Tate’s Britain: issues of continuity and comparison when re-presenting and advertising historic and contemporary British art beyond the gallery walls

References

• Baxandall, M. 1985. Patterns of Intention: On the Historical Explanation of Pictures. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and Darbel A. 1991. The Love of Art: European Art Museums and their Public. Translated from French by Caroline Beattie and Nick Merriman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, N. 1984. Tradition and Desire: From David to Delacroix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, M. 1977. “Validating Modern Art: The impact of Museums on Modern Art History.” Artforum January: 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. 2000. “An Introduction: Beds and Beef (A Short History of British Art) British artists from Hogarth to Hirst have Favoured the Domestic Over the Heroic, argues Peter Conrad.” The Observer, 19 March.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, E. T., 1888. A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, with Preface by John Ruskin, vols. 1 and 2. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, L. 2000. “At Long Last, Tate and Guile: A visit to the Tate is No Longer a Matter of Left Hand Not Knowing What Right Hand is Doing Tate Britain: Mona Hatoum: Beck’s New Futures.” The Observer, March 26.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, P. 2012. Interviewed by R. McKever. April 25.
   Google Scholar
• Cust, L. 1898. “A National Gallery of British Art.” In Catalogue of the National Gallery of British Art (Tate Gallery), edited by Lionel Cust. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, C., and A. Wallach. 1980. “The Universal Survey Museum.” Art History 3 (4): 448–469.
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, T. S. 1919. “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” In The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism, edited by T. S. Eliot, 42–53. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2002. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, G. 2001. “The Chantrey Episode: Art Classification, Museums and the State.” In Art in Museums, edited by S. Pearce, 5–41. London: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galerien, T. 1921. “The Renaissance of the Tate Gallery.” Studio 82 (344): 194.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. 2009. “The Modern Old Masters.” Apollo CLXX (571): 13.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, G. 2011. “Nation Building.” Museums Journal, April.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, P. 2011. We Know What We Like, and It’s Not Modern Art! How Gallery Visitors only Viewed Work by Damien Hirst and Tracy Emin for less than 5 seconds. Daily Mail, [online] (Last updated at 2:35 AM on 13th March 2011). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1365672/Modern-art-How-gallery-visitors-viewed-work-Damien-Hirst-Tracy-Emin-5-seconds.html (Accessed April 14, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 2000a. “It’s New Art All Right, But it’s Not Very British.” The Guardian, March 24.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 2000b. “Tate Modern Gets a Million Visitors in Just Six Weeks. Meanwhile, at Poor Old Tate Britain: Jonathan Jones on an Unfashionable National Treasure.” The Guardian, June 28.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, F. E. S. 1994. Museums and the Making of ‘Ourselves’: The Role of Objects in National Identity. London: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, N., and P. Kotler. 2000. “Can Museums Be All Things to all People? Missions, Goals, and Marketing’s Role.” Museum Management and Curatorship 18 (3): 271–287.
   Google Scholar
• Lauzier Stone, D. 1988. “The Use of Advertising to Attract the Museum Public.” Curator: The Museum Journal 31 (2): 123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Lorente, J. P. 1998. Cathedrals of Urban Modernity: The First Museums of Contemporary Art, 1800–1930. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malraux, A. 1967. Museum Without Walls. Translated from French by Stuart Gilbert and Francis Price. London: Secker and Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, F. 1998. “Museums and the Construction of National Identity: A Review.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 3 (4): 244–252.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, G. 2006. “Public Memories and Private Tastes: The Shifting Definitions of Museums and their Visitors in the UK.” Museum Management and Curatorship 21 (1): 44–57.
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, N. 1991. Beyond the Glass Case: The Past, the Heritage and the Public in Britain. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morphet, R. 2000. Encounters: New Art from Old. London: National Gallery Company.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A., 2003. “Redrawing the Boundaries: Questioning the Geographies of Britishness at Tate-Britain.” Museum and Society, 1 (3): 170–182.
   Google Scholar
• Myrone, M. 2000. Representing Britain 1500–2000: 100 Works from Tate Collections. London: Tate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, N. 2003. “Having One’s Tate and Eating it: Transformations of the Museum in the Hypermodern Era.” In Art and its Publics: Museum Studies at the Millennium, edited by A. McClellan, 51–74. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, M. 2000. “The Rebranding of Britain: Where’s the Beef?” The Independent, March 21.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding, F. 1998. The Tate: A History. London: Tate Gallery Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tate. 2000. Tate Report 1998–2000. London: Tate.
   Google Scholar
• Tate. 2010. Tate Report 09–10. London: Tate.
   Google Scholar
• Tate. 2010b. Audience Research [online] http://www.tate.org.uk/about/ourpriorities/audiences/marketresearch/ (Accessed May 10, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Tate, 2011. Tate Britain Launches Major New Advertising Campaign ‘This is Britain’. Press Release, March 16.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 1999. Art for the Nation: Exhibitions and the London Public 1747–2001. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Art Newspaper. 2011. “Exhibition & Museum Attendance Figures 2010.” The Art Newspaper, no.223, April.
   Google Scholar
• The Art Newspaper. 2012. “Exhibition & Museum Attendance Figures 2011.” The Art Newspaper, no.234, April.
   Google Scholar
• The Future of Tate Britain. 2012. [editorial] The Burlington Magazine, 154 (1310) May.
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, A. 2003. Re-Imagining the Museum: Beyond the Mausoleum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wölfflin, H. 1950. Principles of Art History: The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art. New York, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Woodson-Boulton, A. 2003. “The Art of Compromise, The Founding of the National Gallery of British Art, 1890–1892.” Museum and Society, 1 (3): 147–169.
   Google Scholar
• Zolber, V. L. 1994. “An Elite Experience for Everyone: Art Museums, the Public, and Cultural Literacy.” In Museum Culture: Histories, Discourses, Spectacles, edited by Daniel J. Sherman and Irit Rogoff, 49–65. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
   Google Scholar