The regulation of private military and security companies: Analyzing power in multi-stakeholder initiatives

Reference list

• Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Law, legalization, and politics: An agenda for the next generation of IR/IL scholars. In J. L. Dunoff & M. A. Pollack (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations (pp. 33–56). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamsen, R., & Williams, M. C. (2011). Security beyond the state. Private security in international politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2009). Improved human rights policies and practices within Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs). https://web.archive.org/web/20160330042524/http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/business-and-human-rights/private-military-and-security-companies/improved-human-rights-policies-and-practices-w
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D. (2016). Pragmatic networks and transnational governance of private military and security services. International Studies Quarterly, 60(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqv018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international politics. International Organization, 59(1), 39–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann-Pauly, D., Nolan, J., van Heerden, A., & Samway, M. (2016). Industry-specific multi-stakeholder initiatives that govern corporate human rights standards: Legitimacy assessments of the fair labor association and the global network initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3076-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. (2009, April 15). IPOA submission to the United Nations working group on the use of Mercenaries. [email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D., & Chorev, M. (2008). Ruthless humanitarianism. Why marginalizing private peacekeeping kills people. In M. Caparini, D.-P. Barker, & A. Alexandra (Eds.), Private military and security companies: Ethics, policies and civil-military relations (pp. 116–131). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buzatu, A.-M. (2015). Towards an international code of conduct for private security providers: A view from inside a multistakeholder process (SSR Paper 12). Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). http://www.dcaf.ch/content/download/293835/4626651/file/DCAF-SSR-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M. (2015). Power plays in global internet governance. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 640–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814562655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casier, T. (2017). The different faces of power in European Union–Russia relations. Cooperation and Conflict, 53(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836717729179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheyns, E., & Riisgaard, L. (2014). The exercise of power through multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture and its inclusion and exclusion outcomes. Agriculture and Human Values, 31(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9508-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockayne, J. (2008). Regulating private military and security companies: The content, negotiation, weaknesses and promise of the Montreux document. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 13(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krp006
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Wartime Contracting. (2011). Transforming wartime contracting: Controlling costs, reducing risks. http://psm.du.edu/media/documents/us_research_and_oversight/cwc/reports/us_cwc_final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, C. (2010). The legitimacy of private transnational governance: Experts and the transnational market for force. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Prado, J. L. G. (2008). Private military and security companies and the UN Working Group on the use of Mercenaries. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 13(3), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krp010
   Google Scholar
• del Prado, J. L. G. (2010). A Pyrrhic victory at the United Nations over the 21st century’s ‘private industry’? https://www.business-humanrights.org/de/neuste-meldungen/doc-a-pyrrhic-victory-at-the-united-nations-over-the-21st-centurys-privateer-industry/
   Google Scholar
• de Souza, M. (2015). An offer developing countries could not refuse: How powerful states created the World Trade Organisation. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(2), 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWinter-Schmitt, R. (2017). International soft law initiatives: The opportunities and limitations of the Montreux document, ICoC, and security operations management system standards. In H. Torroja (Ed.), Public international law and human rights violations by private military and security companies (pp. 105–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66098-1_6.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2009). World politics and organizational fields: The case of transnational sustainability governance. European Journal of International Relations, 15(4), 707–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109345056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. (2010). Comments received on the draft for consultation. Global code of conduct for private security companies and private military companies. http://web.archive.org/web/20150416111126/http://www.icoc-psp.org/uploads/2010.16.10_-_Comments.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foreign and Commonwealth Office. (2009). Impact assessment on promoting high standards of conduct by private military and security companies (PMSCs) internationally.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, L. (2005). Power politics and the institutionalization of international relations. In M. Barnett, & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in global governance (pp. 102–129). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. R. (2000). De-facing power. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilary, J. (2007, May 15). Private military and security companies – dogs of war or a force for peace? War on want. Speech at conflict issues APPG meeting. (http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CHQQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fconflictissues.org.uk%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FJohn-Hilary-transcript.doc&ei=d_TXUr6TMsqPtAbn_YDAAQ&usg=AFQjCNECkElJcta8fe9N2HfPYESNNdjlFQ&sig2=9tM0zMApGyicmXEX8zPaQw&bvm=bv.59568121,d.Yms
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council. (2010a, October 1). Human rights council establishes working group on activities of private security companies, renews mandates on Sudan and Somalia. https://newsarchive.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=10407&LangID=E
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council. (2010b, September 14). Human rights council holds interactive debate on contemporary forms of slavery and on Mercenaries. https://newsarchive.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=10327&LangID=E
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council. (2011). Draft of a possible convention on private military and security companies (PMSCs) for consideration and action by the Human Rights Council. A/HRC/WG.10/1/2. A/HRC/WG.10/1/2.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council. (2017, September 11–29). Report of the open-ended intergovernmental working group to consider the possibility of elaborating an international regulatory framework on the regulation, monitoring and oversight of the activities of private military and security companies on its sixth session. A/HRC/36/36.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights First. (2011, August 31). Wartime contracting report makes clear case for reforms. https://web.archive.org/web/20120330062701/http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/08/31/wartime-contracting-report-makes-clear-case-for-reforms/
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). American power and the empire of capitalist democracy. Review of International Studies, 27(5), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210501008087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Code of Conduct Association. (2017). Approved amendment to the code of conduct: New transitional membership process. https://www.icoca.ch/en/approved-amendment-code-conduct-new-transitional-membership-process
   Google Scholar
• Interview#1. (2014). Personal interview with NGO representative, March 31.
   Google Scholar
• Interview#2. (2014). Personal interview with industry representative, March 31.
   Google Scholar
• Interview#3. (2014). Personal interview with former NGO- and PMSC-practitioner, April 1.
   Google Scholar
• Interview#4. (2014). Personal interview with PMSC representative, April 2.
   Google Scholar
• Interview#6. (2014). Personal interview with NGO representative, May 16.
   Google Scholar
• Interview#8. (2014). Telephone interview with NGO representative, May 22.
   Google Scholar
• Interview#10. (2014). Telephone interview with PMSC representative, June 13.
   Google Scholar
• Jerbi, S. (2013). The international code of conduct for private security service providers (Academy Briefing No. 4). Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Publications/Academy%20Briefings/Icoc_web_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, J., & Schneiker, A. (2015). NGOs and the price of governance: The trade-offs between regulating and criticizing private military and security companies. Critical Military Studies, 1(3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2015.1050270
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, J., & Schneiker, A. (2019). Private security and identity politics: Ethical hero warriors, professional managers and new humanitarians. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. R. (1996/1997). “Aliens” and the U.S. immigration laws: The social and legal construction of nonpersons. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 28(2), 263–292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40176418
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H. H. (2010, November 9). A response to introductory speeches from Swiss State Secretary Maurer, industry leaders, and civil society representatives. https://web.archive.org/web/20130413221345/http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/179307.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krahmann, E. (2012). From ‘Mercenaries’ to ‘private security contractors’: The (re)construction of armed security providers in international legal discourses. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(2), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811426673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahmann, E. (2017). From performance to performativity: The legitimization of US security contracting and its consequences. Security Dialogue, 48(6), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010617722650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A. (2014). Theorising the use of private military and security companies: A synthetic perspective. Journal of International Relations and Development, 17(1), 112–141. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jird/journal/v17/n1/abs/jird20134a.html. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A., & Spencer, A. (2013). Contested stories of commercial security: Self- and media narratives of private military and security companies. Critical Studies on Security, 1(3), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2013.857467
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2005). The power to construct international security: On the significance of private military companies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330030601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2012). What do codes of conduct do? Hybrid constitutionalization and militarization in military markets. Global Constitutionalism, 1(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381711000074
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2016a). The politics of whitelisting: Regulatory work and topologies in commercial security. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815616971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2016b). Whitelisting and the rule of law: Legal technologies and governance in contemporary commercial security. In M. Heupel, & T. Reinold (Eds.), The rule of law in Global governance (pp. 205–236). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A., & van Munster, R. (2007). Private security contractors in the debate about Darfur: Reflecting and reinforcing neo-liberal governmentality. International Relations, 21(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117807077004
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. (2010). Consensus emerges over need to hold military contractors accountable. Law and Security Program, Human Rights First.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-Y. (2015). Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare as emerging gaps in private military and security company regulation: Thoughts for the UN Working Group on the use of Mercenaries. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Mercenaries/WG/Event2015/HinYanLiu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mattern, J. B., & Zarakol, A. (2016). Hierarchies in world politics. International Organization, 70(3), 623–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3), 527–556. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. C., & Keohane, R. O. (2014). Contested multilateralism. The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9188-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, H., & Kellow, A. (2013). Forum shopping in global governance: Understanding states, Business and NGOs in multiple arenas. Global Policy, 4(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2012.00195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, S. (2007). Morality and regulation. In S. Chesterman, & C. Lehnardt (Eds.), From Mercenaries to market: The rise and regulation of private military companies (pp. 11–28). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Percy, S. (2012). Regulating the private security industry: A story of regulating the last war. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(887), 941–960. https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/irrc-887-percy.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383113000258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingeot, L. (2012). Dangerous partnership. Private military & security companies and the UN. Global Policy Forum and Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. https://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/sonst_publikationen/studie_dangerous_partnership.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pingeot, L. (2014). Contracting insecurity. Private military and security companies and the future of the United nations. Global Policy Forum and Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. http://www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/GPFEurope/PMSC_2014_Contracting_Insecurity_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prem, B. (2018). Who am I? The blurring of the Private Military and Security Company (PMSC) category. In O. Bures & H. Carrapico (Eds.), Security privatization: How non-security-related private businesses shape security governance (pp. 51–76). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prem, B. (2020). Private Military and Security Companies as global governors: From Barricades to boardrooms. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäferhoff, M., Campe, S., & Kaan, C. (2009). Transnational public-private partnerships in international relations: Making sense of concepts, research frameworks, and results. International Studies Review, 11(3), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00869.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiker, A., & Joachim, J. (2018). Revisiting global governance in multistakeholder initiatives: Club governance based on ideational prealignments. Global Society, 32(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2017.1377688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiberth, C. (2014). Private military and security companies in international law. A challenge for non-binding norm: The Montreux document and the international code of conduct for private security service providers. Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (1990). Law’s power, the sexed body, and feminist discourse. Journal of Law and Society, 17(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, T. (1999). Interview with Lt Col Tim Spicer. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 13(1), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557579908400280
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, R. H. (2002). In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization, 56(2), 339–374. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3078608. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802320005504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürchler, N. (2008). The Swiss initiative comes alive. Seventeen states agree on how to legally deal with private security companies. Journal of International Peace Operations, 4(3), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tougas, M.-L. (2009). Some comments and observations on the Montreux document. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 12(December), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1389135909000129
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuven, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005
   Google Scholar
• van Meegdenburg, H. (2015). What the research on PMSCs discovered and neglected: An appraisal of the literature. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(2), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2015.1061755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tulder, R. (2012). Foreword – the necessity of multi-stakeholder initiatives. In M. van Huijstee (Ed.), Multi-stakeholder initiatives: A strategic guide for civil society organizations (pp. 8–9). SOMO. https://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Multi-stakeholder-initiatives.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Voillat, C. (2012). Pushing the humanitarian agenda through engagement with business actors: The ICRC’s experience. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(887), 1089–1114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383113000507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• War on Want. (2013, September 19). Charity slams conduct code for private military and security companies. http://web.archive.org/web/20140219092301/http://www.waronwant.org/news/press-releases/17987-charity-slams-conduct-code-for-private-military-and-security-companies
   Google Scholar
• War on Want & Campaign Against Arms Trade. (2006). Corporate Mercenaries: The threat of private military and security companies. https://web.archive.org/web/20100616185416/https://www.waronwant.org/attachments/Corporate%20Mercenaries.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Westerwinter, O. (2016). Bargaining in networks. Relationship and the governance of conflict diamonds. In D. Avant, & O. Westerwinter (Eds.), The new power politics: Networks and transnational security governance (pp. 196–223). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, N. D. (2011). The privatisation of military and security functions and human rights: Comments on the UN Working Group’s draft convention. Human Rights Law Review, 11(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngq053
   Google Scholar