Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible?

References

• Andrew, P. J., E. Stover DeRocco, and A. Taylor. 2009. The Innovation Imperative in Manufacturing, How the United States Can Restore its Edge. Boston: The Boston Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• BEPA (Bureau of European Policy Advisors). 2011. Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Borzaga, C., and R. Bodini. 2014. “What to Make of Social Innovation? Towards a Framework for Policy Development.” Social Policy & Society 13 (3): 411–421. doi: 10.1017/S1474746414000116
   Google Scholar
• Bund, E., U. Gerhard, M. Hoelscher, and G. Mildenberger. 2015. “A Methodological Framework for Measuring Social Innovation.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 40 (3): 48–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bund, E., D.-K. Hubrich, B. Schmitz, G. Mildenberger, and G. Krlev. 2013. Blueprint of Social Innovation Metrics – Contributions to an Understanding of Opportunities and Challenges of Social Innovation Measurement. A Deliverable of the Project: “The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Spila, J., A. Luna, and A. Unceta. 2016. “Social Innovation Regime. An Exploratory Framework to Measure Social innovation.” SIMPACT Working Paper, 2016 (1). Gelsenkirschen: Institute for Work and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Social Innovation. 2008. Accessed 15 January 2019. http://www.socialinnovation.ca/about/socialinnovation.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. 2016. The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. 2017. The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. 2018. The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Dainiene, R., and L. Dagliene. 2015. “A TBL Approach Based Theoretical Framework for Measuring Social Innovations.” 20th. International Scientific Conference Economics and Management - 2015 (ICEM-2015).” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 213: 275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.537
   Google Scholar
• Desai, M., S. Fukuda-Parr, J. Johansson, and F. Sagasti. 2002. “Measuring Technology Achievement of Nations and the Capacity to Participate in the Network Age.” Journal of Human Development 3 (1): 95–122. doi: 10.1080/14649880120105399
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2001. 2001 Innovation Scoreboard. Commission Staff Working Paper. SEC (2001) 1414. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2010. European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS) 2009: Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2015. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015. Belgium: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2018. European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Schachter, M., C. E. Matti, and E. Alcántara. 2012. “Fostering Quality of Life Through Social Innovation: A Living Lab Methodology Study Case.” Review of Policy Research 29 (6): 672–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00588.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards-Schachter, M., and M. L. Wallace. 2017. “‘Shaken, but not Stirred’: Sixty Years of Defining Social Innovation.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 119: 64–79. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit). 2007. Innovation: Transforming the Way Business Creates. London: EIU Publications.
   Google Scholar
• EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit). 2009. A New Ranking of the World’s Most Innovative Countries. London: EIU Publications.
   Google Scholar
• EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit). 2016. Old Problems, New Solutions: Measuring the Capacity for Social Innovation Across the World. London: EIU Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht, H.-J. 2018. “The (Social) Innovation – Subjective Well-Being Nexus: Subjective Well-Being Impacts as an Additional Assessment Metric of Technological and Social Innovations.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 31 (3): 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Guide to Social Innovation. Brussels: EU Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Grupp, H., and T. Schubert. 2010. “Review and new Evidence on Composite Innovation Indicators for Evaluating National Performance.” Research Policy 39 (1): 67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INSEAD. 2011. The Global Innovation Index 2011: Accelerating Growth and Development. Fontainebleau: INSEAD.
   Google Scholar
• Krlev, G., E. Bund, and G. Mildenberger. 2014. “Measuring What Matters—Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level.” Information Systems Management 31: 200–224. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2014.923265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihci, H. 2019. “Social Innovation: A Conceptual Survey and Implications for Development Studies.” Innovation and Development 9 (1): 105–123. doi: 10.1080/2157930X.2018.1522064
   Google Scholar
• Milbergs, E., and N. Vonortas. 2004. Innovation Metrics: Measurement to Insight. National Innovation Initiative, 21st. Century Innovation Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch. 2013. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders. 2007. Social Innovation What it is, Why it Matters and How it Can be Accelerated. London: The Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. 2018. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, Oslo Manual 2018 Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg, Accessed 5 October 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pol, E., and S. Ville. 2009. “Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (6): 878–885. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, N., C. O’Sullivan, S. Tucker, P. Ramsden, and G. Mulgan. 2012. Strengthening Social Innovation in Europe: Journey to Effective Assessment and Metrics. Belgium: European Union. doi: 10.2769/53098.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, D., J. Terstriep, and S. Alijani. 2015. Comparative Report on Social Innovation Framework. Derivable D1.1 of the Project “Boosting the Impact of Social Innovation in Europe through Economic Underpinnings” (SIMPACT). 7th. Framework Programme, Brussells: European Commission, DG Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Schibany, A., and G. Streicher. 2008. “The European Innovation Scoreboard: Drowning by Numbers?” Science and Public Policy 35 (10): 717–732. doi: 10.3152/030234208X398512
   Google Scholar
• Simchenko, N. O., and G. P. Zhaldak. 2014. “Scientific Approaches to Assessment of Social Innovations at Industrial Enterprises.” Actual Problems of Economics 151 (1): 376–382.
   Google Scholar
• SINNERGIAK Social Innovation. 2013. Regional Social Innovation Index. A Regional Index to Measure Social Innovation. Basque Innovation Agency: Bilbao.
   Google Scholar
• TEPSIE. 2014. Social Innovation Theory and Research: A Summary of the Findings from TEPSIE. A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., and N. Stott. 2017. “Social Innovation: a Window on Alternative Ways of Organizing and Innovating.” Innovation: Organization & Management 19 (1): 51–60. doi: 10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unceta, A., J. Castro-Spila, and J. G. Fronti. 2016. “Social Innovation Indicators.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29 (2): 192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2001. Human Development Report 2001, Making new Technologies Work for Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2003. Human Development Report 2003, Millennium Development Goals: A Compact among Nations to end Human Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2005. Human Development Report 2005, International Cooperation at a Crossroads, Aid, Trade and Security in an Unequal World. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2010. Human Development Report 2010, the Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2013. Human Development Report 2013, The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• van Beers, C., A. Havas, and E. Chiappero-Martinetti. 2015. “Overview of Existing Innovation Indicators.” CRESSI (Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation) Working Papers, No. 24/2015.
   Google Scholar
• van der Have, R. P., and L. Rubalcaba. 2016. “Social Innovation Research: An Emerging Area of Innovation Studies?” Research Policy 45 (9): 1923–1935. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wobbe, W. 2012. “Measuring Social Innovation and Monitoring Progress of EU Policies.” In Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society, edited by H.-W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, and J. Howaldt, 309–324. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• World Business/INSEAD. 2007. “The World’s Top Innovators.” World Business January-February 2007: 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Yesufu, L., and S. Alajlani. 2019. “Measuring Social Innovation for Education and Resource Development in Refugee Camps: A Conceptual Study.” International Journal of Higher Education 8 (4): 208–220. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p208
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. 2017. “Social Innovation as a Collaborative Concept.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (4): 388–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar