Reference list
- Acheson, R. (2021a). Editorial: CCW struggles. CCW Report, 9(5), 1–2. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2021/prepcom/reports/CCWR9.5.pdf.
- Acheson, R. (2021b). Editorial: Convergence against killer robots. CCW Report, 9(3), 1–3. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2021/gge/reports/CCWR9.3.pdf.
- Acheson, R. (2022). We will not weaponise our way out of horror. CCW Report, 10(2), 1–5. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2022/gge/reports/CCWR10.2.pdf
- Adamsky, D. (2014). Defense innovation in Russia: The current state and prospects for revival. IGCC Defense Innovation Briefs. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0s99052x/qt0s99052x_noSplash_c6bb01c7155b377e87104c036b7af828.pdf?t=nkzueo.
- Akimoto, D. (2019). International regulation of “lethal autonomous weapons systems” (LAWS): Paradigms of policy debate in Japan. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 7(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18588/201911.00a079
- Allik, S., Fahey, S., Jermalavičius, T., McDermott, R., & Muzyka, K. (2021). The rise of Russia’s military robots: Theory, practice and implications. International Centre for Defence and Security. https://icds.ee/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ICDS-Analysis_The-Rise-of-Russias-Military-Robots_Sten-Allik-et-al_February-2021.pdf.
- Altmann, J., & Sauer, F. (2017). Autonomous weapon systems and strategic stability. Survival, 59(5), 117–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1375263
- Alwardt, C., & Schörnig, N. (2022). A necessary step back? Recovering the security perspective in the debate on lethal autonomy. Zeitschrift Für Friedens- Und Konfliktforschung, 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s42597-021-00067-z.
- Asaro, P. (2012). On banning autonomous weapon systems: Human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(886), 687–709. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000768
- Australia, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. (2021). Discussion paper submitted by Australia, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. UNODA. https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Australia-Canada-Japan-United-Kingdom-United-States.pdf.
- Averre, D., & Davies, L. (2015). Russia, humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect: The case of Syria. International Affairs, 91(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12343
- Bendett, S. (2017). Red robots rising: Behind the rapid development of Russian unmanned military systems. The Strategy Bridge. https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2017/12/12/red-robots-rising-behind-the-rapid-development-of-russian-unmanned-military-systems.
- Bendett, S. (2019). The development of artificial intelligence in Russia. In N. D. Wright (Ed.), Artificial intelligence, China, Russia, and the global order (pp. 168–177). Air University Press.
- Bendett, S., Boulègue, M., Connolly, R., Konaev, M., Podvig, P., & Zysk, K. (2021). Advanced military technology in Russia: Capabilities and implications. Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/09/advanced-military-technology-russia/03-putins-super-weapons.
- Bode, I. (2021). Reflecting on the future norms of warfare. AutoNorms. https://www.autonorms.eu/reflecting-on-the-future-norms-of-warfare/.
- Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2022). Autonomous weapons systems and international norms. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- Borrie, J. (2014). Humanitarian reframing of nuclear weapons and the logic of a ban. International Affairs, 90(3), 625–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12130
- Boulanin, V., Saalman, L., Topychkanov, P., Su, F., & Carlsson, M. P. (2020). Artificial intelligence, strategic stability and nuclear risk. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2020/other-publications/artificial-intelligence-strategic-stability-and-nuclear-risk.
- Boulanin, V., & Verbruggen, M. (2017). Mapping the development of autonomy in weapons systems. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2017-11/siprireport_mapping_the_development_of_autonomy_in_weapon_systems_1117_1.pdf.
- Budnitsky, S. (2020). Russia’s great power imaginary and pursuit of digital multipolarity. Internet Policy Review, 9(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.3.1492
- Campaign to Stop Killer Robots. (2019). Russia, United States attempt to legitimize killer robots. https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/news/russia-united-states-attempt-to-legitimize-killer-robots/.
- CCW Review Conference. (2021). Report of main committee II. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2021/RevCon/documents/MCII-rev3.pdf.
- Chebankova, E. (2017). Russia’s idea of the multipolar world order: Origins and main dimensions. Post-Soviet Affairs, 33(3), 217–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2017.1293394
- Checkel, J. T. (1998). The constructivist turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887100008133
- Chernenko, E. (2018). Автомат с «калашниковым». Kommersant. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3714419?from=doc_vrez.
- Clunan, A. (2009). The social construction of Russia’s resurgence: Aspirations, identity, and security interests. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- CNBC. (2017). Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/04/putin-leader-in-artificial-intelligence-will-rule-world.html.
- Consortium Kodex. (2000). Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 10.01.2000 г. № 24 О Концепции национальной безопасности Российской Федерации. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901751578.
- Consortium Kodex. (2021). Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 02.07.2021 г. № 400 О Стратегии национальной безопасности Российской Федерации. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/607148290.
- Crootof, R. (2015). The killer robots are here: Legal and policy implications. Cardozo Law Review, 36(5), 1837–1915. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2534567.
- Dagi, D. (2020). The Russian stand on the responsibility to protect: Does strategic culture matter? Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 7(3), 370–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797020962667
- Dear, K. (2019). Will Russia rule the world through AI? Assessing Putin’s Rhetoric Against Russia’s Reality. RUSI Journal, 164(5–6), 36–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1694227
- Deyermond, R. (2016). The uses of sovereignty in twenty-first century Russian foreign policy. Europe - Asia Studies, 68(6), 957–984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1204985
- Docherty, B. (2021). Countering consensus through humanitarian disarmament: Incendiary weapons and killer robots. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/12/21/countering-consensus-through-humanitarian-disarmament-incendiary-weapons-and-killer.
- Dolgopolov, N., & Shestakov, E. (2020). Открытый дипломат. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. https://rg.ru/2020/02/10/sergej-lavrov-prodolzhaetsia-srashchivanie-nato-s-evrosoiuzom.html.
- Edmonds, J., Bendett, S., Fink, A., Chesnut, M., Gorenburg, D., Kofman, M., Stricklin, K., & Waller, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence and autonomy in Russia. Center for Naval Analyses. https://www.cna.org/centers/cna/sppp/rsp/russia-ai.
- Embassy of the Russian Federation to the UK. (2016). The foreign policy concept of the Russian Federation. https://www.rusemb.org.uk/rp_insight/.
- Engvall, J. (2021). Russia’s military R&D infrastructure: A primer. Swedish Defence Research Agency. https://www.foi.se/report-summary?reportNo=FOI-R–5124–SE.
- Eriksson, J., & Privalov, R. (2021). Russian space policy and identity: Visionary or reactionary? Journal of International Relations and Development, 24(2), 381–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00195-8
- Fey, M., Hellmann, A., Klinke, F., Plümmer, F., & Rauch, C. (2013). Established and rising great powers: The United States, Russia, China, and India. In H. Müller, & C. Wunderlich (Eds.), Norm dynamics in multilateral arms control: Interests, conflicts, and justice (pp. 163–206). The University of Georgia Press.
- Finnemore, M. (1996). National interests in international society. Cornell University Press.
- Forsberg, T., Heller, R., & Wolf, R. (2014). Status and emotions in Russian foreign policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(3–4), 261–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.09.007
- France and Germany. (2021). Franco-German contribution: Outline for a normative and operational framework on emerging technologies in the area of LAWS. UNODA. https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/France-and-Germany.pdf.
- Garcia, D. (2018). Lethal artificial intelligence and change: The future of international peace and security. International Studies Review, 20(2), 334–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy029
- Gayle, D. (2019). UK, US and Russia among those opposing killer robot ban. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/mar/29/uk-us-russia-opposing-killer-robot-ban-un-ai.
- German, T. (2020). Harnessing protest potential: Russian strategic culture and the colored revolutions. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1757251
- Götz, E. (2019). Strategic imperatives, status aspirations, or domestic interests? Explaining Russia’s nuclear weapons policy. International Politics, 56(6), 810–827. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-018-0168-7
- Government of Russia. (2021). Юрий Борисов провёл совещание о развитии технологий искусственного интеллекта в интересах обороны. http://government.ru/news/41953/.
- Gurganus, J., & Rumer, E. (2019). Russia’s global ambitions in perspective. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/02/20/russia-s-global-ambitions-in-perspective-pub-78067.
- Haas, M. C., & Fischer, S. C. (2017). The evolution of targeted killing practices: Autonomous weapons, future conflict, and the international order. Contemporary Security Policy, 38(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1336407
- Haner, J., & Garcia, D. (2019). The artificial intelligence arms race: Trends and world leaders in autonomous weapons development. Global Policy, 10(3), 331–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12713
- Heller, R. (2014). Russia’s quest for respect in the international conflict management in Kosovo. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(3–4), 333–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.09.001
- Holland Michel, A. (2021). Known unkowns: Data issues and military autonomous systems. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. https://unidir.org/known-unknowns.
- Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171
- Hopf, T. (2002). Social construction of international politics: Identities and foreign policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Cornell University Press.
- Hopf, T. (2005). Identity, legitimacy, and the use of military force: Russia’s great power identities and military intervention in Abkhazia. Review of International Studies, 31(June), 225–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050500687X
- Horowitz, M. C. (2019). When speed kills: Lethal autonomous weapon systems, deterrence and stability. Journal of Strategic Studies, 42(6), 764–788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1621174
- Horowitz, M. C., Allen, G. C., Kania, E. B., & Scharre, P. (2018). Strategic competition in an era of artificial intelligence. Center for a New American Security. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/strategic-competition-in-an-era-of-artificial-intelligence.
- Horowitz, M. C., & Scharre, P. (2015). Meaningful human control in weapon systems: A primer. Center for a New American Security. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/meaningful-human-control-in-weapon-systems-a-primer.
- Human Rights Watch. (2019). ‘Killer robots’: Russia, US oppose treaty negotiations. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/08/19/killer-robots-russia-us-oppose-treaty-negotiations.
- Human Rights Watch. (2020a). Stopping killer robots: Country positions on banning fully autonomous weapons and retaining human control. https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/08/10/stopping-killer-robots/country-positions-banning-fully-autonomous-weapons-and#_ftn5.
- Human Rights Watch. (2020b). New weapons, proven precedent: Elements of and models for a treaty on killer robots. https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/10/20/new-weapons-proven-precedent/elements-and-models-treaty-killer-robots.
- ICRC. (2021). ICRC position on autonomous weapon systems. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-position-autonomous-weapon-systems.
- Jankowski, D. P. (2021). Russia and the technological race in an era of great power competition. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/russia-and-technological-race-era-great-power-competition.
- Kanet, R. E. (2007). Russia: Re-emerging great power. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Konaev, M. (2021). Military applications of artificial intelligence: The Russian approach. In M. Boulègue (Ed.), Advanced military technology in russia: Capabilities and implications (pp. 63–74). Chatham House.
- Kortunov, A. (2019). Between polycentrism and bipolarity: On Russia’s world order evolution narratives. Russia in Global Affairs, 17(1), 10–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2019-17-1-10-51
- Kozyulin, V. (2019a). Militarization of AI from a Russian perspective. The Stanley Center for Peace and Security. https://stanleycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/MilitarizationofAI-Russia.pdf.
- Kozyulin, V. (2019b). Смертоносные автономные системы вооружений: проблемы современного международно-правового регулирования и перспективы их решения. Журнал Международная Жизнь [International Affairs Journal]. https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/2152?fbclid=IwAR0K6UZ9aKw4oKuXhMf1uq7zj t0_ooAEpOpRemY_O8HslVWl9AYWTqFpBM8.
- Krishnan, A. (2009). Automating war: The need for regulation. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(1), 172–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260902760397
- Lavrov, S. (2016). Russia’s foreign policy: Historical background. Russia in Global Affairs, 14(2). https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/russias-foreign-policy-in-a-historical-perspective
- Lo, B. (2002). Russian foreign policy in the post-Soviet era: Reality, illusion and mythmaking. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lo, B. (2015). Russia and the new world disorder. Brookings Institution Press.
- Locoman, E., & Papa, M. (2021). Transformation of alliances: Mapping Russia’s close relationships in the era of multivectorism. Contemporary Security Policy, 0(0), 1–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1994692
- Lukyanov, F. (2010). Russian dilemmas in a multipolar world. Journal of International Affairs, 63(2), 19–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24384332.
- Maas, M. M. (2019). How viable is international arms control for military artificial intelligence? Three lessons from nuclear weapons. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(3), 285–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1576464
- Malinova, O. (2014). Obsession with status and ressentiment: Historical backgrounds of the Russian discursive identity construction. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(3-4), 291–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.07.001
- Markotkin, N., & Chernenko, E. (2020). Developing artificial intelligence in Russia: Objectives and reality. Carnegie Moscow Center. https://carnegie.ru/commentary/82422.
- McDermott, R. (2021). Moscow forming first robotic military units. Eurasia Daily Monitor. https://jamestown.org/program/moscow-forming-first-robotic-military-units/.
- Morgan, F. E., Boudreaux, B., Lohn, A. J., Ashby, M., Curriden, C., Klima, K., & Grossman, D. (2020). Military applications of artificial intelligence: Ethical concerns in an uncertain world. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3139-1.html.
- Nadibaidze, A. (2022). Russian perceptions of military AI, automation, and autonomy. Foreign Policy Research Institute. https://www.fpri.org/article/2022/01/russian-perceptions-of-military-ai-automation-and-autonomy/.
- Neumann, I. B. (2008a). Russia’s standing as a great power, 1494–1815. In T. Hopf (Ed.), Russia’s European choice (pp. 13–34). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612587_2.
- Neumann, I. B. (2008b). Russia as a great power, 1815-2007. Journal of International Relations and Development, 11(2), 128–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.7
- Neumann, I. B. (2014). Status is cultural: Durkheimian Poles and Weberian Russians seek great-power status. In T. V. Paul, D. Welch Larson, & W. C. Wohlforth (Eds.), Status in world politics (pp. 85–114). Cambridge University Press.
- Nicholls, D. (2021). Killer robots need “no new rules” about firing on humans, Russia tells UN. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/08/03/killer-robots-need-no-new-regulations-firing-humans-russia-tells/.
- Nitoiu, C. (2017). Aspirations to great power status: Russia’s path to assertiveness in the international arena under Putin. Political Studies Review, 15(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929915623967
- Nocetti, J. (2020). The outsider: Russia in the race for artificial intelligence. Russie.Nei.Reports, no. 34, Institut français des relations internationales. https://www.ifri.org/en/publications/etudes-de-lifri/russieneireports/outsider-russia-race-artificial-intelligence.
- Noor, O. (2022). Discussions at UN on autonomous weapon systems blocked by Russia, but states indicate way forward. Campaign to Stop Killer Robots. https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/news/discussions-at-un-on-autonomous-weapon-systems-blocked-by-russia-but-states-indicate-way-forward/.
- Paul, J. (2022). Russia “torpedoes” deal to stop “slaughterbots” being unleashed as war fears soar. The Daily Express. https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1545395/russia-torpedoes-slaughterbots-ukraine-war-ai-technology-un-usa.
- Payne, K. (2021). I, warbot: The dawn of artificially intelligent conflict. Hurst.
- Petrella, S., Miller, C., & Cooper, B. (2021). Russia’s artificial intelligence strategy: The role of state-owned firms. Orbis, 65(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2020.11.005
- Polyakova, A. (2018). Weapons of the weak: Russia and AI-driven asymmetric warfare. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/weapons-of-the-weak-russia-and-ai-driven-asymmetric-warfare/.
- Radin, A., & Reach, C. (2017). Russian views of the international order. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7249/rr1826.
- Rafferty, J. (2021). Characteristics of autonomous weapons. CCW Report, 9(3), 9–12. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2021/gge/reports/CCWR9.3.pdf.
- RIA Novosti. (2019). Путин назвал последствия нежелания стран признать многополярность мира. https://ria.ru/20190703/1556168743.html.
- Rosendorf, O. (2021). Predictors of support for a ban on killer robots: Preventive arms control as an anticipatory response to military innovation. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1845935
- Rosert, E., & Sauer, F. (2021). How (not) to stop the killer robots: A comparative analysis of humanitarian disarmament campaign strategies. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1771508
- Russian Federation. (2014). Statement by Mr. Vladimir Yermakov, head of delegation of the Russian Federation, at the meeting of high contracting parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. https://perma.cc/49UU-JUP3.
- Russian Federation. (2017a). Statement by the Russian delegation on agenda item 8 of the meeting of the states parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. https://perma.cc/6N34-G2X3.
- Russian Federation. (2017b). Statement by the representative of the Russian Federation to the first committee of the 72nd Session of the UN General Assembly Vladimir Yermakov in the first committee on “Conventional Weapons” cluster. https://perma.cc/YD26-PYSH.
- Russian Federation. (2017c). Examination of various dimensions of emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems, in the context of the objectives and purposes of the Convention. https://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2017/gge/documents/WP8.pdf.
- Russian Federation. (2018). Russia’s approaches to the elaboration of a working definition and basic functions of lethal autonomous weapons systems in the context of the purposes and objectives of the convention. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/%0Adocuments/%0ADisarmament-fora/ccw/2018/gge/documents/GGE.1-WP6-English.pdf%0A.
- Russian Federation. (2019). Potential opportunities and limitations of military uses of lethal autonomous weapons systems. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2019/gge/Documents/GGE.2-WP1.pdf.
- Russian Federation. (2020). National implementation of the guiding principles on emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems. https://perma.cc/Z67Q-5J5N.
- Russian Federation. (2021a). To understanding the characteristics of the LAWS relevant to the aims and objectives of the Convention. https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/To-understanding-the-characteristics-of-the-LAWS-.pdf.
- Russian Federation. (2021b). Considerations for the report of the group of governmental experts of the high contracting parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons on emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems. https://undocs.org/ccw/gge.1/2021/wp.1.
- Schmitt, O. (2020). How to challenge an international order: Russian diplomatic practices in multilateral security organisations. European Journal of International Relations, 26(3), 922–946. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119886024
- Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2011). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge.
- Sharikov, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, cyberattack, and nuclear weapons—A dangerous combination. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 74(6), 368–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2018.1533185
- Stone Tatum, D. (2018). Discourse, genealogy and methods of text selection in international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31(3–4), 344–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1518971
- TASS. (2019). Путин назвал иллюзией однополярный мир. https://tass.ru/politika/7380485.
- TASS. (2021a). Uran-9, Nerekhta robots used in troops formations for first time at Zapad-2021 drills. https://tass.com/defense/1337237.
- TASS. (2021b). Russia to defend principles of sovereignty and equality of states — Putin. https://tass.com/politics/1363447.
- TASS. (2022). Putin’s Munich Speech 15 years later: What prophecies have come true? https://tass.com/politics/1401215.
- The Guardian. (2021). US rejects calls for regulating or banning ‘killer robots.’ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/02/us-rejects-calls-regulating-banning-killer-robots.
- Trenin, D. (2009). Russia’s spheres of interest, not influence. The Washington Quarterly, 32(4), 3–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01636600903231089
- Tsygankov, A. P., & Tsygankov, P. A. (2021). Constructing national calues: The nationally distinctive turn in Russian IR theory and foreign policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 17(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab022.
- Tucker, P. (2017). Russia to the United Nations: Don’t try to stop us from building killer robots. Defense One. https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2017/11/russia-united-nations-dont-try-stop-us-building-killer-robots/142734/.
- United Nations. (2005). Chapter VI: Selected legal opinions of the secretariats of the United Nations and related intergovernmental organizations. In United Nations juridical handbook (pp. 435–502). United Nations. https://legal.un.org/unjuridicalyearbook/pdfs/english/by_chapter/chpVI/2005/chpVI.pdf.
- UN News. (2017). Russia’s Lavrov backs view on primacy of sovereignty in international relations. https://news.un.org/en/story/2017/09/566252-russias-lavrov-backs-view-primacy-sovereignty-international-relations.
- UNODA. (2019). Report of the 2019 session of the group of governmental experts on emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems. https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CCW_GGE.1_2019_3_E.pdf.
- UNODA. (n.d.). The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. https://www.un.org/disarmament/the-convention-on-certain-conventional-weapons.
- Vanian, J. (2022). Invading Ukraine has upended Russia’s A.I. ambitions—and not even China may be able to help. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2022/03/25/russia-ai-sanctions-ukraine-china/.
- Vedomosti. (2020). Путин оценил роль искусственного интеллекта в войнах будущего. https://www.vedomosti.ru/society/news/2020/12/21/851812-putin-otsenil-rol-iskusstvennogo-intellekta-v-voinah-buduschego.
- Wachs, L. (2021). Revival of the ‘dead hand’? Russian political and military elites’ debates on AI and autonomy in conventional and nuclear forces. In A. Alecsandru (Ed.), The 2021 UK PONI papers (pp. 11–18). Royal United Services Institute.
- Wegener, S. (2021). Introduction to the issue of the Russian armed forces’ military capability. In N. B. Poulsen, & J. Staun (Eds.), Russia’s military might – A portrait of its armed forces (pp. 175–194). Djøf Publishing.
- Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
- Zeitchik, S. (2022). The future of warfare could be a lot more grisly than Ukraine. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/11/autonomous-weapons-geneva-un/.
- Zysk, K. (2020). Defence innovation and the 4th industrial revolution in Russia. Journal of Strategic Studies, 44(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2020.1856090