Durable institution under fire? The NPT confronts emerging multipolarity

Reference List

• Abe, N. (2020). The NPT at fifty: Successes and failures. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 3(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1824500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albin, C. (2001). Justice and fairness in international negotiation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, D. M., & Bowen, T. (2021). Counterproductive counter-proliferation? Evaluating kinetic attacks on nascent nuclear programs. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, D. M., & Herzog, S. (2020). “What about China?” and the threat to US–Russian nuclear arms control. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 76(4), 200–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2020.1778370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baccini, L., Lenzi, V., & Thurner, P. W. (2013). Global energy governance: Trade, infrastructure, and the diffusion of international organizations. International Interactions, 39(2), 192–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2013.768512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, I., & Revell, P. (2015). Climate change. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 839–847). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bapat, N. A., & Morgan, T. C. (2009). Multilateral versus unilateral sanctions reconsidered: A test using new data. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1075–1094. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, S. (2001). “Nuclear apartheid” as political position: Race as a postcolonial resource? Alternatives, 26(4), 485–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleek, P. C. (2017). When did (and didn’t) states proliferate? Harvard University, Project on Managing the Atom. Discussion Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Breitmeier, H., Underdal, A., & Young, O. R. (2011). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Comparing and contrasting findings from quantitative research. International Studies Review, 13(4), 579–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budjeryn, M. (2016). The power of the NPT: International norms and Ukraine's nuclear disarmament. The Nonproliferation Review, 22(2), 203–237. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2015.1119968
   Google Scholar
• Bukovansky, M., Clark, I., Eckersley, R., Price, R., Reus-Smit, C., & Wheeler, N. J. (2012). Special responsibilities: Global problems and American power. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, M. L. (2007). Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade. International Organization, 61(4), 735–761. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, A. J., & Vaynman, J. (2015). Collusion and the nuclear nonproliferation regime. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 983–997. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/682080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, A. J., & Vaynman, J. (2020). Why arms control is so rare. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 342–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541900073X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colgan, J. D., & Miller, N. L. (2019). Rival hierarchies and the origins of nuclear technology sharing. International Studies Quarterly, 63(2), 310–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, A., Fuchs, A., Parks, B., Strange, A. M., & Tierney, M. J. (2018). Apples and dragon fruits: The determinants of aid and other forms of state financing from China to Africa. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 182–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, S. E. (2009–2010). United Nations nonproliferation sanctions. International Journal, 65(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201006500105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, M. (2019, November 14). Navy beginning tech study to extend trident nuclear missile into the 2080s. USNI News.
   Google Scholar
• Egeland, K. (2017). The road to prohibition: Nuclear hierarchy and disarmament, 1968–2017 [PhD dissertation]. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Egeland, K. (2022). A theory of nuclear disarmament: Cases, analogies, and the role of the non-proliferation regime. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 106–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1978159
   Google Scholar
• Endicott, J. E. (1977). The 1975–76 debate over ratification of the NPT in Japan. Asian Survey, 17(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2643501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erästö, T., Komžaitė, U., & Topychkanov, P. (2019, April). Operationalizing nuclear disarmament verification. SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security, 2019(3).
