How are old places different from new places? A psychological investigation of the correlation between patina, spontaneous fantasies, and place attachment

References

• Altman, I., and S. Low. 1992. Human Behavior and Environments: Advances in Theory and Research: Place Attachment. Vol. 12. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, C. 2002. “Perception and Aesthetics of Weathered Stone Façades.” In Understanding and Managing Stone Decay, edited by R. Přikryl and H. A. Viles, 331–339. Prague: Karolinum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, C. A., M. E. Young, and K. H. Tonge. 1994. Stonecleaning: A Guide for Practitioners. Edinburgh: Historic Scotland and The Robert Gordon University.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, B. 2007. Conservation Treatment Methodology. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, J. 1975. The Experience of Landscape. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Avrami, E., R. Mason, and M. Torre. 2000. Values and Heritage Conservation. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, J., R. Laing, and M. Young. 2000. “Stone Cleaning: Comparing Perceptions with Physical and Financial Implications.” Journal of Architectural Conservation 6 (2): 47–62.10.1080/13556207.2000.10785269
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 1999. Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process. New York: E and FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, K. S. 2002. “Colorado Fourteeners and the Nature of Place Identity.” Geographical Review 92 (2): 155–179.10.2307/4140968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnes, M., and G. Secchiaroli. 1995. Environmental Psychology: A Psycho-Social Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, K. S., and D. Kerstetter. 2000. “Level of Specialization and Place Attachment: An Exploratory Study of Whitewater Recreationists.” Leisure Sciences 22: 233–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B., D. Perkins, and G. Brown. 2003. “Place Attachment in a Revitalizing Neighborhood: Individual and Block Levels of Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 259–271.10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00117-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cuba, L., and D. Hummon. 1993. “A Place to Call Home: Identification with Dwelling, Community, and Region.” Sociological Quarterly 34: 111–131.10.1111/tsq.1993.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, G. 2007. “Introduction to the Concise Townscape.” In The Urban Design Reader, edited by M. Larice and E. Macdonald, 167–173. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeLyser, D. 1999. “Authenticity on the Ground: Engaging the past in a California Ghost Town.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89 (4): 602–632.10.1111/0004-5608.00164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1982. “Différance.” Margins of Philosophy, 3–27. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2005. Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics and Materiality. New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Feilden, B. M. 1994. Conservation of Historic Buildings. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freewald, D. B. 1989. Preferences for Older Buildings: A Psychological Approach to Architectural Design (doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Galindo, M. P., and M. C. Hidalgo. 2005. “Aesthetic Preferences and the Attribution of Meaning: Environmental Categorization Processes in the Evaluation of Urban Scenes.” International Journal of Psychology 40 (1): 19–27.10.1080/00207590444000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassie, H. H. 1969. Pattern in the Material Folk Culture of the Eastern United States. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, J. 1999. The City: An Urban Cosmology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groat, L. 1995. “Introduction: Place, Aesthetic Evaluation and Home.” In Giving Places Meaning, edited by L. Groat, 1–26. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, C. M., and P. Brimblecombe. 2004. “Aesthetics and Perception of Soiling.” In Air Pollution and Cultural Heritage, edited by C. Saiz-Jimenez, 199–208. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerhall, C. M. 2000. “Clustering Predictors of Landscape Preference in the Traditional Swedish Cultural Landscape: Prospect-Refuge, Mystery, Age and Management.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20: 83–90.10.1006/jevp.1999.0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, D. 2003. “Reimagining Visual Methods: Galileo to Neuromancer.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 176–198. Thousand Oaks, CA: San Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. New York: Routledge.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199602001.013.021
   Google Scholar
• Heerwagen, J. H., and G. H. Orians. 1993. The Biophilia Hypothesis, 138–172. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R. 1989. “A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Urban Nature.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 9 (1): 27–43.10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80024-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., and K. K. Chernick. 2000. “Tranquility and Danger in Urban and Natural Settings.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20: 29–39.10.1006/jevp.1999.0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., and T. A. Gale. 1996. “Preference for Urban Buildings as a Function of Age and Nature Context.” Environment and Behavior 28 (1): 44–72.10.1177/0013916596281003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., and E. J. Miller. 1998. “The Role of Mystery in Perceived Danger and Environmental Preference.” Environment and Behavior 30 (4): 429–449.10.1177/001391659803000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., and R. L. Shier. 2000. “Complexity, Age, and Building Preference.” Environment and Behavior 32 (4): 557–575.10.1177/00139160021972667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummon, D. M. 1992. “Community Attachment: Local Sentiment and Sense of Place.” In Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman and S. Low, 253–278. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4
   Google Scholar
• Imam, K. Z., and J. L. Motloch. 1997. “Memorable Streets.” Sense of Place: Selected from Presentations at the International Making Cities Livable Conference, 1–19. Carmel, CA: IMCL Council.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. B. 1984. Discovering the Vernacular Landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., and S. Kaplan. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, xii, 340 p. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan, and R. L. Ryan. 1998. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature, xiv, 225 p. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, N. 2009. Place, Race and Story: Essays on the past and Future of Historic Preservation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. 2005. Building for Life: Designing and Understanding the Human-Nature Connection, x, 250. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, T. F. 2009. Our Unprotected Heritage: Whitewashing the Destruction of Our Cultural and Natural Resources. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kniffen, F. 1965. “Folk Housing: Key to Diffusion.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 55: 549–576.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1965.tb00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, F. E., M. Bacaicoa, and W. C. Sullivan. 1998. “Transforming Inner-City Landscapes: Trees, Sense of Safety, and Preference.” Environment and Behavior 30 (1): 28–59.10.1177/0013916598301002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, G., A. Graefe, R. Manning, and J. Bacon. 2003. “An Examination of the Relationship between Leisure Activity Involvement and Place Attachment among Hikers along the Appalachian Trail.” Journal of Leisure Research 35 (3): 249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, G., A. Graefe, R. Manning, and J. Bacon. 2004. “Effect of Activity Involvement and Place Attachment on Recreationists' Perception of Setting Density.” Journal of Leisure Research 36 (2): 209–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, R. A., and D. C. M. Urquhart. 1997. “Stone Cleaning and Its Effect on Property Market Selling Price.” Journal of Property Research 14 (4): 329–336.10.1080/095999197368564
   Google Scholar
• Lay, M. C. D., and A. T. D. L. Reis. 1994. “The Impact of Housing Quality on the Urban Image.” In The Urban Experience: A People-Environment Perspective, edited by F. E. Brown, S. J. Neary and M. S. Symes, 85–98. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. 1970. “The Geography of Old Houses.” Earth and Mineral Sciences 39 (5): 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lohr, V. I., and C. H. Pearson-Mims. 2006. “Responses to Scenes with Spreading, Rounded, and Conical Tree Forms.” Environment and Behavior 38 (5): 667–688.10.1177/0013916506287355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. 1992. “Symbolic Ties That Bind: Place Attachment in the Plaza.” In Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman and S. M. Low, 165–185. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. M., and I. Altman. 1992. “Place Attachment: A Conceptual Inquiry.” In Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman and S. M. Low, 1–12. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 1985. The past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 1998. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511523809
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C. 2003. “Beyond House and Haven: Toward a Revisioning of Emotional Relationships with Places.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (1): 47–61.10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, C. C., and M. Barnes. 1999. Healing Gardens: Therapeutic Benefits and Design Recommendations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. 2006. “Theoretical and Practical Arguments for Values-Centered Preservation.” CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship 3 (2): 21–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. 2008. “Be Interested and Beware: Joining Economic Valuation and Heritage Conservation.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 14 (4): 303–318.10.1080/13527250802155810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinig, D. W. 1979. “The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene.” In The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, edited by D. W. Meinig and J. B. Jackson, 33–48. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S., and D. Jodelet. 1976. “Psychological Maps of Paris.” In Environmental Psychology: People and Their Physical Settings, edited by H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson and L. G. Rivlin, 104–124. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. L., and A. R. Graefe. 1994. “Attachments to Recreation Settings: The Case of Rail-Trail Users.” Leisure Sciences 16: 17–31.10.1080/01490409409513214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L. 1994. “Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors.” Environment and Behavior 26 (3): 377–401.10.1177/001391659402600305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassauer, J. I. 1995. “Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames.” Landscape Journal 14: 161–170.10.3368/lj.14.2.161
   Google Scholar
• Orians, G. H. 1986. “An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach to Landscape Aesthetics.” In Landscape Meanings and Values, edited by E. C. Penning-Rowsell and D. Lowenthal, 3–25. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, J. 2009. Conservation in the Age of Consensus. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quist, W. J., R. P. J. Van Hees, S. Naldini, and T. G. Nijland. 2008. “The Perception of Small Scale Damage and Repairs of Natural Stone.” Paper T15 from the Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Durability of Materials and Components, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, Y., P. Björk, and A. Weidenfeld. 2016. “Authenticity and Place Attachment of Major Visitor Attractions.” Tourism Management 52: 110–122.10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real, E., C. Arce, and J. M. Sabucedo. 2000. “Classification of Landscapes Using Quantitative and Categorical Data, and Prediction of Their Scenic Beauty in North-western Spain.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20 (4): 355–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegl, A. 1996. “The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Essence and Its Development.” In Historical and Philosophical Issues on the Conservation of Cultural Heritage, edited by N. S. Price, M. K. J. Talley and A. M. Vaccaro, 69–83. Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, R. B. 1997. “The Visual, the Visible and the Vicarious: Questions about Vision, Landscape and Experience.” In Understanding Ordinary Landscapes, edited by P. Groth and T. Bressi, 200–209. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, R. N. 1997. A Short History of Charleston. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowles, G. D. 1990. “Place Attachment among Small Town Elderly.” Journal of Rural Community Psychology 11: 103–120.
   Google Scholar
• Rowles, G. D. 1980. “Growing Old ‘inside’: Aging and Attachment to Place in an Appalachian Community.” In Transitions of Aging, edited by N. Datan and A. Lahmann, 153–170. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-203580-7.50015-4
   Google Scholar
• Ruskin, J. 1907. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. Leipzig: Bernhard Tauchintz. ( Original work published 1849).
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2006. A Theory of Architecture. Solingen: Umbau-Verlag, Solingen.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. 2009. “Being Autocentric: Towards Symmetry in Heritage Management Practices.” In Valuing Historic Environments, edited by L. Gibson and J. Pendlebury, 93–113. Surry: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin, S., and N. Ujang. 2008. “Making Places: The Role of Attachment in Creating the Sense of Place for Traditional Streets in Malaysia.” Habitat International 32: 399–409.10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheets, V. L., and C. D. Manzer. 1991. “Affect, Cognition, and Urban Vegetation: Some Effects of Adding Trees along City Streets.” Environment and Behavior 23 (3): 285–304.10.1177/0013916591233002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. F. 2003. The Dynamics of Delight: Architecture and Aesthetics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spirn, A. W. 1998. The Language of Landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E. 1999. “Architectural Detail, Van Der Laan Septaves and Pixel Counts.” Design Studies 20: 83–97.10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00025-8
   Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E. 2000. Psychology and the Aesthetics of the Built Environment. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-1-4757-6326-3
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, W. C., F. E. Kuo, and S. F. Depooter. 2004. “The Fruit of Urban Nature.” Environment and Behavior 36 (5): 678–700.10.1177/0193841X04264945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, R. L., and B. G. Atwood. 1978. “Plants, Complexity, and Pleasure in Urban and Suburban Environments.” Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior 3 (2): 67–76.10.1007/BF01135604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y. F. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspectives of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. 1979. “Visual Landscapes and Psychological Well-Being.” Landscape Research 4 (1): 17–23.10.1080/01426397908705892
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. 1981. “Natural versus Urban Scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects.” Environment and Behavior 13 (5): 523–556.10.1177/0013916581135001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. 1984. “View through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery.” Science 224 (4647): 420–421.10.1126/science.6143402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, D. C. M., M. Jones, J. MacDonald, K. Nicholson, and M. E. Young. 1996. Effects of Stonecleaning on Granite Buildings and Monuments. Report to Historic Scotland. Scottish Enterprise and Grampian Enterprise.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 1990. Researching the Lived Experience. Ontario: The University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Vong, L. T. 2013. “An Investigation of the Influence of Heritage Tourism on Local People's Sense of Place: The Macau Youth's Experience.” Journal of Heritage Tourism 8 (4): 292–302.10.1080/1743873X.2013.787084
   Google Scholar
• Walter, E. V. 1988. Placeways: A Theory of the Human Environment. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Retrieved from Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, R. G. M., C. A. Andrew, S. Baxter, J. MacDonald, M. Rocha, B. W. Thomson, K. H. Tonge, D. C. M. Urquhart, and M. E. Young. 1992. Stonecleaning in Scotland - Research Summary, Report to Historic Scotland and Scottish Enterprise by Masonry Conservation Research Group. Aberdeen, SD: Gilcomston Litho.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. C. 2010. “Our History is Not False: Perspectives from the Revitalisation Culture.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 16 (6): 464–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J. C., and E. D. Baldwin. 2012. “Historic Preservation, Significance, and Age Value: A Comparative Phenomenology of Historic Charleston and the nearby New-urbanist Community of I’On.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 32 (4): 384–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, C. M., I. Altman, and D. Oxley. 1985. “Temporal Aspects of Homes: A Transactional Perspective.” In Home Environments; Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by I. Altman and C. M. Werner, 1–32. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R. 2002. “The Social Construction of Arctic Wilderness: Place Meanings, Value Pluralism and Globalization.” In Wilderness in the Circumpolar North: Searching for Compatibility in Traditional Ecotourism and Ecological Values; May 15–16, 2001, edited by A. Watson, L. Alessa and J. Sproull, 120–132. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., and J. W. Roggenbuck. 1989. “Measuring Place Attachment: Some Preliminary Results.” In Paper presented at the session on outdoor planning and management NRPA symposium on leisure research, San Antonio, TX, October 20–22, 1989. Arlington, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., and J. J. Vaske. 2003. “The Measurement of Place Attachment: Validity and Generalizability of a Psychometric Approach.” Forest Science 49 (6): 830–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., B. S. Anderson, C. D. McDonald, and M. E. Paterson. 1995. “Measuring Place Attachment: More Preliminary Results.” In Paper presented at the outdoor recreation planning and management research session 1995 NRPA leisure research symposium, San Antonio, TX, October 4–8, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1984. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., A. Hussain, J. Deng, and N. Letson. 2007. “Public Attitudes toward Urban Trees and Supporting Urban Tree Programs.” Environment and Behavior 39 (6): 797–814.10.1177/0013916506292326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar