Conceptualisation of heritage diplomacy in scholarship

References

• *Akagawa, N. 2016. “Japan and the Rise of Heritage in Cultural Diplomacy: Where are We Heading?” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 13 (1): 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Akagawa, N. 2014. Heritage Conservation and Japan’s Cultural Diplomacy: Heritage, National Identity and National Interest. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Andersen, C., C. Clopot, and J. Ifversen. 2020. “Heritage and Interculturality in EU Science Diplomacy.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7 (1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00668-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, G., B. Graham, and J. Tunbridge. 2007. Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Beaumont, J. 2016. “The Diplomacy of Extra-Territorial Heritage: The Kokoda Track, Papua New Guinea.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 22 (5): 355–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1153496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billore, S. 2021. “Cultural Consumption and Citizen Engagement—Strategies for Built Heritage Conservation and Sustainable Development. A Case Study of Indore City, India.” Sustainability 13 (5): 2878. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. 2010. A History of Diplomacy. London: Reaktion.
   Google Scholar
• Brummett, B. 2010. Techniques of Close Reading. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Calligaro, O. 2014. “From ‘European Cultural Heritage’ to ‘Cultural Diversity’? The Changing Core Values of European Cultural Policy.” Politique Européenne 45 (3): 60–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.045.0060.
   Google Scholar
• *Carruthers, W. 2016. “Multilateral Possibilities: Decolonization, Preservation, and the Case of Egypt.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 13 (1): 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Carta, C., and R. Higgott, eds. 2020. Cultural Diplomacy in Europe. Between the Domestic and the International. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Čeginskas, V. L. A., and S. Kaasik-Krogerus. forthcoming. “Dialogue in and as European Heritage.” Journal of European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• *Chalcraft, J. 2021. “Into the Contact Zones of Heritage Diplomacy: Local Realities, Transnational Themes and International Expectations.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 34 (4): 487–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-020-09391-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopot, C., C. Andersen, and J. Oldfield. 2022. “New Diplomacy and Decolonial Heritage Practices.” In Decolonizing Colonial Heritage. New Agendas, Actors and Practices in and beyond Europe, edited by B. T. Knudsen, J. Oldfield, E. Buettner, and E. Zabunyan, 274–291. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Clarke, A. 2016. “Digital Heritage Diplomacy and the Scottish Ten Initiative.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 13 (1): 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• *Clarke, A. 2017. “Heritage beyond Borders: Australian Approaches to Extra-National Built Heritage.” Archaeologies 13 (1): 153–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-017-9313-y.
   Google Scholar
• *Clarke, A. 2018. “Heritage Diplomacy.” In Handbook of Cultural Security, edited by Y. Watanabe, 417–436. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• *Clarke, D., and P. Duber. 2020. “Polish Cultural Diplomacy and Historical Memory: The Case of the Museum of the Second World War in Gdańsk.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 33 (1): 49–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-018-9294-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. M. 2013. “Between Statecraft and Humanism: Diplomacy and Its Forms of Knowledge.” International Studies Review 15 (2): 141–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Martino, L. 2020. “The Spectrum of Listening.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, edited by N. Snow and N. J. Cull, 21–29. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. 2003. “Close Reading: An Introduction.” In Close Reading. The Reader, edited by F. Lentriccha and A. Dubois, 1–40. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *ECHOES. 2020. “Heritage Diplomacy – A Way Forward in for Colonial Heritage in Europe.” Policy Brief. Accessed 22 October 2021. http://projectechoes.eu/wp-content/uploads/ECHOES_Policy-Brief_Heritage-Diplomacy_January-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Gaudenzi, B., and A. Swenson. 2017. “Looted Art and Restitution in the Twentieth Century. Towards a Global Perspective.” Journal of Contemporary History 52 (3): 491–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009417692409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallop, J. 2007. “The Historicization of Literary Studies and the Fate of Close Reading.” Profession 2007 (1): 181–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.181.
   Google Scholar
• Garnsey, E. 2019. The Justice of Visual Art. Creative State-Building in Times of Political Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Geering, C. 2020. “Protecting the Heritage of Humanity in the Cold War: UNESCO, the Soviet Union and Sites of Universal Value, 1945-1970s.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 26 (12): 1132–1147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1664621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grincheva, N. 2020. Museum Diplomacy in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Hafstein, V. 2018. Making Intangible Heritage: El Condor Pasa and Other Stories from UNESCO. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., ed. 2010. Understanding the Politics of Heritage. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2013a. “Forgetting to Remember, Remembering to Forget: Late Modern Heritage Practices, Sustainability and the ‘Crisis’ of Accumulation of the Past.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (6): 579–595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.678371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2013b. Heritage: Critical Approaches. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Hølleland, H., H. Evan, and J. Phelps. 2018. “Naming, Shaming and Fire Alarms: The Compilation, Development and Use of the List of World Heritage in Danger.” Transnational Environment Law 8 (1): 35–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102518000225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Huang, S.-M., and H.-K. Lee. 2019. “Difficult Heritage Diplomacy? Re-articulating Places of Pain and Shame as World Heritage in Northeast Asia.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 25 (2): 143–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1475410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isar, Y. R. 2010. “Cultural Diplomacy: An Overplayed Hand?” Public Diplomacy. Accessed 22 October 2021. http://publicdiplomacymagazine.com/cultural-diplomacy-an-overplayed-hand
   Google Scholar
• *James, L. 2016. “The Symbolic Value of Expertise in International Heritage Diplomacy.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 13 (1): 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• *Jang, S.-G., H.-K. Lee, and D.-J. Kang. 2020. “Sustainable Conservation of a Difficult Heritage in South Korea: Mapping the Conservation Resources of Sorok-Do Island, Hansen’s Disease Site.” Sustainability 12 (17): 6834. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kersel, M. M., and C. Luke. 2015. “Civil Societies? Heritage Diplomacy and Neo-Imperialism.” In Global Heritage: A Reader, edited by L. Meskell, 70–93. Somerset: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• *Khazanov, A. M. 2019. “Steppe Nomads in the Eurasian Trade.” Chungara Revista de Anthropología Chilena 51 (1): 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kirchmair, L. 2020. “Shifting the Focus from an International Towards a More Regional Cultural Heritage Protection in the Middle East and North Africa.” Verfassung in Recht und Übersee 53 (3): 267–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2020-3-267.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, B. T., J. Oldfield, E. Buettner, and Z. Elvan eds. , edited by. 2022. “.” In Decolonizing Colonial Heritage. New Agendas, Actors and Practices in and beyond Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuutma, K. 2012. “Between Arbitration and Engineering: Concepts and Contingencies in the Shaping of Heritage Regimes.” In Heritage Regimes and the State, edited by R. Bendix, A. F. Eggert, and A. Peselmann, 21–36. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• *Larsen, P. B., and K. Buckley. 2018. “Approaching Human Rights at the World Heritage Committee: Capturing Situated Conversations, Complexity, and Dynamics in Global Heritage Processes.” International Journal of Cultural Property 25 (1): 85–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739118000048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labadi, S. 2007. “Representations of the Nation and Cultural Diversity in Discourses on World Heritage.” Journal of Social Archaeology 7 (2): 147–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605307077466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2016. “Scholarly Discussion as Engineering the Meanings of a European Cultural Heritage.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 19 (6): 529–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549416631996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., V. L. A. Čeginskas, S. Kaasik-Krogerus, K. Mäkinen, and J. Turunen. 2020. Creating and Governing Cultural Heritage in the European Union: The European Heritage Label. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., S. Kaasik-Krogerus, and K. Mäkinen. 2019. “Genealogy of the Concept of Heritage in the European Commission’s Policy Discourse.” Contributions to the History of Concepts 14 (1): 115–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2019.140106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., and A.-K. Koistinen. 2021. “Explorations of Linkages between Intercultural Dialogue, Art, and Empathy.” In Dialogue for Intercultural Understanding: Placing Cultural Literacy at the Heart of Learning, edited by F. Maine and M. Vrikki, 45–58. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., Y. Zhu, and S. Thomas. 2019. “Introduction: Heritage and Scale.” In Politics of Scale. New Directions in Critical Heritage Studies, 1–18. New York: Berghahn’s Books.
   Google Scholar
• *Luke, C. 2012a. “The Science behind United States Smart Power in Honduras: Archaeological Heritage Diplomacy.” Diplomacy and Statecraft 23 (1): 110–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2012.651965.
   Google Scholar
• *Luke, C. 2012b. “U.S. Policy, Cultural Heritage, and U.S. Borders.” International Journal of Cultural Property 19 (2): 175–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S094073911200015X.
   Google Scholar
• *Luke, C., and M. M. Kersel. 2012. US Cultural Diplomacy and Archaeology: Soft Power, Hard Heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkinen, K. 2019. “Interconceptualizing Europe and Peace: Identity Building under the European Heritage Label.” In Dissonant Heritages and Memories in Contemporary Europe, edited by T. Lähdesmäki, L. Passerini, S. Kaasik-Krogerus, and I. Van Huis, 51–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• *McClelland, A. G. 2020. “Heritage Diplomacy.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, edited by A. Kobayashi, 381–385. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• *Meskell, L. 2015. “Introduction: Globalizing Heritage Meskell, L ed. .” In Global Heritage: A Reader, 1–21. Somerset: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Meskell, L. 2018. A Future in Ruins: UNESCO, World Heritage, and the Dream of Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molho, J. 2020. “Putting the City on the World Art Map: Star Curators and Nation Branding.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-020-09389-x.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, M. 2013. “New Perspectives on Instrumentalism: An Empirical Study of Cultural Diplomacy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (5): 557–575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2012.704628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norocel, O. C., T. Saresma, T. Lähdesmäki, and M. Ruotsalainen. 2020. “Performing ‘Us’ and ‘Other’: Intersectional Analyses of Right-Wing Populist Media.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 136754942098000. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420980002.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S., Jr. 2004. “Soft Power and American Foreign Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 119 (2): 255–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20202345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S., Jr. 2008. “Public Diplomacy and Soft Power.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 94–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S., Jr. 2011. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Ohashi, H. 2018. “The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the Context of China’s Opening-up Policy.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 7 (2): 85–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2018.1564615.
   Google Scholar
• *Peycam, P. 2016. “The International Coordinating Committee for Angkor: A World Heritage Site as an Arena of Competition, Connivance and State(s) Legitimation.” Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 31 (3): 743–785. doi:https://doi.org/10.1355/sj31-3b.
   Google Scholar
• *Pradhan, R. 2017. “China’s Rise in Central Asia; the New Silk Road Economic Belt.” World Affairs 21 (3): 50–61.
   Google Scholar
• *Pradhan, R. 2019. “China’s Silk Road Strategy and India’s Apprehension.” IUP Journal of International Relations 13 (4): 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pomian, K. 2019. “European Heritage and the Future of Europe.” In Cultural Heritage in the European Union. A Critical Inquiry into Law and Policy, edited by A. Jakubowski, K. Hausler, and F. Fiorentini, IX–XXII. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, J. 2007. Culture and International Relations, Narratives, Natives and Tourists. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riviera, T. 2015. Distinguishing Cultural Relations from Cultural Diplomacy: The British Council’s Relationship with Her Majesty’s Government. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Schwartz, L. November 2018. “U.S. Diplomatic Engagement and Cultural Heritage Protection.” American Diplomacy 1–11. https://americandiplomacy.web.unc.edu/2018/11/u-s-diplomatic-engagement-and-cultural-heritage-protection/
   Google Scholar
• *Scott, C. 2019. “Conceptions of a Shared, Common, or European Heritage in the Emerging Heritage Diplomacy of the European Union, 1973–92.” In Cultural Heritage in the European Union. A Critical Inquiry into Law and Policy, edited by A. Jakubowski, K. Hausler, and F. Fiorentini, 13–32. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• *Sevilla, H. A. 2017. “China’s New Silk Route Strategy and the Association of the Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).” Indian Journal of Asian Affairs 30 (1): 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• *Svensson, M., and C. Maags. 2018. “Mapping the Chinese Heritage Regime. Ruptures, Governmentality, and Agency.” In Chinese Heritage in the Making. Experiences, Negotiations and Contestations, edited by C. Maags and M. Svensson, 11–38. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Swenson, A. 2016. “The First Heritage International(s): Conceptualizing Global Networks before UNESCO.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 13 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2012. “2012 Manifesto.” Association of Critical Heritage Studies. Accessed 22 October 2021. http://www.criticalheritagestudies.org/history
   Google Scholar
• Soini, K., and I. Birkeland. 2014. “Exploring the Scientific Discourse on Cultural Sustainability.” Geoforum 51: 213–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stille, A. 2002. The Future of the Past. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• *Tal, N. 2017. “Civil War Heritage as American Diplomacy, 1957–1965.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 23 (1): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1221849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1972. “Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.” Accessed 22 October 2021. https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext
   Google Scholar
• *Vandesande, A. 2019. “ILUCIDARE D2.5 Report on CH-led Innovation and Diplomacy.” Leuven: University of Leuven. Accessed 22 October 2021. https://ilucidare.eu/sites/default/files/2019-10/ilucidare_2.5._report_on_heritage-led_innovation_and_diplomacy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vos, C. 2017. “European Integration through ‘Soft Conditionality’. The Contribution of Culture to EU Enlargement in Southeast Europe.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 23 (6): 675–689. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1276577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, C., M. Daugbjerg, S. Eckersley, and G. Bozoğlu. 2019. “Dimensions of European Heritage and Memory. A Framework Introduction.” In Dimensions of Heritage and Memory. Multiple Europes and the Politics of Crisis, edited by W. Christopher, S. Eckersley, M. Daugbjerg, and G. Bozoğlu, 1–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Winter, T. 2014. “Heritage Conservation Futures in an Age of Shifting Global Power.” Journal of Social Archaeology 14 (3): 319–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605314532749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Winter, T. 2015. “Heritage Diplomacy.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (10): 997–1015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1041412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Winter, T. 2016. “Heritage Diplomacy: Entangled Materialities of International Relations.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 13 (1): 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• *Winter, T. 2017. “Conflict Heritage, Preservation Diplomacy, and Future Corridors of Smuggling.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 14 (1): 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• *Winter, T. 2019. Geocultural Power. China’s Quest to Revive the Silk Roads for the Twenty-First Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Winter, T. 2020a. “Silk Road Diplomacy: Geopolitics and Histories of Connectivity.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 26 (7): 898–912. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1765164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Winter, T. 2020b. “Geocultural Power: China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” Geopolitics 26 (5): 1376–1399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1718656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Winter, T. 2021. “The Geocultural Heritage of the Silk Roads.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 27 (7): 700–719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1852296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Xie, B., X. Zhu, and A. Grydehøj. 2020. “Perceiving the Silk Road Archipelago: Archipelagic Relations within the Ancient and 21st-century Maritime Silk Road.” Island Studies Journal 15 (2): 55–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yapp, L. 2016. “Define Mutual: Heritage Diplomacy in the Postcolonial Netherlands.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 13 (1): 67–81.
   Google Scholar