   Google Scholar
• Fetter, S. (1991). Ballistic missiles and weapons of mass destruction: What is the threat? What should be done? International Security, 16(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2539050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, T. (2015). Proliferation alert! The IAEA and non-compliance reporting. Harvard University, Project on Managing the Atom. Discussion Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, D., Mignozzetti, U., & Skarbek, D. (2021). Institutional design and elite support for climate policies: Evidence from Latin American countries. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 8(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.19
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M., & Lupu, Y. (2016). Do arms control treaties work? Assessing the effectiveness of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. International Studies Quarterly, 60(3), 530–539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, F. J. (2015). Strategies of inhibition: US grand strategy, the nuclear revolution, and nonproliferation. International Security, 40(1), 9–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghe, E. (2013). A flash in the pan: Romania and the NPT, 1968–1975. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D. (2018). The humanitarian turn in nuclear disarmament and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, 25(1–2), 11–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1486960
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D. (2020). Supply to deny: The benefits of nuclear assistance for nuclear nonproliferation. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(2), 282–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D. (forthcoming). The hegemon’s tool kit: US leadership and the politics of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, M. J. (2006). Is enforcement necessary for effectiveness? A model of the international criminal regime. International Organization, 60(4), 935–967. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giovannini, F. (2021). The CTBT at 25 and beyond. Arms Control Today, 51(7), 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2012). International regimes for human rights. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 265–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-114414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., Helfer, L. R., & Fariss, C. J. (2011). Emergency and escape: Explaining derogations from human rights treaties. International Organization, 65(4), 673–707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081831100021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of international regimes. International Organization, 41(3), 491–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, M. (2022). Power to the have-nots? The NPT and the limits of a treaty hijacked by a “power-over” model. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2037968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, O. (2002). Do human rights treaties make a difference? The Yale Law Journal, 111(8), 1935–2041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/797642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, L. R. (2009). Regime shifting in the international intellectual property system. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. (2017). The nuclear test ban: Technical opportunities for the new administration. Arms Control Today, 47(1), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. (2021a). After the negotiations: Understanding multilateral nuclear arms control [PhD dissertation]. Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. (2021b). Backchannel non-proliferation: Militarily non-aligned states and nuclear diplomacy. In D. Fleck, & J. L. Black-Branch (Eds.), Nuclear non-proliferation in international law – volume VI (pp. 281–303). Springer/T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-463-1_11
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. (2021c). Veto players, treaty effectiveness, and multilateral nuclear arms control. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S., Baron, J., & Gibbons, R. D. (2022). Antinormative messaging, group cues, and the Nuclear Ban Treaty. The Journal of Politics, 84(1). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/714924
   Google Scholar
• Horovitz, L. (2015). Beyond pessimism: Why the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons will not collapse. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1–2), 126–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.917971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horovitz, L., & Golan-Vilella, R. (2010). Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: How the dominoes might fall after US ratification. The Nonproliferation Review, 17(2), 235–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2010.485426
   Google Scholar
• Houck, F., Rosenthal, M. D., & Wulf, N. A. (2010, July 11–15). Creation of the Model Additional Protocol. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, Baltimore, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, J., & Sonne, P. (2021, May 22). Trump administration discussed conducting first U.S. nuclear test in decades. Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. R. (forthcoming). The nuclear club: How America and the world policed the atom from Hiroshima to Vietnam. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2012). Liberal leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplow, J., & Gibbons, R. D. (2015). The days after a deal with Iran: Implications for the nuclear nonproliferation regime. RAND Corporation. Perspectives, 135.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, A. E. (2007). Beyond compliance: China, international organizations, and global security. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (1982). The demand for international regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 325–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830001897X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, C. (1974). The world in depression, 1929–1939. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, J. W. (2022). Not by NPT alone: The future of the global nuclear order. Contemporary Security Policy. 43(1), 186–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983243
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, M., & Kendall-Taylor, A. (2021). The myth of Russian decline: Why Moscow will be a persistent power. Foreign Affairs, 100(6), 142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koplow, D. A. (2017). Sherlock Holmes meets Rube Goldberg: Fixing the entry-into-force provisions of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 28(1), 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (1976). State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics, 28(3), 317–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2009974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, S. E., & Fuhrmann, M. (2011). Attacking the atom: Does bombing nuclear facilities affect proliferation? Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.559021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2021). World nuclear forces. In SIPRI yearbook 2021: Armaments, disarmament and international security (pp. 333–412). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. (2009). Exporting the bomb: Why states provide sensitive nuclear assistance. American Political Science Review, 103(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, U., & Péczeli, A. (2017). Russia, NATO, and the INF Treaty. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 11(1), 66–99.
   Google Scholar
• Kupchan, C. A. (1998). After Pax Americana: Benign power, regional integration, and the sources of a stable multipolarity. International Security, 23(2), 40–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.2.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoszka, A. (2018). Nuclear proliferation and nonproliferation among Soviet allies. Journal of Global Security Studies, 3(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levite, A. E. (2002–2003). Never say never again: Nuclear reversal revisited. International Security, 27(3), 59–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/01622880260553633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, Y. (2013). The informative power of treaty commitment: Using the spatial model to address selection effects. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 912–925. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, D. (2020). Financial sanctions and political risk in the international currency system. Review of International Political Economy, 28(3), 635–661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1736126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990). Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15(1), 5–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2021). The inevitable rivalry: America, China, and the tragedy of great-power politics. Foreign Affairs, 100(6), 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. L. (2014a). Nuclear dominoes: A self-defeating prophecy? Security Studies, 23(1), 33–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2014.874189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. L. (2014b). The secret success of nuclear nonproliferation sanctions. International Organization, 68(4), 913–944. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818314000216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. L. (2018). Stopping the bomb: The sources and effectiveness of US nonproliferation policy. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, N. P. (2014). Theory of unipolar politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1995). Explaining international human rights regimes: Liberal theory and Western Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 1(2), 157–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066195001002002
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., & Schmidt, A. (2010). The little known story of de-proliferation: Why states give up nuclear weapon activities. In W. C. Potter, & G. Mukhatzhanova (Eds.), Forecasting nuclear proliferation in the 21st century: The role of theory, volume 1 (pp. 124–158). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., & Wunderlich, C. (Eds.). (2013). Norm dynamics in multilateral arms control: Interests, conflicts, and justice. University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, F. (2019, August 9). Global network’s nuclear sensors in Russia went offline after mystery blast. Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. (2005). Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 925–953. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002705281667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda, O. (2022). A wolf in sheep’s clothing? The NPT and symbolic proliferation. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 134–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983699
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E., & Gowan, R. (2012). What makes international agreements work: Defining factors for success. Center for International Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onderco, M. (2021). Networked nonproliferation: Making the NPT permanent. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxenstierna, M. T. (1999). Revisiting the global response to non-proliferation violations in Iraq: Tracing the historical political roots. Contemporary Security Policy, 20(2), 77–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523269908404222
   Google Scholar
• Oye, K. A. (Ed.). (1986). Cooperation under anarchy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pelopidas, B. (2021). The birth of nuclear eternity. In S. Kemp & J. Andersson (Eds.), Futures (pp. 484–500). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrovics, A. A. (2019). Inducing nuclear reversal: Foreign policy effectiveness and deproliferation [PhD dissertation]. University of California, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B. R. (2009). Emerging multipolarity: Why should we care? Current History, 108(721), 347–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2009.108.721.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. (2021). Angling for influence: Institutional proliferation in development banking. International Studies Quarterly, 65(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius, J., & Sauer, T. (2021). Ditch the NPT. Survival, 63(4), 103–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2021.1956197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius, J., & Sauer, T. (2022). When is it legitimate to abandon the NPT? Withdrawal as a political tool to move nuclear disarmament forward. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 161–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.2009695
   Google Scholar
• Riqiang, W. (2020). Living with uncertainty: Modeling China’s nuclear survivability. International Security, 44(4), 84–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, T., & Gibbons, R. D. (2021). Twenty-five years safer? Assessing the effectiveness of the IAEA’s Model Additional Protocol. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwood, L. (2014). The IAEA’s State-Level Concept and the law of unintended consequences. Arms Control Today, 44(7), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwood, L. (2017, June 23–24). Opportunities for US/Russian collaboration in strengthening the IAEA’s safeguards system. Paper prepared for the U.S.–Russia Dialogue on Nuclear Issues Meeting on U.S.–Russian Cooperation at Vienna- and Geneva-Based International Organizations, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Rublee, M. R. (2009). Nonproliferation norms: Why states choose nuclear restraint. University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. (1996–1997). Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. International Security, 21(3), 54–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2539273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sechser, T. S., Narang, N., & Talmadge, C. (2019). Emerging technologies and strategic stability in peacetime, crisis, and war. Journal of Strategic Studies, 42(6), 727–735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1626725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaker, M. (1980). The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Origins and implementation, 1959–1979. Oceana Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smetana, M. (2020). Nuclear deviance: Stigma politics and the rules of the nonproliferation game. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smetana, M., & O’Mahoney, J. (2022). NPT as an antifragile system: How contestation improves the nonproliferation regime. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1978761
   Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. (2007). Nuclear logics: Contrasting paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai, A. (2017). Negotiating the “Iran talks” in Tehran: The Iranian drivers that shaped the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. The Nonproliferation Review, 24(3–4), 225–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1426180
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802760199908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. (2013). Justice and fairness in the nuclear nonproliferation regime. Ethics & International Affairs, 27(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679413000221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timerbaev, R. M. (1999). Rossiia i iadernoe nerasprostranenie: 1945–1968 [Russia and nuclear nonproliferation: 1945–1968]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office. (1980, July 31). Evaluation of US efforts to promote Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Report to Congress by the Comptroller General to the United States, ID-80-41.
   Google Scholar
• Verdier, D. (2008). Multilateralism, bilateralism, and exclusion in the nuclear proliferation regime. International Organization, 62(3), 439–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. (2000). Nuclear order and disorder. International Affairs, 76(4), 703–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1981). The spread of nuclear weapons: More may be better. The Adelphi Papers, 21(171). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/05679328108457394
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (2011). Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(50), 19853–19860. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111690108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar