New opportunities in social media for ad-restricted alcohol products: The case of ‘Yeni Rakı’

References

• Akritidis, L., D.Katsaros, and P.Bozanis. 2011. Identifying the productive and influential bloggers in a community. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: IEEE Transactions on Applications and Reviews99: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Aktekin, U., B. Gürbüz, and M. Gün. 2011. The new regulation on tobacco products and alcoholic beverages in Turkey and its reflections in Turkish Media., http://www.gala-marketlaw.com/joomla4/index.php?option = com_content&view =  article&id = 314&Itemid = 192 (accessed July 11, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Alcohol Concern. 2004. Advertising alcohol. http://www.alcoholconcern.org.uk/assets/files/Publications/Advertising%20factsheet%20April%202004.pdf (accessed July 9, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Babor, T., R.Caetano, S.Casswell, G.Edwards, N.Giesbrecht, K.Graham, J.Grube, P.Grunewald, L.Hill, H.Holder, R.Homel, E.Osterberg, J.Rehm, R.Room, and I.Rossow. 2003. Alcohol: No ordinary commodity. Research and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H.K.1998. Analyzing the impact of the liquor industry's lifting of the ban on broadcast advertising. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing17, no. 1: 132–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barefoot, D., and J.Szabo. 2009. Friends with benefits: A social media marketing handbook. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bein, A.2011. Ottoman Ulema. In Turkish republic: Agents of change and guardians of tradition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, L.E., and D.L.Kurtz. 2007. Contemporary marketing. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, N., and J.A.Matic. 2011. Mapping and leveraging influencers in social media to shape corporate brand perceptions. Corporate Communications: An International Journal16, no. 3: 184–91.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D.2009. Turkish alcohol sector attacks new ad restrictions. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/07/06/uk-turkey-alcohol-restrictionsdUKTRE56537 D200 90706 (accessed July 12, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Meg. 2010. Vertical focus: Alcohol brands. New media age. http://www.nma.co.uk/home/features/vertical-focus-alcohol-brands/3011508.article (accessed January 27, 2011). New media age.
   Google Scholar
• Chester, J., K. Montgomery, and L. Dorfman. 2010. Alcohol marketing in the digital age. Center for Digital Democracy & Berkeley Media Studies Group, http://bmsg.org/sites/default/files/bmsg_report_alcohol_marketing_in_the_digital_age.pdf (accessed January 10, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L.T., S.Torp, and A.F.Firat. 2005. Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: An odd couple?Corporate Communications: An International Journal10, no. 2: 156–67.
   Google Scholar
• CIA World Factbook. 2011. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tu.html (accessed July 5, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides, E., and S.J.Fountain. 2008. Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice9: 231–44.
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, T., M.S.Eastin, and L.Bright. 2008. Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising8, no. 2: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., and Y.S.Lincoln. 2005. Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, ed. N.K.Denzin and Y.S.Lincoln, 1–32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, L.C., and P.J.Kitchen. 2000. IMC, brand communications, and corporate cultures: Client/advertising agency co-ordination and cohesion. European Journal of Marketing34, no. 5/6: 667–86.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman Public Relations and Intelliseek. 2005. Talking from the inside out: The rise of employee bloggers. White Paper, Fall.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, A., H.Hungenberg, H.P.Denker, and S.Mauch. 2008. The long tail of social networking. Revenue models of social networking sites. European Management Journal26, no. 3: 199–211.
   Google Scholar
• Euromonitor International. 2010. http://www.euromonitor.com/alcoholic-drinks-in-turkey/report (accessed May 18, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Fam, K.S., D.S.Waller, and B.Z.Erdogan. 2004. The influence of religion on attitudes towards the advertising of controversial products. European Journal of Marketing38, no. 5/6: 537–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R.2008. Word of mouth and viral marketing: Taking the temperature of the hottest trends in marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing25, no. 3: 179–82.
   Google Scholar
• Finne, Å., and C.Grönroos. 2009. Rethinking marketing communication: From integrated marketing communication to relationship communication. Journal of Marketing Communications15, no. 2–3: 179–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gatarski, R., and A.Lundkvist. 1998. Interactive media face artificial consumers and marketing theory must re-think. Journal of Marketing Communications4, no. 1: 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gayeski, D., and D.Williams. 1985. Interactive media. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Group Against Liquor Advertising (GALA). 2009. Fact sheet on alcohol advertising. www.gala.org.nz/fact_sheet_gala.pdf (accessed June 21, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Grube, J.W., and L.Wallack. 1994. Television beer advertising and drinking knowledge, beliefs, and intentions among schoolchildren. American Journal of Public Health84, no. 2: 254–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, B., A.Hansen, and M.Touri. 2009. Alcohol advertising and young people's drinking. Young Consumers10, no. 1: 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, R., A.Rohm, and V.L.Crittenden. 2011. We're all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons54, no. 3: 265–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, D., B.Shneiderman, and M.A.Smith. 2011. Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Alcohol Studies. 2010. Alcohol & Advertising. www.ias.org.uk/resources/factsheets/advertising.pdf (accessed June 23, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A.M., and M.Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons53, no. 1: 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, K.J., and R.W.Edwards. 1998. Image advertisements for alcohol products: Is their appeal associated with adolescents' intention to consume alcohol?Adolescence33: 47–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J.H., K.Hermkens, I.P.McCarthy, and B.S.Silvestre. 2011. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons54, no. 3: 241–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, P.J.2005. New paradigm IMC under fire. Competitiveness Review15, no. 1: 72–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, P.J., J.Brignell, T.Li, and G.S.Jones. 2004. The emergence of IMC: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Advertising Research44, no. 1: 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariscy, R.W., E.J.Avery, K.D.Sweetser, and P.Howes. 2009. An examination of the role of online social media in journalists' source mix. Public Relations Review35, no. 3: 314–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R.J.2009. The rise of viral marketing through the new media of social media. Faculty Publications and Presentations. Paper 6. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/busi_fac_pubs/6 (accessed November 11, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B.K.2010. Social media and strategic communication: Attitudes and perceptions among college students. Public Relations Journal4, no. 3. http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Documents/2010Lewis.pdf (accessed March 17, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and L.J.Shrum. 2005. Rethinking interactivity: What it means and why it may not always be beneficial. In advertising, promotion, and new media, ed. Marla R.Stafford and Ronald J.Faber, 103–24. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Mangold, W.G., and D.J.Faulds. 2009. Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons52, no. 4: 357–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A.H.1968. Toward a psychology of being. New York: D. Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• McCreanor, T., H.M.Barnes, M.Gregory, H.Kaiwai, and S.Borrel. 2005. Consuming identities: Alcohol marketing and the commodification of youth experience. Addiction Research and Theory13, no. 6: 579–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguéns, J., R. Baggio, and C. Costa. 2008. Social media and tourism destinations: Tripadvisor case study. Paper presented at the Advances in Tourism Research Conference, May 26–28, in Aveiro, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Mulhern, F.2009. Integrated marketing communications: From media channels to digital connectivity. Journal of Marketing Communications15, no. 2–3: 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J.P.2001. Alcohol advertising and advertising bans: A survey of research methods, results, and policy implications. Department of Economics Working Papers 7-012, Pennsylvania State University, http://econ.la.psu.edu/papers/JAI_bans.pdf (accessed June 3, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen. Mey İçki management information. http://www.diageo.com/Lists/Resources/Attachments/738/Diageo%20Announcement%20-%20FINAL.pdf (accessed July 12, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, P.2008. User-generated content and travel: A case study on Tripadvisor.com. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2008, eds. P.O'Connor, W.Höpken and U.Gretzel, 47–58. Austria: SpringerWien NewYork.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvy Booklet. 2009. Expanding the impact of communications through digital influence. http://assets.ogilvy.com/truffles_email/og_recessionpdf/Expanding_the_Impact_of_Communications_through_Digital_Influence.pdf 6 (accessed November 10, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pickton, D., and A.Broderick. 2005. Integrated marketing communications. Essex: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S., and F.Sudweeks. 1997. Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication2, no. 4. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html (accessed November 11, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S.1988. Interactivity: From new media to communication. In Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science. Vol. 16, 110–34. Beverly Hills, CA: cited in Yang, C.C. 1997. An exploratory study of the effectiveness of interactive advertisements on the Internet. Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 3, no. 2: 61–85Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E., and M.Allbritton. 1995. Interactive communication technologies in business organizations. The Journal of Business Communication32, no. 2: 177–95.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, D.E., and H.F.Schultz. 1998. Transitioning marketing communication into the twenty-first century. Journal of Marketing Communications4, no. 1: 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, D.E., and H.Schultz. 2003. IMC the next generation: Five steps for delivering value and measuring returns using marketing communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, D.E., M.P.Block, and K.Raman. 2011. DOI: 10.1080/13527266.2011.567453Understanding consumer-created media synergy. Journal of Marketing Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, I.1998. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shimp, T.A.2010. Advertising, promotion, and other aspects of integrated marketing communications. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Sliburyte, L.2009. How celebrities can be used in advertising to the best advantage?World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology58: 934–9.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, L.B., F.F.Milici, M.Slater, H.Sun, and Y.Strizhakova. 2006. Effects of alcohol advertising exposure on drinking among youth. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine160, no. 1: 18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D.W., and P.A.Pavlou. 2002. From consumer response to active consumer: Measuring the effectiveness of interactive media. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science30, no. 4: 376–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Unplugged Project. 2010. http://theworldunplugged.wordpress.com/about/ (accessed July 1, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute. 2010. http://report.tuik.gov.tr/reports/rwservlet?adnksdb2 = &ENVID = adnksdb2Env&report = turkiye_yasgr.RDF&p_yil = 2010&p_dil = 1&desformat = html (accessed May 28, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Van Doren, D.C., D.L.Fechner, and K.Green-Adelsberger. 2000. Promotional strategies on the world wide web. Journal of Marketing Communications6, no. 1: 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Vlasic, G., and T.Kesic. 2007. Analysis of consumers' attitudes toward interactivity and relationship personalization as contemporary developments in interactive marketing communication. Journal of Marketing Communications13, no. 2: 109–29.
   Google Scholar
• Winer, R.S.2009. New communications approaches in marketing: Issues and research directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing23, no. 2: 108–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B.W.2010. Interactivity as supervariable: Dimensions, mediators, confounds and their implications for theory. Presented at New media theory: How far have we traveled. http://www.depts.ttu.edu/masscom/programs/convergence/conference%20files/Interactivity%20as%20Supervariable.pdf (accessed November 11, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D.K., and M. Hinson. 2008. Examining the increasing impact of social media on public relations practice. Paper presented at the 11th Annual International Public Relations Research Conference, March 9, Miami Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K.1989. Case study research – design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zorlu, A.2003. Batılı Bir Yaşam Tarzı Olarak Tüketim: Türkiye'de Tüketim Ürünlerinin ve Kültürünün Tarihi Gelişimi. In Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar E-Dergisi, http://www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/zorlu_makale.htm (accessed June 20, 2011).
   Google Scholar