388
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Untying the Knot? Assessing the compatibility of the American and European strategic culture under President Obama

Pages 104-126 | Received 06 Dec 2013, Accepted 26 Feb 2015, Published online: 23 Apr 2015

References

  • Aberbach, J. D., R. D Putnam, and B. A. Rockman. 1981. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ajami, F. 2003. “Iraq and the Arab’s Future.” Foreign Affairs 82 (1): 2–18. doi:10.2307/20033424.
  • Almond, G. A., and S. Verba. 1965. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Andreani, G. [2004] 2005. “The ‘War on Terror’: Good Cause, Wrong Concept.” Survival 46 (4): 31–50. doi:10.1080/00396330412331342446.
  • Baltz, D. 2003. “President Puts Onus Back on Iraqi Leader.” The Washington Post, March 7, p. A1. https://global-factiva-com.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/redir/default.aspx?P=sa&an=wp00000020030307dz3700062&cat=a&ep=ASE.
  • Barnes, B. 2001. “Practice as Collective Action.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. V. Savigny, 17–28. New York: Routledge.
  • Benedict, R. 1946. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Berenskoetter, F. S. 2005. “Mapping the Mind Gap: A Comparison of US and European Strategies.” Security Dialogue 36 (1): 71–92. doi:10.1177/0967010605051925.
  • Berger, T. U. 1996. “Changing Norms of Defense and Security in Japan and Germany.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by P. J. Katzenstein, 317–356. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Berger, T. U. 1998. Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Biehl, H., S. Giegerich, and A. Jonas 2013. Strategic Cultures in Europe. Berlin: Springer.
  • Biscop, S. 2005. The European Security Strategy: A Global Agenda for a Positive Power. Hants: Ashgate.
  • Bozo, F. 2005. Mitterand, la fin de la guerre froide et lunification allemande. De Yalta à Maastricht [Mitterand, the End of the Cold War and the Unification of Germany. From Yalta to Maastricht]. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  • Bundesministerium der Verteidigung (BMVg). 2006. Weissbuch 2006 zur Sicherheitspolitik Deutschlands und zur Zukunft der Bundeswehr [Department of Defence, Germany, White Paper 2006: Security Policy for Germany and the Future of the German Armed Forces]. Berlin: Bundesministerium der Verteidigung.
  • Bundesministerium der Verteidigung (BMVg). 2011. Defence Policy Guidelines, 27 May, 2011: Safeguarding National Interests-assuming International Responsibility-Shaping Security Together. Berlin: Bundesministerium der Verteidigung [Berlin: Ministry of Defence].
  • Bulmer, S., and W. E. Paterson. 2010. “Germany and the European Union: From ‘Tamed Power’ to Normalized Power?” International Affairs 86 (5): 1051–1073. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00928.x.
  • Buzan, B., O. Wæver, and J. D. Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Cabinet Office. 2010. A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy. London: Cabinet Office.
  • Cameron, F. 2002. “Utilitarian Multilateralism: The Implications of 11 September 2001 -for US Foreign Policy.” Politics 22 (2): 68–75. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.00161.
  • Cameron, F. 2007. An Introduction to European Foreign Policy. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Campbell, D. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 2006. National Military Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction. Washinton, DC: Department of Defence.
  • Cornish, P. 2013. “United Kingdom.” In Strategic Cultures in Europe: Security and Defense Policies across the Continent, edited by H. Biehl, S. Giegerich, and A. Jonas, 371–386. Berlin: Springer.
  • Cornish, P., and G. Edwards. 2001. “Beyond the EU/NATO Dichotonomy: The Beginnings of a European Strategic Culture.” International Affairs 77 (3): 587–603. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00208.
  • Council on Foreign Relations. 2004. Renewing the Atlantic Partnership. Task Force Report No. 51. Washington, DC: CFR.
  • Daalder, I. H., and J. M. Lindsay. 2005. America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Dannreuther, R., and J. Peterson, eds. 2006. Security Strategy and Transatlantic Relations. London: Routledge.
  • Duffield, J. S. 1998. World Power Forsaken: Political Culture, International Institutions, and German Security Policy after Unification. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Eckstein, H. 1988. “A Culturalist Theory of Political Change.” American Political Science Review 82 (3): 789–804. doi:10.2307/1962491.
  • Elkins, D. J., and R. E. B. Simeon. 1979. “A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain?” Comparative Politics 11 (2): 127–145. doi:10.2307/421752.
  • European Council. 2003. A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy. Brussels: European Council.
  • European Council. 2008. Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy: Providing Security in a Changing World. S407/08, Brussels.
  • Farrell, T., and T. Terriff. 2002. The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Finnemore, M. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. doi:10.1162/002081898550789.
  • Fox, R. 2005. “GWOT Is History. Now for SAVE.” New Statesman, August 8.
  • Freedman, L. 2006. The Transformation of Strategic Affairs. 379 vol. London: IISS.
  • Gaddis, J. L. 2004. Surprise, Security, and the American Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gareis, S. B. 2005. “Sicherheitspolitik zwischen‘Mars und Venus’? Die Sicherheitsstrategien der USA und der EU im Vergleich [Security Policy between Mars and Venus? The Security Strategies of the USA and the EU in Comparison].” In Die Beziehungen zwischen NATO und EU: Partnerschaft, Konkurrenz, Rivalitaet? [The Relationship between NATO and the EU: Partnership, Competition, Rivalry?], edited by J. Varwick, 81–96. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Buderich.
  • Ghez, J., and S. Larrabee. 2009. “France and NATO.” Survival 51 (2): 77–90. doi:10.1080/00396330902860819.
  • Giegerich, B. 2006. European Security and Strategic Culture: National Responses to the EUs Security and Defence Policy. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  • Giegerich, B. 2007. “European Positions and American Responses: ESDP-NATO Compatibility.” In European Foreign Policy in an Evolving International System, edited by N. Casarini and C. Musu, 43–56. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gilch, A. 2005. Das Parlamentsbeteiligungsgesetz: die Auslandsentsendung der Bundeswehr und deren verfahrensrechtliche Ausgestaltung [The Deployment of the Bundeswehr Abroad and Its Procedural Design]. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg.
  • Gnesotto, N. 1998. LEurope et la puissance [Europe and Power]. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
  • Gnesotto, N. 2004. European Defence: A Proposal for a White Paper. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
  • Goldstone, J. E. A. 2000. Failure Task Force Report: Phase III Findings. McLean, VA: Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).
  • Gordon, P. H. 2003. “Bush’s Middle East Vision.” Survival 45 (1): 155–165. doi:10.1080/00396330312331343366.
  • Gray, C. S. 1999. “Strategic Culture as Context: The First Generation of Theory Strikes Back.” Review of International Studies 25 (1): 49–69. doi:10.1017/S0260210599000492.
  • Gray, C. S. 1981. “National Style in Strategy: The American Example.” International Security 6 (2): 21–47. doi:10.2307/2538645.
  • Gray, C. S. 1984. “Comparative Strategic Culture.” Parameters XIV (4): 26–33. http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Articles/1984/1984%20gray.pdf.
  • Gurtov, M. 2006. Superpower on Crusade: The Bush Doctrine in US Foreign Policy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Haglund, D. G. 2004. “What Good Is Strategic Culture? A Modest Defence of an Immodest Concept.” International Journal 59 (3): 479–502. doi:10.2307/40203951.
  • Haglund, D. G. 2011. “‘Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off’? Security Culture as Strategic Culture.” Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 494–516. doi:10.1080/13523260.2011.623053.
  • Heiselberg, S. 2003. Pacifism or Activism: Towards a Common Strategic Culture within the European Security and Defence Policy? IIS Working Paper 2003/4. Copenhagen: Institute for International Studies.
  • Hemmer, C. 2011. “Continuity and Change in the Obama Administration’s National Security Strategy.” Comparative Strategy 30 (3): 268–277. doi:10.1080/01495933.2011.587685.
  • HM Government. 2010. Securing Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The Strategic Defence and Security Review Cm.7948. London: TSO.
  • Howorth, J. 2002. “The CESDP and the Forging of a European Security Culture.” Politique Europèenne 8: 88–108. doi:10.3917/poeu.008.0088.
  • Howorth, J. 2007. Security and Defence Policy in the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Howorth, J. 2010. “What’s in it for France? Prodigal Son or Trojan Horse?” European Security 19 (1): 11–28. doi:10.1080/09662839.2010.502891.
  • Hurrell, A. 2002. “Norms and Ethics in International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by W. Carlsnaes, B. A. Simmons, and T. Risse-Kappen, 137–154. London: Sage.
  • Hymans, J. E. C. 2006. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Irondelle, B., and O. Schmitt 2013. “France.” In Strategic Cultures in Europe, edited by H. Biehl, S. Giegerich, and A. Jonas, 125–37. Berlin: Springer.
  • Jervis, R. 2003. “Understanding the Bush Doctrine.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (3): 365–388. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00398.x.
  • Johnson, J. L., K. M. Kartchner, and J. A. Larsen, eds. 2008. Strategic Culture and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Culturally Based Insights into Comparative National Security Policymaking. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
  • Johnston, A. I. 1995a. Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Johnston, A. I. 1995b. “Thinking about Strategic Culture.” International Security 19 (4): 32–64. doi:10.2307/2539119.
  • Johnson, M. T. 2006. Transatlantic Security Values: Hegemonic versus Shared Power. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Jørgensen, K. E. 1997. “Western Europe and the Petersberg Tasks.” In European Approaches to Crisis Management, edited by K. E. Jørgensen, 131–151. The Hague, Boston: Kluwer Law International.
  • Junk, J., and C. Daase. 2013. “Internationale Schutzverantwortung – Normative Erwartungen und politische Praxis.” Review of. Friedens-Warte – Journal of International Peace and Organization 88: 1–2.
  • Kagan, R. 2002. “Power and Weakness.” Policy Review 113: 3–29. http://search.proquest.com.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/docview/216428794?accountid=14701.
  • Kagan, R. 2004. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Kammel, A. 2011. “Putting Ideas into Action: EU Civilian Operations in Africa.” Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 625–643. doi:10.1080/13523260.2011.623064.
  • Kammel, A., and B. Zyla. 2011. “Looking for a ‘Berlin-Plus in Reverse’? NATO in Search of a New Strategic Concept.” Orbis 55 (4): 648–662. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2011.07.003.
  • Karp, R. 2009. “Germany: A ‘Normal’ Global Actor?” German Politics 18 (1): 12–35. doi:10.1080/09644000802649304.
  • Katzenstein, P. J. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Keulman, K. 2006. European Security and Defence Policy: The EUs Search for a Strategic Role. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Kier, E. 1997. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Kirchner, E. J., and J. Sperling. 2002. “The New Security Threats in Europe.” European Foreign Affairs Review 7 (4): 423–452. http://resolver.scholarsportal.info.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/resolve/13846299/v07i0004/423_tnstietae.xml.
  • Kirchner, E. J., and J. Sperling. 2007. Global Security Governance: Competing Perceptions of Security in the 21st Century. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
  • Klein, B. 1988. “Hegemony and Strategic Culture: American Power Projection and Alliance Defence Politics.” Review of International Studies 14 (2): 133–148. doi:10.1017/S026021050011335X.
  • Klein, B. S. 1994. Strategic Studies and World Order. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Klotz, A. 1995a. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Klotz, A. 1995b. “Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions against South Africa.” International Organization 49 (3): 451–478. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033348.
  • Krasner, S. D. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics.” Comparative Politics 16 (2): 223–246. doi:10.2307/421608.
  • Krasner, S. D. 1988. “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 21 (1): 66–94. doi:10.1177/0010414088021001004.
  • Kratochwil, F. V. 2000. “How Do Norms Matter?” In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by M. Byers, 35–68. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Krauthammer, C. [1990] 1991. “The Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs 70 (1): 23–33. doi:10.2307/20044692.
  • Kundnani, H. 2011. “Germany as a Geo-economic Power.” Washington Quarterly 34 (3): 31–45. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2011.587950.
  • Kupchan, C. 1994. The Vulnerability of Empire. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Kurlantzick, J. 2006. “After the Bush Doctrine: The Fight for Republican Foreign Policy.” The New Republic, 19–23.
  • Leffler, M. P., and J. Legro. 2008. To Lead the World: American Strategy after the Bush Doctrine. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Legro, J. 1995. Cooperation under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint during World War II. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Lijphart, A. 1980. “The Structure of Inference.” In The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, edited by G. A. Almond and S. Verba, 37–56. Boston: Little Brown.
  • Lock, E. 2010. “Refining Strategic Culture: Return of the Second Generation.” Review of International Studies 36 (3): 685–708. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000276.
  • Longhurst, K. 2004. Germany and the Use of ForceThe Evolution of Germany Security Policy 1990-2003. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Longhurst, K., and M. Zaborowski, eds. 2005. Old Europe, New Europe and the Transatlantic Security Agenda. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Lundestad, G. 2008. Just Another Major Crisis?: The United States and Europe since 2000. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Massie, J. 2008. “Regional Strategic Subcultures? Canadians and the Use of Force in Afghanistan and Iraq.” Canadian Foreign Policy 14 (2): 19–48. doi:10.1080/11926422.2008.9673461.
  • McDougall, W. A. 1997. Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World since 1776. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Mead, W. R. 2001. Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. 1st ed. New York: Knopf.
  • Merlini, C. 2002. “US Hegemony and the Roman Analogy: A European View.” International Spectator 37 (3): 19–30. doi:10.1080/03932720208456986.
  • Meyer, C. O. 2005. “Convergence towards a European Strategic Culture? A Constructivist Framework for Explaining Changing Norms.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (4): 523–549. doi:10.1177/1354066105057899.
  • Miles, J. 2002. “Waiting Out North Korea.” Survival 44 (2): 37–50. doi:10.1093/survival/44.2.37.
  • Montgomery, A. H. 2005. “Ringing in Proliferation: How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb Network.” International Security 30 (2): 153–187. doi:10.1162/016228805775124543.
  • Meunier, S. 2008. “France and the World, from Chirac to Sarkozy.” In Developments in French Politics 4, edited by A. Cole, A. Cole, S. Meunier, and V. Tiberj, 244–256. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Neumann, I. B., and H. Heikka. 2005. “Grand Strategy, Strategic Culture, Practice: The Social Roots of Nordic Defence.” Cooperation and Conflict 40 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1177/0010836705049731.
  • Neumann, I. B., and Welsh, J. M. 1991. “The ‘Other’ in European Self-definition: An Addendum to the Literature on International Society.” Review of International Studies 17 (4): 327–348. doi:10.2307/20097270.
  • Norheim-Martinsen, P. M. 2011. “EU Strategic Culture: When the Means Becomes the End.” Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 517–534. doi:10.1080/13523260.2011.623055.
  • Norheim-Martinsen, P. M. 2013. The European Union and Military Force: Government and Strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nye, J. S. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
  • Nye, J. S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. 1st ed. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Paterson, W. E. 2011. “The Reluctant Hegemon? Germany Moves Centre Stage in the European Union.” Review of Annual Review of the Journal of Common Market Studies 49: 59–77.
  • Peters, I. 2011. “Strategic Culture and Multilateralism: The Interplay of the EU and the UN in Conflict and Crisis Management.” Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 644–666. doi:10.1080/13523260.2011.623065.
  • Pond, E. 2004. Friendly Fire: The Near-death of the Transatlantic Alliance. Washington, DC: Brooking’s Institution Press.
  • Posen, B. R. 2003. “Commandos of the Commons: Military Foundation of U.S. Hegemony.” International Security 28 (1): 5–47. doi:10.1162/016228803322427965.
  • Putnam, R. D. 1971. “Studying Elite Political Culture: The Case of ‘Ideology’.” American Political Science Review 65 (3): 651–681. doi:10.2307/1955512.
  • Pye, L. W. 1973. “Culture and Political Science: Problems in the Evaluation of the Concept of Political Culture.” In The Idea of Culture in the Social Sciences, edited by L. Schneider and C. M. Bonjean, 65–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rawls, J. 1955. “Two Concepts of Justice.” Philosophical Review 64 (1): 3–33. doi:10.2307/2182230.
  • Rotte, R., and C. Schwarz. 2010. “The New National Security Strategy of the United States: More Appearance than Reality?” Politische Studien 61 (433): 72–81.
  • Ruggie, J. G. 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Towards a Neo-realist Synthesis.” World Politics 35 (2): 261–285. doi:10.2307/2010273.
  • Ruggie, J. G. 1993. “Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47 (1): 139–174. doi:10.2307/2706885.
  • Ruggie, J. G. 1998. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52 (4): 855–884. doi:10.2307/2601360.
  • Rynning, S. 2003. “European Union: Towards a Strategic Culture?” Security Dialogue 34 (4): 479–496. doi:10.1177/0967010603344007.
  • Sagan, S. D. 1996. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb.” International Security 21 (3): 54–86. doi:10.2307/2539273.
  • Schimmelfennig, F. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetorik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schley, N. 2006. “Transatlantic Relations in a New World Order.” In From Alliance to CoalitionsThe Future of Transatlantic Relations, edited by W. Weidenfeld, C. Koch-Weseer, and C. F. Bergsten, 77–88. Guetersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  • Schmidt, P., and B. Zyla. 2013. National vs. Transnational Security Cultures in Europe: ESDP Operations as the Test Case? London: Routledge.
  • Searle, J. R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
  • Sloan, S. R. 2005. NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic Community: The Transatlantic Bargain Challenged. 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Snyder, J. L. 1977. The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Limited Nuclear Operations. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
  • Snyder, J. L. 1990. “The Concept of Strategic Culture: Caveat Emptor.” In Strategic Power USA/USSR, edited by C. G. Jacobsen, 3–9. London: Macmillan.
  • Solingen, E. 2007. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia & the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Terriff, T., and A. J. Child. 2009. “Confronting Reality: President Obama’s Two War Inheritance.” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 11 (2): 1–43. http://www.jmss.org/jmss/index.php/jmss/article/view/25/23.
  • The French White Paper on Defence and National Security. 2008. Paris.
  • Trachtenberg, D. M. 2004. “Finding the Forest among the Trees: The Bush Administration’s National Security Policy.” Comparative Strategy 23 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1080/01495930490274481.
  • Vaisse, J. 2007. Transformational Diplomacy. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
  • Vennesson, P. 2007. “Europe’s Grand Strategy: The Search for a Postmodern Realism.” In European Foreign Policy in an Evolving International System, edited by N. Casarini and C. Musu, 12–26. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Vertzberger, Y. 1990. The World in Their Minds: Information Processing, Cognition, and Perception in Foreign Policy Decision Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Wendt, A. 1995. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 20 (1): 71–81. doi:10.2307/2539217.
  • Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • White House. 2002. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: White House.
  • White House. 2006. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: White House.
  • White House. 2010. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: White House.
  • Woodward, B. 2004. Plan of attack. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Zyla, B. 2006. “How the EU Supports the Bush Doctrine.” Review of European and Russian Affairs 2 (2): 5–27. http://carleton.ca/rera/wp-content/uploads/vol2-2-Zyla.pdf.
  • Zyla, B. 2007. “Multilateralism a la carte? – The George W. Bush Administration and Traditions of US Foreign Policy.” WeltTrends, Zeitschrift für Internationale Politik und Vergleichende Studien [WeltTrends: Journal for International Politics and Comparative Studies] 51 (Sommer): 113–125.
  • Zyla, B. 2011. “Overlap or Opposition EU and NATO’s Strategic (Sub-)Culture.” Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 667–687. doi:10.1080/13523260.2011.623066.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.