Who follows the leader? Leadership heuristics and valence voting at the UK’s 2016 Brexit referendum

References

• Achen, C.H, and L.M Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alabrese, E., S. O. Becker, T. Fetaer, and D. Novy. 2018. Who Voted for Brexit? Individual and Regional Data Combined. University of Warwick, Department of Economics, Working Paper 384.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H., and P. M. Sniderman. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79 (4): 1061–1078. doi: 10.2307/1956248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D., and D. Stokes. 1969. Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Political Choice. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carl, N., J. Dennison, and G. Evans. 2018. “European but not European Enough.” European Union Politics. doi 10.1177/1465116518802361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., M. Goodwin, and P. Whiteley. 2017. Brexit. Why Britain Voted To Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., D. Sanders, C. Stewart M, and P. Whiteley. 2009. Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and J. Tilley. 2017. The New Politics of Class: The Political Exclusion of the British Working Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R., and M. Goodwin. 2014. Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. 1985. The Decline of Class Voting in Britain: Changes in the Basis of Electoral Choice 1964-1983. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., and O. Heath. 2016a. “The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-Level Analysis of the Result.” The Political Quarterly 87 (4): 223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., and O. Heath. 2016b. Brexit Vote Explained: Poverty, Low Skills and Lack of Opportunities. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Accessed 22 August 2017. https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/brexit-vote-explained-poverty-low-skills-and-lack-opportunities?gclid=CjwKCAjwrO_MBRBxEiwAYJnDLEfmGflFVau2o6_Ba0O5MqfatXmL-W_VawU06705AARh1knin_e3uBoC_vQQAvD_BwE .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., S. Hix, and M. Pickup. 2018. “For and Against Brexit: A Survey Experiment of the Impact of Campaign Effects on Public Attitudes Towards EU Membership.” British Journal of Political Science. doi 10.1017/S007123417000667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., and C. Milazzo. 2015. UKIP. Inside the Campaign to Redraw the Map of British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., and C. Milazzo. 2017. “Taking Back Control? Investigating the Role of Immigration in the 2016 Vote for Brexit.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (3): 450–464. doi: 10.1177/1369148117710799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. 2007. “When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition.” Political Studies 55: 629–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Z., J. Spoon, and C. Williams. 2018. “Reading Between the Lines: Party Cues and SMNP Support for Scottish Independence and Brexit.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28 (3): 307–329. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1394311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, O. 2018. “Policy Alienation, Social Alienation and Working-Class Abstention in Britain, 1964-2010.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 1053–1073. doi: 10.1017/S0007123416000272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2005. “Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration.” European Union Politics 6 (3): 419–443. doi: 10.1177/1465116505057816
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R, J., K. Jones, and D. Manley. 2018a. “Confounding and Collinearity in Regression Analysis: a Cautionary Tale and an Alternative Procedure, Illustrated by Studies of British Voting Behaviour.” Quality and Quantity 52: 1957–1976. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., K. Jones, R. Sarker, C. Propper, S. Burgess, and A. Bolster. 2004. “Party Support and the Neighbourhood Effect: Spatial Polarisation of the British Electorate, 1991-2001.” Political Geography 23 (4): 367–402. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., D. Manley, C. J. Pattie, and K. Jones. 2018b. “Geographies of Brexit and its Aftermath: Voting in England at the 2016 Referendum and the 2017 General Election.” Space and Polity 22 (2): 162–187. doi: 10.1080/13562576.2018.1486349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, C. 2005. “Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values and Individual Differences.” Political Behavior 27: 163–182. doi: 10.1007/s11109-005-1764-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, M. A., and C. Wlezien. 2011. “Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote.” European Journal of Political Research 50: 365–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01934.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57 (2): 368–377. doi: 10.2307/1952828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomz, M., J. Wittenberg, and G. King. 2003. “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 8. https://www.jstatsoft.org/issue/view/v008. doi: 10.18637/jss.v008.i01
   Google Scholar
• Vegetti, F. 2014. “From Political Conflict to Partisan Evaluations: How Citizens Assess Party Ideology and Competence in Polarized Elections.” Electoral Studies 35: 230–241. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P., H. D. Clarke, D. Sanders, and M. C. Stewart. 2013. Affluence, Austerity and Electoral Change in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar