Exploring Deaf heritage futures through critical design and ‘Public Things’

References

• Baker-Shenk, C., and J. Kyle. 1990. “Research with Deaf People: Issues and Conflicts.” Disability, Handicap & Society 5 (1): 65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1986. The Rustle of Language. trans. Richard Howard. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, P., and W. Modest, eds. 2014. Museums, Heritage and International Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, T. 2016. “The Things We Do: Encountering the Possible.” In Design Anthropological Futures, edited by S. Pink, V. Fors, and T. O’Dell, 267–281. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. 2013. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, J., and S. Westlake. 2013. “Don’t Stop Thinking about Tomorrow: A Modest Defence of Futurology.” NESTA. Accessed September 20, 2013. http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/dont_stop.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, D., and S. O’Sullivan. 2019. Fictioning: The Myth-functions of Contemporary Art and Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carreres, Á., and S., . M. Noriega. 2020. “Beyond Words: Concluding Remarks.” In Translation and Multimodality: Beyond Words, edited by M. Boria, Á. Carreres, M. Noriega-Sánchez, and M. Tomalin, 198–203. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and M. Kearnes. 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coulton, P., D. Burnett, and A. I. Gardinar. 2016. “Games as Speculative Design: Allowing Players to Consider Alternate Presents and Plausible Futures.” In Proceedings of Design Research Society Conference 2016, edited by P. Lloyd and E. Bohemia, 1609–1626. London: Design Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 1997. “Creativity in Design: Analyzing and Modelling the Creative Leap.” Leonardo 30 (4): 311–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meulder, M. 2015. “The Legal Recognition of Sign Languages.” Sign Language Studies 15 (4): 498–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., . K. 2017. “Critical Qualitative Inquiry.” Qualitative Inquiry 23 (1): 8–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, M., and H. Nissenbaum. 2014. Values at Play in Digital Games. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1985. The History of Sexuality: Vol. 2. The Use of Pleasure. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fredheim, L. H. 2018. “Endangerment-driven Heritage Volunteering: Democratisation or ‘Changeless Change.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 24 (6): 619–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galla, A., 2016. In Search of the inclusive Museum. In Museums, Ethics and Cultural Heritage, edited by Murphy, Bernice., 304-316. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. 1996. “A Liberation of Desire: An Interview with George Stambolian.” In The Guattari Reader, edited by G. Genosko, 204–214. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, M., B. Kräftner, and J. Kröll. 2017. “Creating Idiotic Speculators: Disaster Cosmopolitics in the Sandbox.” In Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, edited by M. Savransky, A. Wilkie, and M. Rosengarten, 145–179. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2015. “Beyond ‘Natural’ and ‘Cultural’ Heritage: Toward an Ontological Politics of Heritage in the Age of Anthropocene.” Heritage and Society 8 (1): 24–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. C. 2001. “Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the Scope of Heritage Studies.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 7 (4): 319–338.
   Google Scholar
• Hølleland, H., J. Skrede, and S., . B. Holmgaard. 2017. “Cultural Heritage and Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review.” Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 19 (3): 210–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, B. 2017. Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsone, L. 2017. “Critical Design as Approach to Next Thinking.” The Design Journal 20 (1): S4253–S4262.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K., M. Discepoli, and E. Leith. 2019. “The Deaf Heritage Collective: Collaboration and Critical Intent.” Museums as Agents of Change Conference. Tallinn 24–26 April.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., and K. Marwood. 2017. “Action Heritage: Research, Communities, Social Justice.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 23 (9): 816–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, T. 2010. “The Role of The Museum Shop in Extending The Visitor Experience.” International Journal Of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 15 (1): 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, B., . T., and S. Carsten, eds. 2015. Affective Methodologies. London: AIAA.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, P. 2003. Understanding Deaf Culture: in Search Of Deafhood. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. 2013. Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C., and N. Wakeford, eds. 2012. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malazita, J. W. 2018. “Translating Critical Design: Agonism in Engineering Education.” Design Issues 34 (4): 96–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpass, M. 2015. “Criticism and Function in Critical Design Practice.” Design Issues 31 (2): 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2016. “Design Culture and Dialogic Design.” Design Issues: 32 (1): 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. 2019. Conflictual Aesthetics: Artistic Activism and the Public Sphere. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, S., and J. Bradley. 2016. “How Does Arts Practice Engage with Narratives of Migration from Refugees? Lessons from ‘Utopia’.” Journal of Arts and Communities 4 (1–2): 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, M. 2012. “De-signing the Object of Sociology: Toward an ‘Idiotic’ Methodology.” The Sociological Review 60 (1): 166–183.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., H. Mainsah, and K. Rygh. 2019. “Sharp Edges, Blunt Objects, Clean Slices. Exploring Design Research Methods.” The Design Journal 22 (1): 2267–2273.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political: Thinking in Action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D., L. Stead, and N. Nourse. 2019. “Bristol Deaf Memories: Archives, Nostalgia and the Loss of Community Space in the Deaf Community in Bristol.” Social and Cultural Geography 20 (7): 899–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production.” Disability, Handicap & Society 7: 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. 2016. Interpreting Difficult History at Museums and Historic Sites. Rhode Island: RI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, M., A. Wilkie, and M. Rosengarten. 2017. Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, T., D. Foster-Smith, G. Bozoğlu, and C. Whitehead. 2019. “Design and Plural Heritages: Composing Critical Futures”. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2015. BSL (Scotland) Act 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snoddon, K., and K. Underwood. 2014. “Toward a Social Relational Model of Deaf Childhood.” Disability & Society 29 (4): 530–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainforth, E., and H. Graham. 2017. “Utopian Currents in Heritage.” Future Anterior 14 (2): iii–vi.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, T. 2013. “Clarifying the Critical in Critical Heritage Studies.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (6): 532–545. doi:10.1080/13527258.2012.720997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar