(De)politicizing good governance: the World Bank Institute, the OECD and the politics of governance indicators

References

• Argyriades, D. 2006. ”Good Governance, Professionalism, Ethics and Responsibility.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 72 (2): 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, C., and C. Oman. 2006. Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators. Development Centre Studies. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, C., and C. Oman. 2008. “The Politics of Governance Ratings.” Working Paper MGSoG/2008/WP003. Maastricht: Maastricht Gradute School of Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers. A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doig, A., S. McIvor, and R. Theobald. 2006. ”Numbers, Nuances and Moving Targets: Converging the Use of Corruption Indicators or Descriptors in Assessing State Development.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 72 (2): 239–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drechsler, W. 2004. “Governance, Good Governance, and Government: The Case for Estonian Administrative Capacity.” Trames 8 (4): 388–396.
   Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T., and N. Kauppi. 2010. “Alternatives to Existing International Rankings.” In World Social Science Report, edited by F. Caillods, 239–241. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T., and O. Piironen. 2009. “Politics and Numbers: The Iron Cage of Governance Indices.” In Ethics and Integrity in Public Administration: Concepts and Cases, edited by R. W. Cox III, 125–145. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., and M. L. Stevens. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology 49 (3): 401–436. doi:10.1017/S0003975609000150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. European Governance: A White Paper. Brussels: Commission of the European Community. Accessed June 26, 2007. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gephart, M. 2009. “Contextualizing Conceptions of Corruption: Challenges for International Anti-corruption Campaign.” GIGA Working Papers 115. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science. Credibility on the Line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guha, K., and R. McGregor. 2007. “World Bank Directors Test Zoellick.” Financial Times, July 13. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/fe1d7ece-30d8-11dc-9a81-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz2883nwxuM
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, R. 2013. “China Seeks to Water down Key World Bank Report.” Financial Times, May 6. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/a1ca36d2-b654-11e2-b1e5-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2SmcKhrYs
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, But How? – Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A., and P. Miller. 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, R. P. 2006. “The Triumph of Numbers: Knowledges and the Mismeasure of Management.” Administration & Society 38 (1): 58–78. doi:10.1177/0095399705284202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2003. “Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996–2002.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.3106. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2006. “Governance Matters V: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996–2005.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.4012. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2007. “Governance Matters VI: Governance Indicators for 1996–2006.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.4149. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2008. “Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996–2007.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.4654. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2009. “Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996–2008.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.4978. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and P. Zoido. 1999a. “Aggregating Governance Indicators.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2195. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and P. Zoido. 1999b. “Governance Matters.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2196. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Knack, S., M. Kugler, and N. Manning. 2003. “Second Generation Governance Indicators.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 69 (3): 345–364. doi:10.1177/0020852303693004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, L., and S. Knack. 2008. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators and Tautology: Causally Related Separable Concepts, Indicators of a Common Cause, or Both?” Policy Research Working Paper 4669. Development and Research Group. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, W., and W. Walters. 2004. “Globalization as Governmentality.” Alternatives 29: 495–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., and C. Kirkpatrick. 2006. “Evidence-Based Policy-Making in Europe: An Evaluation of European Commission Integrated Impact Assessments.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 24 (1): 23–33. doi:10.3152/147154606781765327.
   Google Scholar
• Lelieveldt, H., and S. Princen. 2011. The Politics of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lonti, Z., and M. Woods. 2008. “Towards Government at a Glance: Identification of Core Data and Issues Related to Public Sector Efficiency.” OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 7, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Löwenheim, O., 2008. “Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International ‘Governance Indicators’.” Third World Quarterly 29 (2): 255–274. doi:10.1080/01436590701806814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, R., and S. McBride. 2009. “Standardizing and Disseminating Knowledge: The Role of the OECD in Global Governance.” European Political Science Review 1 (1): 83–101. doi:10.1017/S1755773909000058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcussen, M., 2002. OECD og idéspillet. Game Over? [OECD and the Diffusion of Ideas: Game Over?] Kopenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., and N. Rose. 1990. “Political Rationalities and Technologies of Government.” In Texts, Contexts, Concepts. Studies on Politics and Power in Language, edited by S. Hänninen and K. Palonen, 166–183. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 1999. “Report of the Puma Expert Group Meeting on Measuring Productivity in the Government Sector.” STD/NA/RD(99)1. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005a. “Management in Government: Feasibility Report on the Development of Comparative Data.” GOV/PGC(2005)10/ANN. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005b. “Management In Government: Feasibility Report on the Development of Comparative Country Data Technical Annexes.” GOV/PGC(2005)10/ANN. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006a. “Issues in Outcome Measurement for ‘Government at a Glance’.” OECD GOV Technical Paper 3. GOV/PGC(2006)10/ANN3. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006b. “Issues in Output Measurement for ‘Government at a Glance’.” OECD GOV Technical Paper 2. GOV/PGC(2006)10/ANN2. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006c. “How and Why Should Government Activity Be Measured in ‘Government at a Glance’?” OECD GOV Technical Paper 1. GOV/PGC(2006)10/ANN1. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. “Towards Better Measurement of Government.” OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 2007/1, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and Used Guide. Paris: OECD. http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/browseit/3008251E.PDF
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. Government at a Glance 2009. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K. 2007. Re-thinking Politics: Essays from a Quarter-Century. The Finnish Political Science Association. Jyväskylä: University Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and G. B. Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. 1995. Trust in Numbers. The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppänen, S. 2003. “Good Governance in International Law.” The Erik Castrén Institute Research Reports 13/2003. Helsinki: The Erik Castrén Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. A. 2007. “The Governance Bank.” International Affairs 83 (4): 720–745. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00649.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. A. 2010. “What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure.” European Journal of Development Research 22 (1): 31–54. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2009.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl, F. 2013. “Challenge Is Not Without Precedent.” Financial Times, May 8. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/66999938-b715-11e2-841e-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2SmcKhrYs
   Google Scholar
• Zadek, S. 2013. “China's Challenge to the World Bank.” Financial Times, May 8. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/661e93d2-b715-11e2-841e-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2SmcKhrYs
   Google Scholar
• Zanotti, L. 2005. “Governmentalizing the Post-Cold War International Regime: The UN Debate on Democratization and Good Governance.” Alternatives 30: 461–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar