Support for the underdog brand biography: Effects on consumer attitude and behavior

References

• Alba, J. W., and J. W. Hutchinson. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (4): 411–435.10.1086/jcr.1987.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Vernon L. 1965. Situational Factors in Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology. Vol. 2, edited by Leonard Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press, 133–175.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, S. T., & Goethals, G. R. 2011. Heroes: What They Do and Why We Need Them. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. 1956. “Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One against a Unanimous Majority.” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 70 (9): 1–70.10.1037/h0093718
   Google Scholar
• Bearden, W., R. Netemeyer, and J. Teel. 1989. “Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence.” Journal of Consumer Research 15: 473–481.10.1086/jcr.1989.15.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettman, J. R., and M. Sujan. 1987. “Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers.” Journal of Consumer Research 14 (2): 141–154.10.1086/jcr.1987.14.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, F. S. 1957. “Group Influence in Marketing and Public Relations.” In Some Applications of Behavioral Research, edited by R. Likert and S. P. Hayes, 207–257. Basil: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Brakus, J. J., B. H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello. 2009. Brand Experience. What is It? How is It Measured? Does It Affect Loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73, 52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., and K. L. Keller. 2003. “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2): 292–304.10.1086/jcr.2003.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, A. 1998. “When Does Comparative Advertising Influence Brand Attitude? The Role of Delay and Market Position.” Psychology and Marketing 15 (5): 461–475.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, H. C., Y. C. Hsieh, and Y. C. Kuo. 2012. “How to Align Your Brand Stories with Your Products.” Journal of Retailing 88: 262–275.10.1016/j.jretai.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., R. J. Borden, A. Thorne, M. R. Walker, S. Freeman, and L. R. Sloan. 1976. “Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 366–375.10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., and F. Lange. 2005. “Advertising Weak and Strong Brands: Who Gains?” Psychology and Marketing 22 (6): 473–488.10.1002/mar.v22:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M. 2001. “Banner Advertisements through a New Lens.” Journal of Advertising Research 41 (4): 23–30.10.2501/JAR-41-4-23-30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deighton, J., D. Romer, and J. McQueen. 1989. “Using Drama to Persuade.” Journal of Consumer Research 16: 335–343.10.1086/jcr.1989.16.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dens, N., and P. Pelsmacker. 2010. “How Advertising Strategy Affects Brand and USP Recall for New Brands and Extensions.” International Journal of Advertising 29 (2): 165–194.10.2501/S0265048710201117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E. 1979. “Deindividuation, Self-Awareness, and Disinhibition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (7): 1160–1171.10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., and B. Isherwood. 1978. The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• End, C. M., B. Dietz-Uhler, E. A. Harrick, and L. Jacquemotte. 2002. “Identifying with Winners: A Reexamination of Sport Fans’ Tendency to BIRG1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32: 1017–1030.10.1111/jasp.2002.32.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E. 1998. “Advertising Narratives: What are They and How Do they Work?” In Representing Consumers: Voices, Views, and Visions, edited by B. B. Stern, 267–289. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. 1989. “On the Power and Functionality of Attitudes: The Role of Attitude Accessibility.” In Attitude Structure and Function, edited by A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler and A. G. Greenwald, 153–180. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, Leon. 1953. “An Analysis of Compliant Behavior.” In Group Relations at the Crossroads, edited by M. Sherif and M. O. Wilson, 232–256. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Firat, A. F., and A. Venkatesh. 1995. “Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (3): 239–267.10.1086/jcr.1995.22.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J., and L. Price. 1992. “An Investigation into the Social Context of Early Adoption Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research 19 (3): 477–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, Z. E., K. Blau, and P. G. Zimbardo. 2011. “Heroism: A Conceptual Analysis and Differentiation between Heroic Action and Altruism.” Review of General Psychology 15: 99–113.10.1037/a0022672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, J. A., and E. E. Snyder. 1991. “The Underdog Concept in Sport.” Sociology of Sport Journal 8: 380–388.10.1123/ssj.8.4.380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. 2013. David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmied, N., and J. A. Vandello. 2009. “The Advantage of Disadvantage: Underdogs in the Political Arena.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 31: 24–31.10.1080/01973530802659810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeff, T. 1996. “Image Congruence Effects on Product Evaluations: The Role of Self-Monitoring and Public/Private Consumption.” Psychology and Marketing 13 (5): 481–499.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayson, K., and R. Martinec. 2004. “Consumer Perceptions of Iconicity and Indexicality and Their Influence on Assessments of Authentic Market Offerings.” Journal of Consumer Research 31 (2): 296–312.10.1086/422109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, G., and J. Olson. 2006. “Coping with Threats to Just-World Beliefs: Derogate, Blame, or Help?1” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36: 664–682.10.1111/jasp.2006.36.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, S. J., and J. Deighton. 1989. “Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience.” Journal of Marketing 53 (2): 1–20.10.2307/1251410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, Stephen J. S., and Marc Vanhuele. 1999. “Know the Name, Forget the Exposure: Brand Familiarity versus Memory of Exposure Context.” Psychology and Marketing 16 (6): 479–496.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. 1995. “How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (1): 1–16.10.1086/jcr.1995.22.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, D. T. 2015. “Is Cinderella Resurging? The Impact of Consumers’ Underdog Disposition on Brand Preferences: Underdog Brand Biography and Brand Status as Moderators.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 14: 307–316.10.1002/cb.v14.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J. 1980. The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. J. 1959. “Symbols for Sale.” Harvard Business Review, 33 (March-April): 117–124.
   Google Scholar
• Machleit, K. A., C. T. Allen, and T. J. Madden. 1993. The Mature Brand and Brand Interest: An Alternative Consequence of Ad-Evoked Affect. Journal of Marketing 57 (October): 72–82.10.2307/1252220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, L., and J. Gentry. 2009. “Underdog Consumption: An Exploration into Meanings and Motives.” Journal of Business Research 62 (2): 19–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. 1998. “Effects of Poll Reports on Voter Preferences.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 (23): 2119–2130.10.1111/jasp.1998.28.issue-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukrishnan, A. V., L. Wathieu, and A. J. Xu. 2009. “Ambiguity Aversion and the Preference for Established Brands.” Management Science 55 (12): 1933–1941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paharia, N., A. Keinan, J. Avery, and J. B. Schor. 2011. “The Underdog Effect: The Marketing of Disadvantage and Determination through Brand Biography.” Journal of Consumer Research 37: 775–790.10.1086/656219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Gary W., Boyd C. Rollins, and Darwin L. Thomas. 1985. “Parental Influence and Adolescent Conformity.” Youth and Society 16 (4): 397–420.10.1177/0044118X85016004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratneshwar, S., A. D. Shocker, and D. W. Stewart. 1987. “Toward Understanding the Attraction Effect: The Implications of Product Stimulus Meaningfulness and Familiarity.” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (4): 520–533.10.1086/jcr.1987.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimel, J., T. Pyszczynski, J. Greenberg, H. O’Mahen, and J. Arndt. 2000. “Running from the Shadow: Psychological Distancing from Others to Deny Characteristics People Fear in Themselves.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 446–462.10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. 1954. “Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 18: 245–253.10.1086/266513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. E., A. B. Claudia, and C. L. Shirley. 1965. Some Aspects of Deindividuation: Identification and Conformity, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1 (July): 356–378.10.1016/0022-1031(65)90015-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan, L. R. 1989. “The Motives of Sports Fans.” In Sports Games and Play: Social and Psychological Viewpoints, edited by J. H. Goldstien (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbrum Associate Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. 2006. “Violent Crime and Victim Compensation: Implications for Social Justice.” Violence and Victims 21: 307–322.10.1891/vivi.21.3.307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., M. Lassegard, and C. E. Ford. 1986. “Distancing after Group Success and Failure: Basking in Reflected Glory and Cutting off Reflected Failure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 382–388.10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., ed. 1978. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, G. J. 1997. “Effective Frequency: One Exposure or Three Factors?” Journal of Advertising Research 37 (4): 75–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandello, J. A., N. P. Goldschmied, and D. A. R. Richards. 2007. “The Appeal of the Underdog.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33: 1603–1616.10.1177/0146167207307488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., and N. R. Branscombe. 1990. “Die-Hard and Fair-Weather Fans: Effects of Identification on BIRGing and CORFing Tendencies.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 14: 103–117.10.1177/019372359001400203
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, Pbillip G. 1970. “The Human Choice: Individuation, Reason, and Order versus Deindividuation, Impulse, and Chaos.” In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. vol. 18, edited by William J. Arnold and David Levine, 237–307. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar