Public procurement of innovation and regional development in peripheral areas

References

• Aschhoff, B., and W. Sofka. 2009. “Innovation on Demand—Can Public Procurement Drive Market Success of Innovations?” Research Policy 38: 1235–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., and A. Isaksen. 2002. “Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global Ubiquitous’ Knowledge.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bovis, C. 1996. Public Procurement and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. London: The Chartered Association of Certified Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• Cabras, I. 2011. “Mapping the Spatial Patterns of Public Procurement: A Case Study from a Peripheral Local Authority in Northern England.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 24 (3): 187–205.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services and Oxford Research. 2011. Final Evaluation of the Lead Market Initiative. Final Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P., and A. Karakasidou. 2009. “Innovation in the Public Sector.” Policy Brief no 2. Manchester: ProInno European-InnoPolicy TrendChart.
   Google Scholar
• Dale-Clough, L. 2015. “Public Procurement of Innovation and Local Authority Procurement: Procurement Modes and Framework Conditions in Three European Cities.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 28 (3): 220–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalpé, R., C. DeBresson, and H. Xiaping. 1992. “The Public Sector as First User of Innovations.” Research Policy 21 (3): 251–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decarolis, F., and M. Frey. 2014. “Introduction.” In Public Procurement’s Place in the World. The Charge towards Sustainability and Innovation, edited by F. Decarolis, and M. Frey, 1–9. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Rosis, S., and S. Nuti. 2018. “Public Strategies for Improving eHealth Integration and Long-Term Sustainability in Public Health Care Systems: Findings from an Italian Case Study.” The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 33: e131–e152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PwC, GHK, and Ecorys. 2014. SMEs’ Access to Public Procurement Markets and Aggregation of Demand in the EU. European Commision.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., and G. Teisman. 2008. “Public-Private Partnership: On the Edge of Project and Process Management. Insights from Dutch Practice: The Sijtwende Spatial Development Project.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26: 614–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J. 2010. “Demand Oriented Innovation Policy.” In The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy an International Research Handbook, edited by R. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, and P. Shapira, 177–208. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J. 2016. “The Impact of Policy Measures to Stimulate Private Demand for Innovation.” In Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, edited by J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gök, and P. Shapira, 318–349. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and L. Georghiou. 2007. “Public Procurement and Innovation—Resurrecting the Demand Side.” Research Policy 36: 949–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., L. Georghiou, E. Uyarra, D. Cox, J. Rigby, Y. Nugroho, and K. Blind. 2009. Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology for the EU Lead Market Initiative: A Concept Development. Manchester: Manchester Institute of Innovation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., L. Georghiou, E. Uyarra, and J. Yeow. 2015. “The Meaning and Limitations of Public Procurement for Innovation: A Supplier’s Experience.” In Public Procurement for Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, N. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagotia, and J. Edler, 35–65. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and E. Uyarra. 2013. “Public Procurement of Innovation.” In The Handbook of Innovation and Change in Public Sector Services, edited by L. Brown, and S. Osborne, 224–237. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and J. Yeow. 2016. “Connecting Demand and Supply: The Role of Intermediation in Public Procurement of Innovation.” Research Policy 45 (2): 414–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2015. “Innovation-Related Public Procurement as a Demand-Oriented Innovation Policy Instrument.” Papers in Innovation Studies. Paper no 2015/28. Lund: CIRCLE Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2016. “The Swedish National Innovation Council: Innovation Policy Governance to Replace Linearity with Holism.” Papers in Innovation Studies. Paper no 2016/24. Lund: CIRCLE Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., N. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. Edler. 2015. Public Procurement for Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2012. “Public Procurement for Innovation as Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 41 (10): 1757–1769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIM. 2004. The Access of SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts. Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Erridge, A. 2007. “Public Procurement, Public Value and the Northern Ireland Project.” Public Administration 85: 1023–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1990. Promoting SME Participation in Public Procurement in the Community. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. “European Code of Best Practices Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts.” Staff Working Document SEC(2008) 2193.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Innobarometer 2009. Analytical Report. The Gallup Organization.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union. Brussels: Comisión Europea.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Innobarometer 2010. Analytical Report. Innovation in Public Administration. The Gallup Organization.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard. A Pilot Exercise. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. Improving SMEs’ Access to Public Procurement. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fee, R., A. Erridge, and S. Hennigan. 2002. “SMEs and Government Purchasing in Northern Ireland: Problems and Opportunities.” European Business Review 14 (5): 326–334.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, A. 2017. “Re-thinking SME Disadvantage in Public Procurement.” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 24 (4): 991–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, A., and P. Davis. 2016a. “Firms’ Experience of SME-Friendly Policy and Their Participation and Success in Public Procurement.” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 23 (3): 616–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, A., and P. Davis. 2016b. “The Policy–Practice Divide and SME-Friendly Public Procurement.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (3): 559–578.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, A., D. McKevitt, and P. Davis. 2015. “The Impact of Size on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Public Sector Tendering.” International Small Business Journal 33 (4): 443–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavras, A., L. Hommen, M. Rolfstam, N. Vasileiadis, M. Mavis, L. Sousa Cardoso, and D. Tsigos. 2010. Procurement as an Innovation Instrument. Heidelberg: Inno-Utilities.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, S., and E. Uyarra. 2013. “A Role for Public Procurement in System Innovation: The Transformation of the Greater Manchester (UK) Waste System.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25 (10): 1175–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., J. Edler, E. Uyarra, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Policy Instruments for Public Procurement of Innovation: Choice, Design and Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., Y. Li, E. Uyarra, and J. Edler. 2010. Public Procurement for Innovation in Small European Countries. A Report from the ERA-PRISM. Brussels: OMC-NetProject, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. A. 1990. “Procurement Policy as a Tool of Industrial Policy.” International Review of Applied Economics 4 (2): 182–198.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. 2001. “Best Practice? Geography, Learning and the Institutional Limits to Strong Convergence.” Journal of Economic Geography 1 (1): 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• GHK. 2007. Evaluation of SMEs’ Access to Public Procurement Markets in the EU. Final Report. DG Enterprise and Industry of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, A. 2008. Accelerating the SME Economic Engine: Through Transparent, Simple and Strategic Procurement. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Gorenstein, S., and L. Moltoni. 2011. “Conocimiento, Aprendizaje y Proximidad en Aglomeraciones Industriales Periféricas. Estudio de Caso sobre la Industria de Maquinaria Agrícola en la Argentina.” Investigaciones Regionales 20: 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gregersen, B. 1992. “The Public Sector as a Pacer in National Systems of Innovation.” In National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, edited by B. A. Lundvall, 129–145. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Guerzoni, M., and E. Raiteri. 2015. “Demand-Side vs. Supply-Side Technology Policies: Hidden Treatment and New Empirical Evidence on the Policy mix.” Research Policy 44 (3): 726–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holma, A. M., and A. Söderman. 2015. “Barriers in Public-Private Cooperation as Viewed by Potential Suppliers. A Case Study of Food Supply Networks.” Paper presented at the 31st IMP (Industrial Marketing & Purchasing) Conference, Kolding (Denmark), August 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hommen, L., and M. Rolfstam. 2009. “Public Procurement and Innovation: Towards a Taxonomy.” Journal of Public Procurement 9 (1): 15–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., K. Moore, and N. Kataria. 2011. Innovation in Public Sector Organisations. A Pilot Survey for Measuring Innovation across the Public Sector. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Izsak, K., and J. Edler. 2011. Trends and Challenges in Demand-Side Innovation Policies in Europe. Manchester: Technopolis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V., T. Kalvet, and R. Kattel. 2011. “Urban Competitiveness and Public Procurement for Innovation.” Urban Studies 48 (7): 1373–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V., R. Kattel, and T. Kalvet. 2014. “Public Procurement and Innovation: Theoy and Practice.” In Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy, edited by V. K. Lember, and T. Kalvet, 13–35. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, R. K., and M. J. Piore. 2004. Innovation. The Missing Dimension. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loader, K. 2005. “Supporting SMEs through Government Purchasing Activity.” The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 6 (1): 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Loader, K. 2007. “The Challenge of Competitive Procurement: Value for Money versus Small Business Support.” Public Money and Management 27: 307–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, K. 2013. “Is Public Procurement a Successful Small Business Support Policy? A Review of the Evidence.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31: 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Loader, K. 2015. “SME Suppliers and the Challenge of Public Procurement: Evidence Revealed by a UK Government Online Feedback Facility.” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 21 (2): 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, K. 2018. “Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises and Public Procurement: A Review of the UK Coalition Government's Policies and their Impact.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (1): 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, N., and M. Feldman. 2008. “Constructing Entrepreneurial Advantage: Consensus Building, Technological Uncertainty and Emerging Industries.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1 (2): 265–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, BÅ. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• MacManus, S. 1991. “Why Businesses Are Reluctant to Sell to Governments.” Public Administration Review 51 (4): 328–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. 1996. “Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts.” Economic Geography 72 (3): 293–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2006. “Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution.” Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Román, J., and I. Romero. 2017. “Determinants of Innovativeness in SMEs: Disentangling Core Innovation and Technology Adoption Capabilities.” Review of Managerial Science 11 (3): 543–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., and A. Malmberg. 1999. “Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, C. 2004. “Using Public Procurement to Achieve Social Outcomes.” Natural Resources Forum 28: 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis, C., M. McGuire, and L. Ferguson. 2003. SBS Diversity in Public Sector Procurement Survey. Final Report. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., and N. Rosenberg. 1979. “The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies.” Research Policy 8 (2): 102–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, P., J. Julius, D. Herr, L. Koch, V. Peycheva, and S. McKiernan. 2017. Annual Report on European SMEs 2016/2017. Focus on Self-Employment. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. G. 2015. “Editorial. Theme: Public Procurement Policy and Practice. International Lessons and Debates.” Public Money and Management 35 (2): 95–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, C., and M. Fruhmann. 2014. “Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Policies in Public Procurement: Time for a Rethink?” Journal of Public Procurement 14 (3): 328–360.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Demand-side Innovation Policy. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Health at a Glance 2016. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Government at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Overmeer, W., and F. Prakke. 1978. Government Procurement Policies and Industrial Innovation: Report Prepared for the Six Countries Programme on Government Policies towards Technological Innovation in Industry. Delft: Strategic Surveys TNO.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, F., and I. Cabras. 2011. “The Impact of Local Authority Procurement on Local Economies: The Case of Cumbria, North West England.” Public Policy and Administration 26 (3): 307–331.
   Google Scholar
• Peñate, M. C., and M. C. Sánchez. 2016. “El papel de la regulación enla compra pública innovadora: relevancia y limitaciones.” Cuaderno Electrónico de Estudios Jurídicos 5: 35–68.
   Google Scholar
• Peñate, M. C., and M. C. Sánchez. 2018. “La compra pública innovadora. Análisis regional de la experiencia española.” Investigaciones Regionales 40: 79–107.
   Google Scholar
• Peñate-Valentín, M. C., A. Pereira, and M. C. Sánchez-Carreira. 2018. “Servitization in the Public Sector: A Framework for Energy Service Companies.” In Practices and Tools for Servitization. Managing Service Transition, edited by M. Kohtamäki, T. Baines, R. Rabetino, and A. Z. Bigdeli, 405–424. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pickernell, D., A. Kay, G. Packham, and C. Miller. 2011. “Competing Agendas in Public Procurement: An Empirical Analysis of Opportunities and Limits in the UK for SMEs.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (4): 641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuss, L. 2011. “On the Contribution of Public Procurement to Entrepreneurship and Small Business Policy.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23 (9-10): 787–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainville, A., and R. Apostol. 2017. “Capturing Value in Innovation Procurement: A Business Case Methodology.” Maastricht School of Management Working Paper Series, 05–2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M. 2013. Public Procurement and Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M. 2016. “Concerning Support for SME’s as Suppliers of Public Health Tech Innovation: Some Reflections and Case Evidence.” Paper presented at the 20th International Research Society on Public Managament Conference, Hong Kong, April, 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R. 1984. “Creating a Regional Innovation-Oriented Infrastructure: The Role of Public Procurement.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 55 (2): 159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, R. 2017. “Beyond Proximities: The Socio-Spatial Dynamics of Knowledge Creation.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (2): 159–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saastamoinen, J., H. Reijonen, and T. Tammi. 2018. “Should SMEs Pursue Public Procurement to Improve Innovative Performance?” Technovation 69: 2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammi, T., H. Reijonen, and J. Saastamoinen. 2017. “Are Entrepreneurial and Market Orientations of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Associated with Targeting Different Tiers of Public Procurement?” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (3): 457–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2005. “One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach.” Research Policy 34 (8): 1203–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trybus, M., and M. Andrecka. 2017. “Favouring Small and Medium Sized Enterprises with Directive 2014/24/EU?.” European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review 12 (3): 224–238.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. 2010. Opportunities for Innovation through Local Government Procurement: A Case Study of Greater Manchester. Research Report. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. 2016. “The Impact of Public Procurement of Innovation.” In Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, edited by J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gök, and P. Shapira, 355–380. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., J. Edler, J. Garcia-Estevez, L. Georghiou, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Barriers to Innovation through Public Procurement: A Supplier Perspective.” Technovation 34 (10): 631–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., and K. Flanagan. 2010. “Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement.” European Planning Studies 18 (1): 123–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., K. Flanagan, E. Magro, and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2016. “Public Procurement of Innovation. A Tool for Regional Development?” Paper presented at the 11th Regional Innovation Policies Conference 2016, Cardiff (United Kingdom), November, 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., K. Flanagan, E. Magro, and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2017. “Anchoring the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement to Place: The Role of Conversations.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (5): 828–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez-Urriago, A., A. Barge-Gil, and A. M. Rico. 2016. “Which Firms Benefit More from Being Located in a Science and Technology Park? Empirical Evidence from Spain.” Research Evaluation 25 (1): 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincze, M. P., J. Mathis, A. Dumitrescu, A. Erbilgic, E. Coscia, and M. Megliola. 2010. Evaluation of SMEs’ Access to Public Procurement Markets in the EU. Final Report. DG Enterprise and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1986. “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts.” Management Science 32: 791–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintjes, R. 2012. Regional Innovation Monitor Thematic Paper 3. Demand-Side Innovation Policies at Regional Level. Fraunhofer ISI and Technopolis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Woldesenbet, K., M. Ram, and T. Jones. 2012. “Supplying Large Firms: The Role of Entrepreneurial and Dynamic Capabilities in Small Business.” International Small Business Journal 30 (5): 493–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xunta de Galicia. 2016. Good Practices and Lessons Learned. Public Procurement of Innovation in Sergas’s H2050 and Innovasaúde Projects. Xunta de Galicia.
   Google Scholar
• Zelenbabic, D. 2015. “Fostering Innovation through Innovation Friendly Procurement Practices: A Case Study of Danish Local Government Procurement.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 28 (3): 261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar