Imagining and enacting the future of the German energy transition: electric vehicles as grid infrastructure

References

• Acatech. 2010. “Wie Deutschland zum Leitanbieter für Elektromobilität werden kann: Status quo - Herausforderungen - Offene Fragen.” Acatech bezieht Position 6.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Benedict. 1983 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections On the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Curtis D., and Judy Anderson. 2010. Electric and Hybrid Cars: A History. 2nd ed. McFarland: Jefferson N.C.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, Arjun. 2013. The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Sjoerd, and Jan J. Trip. 2013. “Policy Options to Support the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in the Urban Environment.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 25: 18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, eds. 1987 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Anniversary ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• BMWi. 2015. “Erneuerbare Energien im Jahr 2014: Erste Daten zur Entwicklung der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland auf Grundlage der Angaben der Arbeitsgruppe Erneuerbare Energien-Statistik.” Last modified September 4, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, Mads, Nik Brown, Kornelia Konrad, and Harro van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Mark B. 2001. “The Civic Shaping of Technology: California's Electric Vehicle Program.” Science, Technology & Human Values 26 (1): 56–81. doi:10.1177/016224390102600103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Nik. 2003. “Hope Against Hype: Accountability in Biopasts, Presents and Futures.” Science Studies 16 (2): 3–12. http://www.york.ac.uk/media/satsu/documents-papers/Brown-2003-hype.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Buchan, David. 2012. The Energiewende: Germany's Gamble. SP 26. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesregierung. 2009. “Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität.” https://www.bmbf.de/files/nationaler_entwicklungsplan_elektromobilitaet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesregierung. 2011. “Regierungsprogramm Elektromobilität.” https://www.bmbf.de/files/programm_elektromobilitaet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1980. “The State and Technical Innovation: A Case-study of the Electrical Vehicle in France.” Research Policy 9 (4): 358–376. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(80)90032-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1987 2012. “Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch. Anniversary ed., 77–97. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canzler, Weert. 2008. “The Paradoxical Nature of Automobility.” In Tracing Mobilities: Towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective, edited by Weert Canzler, Vincent Kaufmann, and Sven Kesselring, 105–118. Transport and Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Reprinted. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Adele E. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Comor, Edward. 2011. “Contextualizing and Critiquing the Fantastic Prosumer: Power, Alienation and Hegemony.” Critical Sociology 37 (3): 309–327. doi:10.1177/0896920510378767.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet M., and Anselm L. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coutard, Olivier, and Simon Guy. 2007. “STS and the City: Politics and Practices of Hope.” Science, Technology & Human Values 32 (6): 713–734. doi:10.1177/0162243907303600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierkes, Meinolf, Ute Hoffman, and Lutz Marz. 1996. Visions of Technology: Social and Institutional Factors Shaping the Development of New Technologies. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Draucker, Claire B., Donna S. Martsolf, Ratchneewan Ross, and Thomas B. Rusk. 2007. “Theoretical Sampling and Category Development in Grounded Theory.” Qualitative Health Research 17 (8): 1137–1148. doi:10.1177/1049732307308450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egyedi, Tineke M., and Donna C. Mehos, eds. 2012. Inverse Infrastructures: Disrupting Networks from Below. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. “Energy Roadmap 2050.” Last modified September 3, 2015. https://www.kowi.de/Portaldata/2/Resources/fp7/coop/com-2011-Energy-Roadmap-2050-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farias, Ignacio, and Thomas Bender, eds. 2010. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. Questioning Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, Mike, ed. 2004. “Automobilities.” Special Issue, Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5). doi:10.1177/0263276404046058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike. 2015. “Keeping Technologies Out: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Formation of Austria's Technopolitical Identity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, and Sang-Hyun Kim, 103–125. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, James. 2005. “Seeing Like an Oil Company: Space, Security, and Global Capital in Neoliberal Africa.” American Anthropologist 107 (3): 377–382. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3567023. doi: 10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraunhofer ISI. 2001. “Greenhouse Gas Reductions in Germany and the UK – Coincidence or Policy Induced? An Analysis for International Climate Policy.” Last modified September 5, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Friedewald, Michael, and Ronald J. Pohoryles. 2013. “Technology and Privacy.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 26 (1–2): 1–6. doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.768011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Gerhard, Nele Hinderer, Gregor Kungl, and Mario Neukirch. 2012. “Adaptive Capacities, Path Creation and Variants of Sectoral Change: The Case of the Transformation of the German Energy Supply System.” SOI Discussion Paper 2.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, Raghu, and Peter Karnøe, eds. 2001. Path Dependence and Creation. LEA's Organization and Management Series. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W. 2012. “A Socio-technical Analysis of Low-carbon Transitions: Introducing the Multi-level Perspective into Transport Studies.” Journal of Transport Geography 24: 471–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Stephen. 2010. Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Stephen, and Simon Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grijalva, Santiago, and Muhammad U. Tariq. 2011. Prosumer-Based Smart Grid Architecture Enables a Flat, Sustainable Electricity Industry. Piscataway: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Matthias, and Rüdiger Mautz. 2015. Renewable Energies. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gubbi, Jayavardhana, Rajkumar Buyya, Slaven Marusic, and Marimuthu Palaniswami. 2013. “Internet of Things (IoT): A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Directions.” Future Generation Computer Systems 29 (7): 1645–1660. doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, Reinhard, Jim Watson, and Wolfgang Eichhammer, eds. 2008. “Transition towards Sustainable Energy Systems.” Special issue, Energy Policy 36 (11): 4009–4298. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, Salman, Muhammad Kamran, and Umar Rashid. 2015. “Impact Analysis of Vehicle-to-Grid Technology and Charging Strategies of Electric Vehicles on Distribution Networks: A Review.” Journal of Power Sources 277: 205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hård, Mikael, and Andreas Knie. 2001. “The Cultural Dimension of Technology Management: Lessons from the History of the Automobile.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 13 (1): 91–103. doi:10.1080/09537320120040464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, Gabrielle. 2009. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity After World War II. Inside Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, Andrew, Jan Hadlaw, and Thomas Swiss, eds. 2015. Theories of the Mobile Internet: Materialities and Imaginaries. Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture 24. New York: London; RoutledgeTaylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, Stephen. 2015. “Capturing the Imaginary: Vanguards, Visions and the Synthetic Biology Revolution.” In Science and Democracy: Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond, edited by Stephen Hilgartner, Clark Miller, and Rob Hagendijk, 33–55. Genetics and Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, Christine. 2007. “Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS.” Science, Technology & Human Values 32 (6): 652–671. doi:10.1177/0162243907303598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommels, Anique. 2005. “Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies.” Science, Technology & Human Values 30 (3): 323–351. doi:10.1177/0162243904271759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huenteler, Joern, Tobias S. Schmidt, and Norichika Kanie. 2012. “Japan's Post-Fukushima Challenge: Implications from the German Experience on Renewable Energy Policy.” Energy Policy 45: 6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. 2009. Transport Energy and CO₂: Moving Toward Sustainability. Paris: OECD/IEA.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2015. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2015. “Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, and Sang-Hyun Kim, 1–33. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47 (2): 119–146. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2013. “Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies.” Science as Culture 22 (2): 189–196. doi:10.1080/09505431.2013.786990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim, eds. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Reiner. 2012. Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kempton, Willett, Jasna Tomic, Steven Letendre, Alec Brooks, and Timothy Lipman. 2001. “Vehicle-to-Grid Power: Battery, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles as Resources for Distributed Electric Power in California.” Recent Work. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0qp6s4mb.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, Kornelia. 2006. “The Social Dynamics of Expectations: The Interaction of Collective and Actor-Specific Expectations on Electronic Commerce and Interactive Television.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 429–444. doi:10.1080/09537320600777192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, Frank N. 2003. “Constructing the Future: Advocating Energy Technologies in the Cold War.” Technology and Culture 44 (1): 27–49. doi:10.1353/tech.2003.0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1986. “Visualization and Cognition: Drawing Things Together.” In Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, edited by Elisabeth Long and Henrika Kuklick, 6 vols, 1–40. Knowledge and Society. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; Distributed by JAICON Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Lente, Harro. 1993. Promising technology: The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments. Enschede: Faculteit Wijsbegeerte en Maatschappijwetenschappen.
