Learning at stations on the secondary level in biology education: the determination of toxic plants

References

• Allen, W. 2003. “Plant Blindness.” BioScience 53 (10): 926–926. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amprazis, A., and P. Papadopoulou. 2020. “Plant Blindness: A Faddish Research Interest or a Substantive Impediment to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals?” Environmental Education Research 26 (8): 1065–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1768225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anđić, B., S. Cvijetićanin, M. Maričić, and D. Stešević. 2018. “The Contribution of Dichotomous Keys to the Quality of Biological-Botanical Knowledge of Eighth Grade Students.” Journal of Biological Education 53 (3): 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1469540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. J., and E. W. Orlandi. 1995. “Active Oxygen in Plant Pathogenesis.” Annual Review of Phytopathology 33 (1): 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.001503.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho, K. W., and A. Powers. 2019. “Testing Enhances Both Memorization and Conceptual Learning of Categorical Materials.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8 (2): 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusing, K., R. Asshoff, and M. Hammann. 2019. “Students’ Conceptions of the Carbon Cycle: Identifying and Interrelating Components of the Carbon Cycle and Tracing Carbon Atoms Across the Levels of Biological Organisation.” Journal of Biological Education 53 (1): 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1447002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einecke, G. 2014. Lernzirkel – Stationenlernen. Available on Internet: http://www.fachdidaktik-einecke.de/.
   Google Scholar
• Fleta-Soriano, E., and S. Munné-Bosch. 2016. “Stress Memory and the Inevitable Effects of Drought: A Physiological Perspective.” Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalan, M., K. Rosinger, and J. B. Ahn. 2020. “Use of Quasi-Experimental Research Designs in Education Research: Growth, Promise, and Challenges.” Review of Research in Education 44 (1): 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C., and M. Knuth. 2019. “An Update of the Literature Supporting the Well-Being Benefits of Plants: A Review of the Emotional and Mental Health Benefits of Plants.” Journal of Environmental Horticulture 37 (1): 30–38. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-37.1.30.
   Google Scholar
• Holgado-Tello, F. P., S. Chacón-Moscoso, S. Sanduvete-Chaves, and J. A. Pérez-Gil. 2016. “A Simulation Study of Threats to Validity in Quasi-Experimental Designs: Interrelationship Between Design, Measurement, and Analysis.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, J., R. Ediger, and D. Lee. 2017. “Students’ Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 29 (1): 108–118.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquemart, A. L., P. Lhoir, F. Binard, and C. Descamps. 2016. “An Interactive Multimedia Dichotomous Key for Teaching Plant Identification.” Journal of Biological Education 50 (4): 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1150870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judson, E. 2019. “Learning Stations in College Classrooms.” College Teaching 67 (4): 250–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1650707.
   Google Scholar
• Karacalı, K., N. Bulunuz, and M. Özkan. 2019. “Examining the Effects of the Learning Station Method on 7th Grade Students’conceptual Understanding Levels Regarding the Light Unit.” European Journal of Education Studies 6 (7): 122–144.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, S. B., and J. H. Flavell. 1990. “Understanding and Remembering: Children's Knowledge about the Differential Effects of Strategy and Task Variables on Comprehension and Memorization.” Child Development 61 (6): 1842–1858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03569.x.
   Google Scholar
• Madejón, P., T. Maranón, J. M. Murillo, and B. Robinson. 2006. “In Defence of Plants as Biomonitors of Soil Quality.” Environmental Pollution 143 (1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendieta, M. D. C., A. D. Z. D. Souza, S. Ceolin, N. R. C. Vargas, T. Ceolin, and R. M. Heck. 2014. “Toxic Plants: Importance of Knowledge for Realization of Health Education.” Journal of Nursing UFPE 8 (3): 680–686.
   Google Scholar
• Metioui, A., F. Matoussi, and L. Trudel. 2016. “The Teaching of Photosynthesis in Secondary School: A History of the Science Approach.” Journal of Biological Education 50 (3): 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1085427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norretranders, T. 1998. The User Illusion. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, L. A., B. Hall, and K. Tanita. 2013. “Animals, Plants, People, and Things: A Review of Multispecies Ethnography.” Environment and Society 4 (1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2013.040102.
   Google Scholar
• Orbanic, N. D., D. S. Dimec, and M. Cencic. 2016. “The Effectiveness of a Constructivist Teaching Model on Students’ Understanding of Photosynthesis.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 15 (5): 575–587. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pho, D. H., H. T. Nguyen, H. M. Nguyen, and T. T. N. Nguyen. 2021. “The Use of Learning Station Method According to Competency Development for Elementary Students in Vietnam.” Cogent Education 8 (1): 1870799. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1870799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogayan Jr, D. V. 2019. “Biology Learning Station Strategy (BLISS): Its Effects on Science Achievement and Attitude towards Biology.” International Journal on Social and Education Sciences 1 (2): 78–89. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.10.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, J. 1995. “The Use of Learning Stations as a Strategy for Teaching Concepts by Active-Learning Methods.” Journal of Geological Education 43 (4): 366–370. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-43.4.366.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, R. 2018. “Toxic Plants: Knowledge, Medicinal Uses and Potential Human Health Risks.” Environment and Ecology Research 6 (5): 487–492. https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2018.060509.
   Google Scholar
• Skribe Dimec, D., and J. Strgar. 2017. “Scientific Conceptions of Photosynthesis among Primary School Pupils and Student Teachers of Biology.” CEPS Journal 7 (1): 49–68. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:12958.
   Google Scholar
• StatPedu. 2015. National Institute for Education in Slovak Republic. Bratislava: NIV. (https://www.statpedu.sk/en/).
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L. 1971. “The Use of Experimental Design in Educational Evaluation.” Journal of Educational Measurement 8 (4): 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00936.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm, H., and F. X. Bogner. 2008. “Student-Oriented Versus Teacher-Centred: The Effect of Learning at Workstations About Birds and Bird Flight on Cognitive Achievement and Motivation.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (7): 941–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701313995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., J. Pei, L. Zhao, B. Ahmad, and L. F. Huang. 2021. “Fighting Climate Change: Soil Bacteria Communities and Topography Play a Role in Plant Colonization of Desert Areas.” Environmental Microbiology 23 (11): 6876–6894. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W., and M. Pye. 2019. “Botany Through the Looking Glass: Cognitive Neuroscience and its Role in the Use of Art in Botanical Education.” International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 27 (7). https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.27.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Tipton, E. 2014. “How Generalizable is Your Experiment? An Index for Comparing Experimental Samples and Populations.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 39 (6): 478–501. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998614558486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, E., and R. B. Olsen. 2018. “A Review of Statistical Methods for Generalizing from Evaluations of Educational Interventions.” Educational Researcher 47 (8): 516–524. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18781522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., and E. E. Schussler. 1999. “Preventing Plant Blindness.” The American Biology Teacher 61 (2): 82–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., E. E. Schussler, and P. P. Blindness. 2001. “Originally Written by Anna Kell & Jonathan Frey, Department of Art & Art History, Bucknell University for Lloydiana Magazine, a Publication of the Lloyd Library in Cincinnati, OH: Volume 21, Issue 1 2019, Pages 11-12.” Science Bulletin 47 (1): 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., P. Xie, L. Li, A. Deng, and C. Hu. 2020. “The Implementation Strategy of Quality-Oriented Education in Botany Teaching Reform.” Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 4 (6): 38–40. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v4i6.1286.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. 1997. “The Conservation of Agrobiodiversity on-Farm: Questioning the Emerging Paradigm.” Biodiversity & Conservation 6 (1): 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018331800939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zani, G., and J. Low. 2022. “Botanical Priming Helps Overcome Plant Blindness on a Memory Task.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 81: 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar