Beyond deterrence: Reconceptualizing denial strategies and rethinking their emotional effects

Reference list

• Adamsky, D. (2018). From Moscow with coercion: Russian deterrence theory and strategic culture. Journal of Strategic Studies, 41(1–2), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1347872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E. (2010). Damned If You Do, damned If You Don’t: Performative power and the strategy of conventional and nuclear defusing. Security Studies, 19(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636411003796002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. (2013). Denial of territory to terrorist groups in US counterterrorism strategy. The Briefing: Perspectives on National Security and Law, Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law, The Hoover Institution (Stanford University).
   Google Scholar
• Art, R. J., & Greenhill, K. M. (2018). Coercion: An analytical overview. In K. M. Greenhil & P. Krause (Eds.), Coercion: The power to hurt in international relations (pp. 3–32). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, P. (2022). Resolving conflicting emotions: Obama’s quandaries on the red line and the fight against ISIS. Foreign Policy Analysis, 18(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orac016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, B. W. (2012). Deterring North Korea from using WMD in future conflicts and crises. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 119–151. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270569
   Google Scholar
• Betts, R. (2013). The lost logic of deterrence: What the strategy that won the cold war can—and can’t—do now. Foreign Affairs, 92(2), 87–99. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2013-02-11/lost-logic-deterrence
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, D. J. (2018). World of Wallcraft: The contemporary resurgence of fortification strategies. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 18–22. https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/world-of-wallcraft-the-contemporary-resurgence-of-fortification-strategies/
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2017). Naval warfare: A global history since 1860. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bonds, T. M., Predd, J. B., Heath, T. R., Chase, M. S., Johnson, M., Lostumbo, M. J., Bonomo, J., Mane, M., & Steinberg, P. S. (2017). What role can land-based, multi-domain anti-access/area denial forces play in deterring or defeating aggression? RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Borghard, E. D., & Lonergan, S. W. (2021). Deterrence by denial in cyberspace. Journal of Strategic Studies, Advanced Online Publication, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2021.1944856
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, P. C. (2005). When Is coercion successful? Naval War College Review, 58(3), 99–120. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 2050&context = nwc-review
   Google Scholar
• Brosch, T., Pourtois, G., & Sander, D. (2010). The perception and categorisation of emotional stimuli: A review. Cognition and Emotion, 24(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902975754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2013). Goals and emotion. In M. Robinson, E. R. Watkins, & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 176–194). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesney, R., & Smeets, M. (2020). Introduction: Is cyber conflict an intelligence contest? Texas National Security Review, Special Issue: Cyber Competition, 2–10. https://tnsr.org/roundtable/policy-roundtable-cyber-conflict-as-an-intelligence-contest/
   Google Scholar
• Cimbala, S. J. (2017). Nuclear deterrence and cyber warfare: Coexistence or competition? Defense & Security Analysis, 33(3), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2017.1351142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (2005). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P. K., O’Mahony, A., Curriden, C., & Lamb, J. (2021). Influencing adversary states: Quelling perfect storms. RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijk, W. W. v., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Investigating the appraisal patterns of regret and disappointment. Motivation and Emotion, 26(4), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022823221146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9056-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkus, A. (2011, May 10). From roman legions to navy SEALs: Military raiding and its discontents. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/05/from-roman-legions-to-navy-seals-military-raiding-and-its-discontents/238646/
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12(3), 271–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshout, M., Nelissen, R. M. A., & Beest, I. v. (2017). Conceptualizing humiliation. Cognition and Emotion, 31(8), 1581–1594. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1249462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian, S. (2020, June 10). Total defense, revisited: An unconventional solution to the problem of conventional forces. Modern War Institute. https://mwi.usma.edu/total-defense-revisited-unconventional-solution-problem-conventional-forces/
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., Halperin, E., Canetti, D., & Jasini, A. (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review, 10(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, M. (2021). Comparing compellence strategies. Comparative Strategy, 40(3), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2021.1912506
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A. (2021). On sieges. The RUSI Journal, 166(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2021.1924077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger, O. (1960). Husitské válečnictví po Lipanech: Vývoj husitského válečnictví po skončení husitské revoluce a jeho význam pro váleňictví vůbec. Naše Vojsko.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2004). Deterrence. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L., & Michaels, J. (2019). The evolution of nuclear strategy: New, updated and completely revised. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (2004). Emotions and action. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. H. Frijda, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 158–173). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gartzke, E., & Lindsay, J. R. (2015). Weaving tangled webs: Offense, defense, and deception in cyberspace. Security Studies, 24(2), 316–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1038188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzke, E., & Lindsay, J. R. (2019). Cross-Domain deterrence: Strategy in an era of complexity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gearson, J. (2012). Deterring conventional terrorism: From punishment to denial and resilience. Contemporary Security Policy, 33(1), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2012.659600
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L. (1969). The “operational code”: A neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision-making. International Studies Quarterly, 13(2), 190–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. L., & Smoke, R. (1974). Deterrence in American foreign policy: Theory and practice. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gholz, E., Friedman, B., & Gjoza, E. (2019). Defensive defense: A better Way to protect US allies in Asia. The Washington Quarterly, 42(4), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2019.1693103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginges, J. (1997). Deterring the terrorist: A psychological evaluation of different strategies for deterring terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 9(1), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546559708427394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. S. (2012). Airpower for strategic effect. Air University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grygiel, J. J. (2015). Why frontline states need offensive weapons. In Frontline allies: War and change in central Europe (pp. 111–118). Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, E. (2008). Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(5), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708314665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harknett, R. J., & Nye, J. S. (2017). Is deterrence possible in cyberspace? International Security, 42(2), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_c_00290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haun, P. (2019). Air power versus ground forces. In E. Gartzke & J. R. Lindsay (Eds.), Cross-Domain deterrence: Strategy in an era of complexity (pp. 144–162). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heginbotham, E., & Heim, J. L. (2015). Deterring without dominance: Discouraging Chinese adventurism under austerity. The Washington Quarterly, 38(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2015.1038189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchens, T., & Johnson-Freese, J. (2016). Toward a new national security space strategy: Time for a strategic rebalancing. Atlantic Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F. (2021). Defeat mechanisms in modern warfare. Parameters, 51(4), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3091
   Google Scholar
• Housley, N. (2002). Religious warfare in Europe 1400-1536. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hynek, N. (2010). Missile defence discourses and practices in relevant modalities of twenty-first-century deterrence. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610374310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbar, E., & Shamir, E. (2014). Mowing the grass: Israel’s strategy for protracted intractable conflict. Journal of Strategic Studies, 37(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2013.830972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, P. V. (2022). Causal theories of threat and success—simple analytical tools making it easier to assess, formulate, and validate military strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 5(1), 177–191. https://sjms.nu/articles/10.31374sjms.164/print. https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.164
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R., Lebow, R., & Stein, J.1985). Psychology and deterrence. John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. E., Mueller, K. P., & Taft, W. H. (2003). Conventional coercion across the spectrum of operations: The utility of U.S. Military forces in the emerging security environment. RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (1996). Elements of military strategy: An historical approach. ABC-Clio.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, T. J. (2018, February). Operation Gunnerside: The Norwegian attack on heavy water that deprived the Nazis of the atomic bomb. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/operation-gunnerside-the-norwegian-attack-on-heavy-water-that-deprived-the-nazis-of-the-atomic-bomb-90360
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Y., & Mukherjee, A. (2019). From denial to punishment: The security dilemma and changes in India’s military strategy towards China. Asian Security, 15(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2019.1539817
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, H. (1960). On thermonuclear war. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, H. (1965). On escalation. Metaphors and scenarios. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Karnaze, M. M., & Levine, L. J. (2018). Sadness, the architect of cognitive change. In H. C. Lench (Ed.), The function of emotions: When and why emotions help us (pp. 45–58). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (2019). Understanding space strategy: The art of war in space. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M., & Pavel, B. (2012). How to deter terrorism. The Washington Quarterly, 35(2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2012.665339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, P. E. (2020). Singapore as a small state: Surmounting vulnerability. In T. Inoguchi (Ed.), The sage handbook of Asian foreign policy (Vol. 1–2, pp. 750–766). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (2001). Relational meaning and discrete emotions. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotions: Theory, methods, research (pp. 37–67). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, R. N., & Stein, J. G. (1989). Rational deterrence theory: I think, therefore I deter. World Politics, 41(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebow, R. N., & Stein, J. G. (1995). We all lost the cold war. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology 66, 799–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of The angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libicki, M. (2021). Can denial deter in cyberspace? In A. Wilner & A. Wenger (Eds.), Deterrence by denial: Theory and practice (pp. 191–210). Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockyer, A., & Cohen, M. D. (2017). Denial strategy in Australian strategic thought. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1278743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttwak, E. N. (1979). The grand strategy of the Roman Empire: From the first century A.D. to the third. John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M. M. (2018). The Black Prince and the Grande Chevauchée of 1355. Boydell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markwica, R. (2018). Emotional choices: How the logic of affect shapes coercive diplomacy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazarr, M. J. (2018). Understanding deterrence. RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. (1983). Conventional deterrence. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelson, R. (2022, February 26). Kyiv piles pressure on Ankara to close straits to Russia’s warships. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/26/kyiv-piles-pressure-on-ankara-to-close-straits-to-russia-warships-ukraine
   Google Scholar
• Mikaberidze, A. (2016). The limits of the operational art: Russia 1812. In M. V. Leggiere (Ed.), Napoleon and the operational art of war: Essays in honor of Donald D. Howard (pp. 265–316). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. W. (2015). A deterrence by denial strategy for the Baltic. In Frontline allies: War and change in central Europe (pp. 119–128). Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, E. B. (2020). Signals of strength: Capability demonstrations and perceptions of military power. Journal of Strategic Studies, 43(2), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1626724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, K. P. (2018a). Conventional deterrence Redux: Avoiding great power conflict in the 21st century. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 76–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26533616
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, K. P. (2018b). Deterrence and coercive diplomacy. In J. A. Olson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of airpower (pp. 252–261). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, K. P., Castillo, J. J., Morgan, F. E., Pegahi, N., & Rosen, B. (2006). Striking first: Preemptive and preventive attack in U.S. National Security Policy. RAND Project Air Force.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, W. S. (2008). Revisiting Taiwan’s defense strategy. Naval War College Review, 61(3), 13–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26396942
   Google Scholar
• Nakashima, E., & Warrick, J. (2012). Stuxnet was work of U.S. and Israeli experts, officials say. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/stuxnet-was-work-of-us-and-israeli-experts-officials-say/2012/06/01/gJQAlnEy6U_story.html
   Google Scholar
• NATO. (2022). NATO 2022 Strategic Concept. https://www.nato.int/strategic-concept/
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (2000). The sentiments and beliefs of distributed cognition. In N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, & S. Bem (Eds.), Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts (pp. 78–107). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, R. A. (1996). Bombing to win: Air power and coercion in war. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pauly, R. B. C., & McDermott, R. (2023). The psychology of nuclear Brinkmanship. International Security, 47(3), 9–51. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pe, M. L., & Kuppens, P. (2012). The dynamic interplay between emotions in daily life: Augmentation, blunting, and the role of appraisal overlap. Emotion, 12(6), 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porch, D. (1999). The Taiwan strait crisis of 1996: Strategic implications for the United States navy. Naval War College Review, 52(3), 15–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44643008
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, M. (2004). Deterrence and deterrability. Contemporary Security Policy, 25(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1352326042000290470
   Google Scholar
• Rahe, P. A. (2016). The primacy of Greece: Athens and Sparta. In J. Lacey (Ed.), Great strategic rivalries: From the classical world to the cold War (pp. 53–80). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rid, T. (2012). Deterrence beyond the state: The Israeli experience. Contemporary Security Policy, 33(1), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2012.659593
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotions: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, J. (2021). Dissuasion by denial in counterterrorism. In A. Wilner & A. Wenger (Eds.), Deterrence by denial: Theory and practice (pp. 97–122). Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and influence. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2011). On the rationality of emotions: Or, when are emotions rational? Social Science Information, 50(3–4), 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411411018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. G. (2019, May 10). Persistent engagement: Foundation, evolution and evaluation of a strategy. Lawfare. https://www.lawfareblog.com/persistent-engagement-foundation-evolution-and-evaluation-strategy
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M.-G., & Barrett, L. F. (2007). Being emotional during decision making: Good or Bad? An empirical investigation. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1985-19287-001. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. M., & Talbot, B. J. (2008). Terrorism and deterrence by denial. In P. Viotti, M. Opheim, & N. Bowen (Eds.), Terrorism and homeland security (1st ed., pp. 53–68). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. (1960). Deterrence and power. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4(2), 163–178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/172650. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276000400201
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. (1961). Deterrence and defense. Toward a theory of national security. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sperandei, M. (2006). Bridging deterrence and compellence: An alternative approach to the study of coercive diplomacy. International Studies Review, 8(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2006.00573.x
   Google Scholar
• Spiegeleire, S. D., Holynska, K., Batoh, Y., & Sweijs, T. (2020). Reimagining deterrence: Towards strategic (Dis)Suasion design. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Steimer, T. (2002). The biology of fear- and anxiety-related behaviors. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 4(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2002.4.3/tsteimer
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein, J. G., & Lotan, M. I. (2019). Disabling deterrence and preventing War: Decision making at the End of the nuclear chain. In A. I. Harrington & J. W. Knopf (Eds.), Behavioral economics and nuclear weapons (pp. 56–77). The University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweijs, T., & Zilincik, S. (2021). The essence of cross-domain deterrence. In F. Osinga & T. Sweijs (Eds.), Nl ARMS Netherlands annual review of military studies 2020: Deterrence in the twenty-first century—insights from theory and practice (pp. 129–158). T.M.C. Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tangredi, S. J. (2018). Antiaccess warfare as strategy: From campaign analyses to assessment of extrinsic events. Naval War College Review, 71(1), 33–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26398090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thucydides. (1972). History of the Peloponnesian War (R. Warner, Trans.). Penguin Group (Original year 1954).
   Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 114–137). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tor, U. (2017). Cumulative deterrence’ as a new paradigm for cyber deterrence. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1–2), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2015.1115975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, M. (1989). Strategic thought in America, 1952-1966. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 301–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1987). New technology for NATO: Implementing follow-on forces attack (OTA-ISC-309). Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• van Hemert, D. A., Poortinga, Y. H., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2007). Emotion and culture: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 21(5), 913–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701339293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hooft, P. (2021). The US and extended deterrence. In F. Osinga & T. Sweijs (Eds.), Nl ARMS Netherlands annual review of military studies 2020: Deterrence in the 21st century—insights from theory and practice (pp. 87–107). T.M.C. Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wick, T. E., & Wick, T. T. (1979). Megara, Athens, and the west in the Archidamian war: A study in thucydides. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 28(1), 1–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4435647
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, A. (2013). Fencing in warfare: Threats, punishment, and intra-war deterrence in counterterrorism. Security Studies, 22(4), 740–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2013.844524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilner, A., & Wenger, A. (2021). Deterrence by denial: Theory and practice. Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J. J. (2018). How does nuclear deterrence differ from conventional deterrence? Strategic Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 58–75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26533615
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J. J. (2021). Deterrence as strategy. In A. Wilner & A. Wenger (Eds.), Deterrence by denial: Theory and practice (pp. 123–144). Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, I. A. (1921). The Dutch and Cuba, 1609-1643. The Hispanic American Historical Review, 4(4), 597–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505681
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W. F., & Bower, G. H. (1992). Mood effects on subjectivity probability assessments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(2), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90039-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yih, J., Kirby, L. D., Spitzer, E. G., & Smith, C. A. (2020). Emotion as a process: Appraisal, emotion, and coping patterns across time. Motivation Science, 6(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000144
   Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., Dijk, W. W. v., Manstead, A. S. R., & Pligt, J. d. (1998). The experience of regret and disappointment. Cognition & Emotion, 12(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilincik, S. (2022a). Awe for strategic effect: Hardly worth the trouble. Journal of Strategic Studies, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2138355
   Google Scholar
• Zilincik, S. (2022b). Emotional and rational decision-making in strategic studies: Moving beyond the false dichotomy. Journal of Strategic Security, 15(1), 1–13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48652009. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.15.1.1974
   Google Scholar
• Zilincik, S., & Duyvesteyn, I. (2021). Deterrence: A continuation of emotional life with the admixture of violent means. In F. Osinga & T. Sweijs (Eds.), Nl ARMS Netherlands annual review of military studies 2020: Deterrence in the 21st century—insights from theory and practice (pp. 455–474). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Zilincik, S., & Pikner, I. (2021). Toward the concept of psychological control: Understanding strategy as an exercise in emotion regulation. Strategein, 5, 151–168. https://www.strategein.gr/toward-the-concept-of-psychological-control-understanding-strategy-as-an-exercise-in-emotion-regulation-samuel-zilincik-ivo-pikner/
   Google Scholar