Performative policy studies: realizing “transition management”

References

• Axelrod, R., and M. D. Cohen. 2000. Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. 2000. Understanding Agency: Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 2006. “Technological Zones.” European Journal of Social Theory 9 (2): 239–253. doi:10.1177/1368431006063343.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and S. Pullberg. 1965. “Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness.” History and Theory 4 (2): 196–211. doi:10.2307/2504151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. 2010. Democratic Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, V. 1955. “Laboratory versus Field Research in Psychology and the Social Sciences.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (20): 319–330. doi:10.1093/bjps/V.20.319.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1987. “Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 83–106. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2007. “What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative?” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. Mackenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 311–357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2009. “Civilizing Markets: Carbon Trading between In Vitro and In Vivo Experiments.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (3–4): 535–548. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and J. Evans. 2009. “Understanding Networks at the Science–policy Interface. Geoforum 40 (3): 355–362. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K., and P. Degeling. 1986. “Talking and Doing in the Work of Administration.” Public Administration and Development 6(4): 339–356.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzens, S. E., and E. J. Woodhouse. 1995. “Science, Government, and the Politics of Knowledge.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 533–553. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. 1991. “How to Make Things Which Hold Together: Social Science, Statistics and the State.” In Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, edited by P. Wagner, and B. Wittrock, 195–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deuten, J. J. 2003. Cosmopolitanising Technologies: A Study of Four Emerging Technological Regimes. Enschede: Twente University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disco, C., A. Rip, and B. Van Der Meulen. 1992. “Technical Innovation and the Universities: Divisions of Labour in Cosmopolitan Technical Regimes.” Social Science Information 31 (3): 465–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djelic, M.-L., and K. Sahlin-Andersson. 2006. “Introduction: A World of Governance: The Rise of Transnational Regulation.” In Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, edited by M.-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. 1982. “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories.” Research Policy 11 (3): 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1964. The Symbolic Use of Politics. Urbana: University of illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Elzen, B., F. Geels, P. Hofman, and K. Green. 2002. “Socio-technical Scenarios as a Tool for Transition Policy. An Example from the Traffic and Transport Domain.” Paper for 10th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, Gothenburg, June 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Elzinga, A. 1997. “The Science-society Contract in Historical Transformation: With Special Reference to “Epistemic Drift.” Social Science Information 36 (3): 411–445. doi:10.1177/053901897036003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrahi, Y. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrahi, Y. 1995. “Technology and the Civil Epistemology of Democracy.” In Technology and the Politics of Knowledge, edited by A. Feenberg and A. Hannay, 159–171. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrahi, Y. 2003. “Science and the Postmodern Shift in Contemporary Democracies.” In Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, edited by B. Joerges and H. Nowotny, 63–75. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, G. 2011. “Illuminating the Apparatus: Steps toward a Nonlocal Ethnography of Global Governance.” In Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by C. Shore, S. Wright, and D. Peró, 32–49. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foxon, T. J., Z. Makuch, M. Mata, and P. Pearson. 2004. “Innovation Systems and Policy-making Processes for the Transition to Sustainability.” In Governance for Industrial Transformationedited by K. Jacob, M. Binder, and A. Wieczorek, 96–112. Berlin: Environmental Policy Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and J. Gehman. 2012. “Metatheoretical Perspectives on Sustainability Journeys: Evolutionary, Relational and Durational.” Research Policy 41 (6): 980–995. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and P. Karnoe. 2002. “Bricolage versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32 (2): 227–300.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 1999. “Sociotechnical Scenarios as a Tool for Reflexive Technology Policies. Using Evolutionary Insights from Technology Studies.” Paper presented at the 4S Conference, San Diego, October 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2001. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-level Perspective and a Case-study.” Paper presented at the conference “The Future of Innovation Studies” at the Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies (ECIS), Eindhoven, September 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2002a. Understanding the Dynamics of Technological Transitions. Enschede: Twente University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2002b. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-level Perspective and a Case-study.” Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F., A. Monaghan, M. Eames, and F. Steward. 2008. The Feasibility of Systems Thinking in Sustainable Consumption and Production Policy: A Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London: Defra.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1982. Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 1998. “Writing Performative History: The New New Atlantis?” Social Studies of Science 28 (3): 465–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2003. “Measuring Science: Is There “Basic Research” Without Statistics?” Social science information 42 (1): 57–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomart, E., and M. A. Hajer. 2003. “Is That Politics? For an Inquiry into Forms in Contemporary Politics.” In Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, edited by B. Joerges and H. Nowotny, 33–61. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J. Schot. 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1991. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik [Justification and Application]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 2010. Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., S. Kivisaari, R. Lovio, and P. Mickwitz. 2009. “Designed to Travel? Transition Management Encounters Environmental and Innovation Policy Histories in Finland.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 409–427. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9094-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., R. A. Suurs, S. O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. Smits. 2007. “Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analysing Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (4): 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. 2008. “On Inclusion and Network Governance: The Democratic Disconnect of Dutch Energy Transitions.” Public Administration 86 (4): 1009–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. 2009. “Policy Design without Democracy? Making Democratic Sense of Transition Management.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 341–368. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9095-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., and J. Grin. 2007. “Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: The Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 (3/4): 333–350. doi:10.1080/15239080701622790.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. P. Schot, and B. Truffer. 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2001. “Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences.” Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2008. “Sts Perspectives on Scientific Governance.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., edited by E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 583–608. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004. “Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society.” In States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order, edited by S. Jasanoff, 13–43. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. 2005. Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse. Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms [Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse Analysis. Foundations of a Research Programme]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. 1994. “Technology and the Transition to Environmental Sustainability.” Futures 26 (10): 1023–1046. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. 1996. “The Transition from Hydrcarbons: The Issues for Policy.” In Models of Sustainable Development, edited by S. Faucheux, D. Pearce, and J. L. R. Proops, 151–175. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., A. Rip, and J. P. Schot. 2001. “Constructing Transition Paths through the Management of Niches.” In Path Dependence and Creation, edited by R. Garud and P. Karnoe, 269–299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and J. Rotmans. 2009. “Transitioning Policy: Co-production of a New Strategic Framework for Energy Innovation Policy in the Netherlands.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 303–322. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. P. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. “Regime Shifts to Sustainability through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., and M. Howlett. 2009. “Implementing Transition Management as Policy Reforms: A Case Study of the Dutch Energy Sector.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 391–408. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., and A. Smith. 2008. “Restructuring Energy Systems for Sustainability? Energy Transition Policy in the Netherlands.” Energy Policy 36 (11): 4093–4103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KETI. 2000. Van saneren naar innoveren. De rol van kennis en technologische innovaties bij het realiseren van de beleidsopgaven van NMP4 [From Renovating to Innovating. The Role of Knowledge in Technological Innovation for Realising Environmental Goals of the Fourth National Environmental Policy Plan]. Den Haag: Werkgroep kennis en technologische innovaties (KETI, working group on knowledge and technological innovation).
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1995. “Laboratory Studies: The Cultural Approach to the Study of Science.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff and E. Al., 140–166. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr, K. D. 1976. Policy-makers use of Social Science Knowledge: Symbolic or Instrumental? Research Memorandum no. 103. Vienna: Institut für Höhere Studien.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, W., and J. Weyer. 1990. “Die Gesellschaft als Labor.” [Society as a Laboratory] In Riskante Entscheidungen und Katastrophenpotentiale [Risky Decisions and Potentials of Catastrophy], edited by J. Halfmann and K. P. Japp, 89–122. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., P. Shapira, and R. Smits. 2010. “A Systemic Perspective: The Innovation Policy Dance.” In The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy. An International Research Handbook, edited by R. E. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, and P. Shapira, 1–22. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. P. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World.” In Science Observed. Perspectives on the Social Studies of Science, edited by K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, 142–169. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1986. “Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together.” Knowledge and Society 6: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, B. 2011. “Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 649–666. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2009. “Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by B. S. Turner, 141–158. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and J. Urry. 2004. “Enacting the Social.” Economy and Society 33 (3): 390–410. doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J., and N. Calvillo. 2013. “In the Political Laboratory: Kurt Lewin’s Atmospheres.” Journal of Cultural Economy (online first). doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.860045.
   Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J., and L. Soneryd. 2007. “Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (3): 279–297. doi:10.1177/0963662507079371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2007. Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development. Utrecht: International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2010. “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework.” Governance 23 (1): 161–183. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maasen, S., and P. Weingart. 2005. “What’s New in Scientific Advice to Politics?” In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-making, edited by S. Maasen and P. Weingart, 1–19. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, D. A. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1): 95–117. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., and E. Saka. 2006. “Assemblage.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2–3): 101–106. doi:10.1177/0263276406062573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects.” Research Policy 41 (6): 955–967. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008. “Technological Innovation Systems and the Multi-level Perspective: Towards an Integrated Framework.” Research Policy 37 (4): 596–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2005. “Environmental Political Economy, Technological Transitions and the State.” New Political Economy 10 (4): 479–498. doi:10.1080/13563460500344419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2007. “Who Is in Charge Here? Governance for Sustainable Development in a Complex World.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9 (3–4): 299–314. doi:10.1080/15239080701631544.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2009. “What about the Politics? Sustainable Development, Transition Management, and Long Term Energy Transitions.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 323–340. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1948. “The Self-fulfilling Prophecy.” The Antioch Review 8 (2): 193–210. doi:10.2307/4609267.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F., and M. Callon. 2007. “Economic Experiments and the Construction of Markets.” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. Mackenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 163–189. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Bellknap.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., J. P. Voß, and J. Monstadt. 2007. “Governance for Sustainable Development: Coping with Ambivalence, Uncertainty and Distributed Power.” Double Special Issue of the Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 (3/4): 185–192. QB 3/2207.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T., and N. Rose. 1999. “Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena? The Example of Public Opinion Research.” The British Journal of Sociology 50 (3): 367–396. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00367.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2012. “Follow the Policy: A Distended Case Approach.” Environment and Planning A 44 (1): 21–30. doi:10.1068/a44179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestre, D. 2004. “Thirty Years of Science Studies: Knowledge, Society and the Political.” History and Technology 20 (4): 351–369. doi:10.1080/0734151042000304330.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. 2006. “Agencement/Assemblage.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2–3): 108–109. doi:10.1177/026327640602300219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A., 1994. “After Representation: Science Studies in the Performative Idiom.” In Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by P. O. S. Association, 413–419. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A., 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. 1995. “The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process.” Journal of European Public Policy 2 (2): 159–183. doi:10.1080/13501769508406981.
