Mobilising connections with art: Artcasting and the digital articulation of visitor engagement with cultural heritage

References

• Ashley, S. L. T. 2014. “‘Engage the World’: Examining Conflicts of Engagement in Public Museums.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 20 (3): 261–280. doi:10.1080/10286632.2013.808630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bærenholdt, J. O., M. Haldrup, J. Larsen, and J. Urry. 2004. Performing Tourist Places. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bal, M. 2006. “Exposing the Public”. A Companion to Museum Studies, edited by S. Macdonald, 525–542. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/doi/10.1002/9780470996836.ch32/summary.
   Google Scholar
• Bal, M. 2007. “Exhibition as Film.” In Exhibition Experiments, edited by S. Macdonald and P. Basu, 71–93. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Black, G. 2005. The Engaging Museum: Developing Museums for Visitor Involvement. Abindgon: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., J. Urry, and K. Witchger. 2010. Mobile Methods. Abindgon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, S., and H. Cooper. 2013. “ARTIST ROOMS Evaluation: Summary and Recommendations”. Sam Cairns Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Charitonos, K., C. Blake, E. Scanlon, and A. Jones. 2012. “Museum Learning via Social and Mobile Technologies: (How) Can Online Interactions Enhance the Visitor Experience?” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (5): 802–819. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. 2015. “A Moveable Feast: Do Mobile Media Technologies Mobilize or Normalize Cultural Participation?” Human Communication Research 41 (1): 82–101. doi:10.1111/hcre.2015.41.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, T., L. Mostmans, and K. Naessens. 2013. “MuseUs: Case Study of a Pervasive Cultural Heritage Serious Game.” Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 6 (2): 8. doi:10.1145/2460376.2460379.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2011. “Mobilities I: Catching Up.” Progress in Human Geography 35 (4): 550–558. doi:10.1177/0309132510383348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossick, G., and P. Kaszynska. 2016. Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture: The AHRC Cultural Value Project. Swindon: Arts and Humanities Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, D. 2015. “Affect, Heritage, Feeling.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, edited by Waterton, E. and Watson, S., 177–190. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137293565_11.
   Google Scholar
• De Souza E Silva, A. 2006. “From Cyber to Hybrid Mobile Technologies as Interfaces of Hybrid Spaces.” Space and Culture 9 (3): 261–278. doi:10.1177/1206331206289022.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., and L. D. Dierking. 2013. The Museum Experience Revisited. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, J. 2015. “Writing Space: Examining the Potential of Location-Based Composition.” Computers and Composition 37 (September): 44–54. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, J., and J. Kalin. 2016. “Here, I Used to Be Mobile Media and Practices of Place-Based Digital Memory.” Space and Culture 19 (1): 43–55. doi:10.1177/1206331215595730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, H. 2010. “Museum Geography: Exploring Museums, Collections and Museum Practice in the UK.” Geography Compass 4 (10): 1462–1476. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00391.x.
   Google Scholar
• Haldrup, M., and J. O. Bœrenholdt. 2015. “Heritage as Performance.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Researchedited by Waterton, E. and Watson, S., 52–68. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137293565_4.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2015. “Beyond ‘Natural’ and ‘Cultural’ Heritage: Toward an Ontological Politics of Heritage in the Age of Anthropocene.” Heritage & Society 8 (1): 24–42. doi:10.1179/2159032X15Z.00000000036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, K. 2014. “Museums and the “Death of Experience”: Singularity, Interiority and the Outside.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 20 (1): 72–85. doi:10.1080/13527258.2012.710851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, L., and S. Pink. 2014. “New Visualities and the Digital Wayfarer: Reconceptualizing Camera Phone Photography and Locative Media.” Mobile Media & Communication 2 (1): 40–57. doi:10.1177/2050157913505257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. 1999. The Educational Role of the Museum. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. 2000. Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeremy, K., and J. Ross. (2016) “’Where Does This Work Belong?; New Digital Approaches to Evaluating Engagement with Art”, In. MW2016: Museums and the Web 2016, Los Angeles. http://mw2016.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/where-does-this-work-belong-new-digital-approaches-to-evaluating-engagement-with-art/.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., R. L. Hill, G. Aiello, and W. Allen. 2016. “The Work That Visualisation Conventions Do.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (6): 715–735. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, J. 2014. Museums in the New Mediascape: Transmedia, Participation, Ethics. London: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kinross, R. 1985. “The Rhetoric of Neutrality.” Design Issues 2 (2): 18–30. doi:10.2307/1511415.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1986. “Visualization and Cognition.” Knowledge and Society 6 (1): 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, P., C. Sharp, B. Lee, L. Cooper, and H. Grayson. 2012. “Raising the Standard of Work By, with and for Children and Young People: Research and Consultation to Understand the Principles of Quality”. Berkshire: National Foundation for Educational Research. http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/ACYP01/ACYP01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. 2005. “Cultural Geography: The Busyness of Being `More-Than-Representational’.” Progress in Human Geography 29 (1): 83–94. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph531pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lury, C., and N. Wakeford. 2012. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malpas, J. 2008. “New Media, Cultural Heritage and the Sense of Place: Mapping the Conceptual Ground.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 14 (3): 197–209. doi:10.1080/13527250801953652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchionne, K. 2010. “On the Old Saw ‘I Know Nothing about Art but I Know What I Like’.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2): 131–141. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Galleries of Scotland. n.d. “Roy Lichtenstein, in the Car, 1963”. https://www.nationalgalleries.org/object/GMA2133.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, A., and A. Ridley. 2013. Arguing About Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, C.-E., and H. Du Cros. 2012. “Projecting Post-Colonial Conditions at Shanghai Expo 2010, China: Floppy Ears, Lofty Dreams and Macao’s Immutable Mobiles.” Urban Studies 49 (13): 2937–2953. doi:10.1177/0042098012452459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, R. 2008. “The Future in Our Hands? Putting Potential into Practice.” In Digital Technologies and the Museum Experience: Handheld Guides and Other Media, edited by L. Tallon and K. Walker. Lanham: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, N. 2011. “Speed, Rhythm, and Time-Space: Museums and Cities.” Space and Culture 14 (2): 197–213. doi:10.1177/1206331210392701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. 1992. “Affective Learning, Affective Experience: What Does It Have to Do with Museum Education.” Visitor Studies: Theory, Research, and Practice 4: 162–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., C. Sowton, J. Knox, and C. Speed. 2017. “Artcasting, Mobilities, and Inventiveness: Engaging with New Approaches to Arts Evaluation.” In Cultural Heritage Communities: Technologies and Challenges, edited by L. Ciolfi, A. Damala, E. Hornecker, M. Lechner, and L. Maye. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2011. “Mobility.” Sociopedia. Isa 12. doi:10.1177/205684601163
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A 38 (2): 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, N. 2010. The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz: Museum 2.0. http://www.participatorymuseum.org/read/.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, N. 2007. “Performing Objecthood; Museums, Architecture and the Play of Artefactuality.” Performance Research 12 (4): 37–46. doi:10.1080/13528160701822619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, E., and V. Kirby. 1998. “Interpretive Evaluation: Towards a Place Approach.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 4 (1): 30–44. doi:10.1080/13527259808722217.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon, L., and K. Walker, eds. 2008. Digital Technologies and the Museum Experience: Handheld Guides and Other Media. Lanham: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tate. n.d. “Robert Mapplethorpe, ‘Lowell Smith’ 1981”. Tate. Accessed 16 November 2016. http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/mapplethorpe-lowell-smith-ar00161.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., and S. Watson. 2013. “Framing Theory: Towards a Critical Imagination in Heritage Studies.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (6): 546–561. doi:10.1080/13527258.2013.779295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar