Paradoxes of (Il)liberal democracy: the role of Christian Democracy

References

• Ágh, A. 2016. “The Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: Hungary as the Worst-Case Scenario.” Problems of Post-Communism 63 (5-6): 277–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antinori, M. R. 1994. “Does Lochner Live in Luxembourg: An Analysis of the Property Rights Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice.” Fordham Int’l LJ 18: 1778.
   Google Scholar
• Barbieri, P. 2009. “Flexible Employment and Inequality in Europe.” European Sociological Review 25 (6): 621–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC News. 2010. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11559451, Published 17 October.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, F., and M. Kmezić. 2017. The Crisis of Democracy in the Western Balkans: Authoritarianism and EU Stabilitocracy. Policy brief. Balkans in European Policy Advisory Group. Available at: http://biepag. eu/publications/the-crisis-of-democracy-in-the-western-balkans-authoritarianismand-eu-stabilitocracy.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, A. 2015. “Germany.” In Gender as Symbolic Glue, edited by E. Kováts and M. Põim, 40–61. Budapest: FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bochsler, D., and A. Juon. 2020. “Authoritarian Footprints in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 36 (2): 167–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. 2009. “How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism.” Democratization 16 (2): 399–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. 2018. “De-democratization in Hungary: Diffusely Defective Democracy.” Democratization 25 (8): 1481–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2019. “Politicising Embedded Neoliberalism: Continuity and Change in Hungary’s Development Model.” West European Politics 42 (5): 1069–1093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonefeld, W. 2017. “Authoritarian Liberalism: From Schmitt via Ordoliberalism to the Euro.” Critical Sociology 43 (4-5): 747–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2017. “Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: the European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (8): 1191–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruff, I. 2014. “The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism.” Rethinking Marxism 26 (1): 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A. 2017. “Illiberal Democracy in Hungary: Authoritarian Diffusion or Domestic Causation.” Democratization 24 (7): 1307–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin, J., and G. Wilton. 2015. God and the EU. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colin-Jaeger, N. 2020. “L’idéal Démocratique Contre la Démocratie Buchanan et L’économie Politique Constitutionnelle.” Consecutio Rerum 9: 97–131.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. 2020. Western Europe’s Democratic Age: 1945–1968. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cristi, F. R. 1984. “Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique 17: 521–535.
   Google Scholar
• Csillag, T., and I. Szelényi. 2015. “Drifting from Liberal Democracy: Traditionalist/neo-Conservative Ideology of Managed Illiberal Democratic Capitalism in Post-Communist Europe.” Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics 1: 18–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvijic, S., and L. Zucca. 2004. Does the European constitution need Christian values.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. 2016. “The Making of European Society: Contesting Methodological Nationalism.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29 (1): 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietze, G. 2016. Sex-Mob-Narrative um die Kölner Sylvesternacht. movements-journal.org.
   Google Scholar
• Dietze, G., and J. Roth. 2020. Right-Wing Populism and Gender: A Preliminary Cartography of an Emergent Field of Research. Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European … .
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. 2010. Le politiche familiari in Italia: problemi e prospettive. Milan. http://old.forumfamiglie.org/tema/Fisco/tema/Fattorefamiglia/allegati/documento_477.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. 2013. “What are the Directions of Family Policy in the EU.” Marriage 19 (2): 216–234.
   Google Scholar
• Duman, A., and A. Horvath. 2013. “Traditional Familialism Served with EU Gravy.” Politique Européenne 2: 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. 2020. “Right-wing Authoritarian Innovations in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• EPP. 2009. The Social Market Economy in a Globalised World. epp.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, A. 2019. “Neoliberalism, Crisis and Authoritarian–Ethnicist Reaction: The Ascendancy of the Orbán Regime.” Competition & Change 23 (2): 165–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A. 1998. “Subsidiarity.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2): 231–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlenza, R. 2017. “The Politics of the Abendland: Christian Democracy and the Idea of Europe After the Second World War.” Contemporary European History 26 (2): 261–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlenza, R., and B. S. Turner. 2019. “Das Abendland: The Politics of Europe’s Religious Borders.” Critical Research on Religion 7 (1): 6–23.
   Google Scholar
• Geva, D. 2021. “Orbán’s Ordonationalism as Post-Neoliberal Hegemony.” Theory, Culture & Society, 0263276421999435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, N., and M. Wohlgemuth. 2008. “Social Market Economy: Origins, Meanings and Interpretations.” Constitutional Political Economy 19 (3): 261–276.
   Google Scholar
• Grekousis, G., and S. Gialis. 2019. “More Flexible yet Less Developed? Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Labor Flexibilization and Gross Domestic Product in Crisis-hit European Union Regions.” Social Indicators Research 143 (2): 505–524.
   Google Scholar
• Grzebalska, W., and A. Pető. 2018. “The Gendered Modus Operandi of the Illiberal Transformation in Hungary and Poland.” In Women’s Studies International Forum 68, 164–172. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539517300882.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, D. 2002. “Christian Democracy and the Paradoxes of Europeanization: Flexibility, Competition and Collusion.” Party Politics 8 (4): 463–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, S., and M. A. Vachudova. 2018. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics 34 (3): 276–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1939. “The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism.” New Commonwealth Quarterly 131: 49.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1966. “The Principles of a Liberal Social Order.” Il Politico 31 (4): 601–618.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 2018. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, H. 2015. “Authoritarian Liberalism.” Eur. LJ 21: 295.
   Google Scholar
• Hien, J. 2020. “European Integration and the Reconstitution of Socio-Economic Ideologies: Protestant Ordoliberalism vs Social Catholicism.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (9): 1368–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hien, J., and F. Wolkenstein. 2021. “Where Does Europe End? Christian Democracy and the Expansion of Europe.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (6): 1623–1629.
   Google Scholar
• Hübscher, E., T. Sattler, and M. Wagner. 2020. “Does Austerity Cause Political Polarization and Fragmentation.” Available at SSRN 3541546.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi-Accetti, C. 2018. “Is the European Union Secular? Christian Democracy in the European Treaties and Jurisprudence.” Comparative European Politics 16 (4): 669–694.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi-Accetti, C. 2020. “The European Union as a Christian Democracy: a Heuristic Approach.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (9): 1329–1348.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi Accetti, C. 2019. What is Christian Democracy?: Politics, Religion and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irving, S. 2018. “Limiting Democracy and Framing the Economy: Hayek, Schmitt and Ordoliberalism.” History of European Ideas 44 (1): 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, K. M. 2002. “Another Road to Maastricht: the Christian Democrat Coalition and the Quest for European Union.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (5): 871–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., and A. Barnes. 2015. “Financial Nationalism and its International Enablers: The Hungarian Experience.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (3): 535–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, W. 2007. Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmar, I. 2020. “The East is Just Like the West, Only More so: Islamophobia and Populism in Eastern Germany and the East of the European Union.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 28 (1): 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. N. 2018. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. N., and K. Van Kersbergen. 2010. “Christian Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 183–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. 2020. “The European Union’s Authoritarian Equilibrium.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (3): 481–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2020. “Between Illiberalism and Hyper-Neoliberalism: Competing Populist Discourses in the Czech Republic.” European Politics and Society 21 (5): 618–633.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbe, W. 1999. Gender and Parenthood in West German Family Politics from the 1960s to the 1980s.
   Google Scholar
• Kornai, J. 1997. “Editorial: Reforming the Welfare State in Postsocialist Societies.” World Development 25 (8): 1183–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korolczuk, E., and A. Graff. 2018. “Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture …  43 (4): 797–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, J. M., and B. Trencsényi. 2020. Brave new Hungary: Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kováts, E. 2017. “The Emergence of Powerful Anti-Gender Movements in Europe and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy.” In Gender and far Right Politics in Europe, edited by Michaela Koettig, Renate Bitzan, and Andrea Pető, 175–189. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kováts, E. 2020. “Post-Socialist Conditions and the Orbán Government’s Gender Politics between 2010 and 2019 in Hungary.” Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European … .
   Google Scholar
• Kováts, E., and M. Põim. 2015. Gender as symbolic glue: The position and role of conservative and far right parties in the anti-gender mobilization in Europe. Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuder-Sonnen, C. 2016. “Beyond Integration Theory: The (Anti-) Constitutional Dimension of European Crisis Governance.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (6): 1350–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuder-Sonnen, C. 2018. “An Authoritarian Turn in Europe and European Studies.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (3): 452–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuder-Sonnen, C., and B. Zangl. 2015. “Which Post-Westphalia? International Organizations Between Constitutionalism and Authoritarianism.” European Journal of International Relations 21 (3): 568–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberts, E. 1997. Christian Democracy in the European Union, 1945/1995: Proceedings of the Leuven Colloquium, 15-18 November 1995 (21). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. 1937. An Inquiry Into the Principles of the Good Society. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J. 2015. “European Integration: a Catholic Perspective.” In God and the EU, edited by Jonathan Chaplin and Gary Wilton, 49–65. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, N. 2017. Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, S. 2014. The tempting of Europe, the political seduction of the cross: a Schmittian reading of Christianity and Islam in European constitutionalism.
   Google Scholar
• Manz, S. 2004. “Constructing a Normative National Identity: The Leitkultur Debate in Germany, 2000/2001.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 25 (5-6): 481–496.
   Google Scholar
• Maritain, J. 2012. Christianity and Democracy, the Rights of man and Natural law. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Cubas, J., A. Bodoque, J. M. Pavía, V. Tasa, and E. Veres-Ferrer. 2019. “The “Big Bang” of the Populist Parties in the European Union: The 2014 European Parliament Election.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (2): 168–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matković, A. 2020. The Man behind Europe: Say Hello to Alfred Müller-Armack, the Nazi-neoliberal. Retrieved 2020-08-12 from https://aleksandarmatkovic.wordpress.com/2020/02/11/the-man-behind-europe-say-hello-to-alfred-muller-armack-the-nazi-neoliberal/.
   Google Scholar
• Menendez, A. J. 2005. “A Christian or a Laïc Europe? Christian Values and European Identity.” Ratio Juris 18 (2): 179–205.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerrose, A. M. 2020. “The Unintended Consequences of Democracy Promotion: International Organizations and Democratic Backsliding.” Comparative Political Studies, 0010414019897689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milton, G. 2015. “God and the Constitution.” In God and the EU, edited by Jonathan Chaplin and Gary Wilton, 207–223. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. 2012. “Christian Identity? European Churches and the Issue of Turkey’s EU Membership.” Comparative European Politics 10 (2): 149–179.
   Google Scholar
• Morel, N. 2007. “From Subsidiarity to ‘Free Choice’: Child-and Elder-Care Policy Reforms in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands.” Social Policy & Administration 41 (6): 618–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2011. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2013. “Towards a new History of Christian Democracy.” Journal of Political Ideologies 18 (2): 243–255.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2020. Christian Democracy or Illiberal Democracy? Retrieved 12 August, 2020 from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/christian-democracy-or-viktor-orban-illiberalism-by-jan-werner-mueller-2020-01.
   Google Scholar
• Myck, M., and M. Oczkowska. 2018. “Shocked by Therapy? Unemployment in the First Years of the Socio-Economic Transition in Poland and its Long-Term Consequences.” Economics of Transition 26 (4): 695–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palier, B. 2010. A long goodbye to Bismarck.
   Google Scholar
• Pascall, G., and N. Manning. 2000. “Gender and Social Policy: Comparing Welfare States in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of European Social Policy 10 (3): 240–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternotte, D., and R. Kuhar. 2017. “Gender Ideology” in Movement: Introduction. Anti-gender campaigns in Europe … .
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, H. 2005. “The Politics of Identity in Germany: the Leitkultur Debate.” Race & Class 46 (4): 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, G. 2020. Nationalism and Perceptions of Threat–Ethnocentrism or Just a Lack of Contact? Islamophobia in Eastern Europe from a Comparative Perspective.” Connections. A Journal for Historians and Area Specialists. https://www.connections.clio-online.net/article/id/artikel-4680
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. 2013. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ptak, R. 2009. “Neoliberalism in Germany.” In The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, edited by P. Mirowski and D. Plehwe, 98–138. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, M. 2002. Italy’s Social Revolution: Charity and Welfare from Liberalism to Fascism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. B., and C. H. Knutsen. 2019. Reforming to Survive: The Bolshevik Origins of Social Policies. manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Regalzi, F. 2012. “Democracy and Its Discontents: Walter Lippmann and the Crisis of Politics (1919-1938).” E-rea. Revue électronique D’études sur le Monde Anglophone 9 (2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/erea.2538.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, S. V. 2020. “Is Freedom as non-Domination a Right-Wing Idea.” European Journal of Political Theory. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120929539.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, H. 1978. Familie als Gegenstruktur zur Gesellschaft: Kritik Grundlegender Theoretischer Ansätze der Westdeutschen Familiensoziologie. Stuttgart: Enke.
   Google Scholar
• Sata, R., and I. P. Karolewski. 2020. “Caesarean Politics in Hungary and Poland.” East European Politics 36 (2): 206–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 2002. “The European Social Model.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiring, G., and K. Szombati. 2020. “From Neoliberal Disembedding to Authoritarian re-Embedding: The Making of Illiberal Hegemony in Hungary.” International Sociology 35 (6): 721–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, W. E. 1996. “Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberal Constitutionalism.” The Review of Politics 58 (2): 299–322.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, W. E. 1997. “The Unholy Alliance of Carl Schmitt and Friedrich A. Hayek.” Constellations (oxford, England) 4 (2): 172–188.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. 1932. “Starker Staat und gesunde Wirtschaft.” Ein Vortrag vor Wirtschaftsführern (gehalten am 23.11. 1932). Volk und Reich, 81-94.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. 1993. “The age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations (1929).” Telos 96: 130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. 2019. “‘Real-Existing’Democracy and Its Discontents: Sources, Conditions, Causes, Symptoms, and Prospects.” Chinese Political Science Review 4 (2): 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. 2017. “Political Safeguards Against Democratic Backsliding in the EU: the Limits of Material Sanctions and the Scope of Social Pressure.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (3): 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobodian, Q. 2020. Globalists: The end of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solchany, J. 2016. “Le Problème Plus que la Solution: La Démocratie Dans la Vision du Monde Néolibérale.” Revue de Philosophie économique 17 (1): 135–169.
   Google Scholar
• Sremac, S., and R. R. Ganzevoort. 2015. Religious and sexual nationalisms in central and Eastern Europe: Gods, gays and governments.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y., and A. Jäger. 2018. Accomplishments and limitations of the ‘new’mainstream in contemporary populism studies.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, P. 2019. “Towards a Political Economy of Welfare in Croatia.” Economic Annals 64 (223): 105–136.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, P., and N. Lendvai-Bainton. 2020. “Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Radical Conservatism and Social Policy Within the European Union: Croatia, Hungary and Poland.” Development and Change 51 (2): 540–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 1987. “Lochner’s Legacy.” Columbia Law Review 87 (5): 873–919.
   Google Scholar
• Syrovatka, F. 2020. “Labour Market Policy Under the new European Economic Governance: France in the Focus of the new European Labour Market Policy.” Capital & Class, 0309816820943177.
   Google Scholar
• Szikra, D. 2018. Welfare for the Wealthy; The Social Policy of the Orbán-regime, 2010-2017. In. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/14209.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Szikra, D., and B. Tomka. 2009. “Social Policy in East Central Europe: Major Trends in the Twentieth Century.” In Post-Communist Welfare Pathways, edited by Alfio Cerami and Pieter Vanhuysse, 17–34. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. 1993. “Civilizational Incompetence: The Trap of Post-Communist Societies.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 22 (2): 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourneux, O. 2020. “Deux Conceptions Néolibérales de la Souveraineté et de la Démocratie: aux Origines de la Gouvernance Européenne.” Consecutio Rerum V (9): 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• Treuke, S. 2018. “Convergences and dissonances within the Bismarckian welfare paradigm: a critical assessment of the impacts of Hartz-IV on the German unemployment insurance system.”.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. A. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 318–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hemel, E. 2020. “Who Leads Leitkultur?: How Populist Claims About ‘Christian Identity’Impact Christian-Democrats in Western Europe.” Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society 5 (2): 312–330.
   Google Scholar
• Vidra, Z. 2018. “Hungary’s Punitive Turn: The Shift from Welfare to Workfare.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51 (1): 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. H. H. 2003. Un’Europa Cristiana: un Saggio Esplorativo. Milano: Rizzoli.
   Google Scholar
• Yendell, A. 2019. “Understanding and Explaining Islamophobia in Eastern Europe.” Connections. A Journal for Historians and Area Specialists. https://www.leibniz-eega.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/EEGA_Special-Issue_1_Islamophobia.pdf
   Google Scholar