Social innovation and ICT in social services: European experiences compared

References

• Carretero, G. S. 2015. Mapping of Effective Technology-based Services for Independent Living for Older People at Home. Luxembourg: Deliverable 1, Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crepaldi, C., E. De Rosa, and F. Pesce. 2012. Literature Review on Innovation in Social Services in Europe (Sectors of Health, Education and Welfare Services), Final Report, WP1; Innoserv Project. http://www.innoserv.eu/sites/default/files/Literature%20review%20WP1_130325.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, H. M., and K. Fahnøe. 2013. Theoretically Informed Case Study Accompanying the Film Mobile Health Care Service – Denmark; Innoserv Project. http://www.inno-serv.eu/sites/default/files/Mobile%20health%20care_final_3_4_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Drejer, I. 2004. “Identifying Innovation in Surveys of Services: A Schumpeterian Perspective.” Research Policy 33 (3): 551–562. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EASPD, G. Vandewalle, A. Decorte, J. Calu, and J-M. Vanhove. 2013. Theoretically Informed Case Study Accompanying the Film Blue Assist and Cloudina–Belgium, Innoserv Project. http://www.inno-serv.eu/sites/default/files/EASPD%20Blue%20Assist%20final_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eurich, J., and A. Langer. 2015. “Innovations in European Social Services: Context, Conceptual Approach, and Findings of the INNOSERV Project.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 28 (1): 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurich, J., and A. Strifler. 2012. European Compared Selection of Innovative Social Services; Innoserv Project. http://innoserv.philnoug.com/sites/default/files/European%20compared%20selection%20of%20innovative%20social%20services.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Commission Communication, Services of General Interest, Including Social Services of General Interest: A New European Commitment, COM(2007) 725 final, 20.11.2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gadrey, J. 2003. Socio-économie des services. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Gallouj F. 2002. Innovation in the Service Economy: The New Wealth of Nations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gallouj, F., and M. Savona. 2009. “Innovation in Services: A Review of the Debate and a Research Agenda.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19 (2): 149–172. doi: 10.1007/s00191-008-0126-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S., M. R. Bloomberg, (Foreword by) G. Georges, and T. G. Burke. 2010. The Power of Social Innovation. How Civic Entrepreneurs Ignite Community Networks for Good. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hawker, C., and J. Frankland. 2012. Theoretical Trends and Criteria for Innovative Service Practices’ in Social Services Within the EU, Final Report, WP2; Innoserv Project. http://innoserv.philnoug.com/sites/default/files/Literature%20based%20criteria%20for%20innovation_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hochgerner, J. 2011. “ Social Innovation. A Call for Broadening of the Innovation Paradigm,” Power Point Presentation at the Conference «Capacity Building on Social Innovation Research and Management in South East Europe», 4 May 2011. http://www.aso.zsi.at/attach/1Hochgerner_Ohrid_03-05-2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., and M. Schwarz. 2010. Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends. Aaachen: RWTH Aachen University – Department of Information Management in Mech. Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Krlev, G., E. Bund, and G. Mildenberger. 2014. “Measuring What Matters – Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level.” Information Systems Management 31(3): 200–224. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2014.923265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, A., S. Güntner, and J. Crcic. 2013. Theoretically Informed Case Studies, Final Report, WP7; Innoserv Project. http://www.inno-serv.eu/sites/default/files/Theoretically%20Informed%20Case%20Studies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lévesque, B., and F. La Jeunesse-Crevier. 2005. Innovations et transformations sociales dans le développement économique et le développement social: approches théoriques et politiques publiques, “Études théoriques.” Montréal: Centre de recherche sur les innovations sociales (CRISES).
   Google Scholar
• Milbergs, E., and N. Vonortas. 2004. Innovation Metrics: Measurement to Insight. Washington, DC: George Washington University for the National Innovation Initiative 21st Century Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw, and S. Gonzalez. 2005. “Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1669–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, V., Rosenbusch, N., and A. Bausch. 2013. “Success Patterns of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Institutional Factors.” Journal of Management 39: 1606–1636. doi: 10.1177/0149206313484516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, G. J. 2015. “The Disruptive Impact of Emerging Technology.” In Contemporary Research Methods and Data Analytics in the News Industry, edited by W. J. Gibbs and J. McKendrick, 233–256. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R., J. Caulier-Grice, and G. Mulgan. 2010. The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: The Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2002. Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pesce, F., and M. Ispano. 2013. “ Pushing Research Further: A Comparative Analysis from Local Feedbacks,” WP8 Local Workshop – European FP7-Research Project «Social Platform on Innovative Social Services».
   Google Scholar
• Racine, D. P. 2006. “Reliable Effectiveness: A Theory on Sustaining and Replicating Worthwhile Innovations.” Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 33 (3): 356–387. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0047-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1964. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot (6. Auflage).
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, R., and J. Shiffman. 2007. “Scaling Up Reproductive Health Service Innovations: A Framework for Action.” In Scaling Up Health Service Delivery: From Pilot Innovations to Policies and Programmes, edited by R. Simmons, P. Fajans, and L. Ghiron, 1–30. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Tether, B., and J. Howells. 2007. Changing Understanding of Innovation in Services, in DTI (eds), Innovation in Services, Dti Occasional paper N. 9, Department of Trade and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gyes, G., and T. Vandenbrande. 2005. Innovation and Labour Issues. A Literature Study of Policy Uncertainties from the Flemish Point of View. Leuven: Higher Institute for Labour.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhove, J. M., EASPD 2012. Innovative Practices in Europe: INNOSERV Project Selection of Innovative Practices, Final Report, WP3; Innoserv Project. http://www.inno-serv.eu/sites/default/files/WP3%20Report_Innovative%20practices%20INNOSERV_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weerakkody, V., U. Sivarajah, Z. Irani, and M. Osmani. 2014. Evaluating the Public Value of Social Innovation. British Academy of Management (BAM) Conference, BAM 2014 Proceedings.
   Google Scholar