   Google Scholar
• LeVine, Steve. 2015. “Mass-Market Electric Cars Will Go 200 Miles, But Are Still a Long Way from Being Profitable.” Accessed September 7, 2015. http://qz.com/411066/mass-market-electric-cars-will-go-200-miles-but-are-still-a-long-way-from-being-profitable/
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Liansheng, Fanxin Kong, Xue Liu, Yu Peng, and Qinglong Wang. 2015. “A Review on Electric Vehicles Interacting with Renewable Energy in Smart Grid.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 51: 648–661. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel, Rodica, Guzay Pasaoglu, and Christian Thiel. 2014. “Large-Scale Deployment of Electric Vehicles in Germany by 2030: An Analysis of Grid-to-Vehicle and Vehicle-to-Grid Concepts.” Energy Policy 65: 432–443. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, William J., Chris Borroni-Bird, and Lawrence D. Burns. 2010. Reinventing the Automobile: Personal Urban Mobility for the 21^st Century. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Flavia Martinelli, Sara González, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2007. “Social Innovation and Governance in European Cities: Urban Development Between Path Dependency and Radical Innovation.” European Urban and Regional Studies 14 (3): 195–209. doi:10.1177/0969776407077737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullan, Jonathan, David Harries, Thomas Bräunl, and Stephen Whitely. 2012. “The Technical, Economic and Commercial Viability of the Vehicle-to-Grid Concept: Special Section: Frontiers of Sustainability.” Energy Policy 48: 394–406. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPE. 2010. “Zwischenbericht der Nationalen Plattform Elektromobilität.” https://www.bdew.de/internet.nsf/id/E5CDE6B07CA23EEFC125783E005458AE/$file/Zwischenbericht%20Nationale%20Plattform%20Elektromobilit%C3%A4t_30.11.2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NPE. 2014. “Fortschrittsbericht 2014: Bilanz der Marktvorbereitung.” https://www.bmbf.de/files/NPE_Fortschrittsbericht_2014_barrierefrei.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/ITF. 2015. ITF Transport Outlook 2015. Paris: International Transport Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, Nelly, and Trevor Pinch. 2003. How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies. Inside Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, Werner. 2002. “The Cultural Shaping of Technologies and the Politics of Technodiversity.” In Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces, and Tools, edited by Knut H. Sørensen and Robin Williams, 173–196. Cheltenham: Elgar. http://en.scientificcommons.org/58595944.
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, Werner. 2012. “Distributed Agency and Advanced Technology.” In Agency Without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action, edited by Jan-Hendrik Passoth, Birgit M. Peuker, and Michael W. J. Schillmeier, 98–112. Routledge Advances in Sociology 58. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rammler, Stephan. 2008. “The Wahlverwandtschaft of Modernity and Mobility.” In Tracing Mobilities: Towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective, edited by Weert Canzler, Vincent Kaufmann, and Sven Kesselring, 57–76. Transport and Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• RAP. 2015. “Report on the German Power System: Version 1.0. Study Commissioned by Agora Energiewende.” Accessed September 5, 2015. http://www.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin/downloads/publikationen/CountryProfiles/Agora_CP_Germany_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer.’” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36. doi:10.1177/1469540509354673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Everett M. 1962 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press; Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rohracher, Harald. ed. 2008. “Transforming Energy Systems Towards Sustainability: Critical Issues from a Socio-Technical Perspective.” Special issue, International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management 9 (2/3): 141–315. doi: 10.1504/IJETM.2008.019026
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Nicholas J., and Jan-Hendrik Passoth. 2015. “Infrastructure and the State in Science and Technology Studies.” Social Studies of Science 45 (1): 137–145. doi:10.1177/0306312714537566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucht, Dieter, and Jochen Roose. 2001. “Neither Decline Nor Sclerosis: The Organisational Structure of the German Environmental Movement.” West European Politics 24 (4): 55–81. doi:10.1080/01402380108425465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuer, Anna, and Daniela Weismeier-Sammer. 2010. “Energy Cooperatives and Local Ownership in the Field of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Literature Review.” RiCC – Research Reports 4. http://epub.wu. ac.at/2897.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. The Yale ISPS series. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sierzchula, William, Sjoerd Bakker, Kees Maat, and Bert van Wee. 2014. “The Influence of Financial Incentives and Other Socio-Economic Factors on Electric Vehicle Adoption.” Energy Policy 68: 183–194. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, Benjamin K., and Richard F. Hirsh. 2009. “Beyond Batteries: An Examination of the Benefits and Barriers to Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) and a Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Transition.” Energy Policy 37 (3): 1095–1103. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, Anurag K., Bharath Annabathina, and Sukumar Kamalasadan. 2010. “The Challenges and Policy Options for Integrating Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle into the Electric Grid.” The Electricity Journal 23 (3): 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2010.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Public Planet Books. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, Gregory C. 2000. “Understanding Carbon Lock-In.” Energy Policy 28 (12): 817–830. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, John. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkswagen. 2014, April 16. “Intelligente Energie: 20 Elektroautos mit SchwarmStrom starten Flottenversuch in Berlin.” News release. April 16, 2014. Accessed September 9, 2015. http://www.erneuerbar-mobil.de/de/projekte/foerderung-von-vorhaben-im-bereich-der-elektromobilitaet-ab-2012/kopplung-der-elektromobilitaet-an-erneuerbare-energien-und-deren-netzintegration/projektflyer-netzintergration/pm-flottenstart-vw-inees.pdf
   Google Scholar