Reference list
- Arbatov, A. (2015). An unnoticed crisis. The end of history for nuclear arms control? Carnegie Moscow Center. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CP_Arbatov2015_n_web_Eng.pdf.
- Barnum, M., & Lo, J. (2020). Is the NPT unraveling? Journal of Peace Research, 57(6), 740–751. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320960523
- Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Blackaby, F. (1997). Time for a peasants’ revolt. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 53(6), 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1997.11456777
- Bodansky, D. (1999). The legitimacy of international governance: A coming challenge for international environmental law? The American Journal of International Law, 93(3), 596–624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2555262
- Bodansky, D. (2012). Legitimacy in international law and international relations. In J. Dunoff, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations: The state of the art (pp. 321–342). Cambridge University Press.
- Brodie, B. (1946). The absolute weapon. Harcourt Brace.
- Brölmann, C. M., Collins, R., Droubi, S., & Wessel, R. (2018). Exiting international organizations: A brief introduction. International Organizations Law Review, 15(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01502001
- Brown, J., & Potter, W. (2019, April 24). Open forum: Time for a reality check on nuclear diplomacy. San Francisco Chronicle, https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Open-Forum-Time-for-a-reality-check-on-nuclear-13793344.php.
- Bunn, G., & Rhinelander, J. B. (2005). NPT withdrawal: Time for the UNSC to step in. Arms Control Today. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2005-05/features/npt-withdrawal-time-security-council-step.
- Burr, W. (2018, October 29). 60th anniversary of Irish resolution: A forerunner of the NPT. National Security Archive. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2018-10-29/60th-anniversary-irish-resolution-forerunner-npt.
- Carpes, M. (2013). When words are not enough: Assessing the relationship between international commitments and the nuclear choices of Brazil, India and South Africa. Third World Quarterly, 34(6), 1111–1126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.802500
- Carranza, M. (2006). Can the NPT survive? Contemporary Security Policy, 27(3), 489–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260601060537
- Cohen, A., & Burr, W. (2020, August 31). Revisiting the 1979 VELA mystery: A report on a critical oral history conference. Sources and methods: A blog of the history and public policy program of the Woodrow Wilson Center. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/revisiting-1979-vela-mystery-report-critical-oral-history-conference.
- Columbia Broadcasting System News. (2020, October 22). US urges nations to withdraw support for UN nuclear weapons prohibition treaty. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-urges-nations-to-withdraw-support-for-un-nuclear-weapons-prohibition-treaty-ap/.
- Considine, L. (2019). Contests of legitimacy and value: The treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons and the logic of prohibition. International Affairs, 95(5), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz103
- Coppen, T. (2014). Good faith and withdrawal from the non-proliferation treaty. Questions of International Law, 1, 21–33.
- Debre, J., & Dijkstra, H. (2021). Institutional design for a post-liberal order: Why some international organizations live longer than others. European Journal of International Relations, 27(1), 311–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120962183
- Dellmuth, L., Scholte, J., & Tallberg, J. (2019). Institutional sources of legitimacy for international organisations: Beyond procedure versus performance. Review of International Studies, 45(4), 627–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051900007X
- Dhanapala, J. (1996). Fulfilling the promise of the NPT: The CTBT and beyond. Arms Control Today, 26(4), 3–6.
- Dhanapala, J. (2008). Fulfill and strengthen the bargain. Arms Control Today, 38(5), 14–16.
- Doyle, T. E. (2009). The moral implications of the subversion of the nonproliferation treaty regime. Ethics and Global Politics, 2(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v2i2.1916
- Duarte, S. (2019, November 18). Ditch the bomb, not the NPT. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. https://thebulletin.org/2019/11/ditch-the-bomb-not-the-npt/.
- Egeland, K. (2021). The ideology of nuclear order. New Political Science, 43(2), 208–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2021.1886772
- Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. (2020). Death of international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 15(2), 339–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9340-5
- Etzioni, A. (2015, February 13). The darker side of the US-India nuclear deal. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2015/02/the-darker-side-of-the-u-s-india-nuclear-deal/.
- Falk, R. (1977). Nuclear weapons proliferation as a world order problem. International Security, 1(3), 79–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2626658
- Falk, R., & Krieger, D. (2021, May 4). Biden’s foreign policy and nuclear weapons: A dialogue. Counterpunch. https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/05/04/bidens-foreign-policy-and-nuclear-weapons-a-dialogue/.
- Gibbons, R. D. (2016). American hegemony and the politics of the nuclear non-proliferation regime [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University theses and dissertation digital repository]. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1041833
- Glennon, M. J. (2005). How international rules die. The Georgetown Law Journal, 93(3), 939–991.
- Goldschmidt, P. (2020, January 23). Dealing preventively with NPT withdrawal. NPEC Publication. http://npolicy.org/article.php?aid=1461&rid=3.
- Hamidi, S. (2020). Law as discursive resource: The politics of the nuclear/non-nuclear distinction in the non-proliferation treaty. European Journal of International Relations, 26(2), 545–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119875999
- Hanson, M. (2022). Power to the have-nots? The NPT and the limits of a treaty hijacked by a “power-over” model. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 80–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2037968.
- Harries, M. (2021). Response: Keep the NPT. Survival, 63(4), 125–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2021.1956198
- Helfer, L. R. (2005). Exiting treaties. Virginia Law Review, 91(7), 1579–1648.
- Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Harvard University Press.
- Horovitz, L. (2014). Beyond pessimism: Why the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons will not collapse. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1-2), 126–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.917971
- Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550913
- Hurd, I. (2019). Legitimacy and contestation in global governance. Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 717–729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9338-z
- Johnson, R. (1999). Troubled treaties: Is the NPT tottering? The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 55(2), 15–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1999.11460310
- Keeley, M., & Graham, J. (1991). Exit, voice, and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 349–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383236
- Kmentt, A. (2013). How divergent views on nuclear disarmament threaten the NPT. Arms Control Today, 43(10), 8–13.
- Kmentt, A. (2015). The development of the international initiative on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons and its effect on the nuclear weapons debate. International Review of the Red Cross, 97(899), 681–709. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383116000059
- Kmentt, A. (2021). The humanitarian initiative and the TPNW. Policy Brief 104, February. Toda Peace Institute.
- Knopf, J. (2022). Not by NPT alone: The future of the global nuclear order. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 186–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983243.
- Lavelle, K. C. (2007). Exit, voice, and loyalty in international organizations: US involvement in the League of Nations. Review of International Organizations, 2(4), 371–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-007-9015-0
- Leith, R., & Pretorius, J. (2009). Eroding the middle ground: The shift in foreign policy underpinning South African nuclear diplomacy. Politikon, 36(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02589341003600171
- Meyer, P. (2017). The nuclear nonproliferation treaty: fin de régime? Arms Control Today. April. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2017-04/features/nuclear-nonproliferation-treaty-fin-de-regime.
- Meyer, P. (2019). Creating an environment for nuclear disarmament: Striding forward or stepping back? Arms Control Today, April. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-04/features/creating-environment-nuclear-disarmament-striding-forward-stepping-back.
- Mian, Z., & Ramana, M. V. (1999). Diplomatic judo: Using the NPT to make the nuclear-weapons states negotiate the abolition of nuclear weapons. Disarmament Diplomacy, (36). http://www.acronym.org.uk/old/archive/36judo.htm
- Miller, S. E. (2020). A nuclear world transformed: The rise of multilateral disorder. Daedalus, 149(2), 17–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01787
- Mulligan, S. P. (2006). The uses of legitimacy in international relations. Millennium, 34(2), 349–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060340021801
- Noda, O. (2022). A wolf in sheep’s clothing? The NPT and symbolic proliferation. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 134–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983699.
- NPT. (1968). Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/npt/text/.
- NPT. (1995). Review and extension conference of the parties to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons final document. NPT/CONF.1995/32. https://nuke.fas.org/control/npt/docs/2142.htm.
- Nuclear Threat Initiative. (2007, May 10). U.S. urges penalties for NPT withdrawals. https://www.nti.org/gsn/article/us-urges-penalties-for-npt-withdrawals/.
- Ogilvie-White, T. (2017). Challenges facing the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. In A. Burke, & R. Parker (Eds.), Global insecurity: Futures of global chaos and governance (pp. 195–214). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Onderco, N., & Van Wyk, A. (2019). Birth of a norm champion: How South Africa came to support the NPT’s indefinite extension. The Nonproliferation Review, 26(1-2), 23–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2019.1591771
- P3. (2017). Joint press statement from the permanent representatives to the United Nations of the United States, United Kingdom and France following the adoption of a treaty banning nuclear weapons. United States Mission to the United Nations. https://usun.usmission.gov/joint-press-statement-from-the-permanent-representatives-to-the-united-nations-of-the-united-states-united-kingdom-and-france-following-the-adoption/.
- Polakow-Suransky, S. (2010). The unspoken alliance: Israel’s secret relationship with apartheid South Africa. Pantheon Books.
- Pretorius, J. (2013). Nuclear politics of denial. International Negotiation, 18(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341262
- Pretorius, J., & Sauer, T. (2019, September 6). Is it time to ditch the NPT? The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://thebulletin.org/2019/09/is-it-time-to-ditch-the-npt/.
- Pretorius, J., & Sauer, T. (2021). Ditch the NPT. Survival, 63(4), 103–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2021.1956197
- Rashica, V. (2019). The right, procedures and reasons of the withdrawal of states from international organizations. SEEU Review, 14(2), 62–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2019-0019
- Rauf, T. (2019, August 5). CEND is creating the conditions to ‘never disarm’: 74 years since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. InDepth News. https://www.indepthnews.net/index.php/opinion/2876-cend-is-creating-the-conditions-to-never-disarm-74-years-since-hiroshima-nagasaki.
- Rauf, T. (2020). The NPT at fifty: Perish or survive? Arms Control Today, March. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2020-03/features/npt-50-perish-survive.
- Rauf, T., & Johnson, R. (1995). After the NPT’s indefinite extension: The future of the global nonproliferation regime. Nonproliferation Review, Fall(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736709508436604
- Robinson, T. (2019, February 24). The NPT: A big distraction from the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. Pressenza. https://www.pressenza.com/2019/02/the-npt-a-big-distraction-from-the-treaty-on-the-prohibition-of-nuclear-weapons/.
- Rydell, R. (2006). Going for Baruch: The nuclear plan that refused to go away. Arms Control Today, 36(June), https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2006-06/looking-back-going-baruch-nuclear-plan-refused-away.
- Sauer, T. (1995). Het nucleair non-proliferatie verdrag [The nuclear non-proliferation treaty]. Streven, 62(4), 306–315.
- Sauer, T. (2006). The nuclear nonproliferation regime in crisis. Peace Review, 18(3), 333–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650600848274
- Sauer, T., & Reveraert, M. (2018). The potential stigmatizing effect of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, 25(5-6), 437–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1548097
- Scheinman, A. (2019, October 7.). No, it is not time to ditch the NPT. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://thebulletin.org/2019/10/no-it-is-not-time-to-ditch-the-npt/.
- Shaker, M. (1979). The nuclear non-proliferation treaty: Origins and implementation, 1959–1979. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. https://nonproliferation.org/the-nuclear-non-proliferation-treaty-origins-and-implementation-1959-1979/.
- Smetana, M., & O’Mahoney, J. (2022). NPT as an antifragile system: How contestation improves the nonproliferation regime. Contemporary Security Policy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1978761.
- Steffek, J. (2003). The legitimation of international governance: A discourse approach. European Journal of International Relations, 9(2), 249–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066103009002004
- Strange, M. (2016). The discursive (de)legitimisation of global governance: Political contestation and the emergence of new actors in the WTO’s dispute settlement body. Global Discourse, 6(3), 352–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2015.1070019
- Tallberg, J., & Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 581–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9330-7
- Tannenwald, N. (2018). The great unraveling: The decline of the nuclear normative order. American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
- Thomas, C. A. (2014). The uses and abuses of legitimacy in international law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(4), 729–758. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu008
- VCLT. (1969). Vienna convention on the law of treaties. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf.
- von Borzyskowski, I., & Vabulas, F. (2019). Hello, goodbye: When do states withdraw from international organizations? The Review of International Organizations, 14(2), 335–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09352-2
- Walker, W. (2000). Nuclear order and disorder. International Affairs, 76(4), 703–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00160
- Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology. University of California Press.