351
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The industrial heritage of two sacrifice zones and the geopolitics of memory in Northern Chile. The cases of Gatico and Ollagüe

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 243-259 | Received 11 Dec 2022, Accepted 13 Feb 2023, Published online: 23 Feb 2023

References

  • Agamben, G. 1995. Estancias: la palabra y el fantasma de la cultura occidental. Málaga: Pre-textos.
  • Alemán, J. 2022. Brevario político de psiconalisis. Buenos Aires: Ned Ediciones.
  • Artaza, P., S. González, and S. Jiles. 2009. A cien años de la masacre de Santa María de Iquique. Santiago: LOM Ediciones.
  • Bergeron, L. 2006. “Archéologie industrielle, patrimoine industriel: entre mots et notions.” In La mémoire de l’industrie. De l’usine au patrimoine, edited by J.-C. Daumas, 23–30. France: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1979. La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
  • Boyden, S. V. 1992. Biohistory: The Interplay Between Human Society and the Biosphere – Past and Present. Paris, Carnforth, Park Ridge: UNESCO, Parthenon Pub. Group.
  • Cajías, F. 1975. La Provincia de Atacama, 1825-1842. La Paz: Editorial Universo.
  • Cano Sanchiz, J. M. 2018. “The Morphology of a Working Place Linked to the World: The Railway Workshops of Jundiaí (Brazil, 1892–1998).” Industrial Archaeology Review 40 (2): 103–116. doi:10.1080/03090728.2018.1488361.
  • Carroll, D. 1983. “The Alterity of Discourse: Form, History, and the Question of the Political in M. M. Bakhtin.” Diacritics 13 (2): 65–83. doi:10.2307/464660.
  • Cavieres, E. 1998. “Industria, empresarios y Estado. Chile 1880-1934 ¿Protoindustrialización o industrialización en la periferia?” In Desarrollo industrial y subdesarrollo económico: el caso chileno: (1860-1920), edited by M. Carmagnani, 10–30. Santiago: Dirección de Bibliotecas, Archivos y Museos.
  • Clifford, J. 1988. “On Ethnographic Surrealism.” In The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art, 117–151. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Clifford, J. 1997. Routes. Travel and Translation in the Late 20th Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Cochrane, G. 2017. Anthropology in the Mining Industry: Community Relations After Bougainville’s Civil War. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Daumas, J.C. 2006. “L’usine, la mémoire et l’histoire.” In La mémoire de l’industrie. De l’usine au patrimoine, edited by J.-C. Daumas, 9–20. France: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
  • De Souza Santos, A. A., and S. A. S. Iamamoto. 2019. “The Difficult Legacy of Mining in Past and Contemporary Potosí and Ouro Preto.” Journal of Latin American Geography 18 (3): 110–131. doi:10.1353/lag.2019.0054.
  • Dicks, B. 2003. Culture on Display: The Production of Contemporary Visitability. Berkshire: Open University Press.
  • Edensor, T. 2005. Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics and Materiality. Oxford: Berg.
  • Emmelhainz, I. 2016. “Antropoceno y razón técnica: destrucción modernista y acción política.” Campo de relámpagos y Artium. Centro-Museo Vasco de Arte Contemporáneo de Vitoria-Gasteiz. Retrieved from http://campoderelampagos.org/critica-y-reviews/4/6/2016
  • Encina, I. 1965. “El azufre.” Ancora: Revista de Cultura Universitaria 1: 43–48.
  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., and H. Haberl. 2000. “El metabolismo socioeconómico.” Ecología Política 19: 21–34.
  • Foster, J. B. 2004. La ecología de Marx. Materialismo y naturaleza. Barcelona: El Viejo Topo.
  • Frascella, R. 2016. “Sacrifice Zones.” Rethinking Schools 30: 3.
  • Freud, S. [1927] 1990. Fetichismo. Obras Completas. Vol. XXI. 2nd ed. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
  • Galaz-Mandakovic, D. 2019. “Las dos caras de la patrimonialización: memoria local y poética de la ausencia.” Revista Entorno 67: 42–47. doi:10.5377/entorno.v0i67.7490.
  • Galaz-Mandakovic, D. 2020. Memorias de la ciudad de Gatico. Minería y sociedad (1832-1940). Antofagasta: Pampa Negra Ediciones.
  • Galaz-Mandakovic, D., and E. Owen. 2015. Hermanos Latrille. Impronta en el desierto. Tocopilla: Retruécanos Ediciones.
  • Galaz-Mandakovic, D., and F. Rivera. 2020. “Bolivian Migration and Ethnic Subsidiarity in Chilean Sulphur and Borax High-Altitude Mining (1888–1946).” History and Anthropology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02757206.2020.1862106.
  • González Miranda, S. 2007. Ofrenda a una masacre. Claves e indicios históricos de la emancipación pampina de 1907. Santiago: Ediciones LOM.
  • González Miranda, S., and S. Leiva Gómez. 2016. “El norte grande durante el ciclo del salitre: la política salitrera y la política exterior en la formación de un espacio transfronterizo (Bolivia y Chile, 1880-1929).” Estudios Atacameños 52: 11–29. doi:10.4067/S0718-10432016005000006.
  • Gordillo, G. 2014. Rubble: The Afterlife of Destruction. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Han, B.C. 2018. Saving Beauty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Hardesty, D. L. 2003. “Mining Rushes and Landscape Learning in the Modern World.” In Colonisation of Unfamiliar Landscapes. The Archaeology of Adaptation, edited by M. Rockman and J. Steele, 81–95. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Harrison, R. 2002. “Australia’s Iron Age: Aboriginal Post-Contact Metal Artefacts from Old Lamboo Station, Southeast Kimberley, Western Australia.” Australasian Historical Archaeology 20: 67–76.
  • High, S., L. MacKinnon, and A. Perchard. 2017. “Introduction.” In The Deindustrialized World. Confronting Ruination in Postindustrial Places, edited by S. High, L. MacKinnon, and A. Perchard, 3–22. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Holifield, R., and M. Dany. 2017. “A Framework for a Critical Physical Geography of ‘Sacrifice Zones’: Physical Landscapes and Discursive Spaces of Frac Sand Mining in Western Wisconsin.” Geoforum 85: 269–279. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.08.004.
  • Huyssen, A. 1995. Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia. New York: Routledge.
  • Huyssen, A. 2016. “Memory Things and Their Temporality.” Memory Studies 9 (1): 107–110. doi:10.1177/1750698015613977.
  • Ingold, T. 2009. “Point, Line and Counterpoint: From Environment to Fluid Space.” In Neurobiology of “Umwelt”. How Living Beings Perceive the World, edited by A. Berthoz and Y. Christen, 141–155. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  • Ingold, T. 2015. The Life of Lines. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Klein, N. 2015. Esto lo cambia todo: el capitalismo contra el clima. Madrid: Paidós Ibérica.
  • Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditisation as Process.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by A. Appadurai, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Macdonald, S. 2009. Difficult Heritage. Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and Beyond. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Macdonald, S. 2015. “Is ‘Difficult Heritage’ Still ‘Difficult’?” Museum International 67 (1–4): 6–22. doi:10.1111/muse.12078.
  • Mah, A. 2012. Industrial Ruination, Community, and Place: Landscapes and Legacies of Urban Decline. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Menard, A. 2017. “Cachureos, reliquias, mercancías, monumentos: vida y vitalidad de los fetiches en la era de la patrimonialización Montecino, Sonia.” In Tramas de la diversidad: Reflexiones, debates y propuestas en torno al patrimonio en Chile. Valparaíso: Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes. 41–59.
  • Murphy, M. 2008. “Chemical Regimes of Living.” Environmental History 13 (4): 695–703.
  • Pohl, L. 2021. “Aura of Decay: Fetishising Ruins with Benjamin and Lacan.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47: 153–166. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/tran.12481.
  • Prats, L. 2005. “Concepto y gestión del patrimonio local.” Cuadernos de Antropología Social 21: 17–35.
  • Prieto, M., D. Salazar, and M. Jesús Valenzuela. 2019. “The Dispossession of the San Pedro de Inacaliri River: Political Ecology, Extractivism and Archaeology.” The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (2): 562–572. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2019.02.004.
  • Risacher, F., H. Alonso, and C. Salazar. 2003. “The Origin of Brines and Salts in Chilean Salars: A Hydrochemical Review.” Earth-Science Reviews 63: 249–293. doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(03)00037-0.
  • Rivera, F. 2018. “Cicatrices materiales y espacios industriales en Ollagüe, norte de Chile.” Revista de Arqueología Americana 36: 85–118.
  • Rivera, F. 2020. “A Pendulum of Innovations and Challenges: Technological System and Industrial Heritage of Sulphur Mining in Northern Chile (1887–1993).” Industrial Archaeology Review 42 (1): 48–61. doi:10.1080/03090728.2019.1709729.
  • Rivera, F., R. Lorca, and P. González. 2018. “Post-preservación industrial en Ollagüe: un breve elogio de la decadencia.” Boletín de la Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología 48: 9–29.
  • Santarcángelo, J. E., D. Schteingart, and F. Porta. 2018. “Industrial Policy in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico: A Comparative Approach.” Revue Interventions Économiques (Online) 59. doi:10.4000/interventionseconomiques.3852.
  • Segall, M. 1953. Desarrollo del capitalismo en Chile. Cinco ensayos dialécticos. Santiago: Ediciones del Pacífico.
  • Shanks, M., and C. Tilley. 1987. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Silliman, S. W. 2009. “Change and Continuity, Practice and Memory: Native American Persistence in Colonial New England.” American Antiquity 74 (2): 211–230. doi:10.1017/S0002731600048575.
  • Silliman, S. W. 2010. “Indigenous Traces in Colonial Spaces. Archaeologies of Ambiguity, Origin, and Practice.” Journal of Social Archaeology 10 (1): 28–58. doi:10.1177/1469605309353127.
  • Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, L. 2021. Emotional Heritage. Visitor Engagement at Museums and Heritage Sites. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, L., and E. Waterton. 2009. Heritage, Communities and Archaeology. London: Duckworth.
  • Solano, L. F. 2008. Patrocinio y mecenazgo: Instrumentos de responsabilidad social corporativa. Madrid: Editorial Fragua.
  • Stigler, G. J. 1992. “La Escuela de Chicago.” Estudios Públicos 47: 181–199.
  • Storm, A. 2014. Post-Industrial Landscape Scars. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Storm, A. 2022. “Scars. Living with Ambiguous Pasts.” In Heritage Ecologies, edited by T. R. Bangstad and Þ. Pétursdóttir, 49–65. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Toledo, V. M. 2013. “El metabolismo social: una nueva teoría socioecológica.” Relaciones Estudios de Historia y Sociedad 34 (136): 41–71. doi:10.24901/rehs.v34i136.163.
  • Tunbridge, J. E., and G. J. Ashworth. 1996. Dissonant Heritage. The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. Chichester, New York: John Wiley.
  • Vilches, F., C. Rees, C. Silva, F. Rovano, and Y. Araneda. 2013. “La arqueología del salitre: reflexiones desde la materialidad en el Cantón Central, Región de Antofagasta.” In La sociedad del salitre. Protagonistas, migraciones, cultura urbana y espacios públicos, edited by S. González, 527–549. Santiago: RIL Editores.
  • Voyles, T. B. 2015. Wastelanding: Legacies of Uranium Mining in Navajo Country. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Wajcman, G. 2001. El objeto del siglo. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.