Urbino belonging: Exploring place-based community heritage with digital & participatory methods

References

• Aboulkacem, A. R., S. Aboulkacem, and L. E. Haas. 2021. “Photovoice 2.0: A Comprehensive Research Framework for the Digital Generation.” TechTrends 65 (5): 874–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00642-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberis, E., and C. Adriano. 2012. “Urbino 2. Doppi muri ai margini dei distretti industriali.” In Vivere da stranieri in aree fragili. L’integrazione dei migranti nei piccoli comuni, edited by G. Osti and F. Ventura, 43–59. Napoli: Liguori Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Belova, D., and J. Schofield. 2022. “Collaborative Experimentation in the Urban Process: Activism and Everyday Heritage in Krasnoyarsk (Siberia, Russia).” International Journal of Heritage Studies 28 (4): 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.2020878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, A., and M. Axel Pedersen. 2014. “Complementary Social Science? Quali-Quantitative Experiments in a Big Data World.” Big Data & Society 1 (2): 205395171454390. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714543908.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods. Fifth ed. London, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cesário, V., A. Albert, N. Nuno, and N. Valentina. 2022. “People-Place Interactions: From Pictures and Stories to Places and Sense of Place.” In Congress of the International Association of Societies of Design Research, edited by G. Bruyns and H. Wei, 920–939. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_60.
   Google Scholar
• City of Urbino. 2013. “Management Plan of the UNESCO World Heritage Site “Historic Centre of Urbino”.” https://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-1144-7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, M. 2004. “Approaches to Analysis in Visual Anthropology’.” In The Handbook of Visual Analysis, edited by Theo Van Leeuwen and Carey Jewitt, 35–60. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020062.n3.
   Google Scholar
• Colomer, L. 2021 November. “Exploring Participatory Heritage Governance After the EU Faro Convention.” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-03-2021-0041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, S., and B. Kristal. 2021. “Visual Research Methodologies and the Heritage of “Everyday” Places.” In People-Centred Methodologies for Heritage Conservation: Exploring Emotional Attachments to Historic Urban Places (1st) ed, edited by Rebecca Madgin and James Lesh , 1–15. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345807.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2005. “Explanatory Report to the Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. Vol.” Council of Europe Treaty Series. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016800d3814.
   Google Scholar
• Da Milano, C., F. Elisabetta, M. Pascuala, and N. Valentina. 2023. “Digital Storytelling, Cultural Heritage, and Social Inclusion: The MEMEX Project Cristina Da Milano, Elisabetta Falchetti, Pascuala Migone, and Valentina Nisi.” In Digital Approaches to Inclusion and Participation in Cultural Heritage: Insights from Research and Practice in Europe (1st) ed, edited by Danilo Giglitto, Luigina Ciolfi, Eleanor Lockley, and Eirini Kaldeli, 8–26. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003277606-2.
   Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M. 2020. “Visual Network Analysis: A Qualitative Method for Researching Sociomaterial Practice.” Qualitative Research 20 (1): 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118816613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglitto, D., L. Ciolfi, E. Lockley, and E. Kaldeli. 2023. Digital Approaches to Inclusion and Participation in Cultural Heritage: Insights from Research and Practice in Europe. edited by. Giglitto, Danilo, Abingdon, Oxon New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003277606.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D., and Haraway. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, D. 2002. “Talking About Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.” Visual Studies 17 (1): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345.
   Google Scholar
• Jacomy, M., V. Tommaso, H. Sebastien, and B. Mathieu. 2014. “ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software’. Edited by Mark R. Muldoon.” PLoS One 9 (6): e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. E., A. Birkbak, A. Koed Madsen, and A. Kristian Munk. 2021. “Participatory Data Design: Acting in a Digital World.” In Making & Doing: Activating STS Through Knowledge Expression and Travel, edited by. Gary Downey and Zuiderent-Jerak, T., 117–136. Downey and Teun Zuiderent-Jerak. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11310.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 2010. Netnography: Ethnographic Research in the Age of the Internet. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S. S., J. Pagh, and F. Huijie Zeng. 2019. “Tracing Communicative Patterns: A Comparative Ethnography Across Platforms, Media and Contexts.” Nordicom Review 40 (s1): 141–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0019.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., P. Jensen, T. Venturini, S. Grauwin, and D. Boullier. 2012. ““The Whole is Always Smaller Than Its Parts” - a Digital Test of Gabriel Tardes’ Monads: “The Whole is Always Smaller Than Its Parts”.” The British Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 590–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesh, J. 2021. “Melbourne’s Federation Square and Its Heritage Discontents, 1994-2002.” Fabrications 31 (1): 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1827545.
   Google Scholar
• Madgin, R., and J. Lesh. 2021. “Exploring Emotional Attachments to Historic Places Bridging Concept, Practice and Method.” In People-Centred Methodologies for Heritage Conservation: Exploring Emotional Attachments to Historic Urban Places, edited by Rebecca Madgin and James Lesh. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345808.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, A. K., A. Grundtvig, and S. Thorsen. 2022. “Soft City Sensing: A Turn to Computational Humanities in Data-Driven Urbanism.” Cities 126 (July): 103671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103671.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, A. K., M. G. Sofie Thorsen, D. H. Ehn, C. De Gaetano, S. Niederer, K. Norsk, and T. Simonsen. 2023. “The Urban Belonging App: A Photovoice Toolkit for Studying Place Attachments with Digital and Participatory Methods.“ Methodological Innovations. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231185351
   Google Scholar
• Munk, A. K. 2019. “Four Styles of Quali-Quantitative Analysis: Making Sense of the New Nordic Food Movement on the Web.” Nordicom Review 40 (s1): 159–176. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0020.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, P., D. B. M. Ana, E. Parga-Dans, and P. Alonso González. 2021. “Democratising Heritage Values: A Methodological Review.” Sustainability 13 (22): 12492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regulation (EU). 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2022. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. Fifth ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. 2016. Heritage Expertise and the Everyday: Citizens and Authority in the Twenty-first Century. In Who Needs Experts?: Counter-Mapping Cultural Heritage, edited by J, Schofield. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315547251.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, J., and R. Szymanski, eds. 2016. Local Heritage, Global Context: Cultural Perspectives on Sense of Place. Heritage, Culture and Identity. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. 1st ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2020. Emotional Heritage: Visitor Engagement at Museums and Heritage Sites. Abingdon, Oxon New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., and T. Tomer. 2013. “Community Participation and the Tangible and Intangible Values of Urban Heritage.” Heritage & Society 6 (2): 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000013.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1998. “Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.” https://whc.unesco.org/archive/1998/whc-98-conf203-18e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2011. “Recommendations on the Historic Urban Landscape.” https://whc.unesco.org/document/160163.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T., M. Jacomy, and P. Jensen. 2021. “What Do We See When We Look at Networks: Visual Network Analysis, Relational Ambiguity, and Force-Directed Layouts.” Big Data & Society 8 (1): 205395172110184. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211018488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., and M. Ann Burris. 1997. “Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment.” Health Education & Behavior 24 (3): 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, E. 2015. “Heritage and Community Engagement.” In The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice, edited by Tracy Ireland and John Schofield, 53–67. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_4.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., and L. Smith. 2010. “The Recognition and Misrecognition of Community Heritage.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 16 (1–2): 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250945.
   Google Scholar