(The lack of) fluency and perceptions of decision making

References

• Alter, A. L., and D. M. Oppenheimer. 2009. “Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 13: 219–235. doi:10.1177/1088868309341564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., and D. Zakay. 2001. “A Timely Account of the Role of Duration in Decision Making.” Acta Psychologica 108: 187–207. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00034-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., and J. Mills. 1959. “The Effect of Severity of Initiation on Liking for a Group.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 59 (2): 177–181. doi:10.1037/h0047195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, A. E. 2018. “Processing Fluency: Examining Its Relationship with Thinking Style and Purchase Intention.” Journal of Marketing Communications 24 (6): 588–598. doi:10.1080/13527266.2016.1167765.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R., and D. Luna. 2011. “The Other Meaning of Fluency.” Journal of Advertising 40 (3): 73–84. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367400306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. 2013. “Imagery Fluency and Narrative Advertising Effects.” Journal of Advertising 42 (1): 54–68. doi:10.1080/00913367.2012.749087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 2012. “The Role of Varying Information Quantity in Ads on Immediate and Enduring Cross-media Synergies.” Journal of Marketing Communications 18 (3): 217–240.
   Google Scholar
• Chernev, A., U. Böckenholt, and J. Goodman. 2015. “Choice Overload: A Conceptual Review and Meta-analysis.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 25 (2): 333–358. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R. 1997. “Consumer Preference for a No-choice Option.” Journal of Consumer Research 24 (2): 215–231. doi:10.1086/209506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerard, H. B., and G. C. Mathewson. 1966. “The Effect of Severity of Initiation on Liking for A Group: A Replication.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2 (3): 278–287. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(66)90084-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, L. K. M., and J. R. Landwehr. 2015. “A Dual-process Perspective on Fluency-based Aesthetics: The Pleasure-interest Model of Aesthetic Liking.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 19 (4): 395–410. doi:10.1177/1088868315574978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, L. K. M., S. Mayer, and J. R. Landwehr. 2018. “Measuring Processing Fluency: One versus Five Items.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 28 (3): 393–411. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, C., G. Häubl, and A. Herrmann. 2014. “Product Customization via Starting Solutions.” Journal of Marketing Research 51 (6): 707–725. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbar, Y., S. Botti, and K. Hanko. 2011. “Decision Speed and Choice Regret: When Haste Feels like Waste.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47 (3): 533–540. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. S., and M. R. Lepper. 2000. “When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (6): 995. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., and M. Dallas. 1981. “On the Relationship between Autobiographical Memory and Perceptual Learning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110 (3): 306. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labroo, A. A., R. Dhar, and N. Schwarz. 2008. “Of Frowning Watches and Frog Wines: Semantic Priming, Perceptual Fluency, and Brand Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research 34: 819–831. doi:10.1086/523290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labroo, A. A., and S. Kim. 2009. “The “Instrumentality” Heuristic: Why Metacognitive Difficulty Is Desirable during Goal Pursuit.” Psychological Science 20 (1): 127–134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02264.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, L., J. Robinson, and T. Abberbock. 2017. “TurkPrime. Com: A Versatile Crowdsourcing Data Acquisition Platform for the Behavioral Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 49 (2): 433–442. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkoc, S. A., W. Hedgcock, and S. Hoeffler. 2013. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Failure of the Attraction Effect among Unattractive Alternatives.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 23 (3): 317–329. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M. 2004. “Spontaneous Discounting of Availability in Frequency Judgment Tasks.” Psychological Science 15: 100–105. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502005.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocheptsova, A., A. A. Labroo, and R. Dhar. 2010. “Making Products Feel Special: When Metacognitive Difficulty Enhances Evaluation.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (6): 1059–1069. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., D. Nayakankuppam, M. A. Fleming, and J. Godek. 2004. “The A2SC2 Model: The Influence of Attitudes and Attitude Strength on Consideration and Choice.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (4): 574–587. doi:10.1086/380290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., N. Schwarz, and P. Winkielman. 2004. “Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience?” Personality and Social Psychology Review 8: 364–382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., P. Winkielman, and N. Schwarz. 1998. “Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments.” Psychological Science 9: 45–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. J., Ed. 2010. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., H. Bless, F. Strack, G. Klumpp, and A. Simons. 1991. “Ease of Retrieval as Information: Another Look at the Availability Heuristic.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (2): 195–202. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., and G. L. Clore. 2007. “Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences.” In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, edited by E. T. Higgins and A. Kruglanski, 385–407. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. V., and E. C. Ince. 2013. “When Disfluency Signals Competence: The Effect of Processing Difficulty on Perceptions of Service Agents.” Journal of Marketing Research 50 (2): 228–240. doi:10.1509/jmr.11.0340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., and F. Strack. 2009. “The Analysis of Intuition: Processing Fluency and Affect in Judgments of Semantic Coherence.” Cognition & Emotion 23: 1465–1503. doi:10.1080/02699930802420745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A., L. L. Jacoby, and K. Girard. 1990. “Illusions of Immediate Memory: Evidence of an Attributional Basis for Feelings of Familiarity and Perceptual Quality.” Journal of Memory and Language 29 (6): 716–732. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90045-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., and J. T. Cacioppo. 2001. “Mind at Ease Puts a Smile on the Face: Psychophysiological Evidence that Processing Facilitation Leads to Positive Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 989–1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., J. Halberstadt, T. Fazendeiro, and S. Catty. 2006. “Prototypes are Attractive because They are Easy on the Mind.” Psychological Science 17: 799–806. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., N. Schwarz, T. Fazendeiro, and R. Reber. 2003. “The Hedonic Marking of Processing Fluency: Implications for Evaluative Judgment.” In The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion, edited by Jochen Musch, Karl C. Klauer, 189–217. New York, Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar