Science 52, no. 1 (2008): 16–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, Adam, and Collette Schulz-Herzenberg. “Democratization and Parliamentary Opposition in Contemporary South Africa: The 2009 National and Provincial Elections in Perspective.” Politikon 38, no. 2 (2011): 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffajee, Ferial. “ANC’s Collapse as South Africa’s Majority Party Is Foretold in New Poll.” Daily Maverick, August, 14 2022 https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-08-14-ancs-collapse-as-south-africas-majority-party-is-foretold-in-new-poll/.
   Google Scholar
• Haffajee, Ferial, and Ivor Chipkin. Days of Zondo: The Fight for Freedom from Corruption. Johannesburg: Daily Maverick, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, Stephen. Post-Imperial Democracies: Ideology and Party Formation in Third Republic France, Weimar Germany, and Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Adam. Everyday Identity and Electoral Politics: Race, Ethnicity, and the Bloc Vote in South Africa and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Donald. A Democratic South Africa? Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Donald. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. “Networks In Context: The Social Flow of Political Information.” American Political Science Review 81, no. 4 (1987): 1197–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Richard, and Lawrence Schlemmer, eds. Launching Democracy in South Africa: The First Open Election, April 1994. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, Jan-Jan. Who Will Rule in 2019? Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball Publishers, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Key, Valdimer O. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Mass: Belknap Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Kittilson, Miki, and Christopher Anderson. “In “Electoral Supply and Voter Turnout”.” In Citizens, Context and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices, edited by Russell Dalton, and Christopher Anderson, 33–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lachat, Romain. “Explaining Electoral Volatility: Predispositions’ Strength, Heuristics, and Political Sophistication.” In Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Lund, Sweden, pp. 15-18. July 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, Dean, and Barry Burden. “The Vote-Stealing and Turnout Effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 US Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 43, no. 1 (1999): 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, Evan, and Rorisang Lekalake. “South Africa's Resilient Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 33, no. 2 (2022): 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, Staffan. “Opposition Parties and Democratisation in sub-Saharan Africa.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 24, no. 1 (2006): 123–138. doi:10.1080/02589000500514943.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, Staffan, and Minion Morrison. “Exploring Voter Alignments in Africa: Core and Swing Voters in Ghana.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 43, no. 4 (2005): 565–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, Pedro, Paolo Segatti, and Tianjian Shi. “Mobilisation, Informal Networks, and the Social Contexts of Turnout.” In Voting in Old and New Democracies, edited by Richard Gunther, Paul Beck, Pedro Magalhães, and Alejandro Moreno, 64–98. New York: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Maloka, Eddy. “‘White’ Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in South Africa.” Democratization 8, no. 1 (2001): 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Mashele, Prince, and Mzukisi Qobo. The Fall of the ANC Continues: What Next? Johannesburg: Picador Africa, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, Robert. The Election Book: Judgment and Choice in South Africa’s 1994 Election. Cape Town: Idasa, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, Robert. “The 2014 Election and South African Democracy.” In Election 2014: The Campaigns, Results and Future Prospects, edited by Collette Schulz-Herzenberg, and Roger Southall, 169–187. Auckland Park: Jacana Media, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, Robert. “South Africa's Emerging Black Middle Class: A Harbinger of Political Change?” Journal of International Development 27, no. 5 (2015): 665–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, Robert, Cherrel Africa, and Helen Taylor. “Judgment and Choice in the 1999 South African Election.” Politikon: The South African Journal of Political Studies 26, no. 2 (1999): 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, Robert, and Jessica Piombo. “Opposition Parties and the Voters in South Africa's General Election of 1999.” Democratization 8, no. 3 (2001): 101–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, Robert, Matthias Krönke, and Sarah Lockwood. “In “South African Parties and the Development of Democracy”.” In Political Parties and the Crisis of Democracy, edited by Thomas Poguntke, and Wilhelm Hofmeister. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Mattisonn, John. “Who Will Eat the ANC’s Lunch come 2024?” Daily Maverick, August, 17 2022. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-08-17-who-will-eat-the-ancs-lunch-come-2024/.
   Google Scholar
• Nkomo, Sibusiso. “Land Redistribution: South Africans Prioritize Land Taken in Forced Removals, Support ‘Willing Seller’ Approach, Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 254, 2018.” https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ab_r7_dispatchno254_land_redistribution_in_south_africa.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, Richard, and Herbert Weisberg, eds. Classics in Voting Behavior. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pauws, Jacques. The President’s Keepers: Those Keeping Zuma in Power and out of Prison. Cape Town: Tafelberg, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pempel, T. J. “Conclusion. One-Party Dominance and the Creation of Regimes.” In Uncommon Democracies, edited by Pempel, TJ, 333–360. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Platas, Melina, and Pia Raffler. “Closing the Gap: Information and Mass Support in a Dominant Party Regime.” The Journal of Politics 83, no. 4 (2021): 1619–1634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, Roy. “Modelling Electoral Second Choices: Thwarted Voters in the United States, France, and Russia.” Electoral Studies 22, no. 2 (2003): 265–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, Samuel. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Rakner, Lise, and Nicolas Van de Walle. “Democratization by Elections? Opposition Weakness in Africa.” Journal of Democracy 20, no. 3 (2009): 108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattinger, Hans, and Elena Wiegand. “Volatility on the Rise? Attitudinal Stability, Attitudinal Change, and Voter Volatility.” In Voters on the Move or on the Run, edited by Bernhard Wessels, Hans Rattinger, Sigfried Rossteutscher, Rudger Schmitt-Beck, 287–308. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, Meredith. Voter Turnout: A Social Theory of Political Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Richard, and Ian McAllister. The Loyalties of Voters. London: Sage publications, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Richard, and Derek Urwin. “Social Cohesion, Political Parties and Strains in Regimes.” Comparative Political Studies 2, no. 1 (1969): 7–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, Bradley. “European Party Loyalties Revisited.” In Elections and Voting Behaviour: New Challenges, New Perspectives, edited by Pippa Norris, 21–46. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Bradley, and Paul Beck. “In “The Flow of Political Information: Personal Discussants, the Media, and Partisanship”.” In Democracy, Intermediation, and Voting on Four Continents Gunther, edited by Richard Gunther, Jose Ramon Montero, and Hans-Jurgen Puhle, 183–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, William, and Peter Ordeshook. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62, no. 1 (1968): 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Herzenberg, C. “Trends in Party Support and Voter Behaviour, 1994–2009.” In Zunami!: The 2009 South African Elections, edited by Roger Southall, and John Daniel, 23–46. Johannesburg: Jacana, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz-Herzenberg, Collette. “Trends in Voter Participation: Registration, Turnout and the Disengaging Electorate.” In Election 2019: Change and Stability in South Africa’s Democracy, edited by Collette Schulz-Herzenberg, and Roger Southall, 44–65. Auckland Park: Jacana Media, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz-Herzenberg, Collette. “The 2019 National Election Results.” In Election 2019: Change and Stability in South Africa’s Democracy, edited by Collette Schulz-Herzenberg, and Roger Southall, 170–189. Auckland Park: Jacana Media, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, Peter. “Retrospective Voting and Electoral Volatility: A Nordic Perspective.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31, no. 2 (2008): 217–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southall, Roger. Liberation Movements in Power: Party and State in Southern Africa. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu Natal Press / James Currey, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Southall, Roger. “Opposition in South Africa: Issues and Problems.” Democratization 8, no. 1 (2001): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Southall, Roger. The New Black Middle Class in South Africa. Martlesham, UK: Boydell & Brewer, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Thurner, Paul, and Angelika Eymann. “Policy-specific Alienation and Indifference in the Calculus of Voting: A Simultaneous Model of Party Choice and Abstention.” Public Choice 102, no. 1 (2000): 49–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, Ruy. “Turnout in the 1992 Election.” Brookings Review 11, no. 2 (1993): 47–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillman, Erik. “Economic Judgments, Party Choice, and Voter Abstention in Cross-National Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 9 (2008): 1290–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torcal, Mariano, and José Montero. Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies. London: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Trilling, Richard. Party Image and Electoral Behavior. New York: John Wiley, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry Brady. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Weschle, Simon. “Two Types of Economic Voting: How Economic Conditions Jointly Affect Vote Choice and Turnout.” Electoral Studies 34 (2014): 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelle, Carsten. “Social Dealignment Versus Political Frustration: Contrasting Explanations of the Floating Vote in Germany.” European Journal of Political Research 27, no. 3 (1995): 319–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar