Global Britain in the grey zone: Between stagecraft and statecraft

References

• Australian Department of Defence. (2020). Defence strategic update. https://www1.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/2020_Defence_Strategic_Update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Haim, Y. (2015). Dealing with uncertainty in strategic decision-making. Parameters, 45(3), 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Blagden, D. (2020). Deterring cyber coercion: The exaggerated problem of attribution. Survival, 62(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2020.1715072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, A. S. (2021). Russian military mobilization on Ukraine’s borders and in occupied Crimea (#IN116551). Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11651.
   Google Scholar
• Braw, E. (2019, May 17). Second strike communications. RUSI Newsbrief. https://rusi.org/publication/rusi-newsbrief/second-strike-communications.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, M., & Jessett, W. (2020, March 26). Defence and the integrated review: a testing time (RUSI Whitehall Report 2-20). RUSI. https://static.rusi.org/20200324_defence_and_integrated_review_readyforweb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chief of the Defence Staff. (2015, December 16). Annual chief of the defence staff lecture 2015. RUSI. https://rusi.org/event/annual-chief-defence-staff-lecture-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chief of the Defence Staff. (2018a, June 05). Air chief marshal Sir Stuart peach valedictory address as chief of the defence staff. RUSI. https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/CDS-transcript.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chief of the Defence Staff. (2018b, December 11). Annual chief of the defence staff lecture 2018. RUSI. https://rusi.org/event/annual-chief-defence-staff-lecture-and-rusi-christmas-party-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chief of the Defence Staff. (2019, December 05). Annual chief of the defence staff lecture and RUSI Christmas party 2019. RUSI. https://rusi.org/event/annual-chief-defence-staff-lecture-and-rusi-christmas-party-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cormac, R., & Aldrich, R. J. (2018). Grey is the new black: Covert action and implausible deniability. International Affairs, 94(3), 477–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, P., & Dorman, A. (2015). Complex security and strategic latency: The UK strategic defence and security review. International Affairs, 91(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defence Committee. (2019, June 28). Hybrid threats to the UK examined. UK Parliament. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/24/defence-committee/news/114516/hybrid-threats-to-the-uk-examined/.
   Google Scholar
• Defence Committee. (2020b, July 7). Oral evidence: Work of the Chief of Defence Staff. UK Parliament. https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/652/pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Navy of the United States of America. (2020). Force Design 2030. https://www.hqmc.marines.mil/Portals/142/Docs/CMC38%20Force%20Design%202030%20Report%20Phase%20I%20and%20II.pdf?ver=2020-03-26-121328-460.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016, April 6). FAQ: Joint framework on countering hybrid threats. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/it/MEMO_16_1250.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017, July 19). Security and defence: Significant progress to enhance Europe's resilience against hybrid threats – more work ahead [Press Release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_2064.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021, July 3). Empowering a pan-European network to counter hybrid threats. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/883054.
   Google Scholar
• Fazal, T. M., & Poast, P. (2019, October 15). War is not over. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2019-10-15/war-not-over.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Government of Germany. (2016). White paper 2016: On German security policy and the future of the Bundeswehr. https://issat.dcaf.ch/download/111704/2027268/2016%20White%20Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. (2021, April 15). Russia: UK exposes Russian involvement in SolarWinds cyber compromise [Press Release]. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/russia-uk-exposes-russian-involvement-in-solarwinds-cyber-compromise.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A. C. (2020). Five models of strategic relationship in proxy war. Georgetown Security Studies Review, 8(2), 50–58. https://georgetownsecuritystudiesreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/17-Nov-82-Final-Draft.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, O. (2018). Russian ‘hybrid warfare’: Resurgence and politicization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, O., Kabernik, V., & Peace, J. C. (2019). Hybrid conflicts and information warfare. New labels, old politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti, M. (2016). Hybrid, ambiguous, and non-linear? How new is Russia’s ‘new way of war’? Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27(2), 282–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2015.1129170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeotti, M. (2018, November 29). (Mis)Understanding Russia’s two ‘hybrid wars’. Eurozine. https://www.eurozine.com/misunderstanding-russias-two-hybrid-wars/.
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti, M. (2019). Russian political war: Moving beyond the hybrid. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giannopoulos, G., Smith, H., & Theocharidou, M. (2021, February 5). The landscape of hybrid threats: A conceptual model. Hybrid CoE. https://www.hybridcoe.fi/publications/the-landscape-of-hybrid-threats-a-conceptual-model/.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, K. (2019). Hybrid threats: What can we learn from Russia? (Security policy working paper #16). Federal Academy for Security Policy. https://www.baks.bund.de/sites/baks010/files/working_paper_2019_16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, S., & Ramali, K. (2020, December 13). Outsourcing disinformation. Lawfare. https://www.lawfareblog.com/outsourcing-disinformation.
   Google Scholar
• Gunneriusson, H. (2017). Bordieuan field theory as an instrument for military operational analysis. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies. https://www.potomacinstitute.org/images/stories/publications/potomac_hybridwar_0108.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F. G. (2009). Hybrid threats: Reconceptualizing the evolving character of modern conflict. Strategic Forum, April 2009(240), 1–8. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/98862/SF240.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F. G. (2010). Hybrid threats: Neither omnipotent nor unbeatable. Orbis, 54(3), 441–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2010.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F. G. (2018). Examining complex forms of conflict: Gray zone and hybrid challenges. Prism, 7(4), 30–47. https://cco.ndu.edu/Portals/96/Documents/prism/prism7_4/181204_Hoffman_PDF.pdf?ver=2018-12-04-161237-307.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2020). War in the grey zone. Historical reflections and contemporary implications. Survival, 62(3), 131–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2020.1763618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IISS. (2014). Countering hybrid threats: Challenges for the West. Strategic Comments, 20(8), x–xii. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2014.992189.
   Google Scholar
• Intelligence and Security Committee. (2020, July 21). Russia. Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. https://isc.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CCS207_CCS0221966010-001_Russia-Report-v02-Web_Accessible.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A., & Lasconjarias, G. (2015). NATO's hybrid flanks - handling unconventional warfare in the South and the East (Research paper #112). NATO Defense College. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/190786/rp_112.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Janičatová, S., & Mlejnková, P. (2021). The ambiguity of hybrid warfare: A qualitative content analysis of the United Kingdom’s political–military discourse on Russia’s hostile activities. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(3), 312–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1885921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (2018). Hybrid war and its countermeasures: A critique of the literature. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29(1), 141–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2018.1404770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy. (2019, July 21). Revisiting the UK’s national security strategy: The national security capability review and the modernising defence programme (Fourth report of session 2017–19, HC 2072, HL Paper 406). House of Commons & House of Lords. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201719/jtselect/jtnatsec/2072/2072.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, A. (2020, March 30). In an era of hybrid warfare, departments must work together to protect Britain. PoliticsHome. https://www.politicshome.com/thehouse/article/in-an-era-of-hybrid-warfare-departments-must-work-together-to-protect-uk-society.
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, D. (2020). The dragons and the snakes: How the rest learned to fight the West. Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Lanoszka, A. (2016). Russian hybrid warfare and extended deterrence in Eastern Europe. International Affairs, 92(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoszka, A. (2019). Disinformation in international politics. European Journal of International Security, 4(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. (2018). Countering hybrid warfare as ontological security management: The emerging practices of the EU and NATO. European Security, 27(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKane, T. (2020, April 24). Reflections on defence and the integrated review: A testing time. RUSI Commentary. https://rusi.org/commentary/reflections-defence-and-integrated-review-testing-time.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Armées. (2017). Defence and national security strategic review 2017. https://www.defense.gouv.fr/layout/set/popup/content/download/520198/8733095/version/2/file/DEFENCE+AND+NATIONAL+SECURITY+STRATEGIC+REVIEW+2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2018a). Mobilising, modernising & transforming defence. A report on the modernising defence programme. HM Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/931705/ModernisingDefenceProgramme_report_2018_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2018b). Global strategic trends. The future starts today. HM Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/771309/Global_Strategic_Trends_-_The_Future_Starts_Today.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2019a, February 11). Defence in Global Britain. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/defence-in-global-britain.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2019b, June 4). Defence Secretary keynote speech at the Land Warfare Conference 2019. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/defence-secretary-keynote-speech-at-the-land-warfare-conference-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2019c, December 3). Defence Secretary's speech at NATO engages. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/defence-secretarys-speech-at-nato-engages.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2020a, February 12). UK further commits to NATO and European security through JEF Readiness Declaration and deployment of typhoons to Lithuania [Press Release]. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-further-commits-to-nato-and-european-security-through-jef-readiness-declaration-and-deployment-of-typhoons-to-lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2020b, September 28). UK leads thousands of NATO troops in major exercise off Scottish coast [Press Release]. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-leads-thousands-of-nato-troops-in-major-exercise-off-scottish-coast.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2020c, October 8). The Chief of the General Staff: Tomorrow’s army – An asymmetric army for the digital age. The British Army. https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2020/10/cgs-tomorrow-s-army/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2020d, October 19). MOD Science and Technology Strategy 2020. Retrieved March 20, 2021, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-science-and-technology-strategy-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. (2021, March 30). Defence in a competitive age. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-in-a-competitive-age.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, A., & Wyss, M. (2020). The political power of proxies: Why nonstate actors use local surrogates. International Security, 44(4), 119–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, A. (2016). The ‘war’ in Russia’s ‘hybrid warfare’. Parameters, 45(4), 65–74. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/parameters/vol45/iss4/8.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, S. (2019). Countering hybrid warfare: So what for the future joint force? Prism, 8(2), 83–98. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/prism/prism_8-2/PRISM_8-2_Monaghan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Multinational Capability Development Campaign. (2019). Countering Hybrid Warfare Project: Countering Hybrid Warfare. HM Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/784299/concepts_mcdc_countering_hybrid_warfare.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. (2016, July 9). Warsaw summit communiqué. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133169.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. (2017, October 2). Remarks by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at the inauguration of the Helsinki Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats, with EU High Representative Federica Mogherini. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_147499.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. (2018, March 2018). Joint press point with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_153049.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. (2021, March 16). NATO’s response to hybrid threats. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_156338.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, D. (2020, September 12). Threat of the future is ‘use of proxies to inflict military harm, says defence secretary’. The Telegraph, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/09/12/threat-future-use-proxies-inflict-military-harm-says-defence/.
   Google Scholar
• Nyemann, D. B., & Sørensen, H. (2019, January 8). Going beyond resilience. A revitalised approach to countering hybrid threats (Hybrid CoE Strategic Analysis 13). Hybrid CoE. https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Strategic-analysis-13-Sorensen-Nyeman.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pabriks, A. (2020, June 25). How Latvia accomplishes comprehensive defence. RUSI Commentary. https://rusi.org/commentary/how-latvia-accomplishes-comprehensive-defence.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2015, November 23). National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-strategy-and-strategic-defence-and-security-review-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2018a, March 28). National security capability review. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-capability-review-nscr.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2018b, September 5). PM statement on the Salisbury investigation. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-statement-on-the-salisbury-investigation-5-september-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2020a, February 26). PM outlines new review to define Britain’s place in the world. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-outlines-new-review-to-define-britains-place-in-the-world.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2020b, September 30). Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir Nick Carter launches the integrated operating concept. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/chief-of-the-defence-staff-general-sir-nick-carter-launches-the-integrated-operating-concept.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2020c, September 30). Introducing the integrated operating concept. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-integrated-operating-concept-2025.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2021, March 16). Global Britain in a competitive age: The integrated review of security, defence, development and foreign policy. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/global-britain-in-a-competitive-age-the-integrated-review-of-security-defence-development-and-foreign-policy.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. F. (2018, March 16). Global Britain might just have found its calling in leading the charge against Russia's hybrid warfare. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/16/global-britain-might-just-have-found-calling-leading-charge/.
   Google Scholar
• Rauta, V. (2018). A structural-relational analysis of party dynamics in proxy wars. International Relations, 32(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818802436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V. (2020a). Towards a typology of non-state actors in ‘hybrid warfare’: Proxy, auxiliary, surrogate and affiliated forces. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(6), 868–887. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1656600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V. (2020b). Proxy warfare and the future of conflict: Take two. The RUSI Journal, 165(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2020.1736437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V. (2021a). Framers, founders, and reformers: Three generations of proxy war research. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1800240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V. (2021b). ‘Proxy war’ - A reconceptualisation. Civil Wars, 23(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2021.1860578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz, B. (2016). Russia and hybrid warfare. Contemporary Politics, 22(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz, B. (2019). Russian responses to the changing character of war. International Affairs, 95(4), 817–834. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz, B., & Smith, H. (2016). Russia and hybrid warfare. Going beyond the label (Aleksanteri Papers #1). Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/175291/renz_smith_russia_and_hybrid_warfare.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2019, December 17). The upcoming defence and security review: Questions that must be answered. RUSI Commentary. https://rusi.org/commentary/upcoming-defence-and-security-review-questions-must-be-answered.
   Google Scholar
• Rühle, M. (2019). Deterring hybrid threats: The need for a more rational debate. NATO Defense College. https://www.ndc.nato.int/download/downloads.php?icode=600.
   Google Scholar
• RUSI. (2018, June 20). General Mark Carleton Smith, CGS keynote address, RUSI Land Warfare Conference [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jurJ4hHpDAY.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and influence. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seeley, B. (2018, June 4). A definition of contemporary Russian conflict: How does the Kremlin wage war? The Henry Jackson Foundation. https://henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/a-definition-of-contemporary-russian-conflict-how-does-the-kremlin-wage-war/.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, K. (2019, August 1). Army to form new hybrid-warfare division. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-army-hybrid-warfare-division-conflict-intelligence-cyber-a9030281.html.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, T. (2021, May 2). Raab: Putin’s trolls are targeting national newspapers. The Sunday Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/raab-putins-trolls-are-targeting-national-newspapers-fzd8hlw65.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, D., & Whiteside, C. (2020). Blurred lines: Gray-zone conflict and hybrid war - Two failures of American strategic thinking. Naval War College Review, 73(1), 1–38. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8092&context=nwc-review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strategic Command. (2020, July 15). Commander Strategic Command, General Sir Patrick Sanders’ speech at the Air and Space Power Conference. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/commander-strategic-command-general-sir-patrick-sanders-speech-at-the-air-and-space-power-conference.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2020, September 15). Into the greyzone: Britain’s armed forces get ready for a revolution. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/britain/2020/09/15/britains-armed-forces-get-ready-for-a-revolution.
   Google Scholar
• The Observer. (2020, July 19). The Observer view on Russian interference in British democracy. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/19/the-observer-view-on-russian-interference-in-british-democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, D. H., & Marks, T. A. (2018). Violence in context: Mapping the strategies and operational art of irregular warfare. Contemporary Security Policy, 39(2), 206–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2018.1432922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States of America Department of Defense. (2018). Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weissmann, M., Nilsson, N., Thunholm, P., & Palmertz, B. (2021). Hybrid warfare: Security and asymmetric conflict in international relations. I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• White House. (2021, March 3). Interim national security strategic guidance. White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/03/interim-national-security-strategic-guidance/.
   Google Scholar
• Wigell, M. (2019). Hybrid interference as a wedge strategy: A theory of external interference in liberal democracy. International Affairs, 95(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, G. (2018, March 31). We have entered a dangerous new era of warfare and must evolve to meet Putin's threat. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/03/31/have-entered-dangerous-new-era-warfare-must-evolve-meet-putins/.
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, A. S. (2020). US cyber deterrence: Practice guiding theory. Journal of Strategic Studies, 43(2), 245–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2018.1563779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wither, J. K. (2020). Back to the future? Nordic total defence concepts. Defence Studies, 20(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2020.1718498
   Google Scholar