   Google Scholar
• Redclift, M. 1993. “Sustainable Development: Needs, Values, Rights.” Environmental Values 2 (1): 3–20. doi:10.3197/096327193776679981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J. 1994. “Experimental Systems: Historiality, Narration, and Deconstruction.” Science in Context 7 (1): 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. “The New Governance: Governing without Government.” Political studies 44 (4): 652–667. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 1981. “A Cognitive Approach to Science Policy.” Research Policy 10 (4): 294–311. <Go to ISI>://A1981MW55200001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 1988. “Processes in Science Policy and Their Study.” In Science and Society, edited by M. Gosselin and F. Demeyere, 34–54. Brussels: Centre for Empirical Epistemology, Free University of Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 1992a. “Between Innovation and Evaluation: Sociology of Technology Applied to Technology Policy and Technology Assessment.” Rivista di Studi Epistemologici e Sociali Sulla Scienza e la Technologia [Journal of Epistemological and Social Studies of Science and Technology] 1992 (2): 39–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 1992b. “A Quasi-evolutionary Model of Technological Development and a Cognitive Approach to Technology Policy.” Rivista di Studi Epistemologici e Sociali Sulla Scienza e la Technologia 1992 (3): 69–103.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 1995. “Introduction of New Technology: Making Use of Recent Insights from Sociology and Economics of Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7 (4): 417–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 1998. “The Dancer and the Dance: Steering in/of Science and Technology.” In Steering and Effectiveness in a Developing Knowledge Society. Proceedings of a Workshop at the University of Twente, edited by A. Rip, 27–49. Urecht: LEMMA.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and A. Groen. 2002. “Many Visible Hands.” In Technology and the Market, edited by R. Coombs, A. Green, V. Richards, and V. Walsh, 12–37. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. “Technological Change.” In Human Choice and Climate Change, edited by S. Rayner and E. L Malone, 327–399. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., T. J. Misa, and J. P. Schot. 1995. “Constructive Technology Assessment: A New Paradigm for Managing Technology in Society.” In Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, edited by A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. P. Schot, 1–14. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and A. J. Nederhof. 1986. “Between Dirigism and Laisser Faire: Effects of Implementing the Science Policy Priority for Biotechnology in the Netherlands.” Research Policy 15 (5): 253–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and J.-P. Voß. 2013. “Umbrella Terms as Mediators in the Governance of Emerging Science and Technology.” STI-Studies 9 (2): 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., and R. Kemp. 2008. “Detour Ahead: A Response to Shove and Walker about the Perilous Road of Transition Management.” Environment and Planning A: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (4): 1006–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. Van Asselt. 2001. “More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.” Foresight 3 (1): 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, M. Van Asselt, F. Geels, G. Verbong, and K. G. P. Molendijk. 2000. Transities & Transitiemanagement. De casus van een emissiearme energievorzeening [Transitions & Transition Management. The Case of Low Emission Energy Provision]. Maastricht: ICIS & MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., and D. Loorbach. 2009. “Complexity and Transition Management.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 13 (2): 184–196. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00116.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., and J. Zeitlin. 2012. “Experimentalist Governance.” In Oxford handbook of governance, edited by D. Levi-Faur, 169–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Safarzynska, K., K. Frenken, and J. C. J. M. Van Den Bergh. 2012. “Evolutionary Theorizing and Modeling of Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 41 (6): 1011–1024. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.014.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and A. Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (23): 251–268. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J. W. 1992a. “The Policy Relevance of the Quasi-evolutionary Model: The Case of Stimulating Clean Technologies.” In Technological Change and Company Strategies: Economic and Sociological Perspectives, 185–200. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. W. 1992b. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies.” Science, Technology & Human Values 17 (1): 36–56. doi:10.1177/016224399201700103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm, E., and P. Wehling. 1998. Forschungspolitik für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung: Das niederländische DTO-Programm und seine Bedeutung für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Research Policy for Sustainable Development: The Dutch DTO-programme and Its Relevance for the Federal Republic of Germany]. ISOE-Studientext 5 Frankfurt a. M.: Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2007. “Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management.” Environment and Planning A 39 (4): 763–770.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and F. Kern. 2009. “The Transitions Storyline in Dutch Environmental Policy.” Environmental Politics 18 (1): 78–98. doi:10.1080/09644010802624835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2007. “Moving Outside or Inside? Objectification and Reflexivity in the Governance of Socio-technical Systems.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 (3/4): 351–373. doi:10.1080/15239080701622873.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2010. “The Politics of Social-ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio-technical Transitions.” Ecology and Society 15 (1): 11–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. “The Governance of Sustainable Socio-technical Transitions.” Research Policy 34 (10): 1491–1510.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., J.-P. Voß, and J. Grin. 2010. “Innovation Studies and Sustainability Transitions: The Allure of the Multi-level Perspective and Its Challenges.” Research Policy 39 (4): 435–448. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V77-4YFT55M-3/2/5fbae853e56df492306bae3bfdee78f5.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, R., and S. Kuhlmann. 2004. “The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1 (12): 4–32. doi:10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621.
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P., H. Rohracher, M. Weber, and I. Oehme. 2006. “The Transition towards Sustainable Production Systems in Austria - a Reflexive Exercise?” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, 355–382. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar,
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “‘Institutional ecology’, ‘translation’, and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeleys Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., J.-P. Voß, and K. Konrad. 2008. “Mapping Expectations for System Transformations. Lessons from Sustainability Foresight in German Utility Sectors.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75: 1360–1372. QB 3/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Ven, A. H., D. Polley, R. Garud, and S. Venkatamaran. 1999. The Innovation Journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Belt, H., and A. Rip. 1987. “The Nelson-winter-dosi Model and Synthetic Dye Industry.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 135–158. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Loo, F.A. 2009. Energy Transition: The Dutch Context: Creatieve Energie – Energie Transitie. [Creative Energy - Energy Transition, Energy Programme of the Dutch Government]. Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leenders, C. 2003. “Managing the Direction of Societal Change. Sustainable Development in Practice.” IHDP Newsletter 2003 (4): 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lente, H., and A. Rip. 1998. “Expectations in Technological Developments: An Example of Prospective Structures to Be Filled in By Agency.” In Getting New Things Together, edited by C. Disco and B. J. R. Van Der Meulen, 195–220. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter,
   Google Scholar
• Vergragt, P., and L. Jansen. 1993. “Sustainable Technological Development: The Making of a Dutch Long-term Oriented Technology Programme.” Project Appraisal 8 (3): 134–140.
   Google Scholar
• Vergragt, P., P. Weaver, L. Jansen, G. Van Grootveld, and E. Van Spiegel. 2000. Sustainable Technology Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P. 2007a. “Designs on Governance. Development of Policy Instruments and Dynamics in Governance.” PhD thesis Enschede, University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P. 2007b. “Innovation Processes in Governance: The Development of ‘Emissions Trading’ as a New Policy Instrument.” Science and Public Policy 34 (5): 329–343. QB 2/2007.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P. 2013. “Technikwissenschaftliches Wettrüsten für nachhaltige Entwicklung? Wo transformative Wissenschaft hinführen könnte.” [A Technoscientific Arms Race for Sustainable Development? Where Transformative Science Could Lead to] Ökologisches Wirtschaften 2013 (2): 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp. 2006a. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., and B. Bornemann. 2011. “The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management.” Ecology and Society 16 (2): 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., K. Konrad, and B. Truffer. 2006b. “Sustainability Foresight. Reflexive Governance in the Transformation of Utility Systems.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, 162–188. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., and A. Simons. 2014. “Instrument Constituencies and the Supply-side of Policy Innovation: The Social Life of Emissions Trading.” Environmental Politics 23 (5): 735–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., A. Smith, and J. Grin. 2009. “Designing Long-term Policy: Rethinking Transition Management.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 275–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VROM. 2001. Where There Is a Will There Is a World: Working towards Sustainability. The Hague: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu (VROM, Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment).
   Google Scholar
• VROM-Raad. 1998. Transitie naar een koolstofarme energiehuishouding [Transition to a Low-Carbon Energy Economy]. Den Haag: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu (VROM, Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P., C. H. Weiss, B. Wittrock, and H. Wollman. 1991. Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G., and E. Shove. 2007. “Ambivalence, Sustainability and the Governance of Socio-technical Transitions.” In Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 (3/4): 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• WBGU. 2011. Welt im Wandel: Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine große Transformation [World in Transition – A Social Contract for Sustainability]. Berlin: WBGU, Advisory Council to the German Government on Global Environmental Change.
   Google Scholar
• Wced. 1987. Our Common Future. Report by the World Commission on Environment and Development. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 2004. Die stunde der Wahrheit [The Moment of Truth for Science]. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, B., P. Wagner, and H. Wollmann. 1991. “Social Science and the Modern State: Policy Knowledge and Political Institutions in Western Europe and the United States.” In Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads, edited by B. Wittrock, P. Wagner, C. H. Weiss, and H. Wollman, 28–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar